How to respond in the rebuttal phase when the reviewer's concern is a blind review issue?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase.
One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.
Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!
I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!
peer-review conference paper-submission
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase.
One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.
Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!
I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!
peer-review conference paper-submission
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
add a comment |Â
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase.
One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.
Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!
I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!
peer-review conference paper-submission
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
I recently received the reviewers' feedback for my paper and I need to respond them in their questions in the rebuttal phase.
One reviewer (who also gave me a weak reject) mentioned that one of my references infringes the blind-review policy of the conference.
Well, I cited my paper Y, which is recently accepted in the upcoming conference X, without using my name, but I mentioned the name of the paper and the conference as well. I think the reviewer tried to investigate further and went to the program of that conference and searched for paper Y to find the name of the authors!
I do not know what to respond regarding this comment to avoid my paper from being rejected by the PC and also to satisfy the reviewer's concern?!
peer-review conference paper-submission
peer-review conference paper-submission
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
edited 2 hours ago
Anyon
4,04412132
4,04412132
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
asked 3 hours ago
Babak
1,0561621
1,0561621
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Ignore it.
Even if your paper infringes the blind-review policy of the conference, it doesn't change the veracity of the results. It could, conceivably, have led to a desk reject without sending for review, but the editor clearly did not pick up on it, for he sent it for review anyway.
The reviewer's comment was as much a reminder to you as it was to the editor. Perhaps the editor should not have sent it for review, but since he already has, what's done cannot be undone. Just ignore it, and treat the rest of the comments.
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
add a comment |Â
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Ignore it.
Even if your paper infringes the blind-review policy of the conference, it doesn't change the veracity of the results. It could, conceivably, have led to a desk reject without sending for review, but the editor clearly did not pick up on it, for he sent it for review anyway.
The reviewer's comment was as much a reminder to you as it was to the editor. Perhaps the editor should not have sent it for review, but since he already has, what's done cannot be undone. Just ignore it, and treat the rest of the comments.
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
Ignore it.
Even if your paper infringes the blind-review policy of the conference, it doesn't change the veracity of the results. It could, conceivably, have led to a desk reject without sending for review, but the editor clearly did not pick up on it, for he sent it for review anyway.
The reviewer's comment was as much a reminder to you as it was to the editor. Perhaps the editor should not have sent it for review, but since he already has, what's done cannot be undone. Just ignore it, and treat the rest of the comments.
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
add a comment |Â
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Ignore it.
Even if your paper infringes the blind-review policy of the conference, it doesn't change the veracity of the results. It could, conceivably, have led to a desk reject without sending for review, but the editor clearly did not pick up on it, for he sent it for review anyway.
The reviewer's comment was as much a reminder to you as it was to the editor. Perhaps the editor should not have sent it for review, but since he already has, what's done cannot be undone. Just ignore it, and treat the rest of the comments.
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
Ignore it.
Even if your paper infringes the blind-review policy of the conference, it doesn't change the veracity of the results. It could, conceivably, have led to a desk reject without sending for review, but the editor clearly did not pick up on it, for he sent it for review anyway.
The reviewer's comment was as much a reminder to you as it was to the editor. Perhaps the editor should not have sent it for review, but since he already has, what's done cannot be undone. Just ignore it, and treat the rest of the comments.
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
answered 3 hours ago
Allure
19.3k1264109
19.3k1264109
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f118333%2fhow-to-respond-in-the-rebuttal-phase-when-the-reviewers-concern-is-a-blind-revi%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
