How to present results of time series forecasting

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
5
down vote

favorite
5












I'm doing some electricity load forecasting in which I've used 5 fold cross validation and have calculated MAPE for each split as follows:



NIC 12.4070736159999 12.4381016317022 13.012084025233 12.8202279490414 13.0173158393873
QLD 11.1222557214741 11.2011253786453 11.0949104146992 11.0204844071916 10.9866043178404
SA 18.1933345652622 16.5824118552869 16.9662739986567 22.0912790309511 18.7201687363193
TAS 10.9283795353769 10.8375790347786 10.9969285266692 10.65564127531 10.830705163829
VIC 14.4304582955302 13.749822370597 14.185836762341 14.1723784565888 14.8015564381059


I want to show the results in my research paper but I don't know how to present the results. I want to know, other than showing MAPE for each folds what else is shown in the paper? (like standard deviations of the error, confidence interval etc)










share|cite|improve this question



























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite
    5












    I'm doing some electricity load forecasting in which I've used 5 fold cross validation and have calculated MAPE for each split as follows:



    NIC 12.4070736159999 12.4381016317022 13.012084025233 12.8202279490414 13.0173158393873
    QLD 11.1222557214741 11.2011253786453 11.0949104146992 11.0204844071916 10.9866043178404
    SA 18.1933345652622 16.5824118552869 16.9662739986567 22.0912790309511 18.7201687363193
    TAS 10.9283795353769 10.8375790347786 10.9969285266692 10.65564127531 10.830705163829
    VIC 14.4304582955302 13.749822370597 14.185836762341 14.1723784565888 14.8015564381059


    I want to show the results in my research paper but I don't know how to present the results. I want to know, other than showing MAPE for each folds what else is shown in the paper? (like standard deviations of the error, confidence interval etc)










    share|cite|improve this question























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      5









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite
      5






      5





      I'm doing some electricity load forecasting in which I've used 5 fold cross validation and have calculated MAPE for each split as follows:



      NIC 12.4070736159999 12.4381016317022 13.012084025233 12.8202279490414 13.0173158393873
      QLD 11.1222557214741 11.2011253786453 11.0949104146992 11.0204844071916 10.9866043178404
      SA 18.1933345652622 16.5824118552869 16.9662739986567 22.0912790309511 18.7201687363193
      TAS 10.9283795353769 10.8375790347786 10.9969285266692 10.65564127531 10.830705163829
      VIC 14.4304582955302 13.749822370597 14.185836762341 14.1723784565888 14.8015564381059


      I want to show the results in my research paper but I don't know how to present the results. I want to know, other than showing MAPE for each folds what else is shown in the paper? (like standard deviations of the error, confidence interval etc)










      share|cite|improve this question













      I'm doing some electricity load forecasting in which I've used 5 fold cross validation and have calculated MAPE for each split as follows:



      NIC 12.4070736159999 12.4381016317022 13.012084025233 12.8202279490414 13.0173158393873
      QLD 11.1222557214741 11.2011253786453 11.0949104146992 11.0204844071916 10.9866043178404
      SA 18.1933345652622 16.5824118552869 16.9662739986567 22.0912790309511 18.7201687363193
      TAS 10.9283795353769 10.8375790347786 10.9969285266692 10.65564127531 10.830705163829
      VIC 14.4304582955302 13.749822370597 14.185836762341 14.1723784565888 14.8015564381059


      I want to show the results in my research paper but I don't know how to present the results. I want to know, other than showing MAPE for each folds what else is shown in the paper? (like standard deviations of the error, confidence interval etc)







      forecasting cross-validation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Aug 11 at 9:08









      Ansh Kumar

      1384




      1384




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          9
          down vote



          accepted










          Standard forecasting papers unfortunately usually only show the averages of errors, so you would show the averages of your MAPEs.



          The authors often then start to discuss differences in the third significant digit. Without a notion of the variation in errors, this makes no sense. Therefore, I very much recommend that you do indicate the variation in your errors, e.g., by giving standard deviations.



          In addition, it is common practice in (load and other) forecasting papers to present results on multiple error measures, e.g., the rmse or the mae in addition to the mape.



          I suggest you skim though a couple of load forecasting papers and be inspired by what you find there.




          For your specific data, a nice and useful visualization could be a dotchart like this (note how I jittered the dots horizontally to reduce overplotting):



          MAPEs



          mapes <- structure(c(12.4070736159999, 11.1222557214741, 18.1933345652622, 
          10.9283795353769, 14.4304582955302, 12.4381016317022, 11.2011253786453,
          16.5824118552869, 10.8375790347786, 13.749822370597, 13.012084025233,
          11.0949104146992, 16.9662739986567, 10.9969285266692, 14.185836762341,
          12.8202279490414, 11.0204844071916, 22.0912790309511, 10.65564127531,
          14.1723784565888, 13.0173158393873, 10.9866043178404, 18.7201687363193,
          10.830705163829, 14.8015564381059), .Dim = c(5L, 5L), .Dimnames = list(
          c("NIC", "QLD", "SA", "TAS", "VIC"), NULL))

          set.seed(1)
          xx <- runif(nrow(mapes)*ncol(mapes),-0.3,0.3)+rep(1:ncol(mapes),nrow(mapes))
          plot(xx,as.vector(mapes),pch=19,xaxt="n",ylab="",xlab="",main="MAPE")
          axis(1,seq_along(rownames(mapes)),rownames(mapes))





          share|cite|improve this answer




















            Your Answer




            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            );
            );
            , "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "65"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f361744%2fhow-to-present-results-of-time-series-forecasting%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            9
            down vote



            accepted










            Standard forecasting papers unfortunately usually only show the averages of errors, so you would show the averages of your MAPEs.



            The authors often then start to discuss differences in the third significant digit. Without a notion of the variation in errors, this makes no sense. Therefore, I very much recommend that you do indicate the variation in your errors, e.g., by giving standard deviations.



            In addition, it is common practice in (load and other) forecasting papers to present results on multiple error measures, e.g., the rmse or the mae in addition to the mape.



            I suggest you skim though a couple of load forecasting papers and be inspired by what you find there.




            For your specific data, a nice and useful visualization could be a dotchart like this (note how I jittered the dots horizontally to reduce overplotting):



            MAPEs



            mapes <- structure(c(12.4070736159999, 11.1222557214741, 18.1933345652622, 
            10.9283795353769, 14.4304582955302, 12.4381016317022, 11.2011253786453,
            16.5824118552869, 10.8375790347786, 13.749822370597, 13.012084025233,
            11.0949104146992, 16.9662739986567, 10.9969285266692, 14.185836762341,
            12.8202279490414, 11.0204844071916, 22.0912790309511, 10.65564127531,
            14.1723784565888, 13.0173158393873, 10.9866043178404, 18.7201687363193,
            10.830705163829, 14.8015564381059), .Dim = c(5L, 5L), .Dimnames = list(
            c("NIC", "QLD", "SA", "TAS", "VIC"), NULL))

            set.seed(1)
            xx <- runif(nrow(mapes)*ncol(mapes),-0.3,0.3)+rep(1:ncol(mapes),nrow(mapes))
            plot(xx,as.vector(mapes),pch=19,xaxt="n",ylab="",xlab="",main="MAPE")
            axis(1,seq_along(rownames(mapes)),rownames(mapes))





            share|cite|improve this answer
























              up vote
              9
              down vote



              accepted










              Standard forecasting papers unfortunately usually only show the averages of errors, so you would show the averages of your MAPEs.



              The authors often then start to discuss differences in the third significant digit. Without a notion of the variation in errors, this makes no sense. Therefore, I very much recommend that you do indicate the variation in your errors, e.g., by giving standard deviations.



              In addition, it is common practice in (load and other) forecasting papers to present results on multiple error measures, e.g., the rmse or the mae in addition to the mape.



              I suggest you skim though a couple of load forecasting papers and be inspired by what you find there.




              For your specific data, a nice and useful visualization could be a dotchart like this (note how I jittered the dots horizontally to reduce overplotting):



              MAPEs



              mapes <- structure(c(12.4070736159999, 11.1222557214741, 18.1933345652622, 
              10.9283795353769, 14.4304582955302, 12.4381016317022, 11.2011253786453,
              16.5824118552869, 10.8375790347786, 13.749822370597, 13.012084025233,
              11.0949104146992, 16.9662739986567, 10.9969285266692, 14.185836762341,
              12.8202279490414, 11.0204844071916, 22.0912790309511, 10.65564127531,
              14.1723784565888, 13.0173158393873, 10.9866043178404, 18.7201687363193,
              10.830705163829, 14.8015564381059), .Dim = c(5L, 5L), .Dimnames = list(
              c("NIC", "QLD", "SA", "TAS", "VIC"), NULL))

              set.seed(1)
              xx <- runif(nrow(mapes)*ncol(mapes),-0.3,0.3)+rep(1:ncol(mapes),nrow(mapes))
              plot(xx,as.vector(mapes),pch=19,xaxt="n",ylab="",xlab="",main="MAPE")
              axis(1,seq_along(rownames(mapes)),rownames(mapes))





              share|cite|improve this answer






















                up vote
                9
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                9
                down vote



                accepted






                Standard forecasting papers unfortunately usually only show the averages of errors, so you would show the averages of your MAPEs.



                The authors often then start to discuss differences in the third significant digit. Without a notion of the variation in errors, this makes no sense. Therefore, I very much recommend that you do indicate the variation in your errors, e.g., by giving standard deviations.



                In addition, it is common practice in (load and other) forecasting papers to present results on multiple error measures, e.g., the rmse or the mae in addition to the mape.



                I suggest you skim though a couple of load forecasting papers and be inspired by what you find there.




                For your specific data, a nice and useful visualization could be a dotchart like this (note how I jittered the dots horizontally to reduce overplotting):



                MAPEs



                mapes <- structure(c(12.4070736159999, 11.1222557214741, 18.1933345652622, 
                10.9283795353769, 14.4304582955302, 12.4381016317022, 11.2011253786453,
                16.5824118552869, 10.8375790347786, 13.749822370597, 13.012084025233,
                11.0949104146992, 16.9662739986567, 10.9969285266692, 14.185836762341,
                12.8202279490414, 11.0204844071916, 22.0912790309511, 10.65564127531,
                14.1723784565888, 13.0173158393873, 10.9866043178404, 18.7201687363193,
                10.830705163829, 14.8015564381059), .Dim = c(5L, 5L), .Dimnames = list(
                c("NIC", "QLD", "SA", "TAS", "VIC"), NULL))

                set.seed(1)
                xx <- runif(nrow(mapes)*ncol(mapes),-0.3,0.3)+rep(1:ncol(mapes),nrow(mapes))
                plot(xx,as.vector(mapes),pch=19,xaxt="n",ylab="",xlab="",main="MAPE")
                axis(1,seq_along(rownames(mapes)),rownames(mapes))





                share|cite|improve this answer












                Standard forecasting papers unfortunately usually only show the averages of errors, so you would show the averages of your MAPEs.



                The authors often then start to discuss differences in the third significant digit. Without a notion of the variation in errors, this makes no sense. Therefore, I very much recommend that you do indicate the variation in your errors, e.g., by giving standard deviations.



                In addition, it is common practice in (load and other) forecasting papers to present results on multiple error measures, e.g., the rmse or the mae in addition to the mape.



                I suggest you skim though a couple of load forecasting papers and be inspired by what you find there.




                For your specific data, a nice and useful visualization could be a dotchart like this (note how I jittered the dots horizontally to reduce overplotting):



                MAPEs



                mapes <- structure(c(12.4070736159999, 11.1222557214741, 18.1933345652622, 
                10.9283795353769, 14.4304582955302, 12.4381016317022, 11.2011253786453,
                16.5824118552869, 10.8375790347786, 13.749822370597, 13.012084025233,
                11.0949104146992, 16.9662739986567, 10.9969285266692, 14.185836762341,
                12.8202279490414, 11.0204844071916, 22.0912790309511, 10.65564127531,
                14.1723784565888, 13.0173158393873, 10.9866043178404, 18.7201687363193,
                10.830705163829, 14.8015564381059), .Dim = c(5L, 5L), .Dimnames = list(
                c("NIC", "QLD", "SA", "TAS", "VIC"), NULL))

                set.seed(1)
                xx <- runif(nrow(mapes)*ncol(mapes),-0.3,0.3)+rep(1:ncol(mapes),nrow(mapes))
                plot(xx,as.vector(mapes),pch=19,xaxt="n",ylab="",xlab="",main="MAPE")
                axis(1,seq_along(rownames(mapes)),rownames(mapes))






                share|cite|improve this answer












                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer










                answered Aug 11 at 11:34









                Stephan Kolassa

                40.6k686150




                40.6k686150



























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f361744%2fhow-to-present-results-of-time-series-forecasting%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Bahrain

                    Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay