How to argue that a series that isn't a power series is analytic?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $f(z)=sum_n=0^inftyfracz^n1-z^n$. Then $f$ converges in the unit disc. I want to show that it is analytic in this region as well, but since it is not a power series I don't have any theorems to apply. My only thought was to try and use similar reasoning as with power series: show that converges is uniform so that we can switch integral and sum to show that the integral of the series is 0, then apply Morera's Theorem. But the problem is, according to Wolfram Alpha, $int_gammafracz^n1-z^n=int_0^2pifrace^intie^it1-e^intdt$ doesn't converge.



EDIT: To apply Morera's Theorem $gamma$ should be closed path contained in the unit circle. (It probably should have been obvious that the integral doesn't converge since the unit circle contains 1...). So the above strategy does works (yay!) since the function is holomorphic in any closed disk with radius less than 1.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 7




    Of course the sum should start at $n=1$, not $n=0$. To show this is a power series, note that, if $|z|<1$, $$f(z)=sum_n=1^infty z^nsum_k=0^infty z^kn=sum_ngeqslant1,kgeqslant0z^n(k+1)=sum_n=1^inftysigma_1(n)z^n$$ where $sigma_1(n)$ denotes the number of divisors of $n$.
    – Did
    Aug 11 at 15:15










  • How are you getting the first equality?
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:23










  • Any one of the five people who upvoted should feel free to answer
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:33










  • @Did How did you get the last equality?
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35










  • @SihOASHoihd That’s just geometric series.
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












Let $f(z)=sum_n=0^inftyfracz^n1-z^n$. Then $f$ converges in the unit disc. I want to show that it is analytic in this region as well, but since it is not a power series I don't have any theorems to apply. My only thought was to try and use similar reasoning as with power series: show that converges is uniform so that we can switch integral and sum to show that the integral of the series is 0, then apply Morera's Theorem. But the problem is, according to Wolfram Alpha, $int_gammafracz^n1-z^n=int_0^2pifrace^intie^it1-e^intdt$ doesn't converge.



EDIT: To apply Morera's Theorem $gamma$ should be closed path contained in the unit circle. (It probably should have been obvious that the integral doesn't converge since the unit circle contains 1...). So the above strategy does works (yay!) since the function is holomorphic in any closed disk with radius less than 1.










share|cite|improve this question



















  • 7




    Of course the sum should start at $n=1$, not $n=0$. To show this is a power series, note that, if $|z|<1$, $$f(z)=sum_n=1^infty z^nsum_k=0^infty z^kn=sum_ngeqslant1,kgeqslant0z^n(k+1)=sum_n=1^inftysigma_1(n)z^n$$ where $sigma_1(n)$ denotes the number of divisors of $n$.
    – Did
    Aug 11 at 15:15










  • How are you getting the first equality?
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:23










  • Any one of the five people who upvoted should feel free to answer
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:33










  • @Did How did you get the last equality?
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35










  • @SihOASHoihd That’s just geometric series.
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











Let $f(z)=sum_n=0^inftyfracz^n1-z^n$. Then $f$ converges in the unit disc. I want to show that it is analytic in this region as well, but since it is not a power series I don't have any theorems to apply. My only thought was to try and use similar reasoning as with power series: show that converges is uniform so that we can switch integral and sum to show that the integral of the series is 0, then apply Morera's Theorem. But the problem is, according to Wolfram Alpha, $int_gammafracz^n1-z^n=int_0^2pifrace^intie^it1-e^intdt$ doesn't converge.



EDIT: To apply Morera's Theorem $gamma$ should be closed path contained in the unit circle. (It probably should have been obvious that the integral doesn't converge since the unit circle contains 1...). So the above strategy does works (yay!) since the function is holomorphic in any closed disk with radius less than 1.










share|cite|improve this question















Let $f(z)=sum_n=0^inftyfracz^n1-z^n$. Then $f$ converges in the unit disc. I want to show that it is analytic in this region as well, but since it is not a power series I don't have any theorems to apply. My only thought was to try and use similar reasoning as with power series: show that converges is uniform so that we can switch integral and sum to show that the integral of the series is 0, then apply Morera's Theorem. But the problem is, according to Wolfram Alpha, $int_gammafracz^n1-z^n=int_0^2pifrace^intie^it1-e^intdt$ doesn't converge.



EDIT: To apply Morera's Theorem $gamma$ should be closed path contained in the unit circle. (It probably should have been obvious that the integral doesn't converge since the unit circle contains 1...). So the above strategy does works (yay!) since the function is holomorphic in any closed disk with radius less than 1.







sequences-and-series complex-analysis analytic-functions






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Aug 11 at 15:57

























asked Aug 11 at 15:08









SihOASHoihd

18112




18112







  • 7




    Of course the sum should start at $n=1$, not $n=0$. To show this is a power series, note that, if $|z|<1$, $$f(z)=sum_n=1^infty z^nsum_k=0^infty z^kn=sum_ngeqslant1,kgeqslant0z^n(k+1)=sum_n=1^inftysigma_1(n)z^n$$ where $sigma_1(n)$ denotes the number of divisors of $n$.
    – Did
    Aug 11 at 15:15










  • How are you getting the first equality?
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:23










  • Any one of the five people who upvoted should feel free to answer
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:33










  • @Did How did you get the last equality?
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35










  • @SihOASHoihd That’s just geometric series.
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35












  • 7




    Of course the sum should start at $n=1$, not $n=0$. To show this is a power series, note that, if $|z|<1$, $$f(z)=sum_n=1^infty z^nsum_k=0^infty z^kn=sum_ngeqslant1,kgeqslant0z^n(k+1)=sum_n=1^inftysigma_1(n)z^n$$ where $sigma_1(n)$ denotes the number of divisors of $n$.
    – Did
    Aug 11 at 15:15










  • How are you getting the first equality?
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:23










  • Any one of the five people who upvoted should feel free to answer
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:33










  • @Did How did you get the last equality?
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35










  • @SihOASHoihd That’s just geometric series.
    – Szeto
    Aug 11 at 15:35







7




7




Of course the sum should start at $n=1$, not $n=0$. To show this is a power series, note that, if $|z|<1$, $$f(z)=sum_n=1^infty z^nsum_k=0^infty z^kn=sum_ngeqslant1,kgeqslant0z^n(k+1)=sum_n=1^inftysigma_1(n)z^n$$ where $sigma_1(n)$ denotes the number of divisors of $n$.
– Did
Aug 11 at 15:15




Of course the sum should start at $n=1$, not $n=0$. To show this is a power series, note that, if $|z|<1$, $$f(z)=sum_n=1^infty z^nsum_k=0^infty z^kn=sum_ngeqslant1,kgeqslant0z^n(k+1)=sum_n=1^inftysigma_1(n)z^n$$ where $sigma_1(n)$ denotes the number of divisors of $n$.
– Did
Aug 11 at 15:15












How are you getting the first equality?
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:23




How are you getting the first equality?
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:23












Any one of the five people who upvoted should feel free to answer
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:33




Any one of the five people who upvoted should feel free to answer
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:33












@Did How did you get the last equality?
– Szeto
Aug 11 at 15:35




@Did How did you get the last equality?
– Szeto
Aug 11 at 15:35












@SihOASHoihd That’s just geometric series.
– Szeto
Aug 11 at 15:35




@SihOASHoihd That’s just geometric series.
– Szeto
Aug 11 at 15:35










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Let $C$ be a compact subset of the open unit disk and let $M=sup_zin C|z|$. Then $M<1$ and, for each $ninmathbb N$,$$left|fracz^n1-z^nright|=frac1-z^nleqslantfracM^n1-leqslantfracM^n1-M^n.$$Since the series $sum_n=1^inftyfracM^n1-M^n$ converges, your series converges uniformly on $C$. Since this holds for every compact subset of $D_1(0)$, the sum of the series is analytic.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I was wondering what other theorems there are. This is not one I think I knew.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:22







  • 2




    Just to be clear: the theorem that I used here is due to Weierstrass and says that if a sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ of analytic functions converges uniformly to a function $f$ on each compact, then $f$ is analytic too.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 11 at 15:27










  • After posting I realized that to apply Morera's Theorem I only need uniform convergence in some closed disk contained in the unit circle. So the integral above probably does equal zero on such a closed disk.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:31










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2879475%2fhow-to-argue-that-a-series-that-isnt-a-power-series-is-analytic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Let $C$ be a compact subset of the open unit disk and let $M=sup_zin C|z|$. Then $M<1$ and, for each $ninmathbb N$,$$left|fracz^n1-z^nright|=frac1-z^nleqslantfracM^n1-leqslantfracM^n1-M^n.$$Since the series $sum_n=1^inftyfracM^n1-M^n$ converges, your series converges uniformly on $C$. Since this holds for every compact subset of $D_1(0)$, the sum of the series is analytic.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I was wondering what other theorems there are. This is not one I think I knew.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:22







  • 2




    Just to be clear: the theorem that I used here is due to Weierstrass and says that if a sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ of analytic functions converges uniformly to a function $f$ on each compact, then $f$ is analytic too.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 11 at 15:27










  • After posting I realized that to apply Morera's Theorem I only need uniform convergence in some closed disk contained in the unit circle. So the integral above probably does equal zero on such a closed disk.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:31














up vote
8
down vote



accepted










Let $C$ be a compact subset of the open unit disk and let $M=sup_zin C|z|$. Then $M<1$ and, for each $ninmathbb N$,$$left|fracz^n1-z^nright|=frac1-z^nleqslantfracM^n1-leqslantfracM^n1-M^n.$$Since the series $sum_n=1^inftyfracM^n1-M^n$ converges, your series converges uniformly on $C$. Since this holds for every compact subset of $D_1(0)$, the sum of the series is analytic.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • I was wondering what other theorems there are. This is not one I think I knew.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:22







  • 2




    Just to be clear: the theorem that I used here is due to Weierstrass and says that if a sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ of analytic functions converges uniformly to a function $f$ on each compact, then $f$ is analytic too.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 11 at 15:27










  • After posting I realized that to apply Morera's Theorem I only need uniform convergence in some closed disk contained in the unit circle. So the integral above probably does equal zero on such a closed disk.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:31












up vote
8
down vote



accepted







up vote
8
down vote



accepted






Let $C$ be a compact subset of the open unit disk and let $M=sup_zin C|z|$. Then $M<1$ and, for each $ninmathbb N$,$$left|fracz^n1-z^nright|=frac1-z^nleqslantfracM^n1-leqslantfracM^n1-M^n.$$Since the series $sum_n=1^inftyfracM^n1-M^n$ converges, your series converges uniformly on $C$. Since this holds for every compact subset of $D_1(0)$, the sum of the series is analytic.






share|cite|improve this answer












Let $C$ be a compact subset of the open unit disk and let $M=sup_zin C|z|$. Then $M<1$ and, for each $ninmathbb N$,$$left|fracz^n1-z^nright|=frac1-z^nleqslantfracM^n1-leqslantfracM^n1-M^n.$$Since the series $sum_n=1^inftyfracM^n1-M^n$ converges, your series converges uniformly on $C$. Since this holds for every compact subset of $D_1(0)$, the sum of the series is analytic.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Aug 11 at 15:16









José Carlos Santos

122k16101186




122k16101186











  • I was wondering what other theorems there are. This is not one I think I knew.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:22







  • 2




    Just to be clear: the theorem that I used here is due to Weierstrass and says that if a sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ of analytic functions converges uniformly to a function $f$ on each compact, then $f$ is analytic too.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 11 at 15:27










  • After posting I realized that to apply Morera's Theorem I only need uniform convergence in some closed disk contained in the unit circle. So the integral above probably does equal zero on such a closed disk.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:31
















  • I was wondering what other theorems there are. This is not one I think I knew.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:22







  • 2




    Just to be clear: the theorem that I used here is due to Weierstrass and says that if a sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ of analytic functions converges uniformly to a function $f$ on each compact, then $f$ is analytic too.
    – José Carlos Santos
    Aug 11 at 15:27










  • After posting I realized that to apply Morera's Theorem I only need uniform convergence in some closed disk contained in the unit circle. So the integral above probably does equal zero on such a closed disk.
    – SihOASHoihd
    Aug 11 at 15:31















I was wondering what other theorems there are. This is not one I think I knew.
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:22





I was wondering what other theorems there are. This is not one I think I knew.
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:22





2




2




Just to be clear: the theorem that I used here is due to Weierstrass and says that if a sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ of analytic functions converges uniformly to a function $f$ on each compact, then $f$ is analytic too.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 11 at 15:27




Just to be clear: the theorem that I used here is due to Weierstrass and says that if a sequence $(f_n)_ninmathbb N$ of analytic functions converges uniformly to a function $f$ on each compact, then $f$ is analytic too.
– José Carlos Santos
Aug 11 at 15:27












After posting I realized that to apply Morera's Theorem I only need uniform convergence in some closed disk contained in the unit circle. So the integral above probably does equal zero on such a closed disk.
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:31




After posting I realized that to apply Morera's Theorem I only need uniform convergence in some closed disk contained in the unit circle. So the integral above probably does equal zero on such a closed disk.
– SihOASHoihd
Aug 11 at 15:31

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2879475%2fhow-to-argue-that-a-series-that-isnt-a-power-series-is-analytic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay