Difference between nice level and systemctl CPUShares property

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








4















As I understand it (please correct me if I'm wrong),



systemctl set-property ... CPUShares=some_value


limits the cpu time for an entire cgroup unit. If we instead want to limit cpu time for a process within that unit, we can run the process with



systemd-run ... nice=some_value


I'm wondering if there's some intrinsic difference between the concepts of the nice-value of a process and the CPUShares-value of a group of processes? Can we limit CPUShares of a process, or set the nice-value of a cgroup unit? When would we want to do one or the other?










share|improve this question




























    4















    As I understand it (please correct me if I'm wrong),



    systemctl set-property ... CPUShares=some_value


    limits the cpu time for an entire cgroup unit. If we instead want to limit cpu time for a process within that unit, we can run the process with



    systemd-run ... nice=some_value


    I'm wondering if there's some intrinsic difference between the concepts of the nice-value of a process and the CPUShares-value of a group of processes? Can we limit CPUShares of a process, or set the nice-value of a cgroup unit? When would we want to do one or the other?










    share|improve this question
























      4












      4








      4








      As I understand it (please correct me if I'm wrong),



      systemctl set-property ... CPUShares=some_value


      limits the cpu time for an entire cgroup unit. If we instead want to limit cpu time for a process within that unit, we can run the process with



      systemd-run ... nice=some_value


      I'm wondering if there's some intrinsic difference between the concepts of the nice-value of a process and the CPUShares-value of a group of processes? Can we limit CPUShares of a process, or set the nice-value of a cgroup unit? When would we want to do one or the other?










      share|improve this question














      As I understand it (please correct me if I'm wrong),



      systemctl set-property ... CPUShares=some_value


      limits the cpu time for an entire cgroup unit. If we instead want to limit cpu time for a process within that unit, we can run the process with



      systemd-run ... nice=some_value


      I'm wondering if there's some intrinsic difference between the concepts of the nice-value of a process and the CPUShares-value of a group of processes? Can we limit CPUShares of a process, or set the nice-value of a cgroup unit? When would we want to do one or the other?







      systemd cgroups nice






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 14 '17 at 15:28









      embedded_crysisembedded_crysis

      775




      775




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          8














          From reading man systemd-run, it will create a service and thus a cgroup on the fly. From reading systemd.exec, the Nice= directive will apply to all executed processes, so the way that systmd handles the concepts of Nice= and CPUShares= are very similar.



          My understanding of the relationship is that it has to do with history. nice has existed for a listed a couple of decades and always applied to specific processes.



          On the other hand, the concept of cgroups and the idea of applying CPUShares= to a process group is much a newer concept but accomplishes the same goal.



          I expect systemd supports Nice= for historical compatibility.



          I would use whichever one you are comfortable with, but not both to avoid confusion. If you have no preference, I would use the newer CPUShares= concept.






          share|improve this answer


















          • 1





            Beware, using CPU shares and nice values are likely to result in very different behaviors on "recent" distributions using systemd default cgroups (Debian 9 is one of those). See sched(7) : "Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group." A cgroup being such a task group. See my answer for more details.

            – Totor
            Mar 14 at 13:28


















          1














          On Linux,



          • a nice value applies to a task, that is a process or thread (see link for disambiguation),

          • a "CPU shares" value applies to a cgroup (a group of one or more tasks).

          The default non-realtime Linux' task scheduler (CFQ), distributes CPU time "fairly" among the different cgroups. It will use the cpu.shares value of each cgroup (by default 1024), relative to other cgroups' cpu.shares values, to grant more or less CPU time to each cgroup (more shares = more CPU bandwith).



          Now, within each cgroup, a task's nice value will be used to grant it more or less CPU time, relative to other tasks' nice values within the same cgroup.



          sched(7) says:




          Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group.





          Side notes:



          • a task group is a cgroup or an autogroup (see sched(7)),

          • autogrouping may be disabled by defaut on your Linux distribution, check with cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled,

          • task groups can have hierarchical relationships (cgroups within a cgroup) that I guess the CFQ task scheduler considers to distribute CPU time,

          • "recent" distributions may be using systemd to put tasks in cgroups by default (try systemd-cgtop and systemd-cgls).





          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344936%2fdifference-between-nice-level-and-systemctl-cpushares-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            8














            From reading man systemd-run, it will create a service and thus a cgroup on the fly. From reading systemd.exec, the Nice= directive will apply to all executed processes, so the way that systmd handles the concepts of Nice= and CPUShares= are very similar.



            My understanding of the relationship is that it has to do with history. nice has existed for a listed a couple of decades and always applied to specific processes.



            On the other hand, the concept of cgroups and the idea of applying CPUShares= to a process group is much a newer concept but accomplishes the same goal.



            I expect systemd supports Nice= for historical compatibility.



            I would use whichever one you are comfortable with, but not both to avoid confusion. If you have no preference, I would use the newer CPUShares= concept.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              Beware, using CPU shares and nice values are likely to result in very different behaviors on "recent" distributions using systemd default cgroups (Debian 9 is one of those). See sched(7) : "Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group." A cgroup being such a task group. See my answer for more details.

              – Totor
              Mar 14 at 13:28















            8














            From reading man systemd-run, it will create a service and thus a cgroup on the fly. From reading systemd.exec, the Nice= directive will apply to all executed processes, so the way that systmd handles the concepts of Nice= and CPUShares= are very similar.



            My understanding of the relationship is that it has to do with history. nice has existed for a listed a couple of decades and always applied to specific processes.



            On the other hand, the concept of cgroups and the idea of applying CPUShares= to a process group is much a newer concept but accomplishes the same goal.



            I expect systemd supports Nice= for historical compatibility.



            I would use whichever one you are comfortable with, but not both to avoid confusion. If you have no preference, I would use the newer CPUShares= concept.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 1





              Beware, using CPU shares and nice values are likely to result in very different behaviors on "recent" distributions using systemd default cgroups (Debian 9 is one of those). See sched(7) : "Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group." A cgroup being such a task group. See my answer for more details.

              – Totor
              Mar 14 at 13:28













            8












            8








            8







            From reading man systemd-run, it will create a service and thus a cgroup on the fly. From reading systemd.exec, the Nice= directive will apply to all executed processes, so the way that systmd handles the concepts of Nice= and CPUShares= are very similar.



            My understanding of the relationship is that it has to do with history. nice has existed for a listed a couple of decades and always applied to specific processes.



            On the other hand, the concept of cgroups and the idea of applying CPUShares= to a process group is much a newer concept but accomplishes the same goal.



            I expect systemd supports Nice= for historical compatibility.



            I would use whichever one you are comfortable with, but not both to avoid confusion. If you have no preference, I would use the newer CPUShares= concept.






            share|improve this answer













            From reading man systemd-run, it will create a service and thus a cgroup on the fly. From reading systemd.exec, the Nice= directive will apply to all executed processes, so the way that systmd handles the concepts of Nice= and CPUShares= are very similar.



            My understanding of the relationship is that it has to do with history. nice has existed for a listed a couple of decades and always applied to specific processes.



            On the other hand, the concept of cgroups and the idea of applying CPUShares= to a process group is much a newer concept but accomplishes the same goal.



            I expect systemd supports Nice= for historical compatibility.



            I would use whichever one you are comfortable with, but not both to avoid confusion. If you have no preference, I would use the newer CPUShares= concept.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Feb 14 '17 at 16:08









            Mark StosbergMark Stosberg

            4,0681226




            4,0681226







            • 1





              Beware, using CPU shares and nice values are likely to result in very different behaviors on "recent" distributions using systemd default cgroups (Debian 9 is one of those). See sched(7) : "Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group." A cgroup being such a task group. See my answer for more details.

              – Totor
              Mar 14 at 13:28












            • 1





              Beware, using CPU shares and nice values are likely to result in very different behaviors on "recent" distributions using systemd default cgroups (Debian 9 is one of those). See sched(7) : "Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group." A cgroup being such a task group. See my answer for more details.

              – Totor
              Mar 14 at 13:28







            1




            1





            Beware, using CPU shares and nice values are likely to result in very different behaviors on "recent" distributions using systemd default cgroups (Debian 9 is one of those). See sched(7) : "Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group." A cgroup being such a task group. See my answer for more details.

            – Totor
            Mar 14 at 13:28





            Beware, using CPU shares and nice values are likely to result in very different behaviors on "recent" distributions using systemd default cgroups (Debian 9 is one of those). See sched(7) : "Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group." A cgroup being such a task group. See my answer for more details.

            – Totor
            Mar 14 at 13:28













            1














            On Linux,



            • a nice value applies to a task, that is a process or thread (see link for disambiguation),

            • a "CPU shares" value applies to a cgroup (a group of one or more tasks).

            The default non-realtime Linux' task scheduler (CFQ), distributes CPU time "fairly" among the different cgroups. It will use the cpu.shares value of each cgroup (by default 1024), relative to other cgroups' cpu.shares values, to grant more or less CPU time to each cgroup (more shares = more CPU bandwith).



            Now, within each cgroup, a task's nice value will be used to grant it more or less CPU time, relative to other tasks' nice values within the same cgroup.



            sched(7) says:




            Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group.





            Side notes:



            • a task group is a cgroup or an autogroup (see sched(7)),

            • autogrouping may be disabled by defaut on your Linux distribution, check with cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled,

            • task groups can have hierarchical relationships (cgroups within a cgroup) that I guess the CFQ task scheduler considers to distribute CPU time,

            • "recent" distributions may be using systemd to put tasks in cgroups by default (try systemd-cgtop and systemd-cgls).





            share|improve this answer



























              1














              On Linux,



              • a nice value applies to a task, that is a process or thread (see link for disambiguation),

              • a "CPU shares" value applies to a cgroup (a group of one or more tasks).

              The default non-realtime Linux' task scheduler (CFQ), distributes CPU time "fairly" among the different cgroups. It will use the cpu.shares value of each cgroup (by default 1024), relative to other cgroups' cpu.shares values, to grant more or less CPU time to each cgroup (more shares = more CPU bandwith).



              Now, within each cgroup, a task's nice value will be used to grant it more or less CPU time, relative to other tasks' nice values within the same cgroup.



              sched(7) says:




              Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group.





              Side notes:



              • a task group is a cgroup or an autogroup (see sched(7)),

              • autogrouping may be disabled by defaut on your Linux distribution, check with cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled,

              • task groups can have hierarchical relationships (cgroups within a cgroup) that I guess the CFQ task scheduler considers to distribute CPU time,

              • "recent" distributions may be using systemd to put tasks in cgroups by default (try systemd-cgtop and systemd-cgls).





              share|improve this answer

























                1












                1








                1







                On Linux,



                • a nice value applies to a task, that is a process or thread (see link for disambiguation),

                • a "CPU shares" value applies to a cgroup (a group of one or more tasks).

                The default non-realtime Linux' task scheduler (CFQ), distributes CPU time "fairly" among the different cgroups. It will use the cpu.shares value of each cgroup (by default 1024), relative to other cgroups' cpu.shares values, to grant more or less CPU time to each cgroup (more shares = more CPU bandwith).



                Now, within each cgroup, a task's nice value will be used to grant it more or less CPU time, relative to other tasks' nice values within the same cgroup.



                sched(7) says:




                Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group.





                Side notes:



                • a task group is a cgroup or an autogroup (see sched(7)),

                • autogrouping may be disabled by defaut on your Linux distribution, check with cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled,

                • task groups can have hierarchical relationships (cgroups within a cgroup) that I guess the CFQ task scheduler considers to distribute CPU time,

                • "recent" distributions may be using systemd to put tasks in cgroups by default (try systemd-cgtop and systemd-cgls).





                share|improve this answer













                On Linux,



                • a nice value applies to a task, that is a process or thread (see link for disambiguation),

                • a "CPU shares" value applies to a cgroup (a group of one or more tasks).

                The default non-realtime Linux' task scheduler (CFQ), distributes CPU time "fairly" among the different cgroups. It will use the cpu.shares value of each cgroup (by default 1024), relative to other cgroups' cpu.shares values, to grant more or less CPU time to each cgroup (more shares = more CPU bandwith).



                Now, within each cgroup, a task's nice value will be used to grant it more or less CPU time, relative to other tasks' nice values within the same cgroup.



                sched(7) says:




                Under group scheduling, a thread's nice value has an effect for scheduling decisions only relative to other threads in the same task group.





                Side notes:



                • a task group is a cgroup or an autogroup (see sched(7)),

                • autogrouping may be disabled by defaut on your Linux distribution, check with cat /proc/sys/kernel/sched_autogroup_enabled,

                • task groups can have hierarchical relationships (cgroups within a cgroup) that I guess the CFQ task scheduler considers to distribute CPU time,

                • "recent" distributions may be using systemd to put tasks in cgroups by default (try systemd-cgtop and systemd-cgls).






                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Mar 14 at 13:18









                TotorTotor

                8,807135281




                8,807135281



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f344936%2fdifference-between-nice-level-and-systemctl-cpushares-property%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown






                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                    How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?