Can anyone tell me why this program fails?
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
33
$begingroup$
org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
ScalaTestFailureLocation: SorterTest at (SorterTest.scala:75107)
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:70102)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:6597)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4(SorterTest.scala:72104)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4$adapted(SorterTest.scala:6597)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:84116)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$3(SorterTest.scala:69101)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:83115)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:77109)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:6698)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:6799)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture(TestSuite.scala:85117)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture$(TestSuite.scala:83115)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.withFixture(FunSuite.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:73105)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:72104)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest(FunSuiteLike.scala:84116)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest$(FunSuiteLike.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.runTest(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:70102)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:6597)
Why is this program failing?
Hint:
I've tried to duplicate the code but I got the same problem...
cipher steganography
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
$endgroup$
|
show 6 more comments
33
$begingroup$
org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
ScalaTestFailureLocation: SorterTest at (SorterTest.scala:75107)
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:70102)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:6597)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4(SorterTest.scala:72104)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4$adapted(SorterTest.scala:6597)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:84116)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$3(SorterTest.scala:69101)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:83115)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:77109)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:6698)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:6799)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture(TestSuite.scala:85117)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture$(TestSuite.scala:83115)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.withFixture(FunSuite.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:73105)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:72104)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest(FunSuiteLike.scala:84116)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest$(FunSuiteLike.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.runTest(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:70102)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:6597)
Why is this program failing?
Hint:
I've tried to duplicate the code but I got the same problem...
cipher steganography
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Perhaps tell is what exactly the problem is that you are encountering in detail, other than a vague “it’s not working?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 14 at 12:45
5
$begingroup$
I really think this should be here, just read it carefully ;P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 12:57
7
$begingroup$
Voting to close, needs [mcve] ;)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Mar 14 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
This is a cipher puzzle, just a bit different ^^
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 13:10
8
$begingroup$
I just love how this looks like a bad StackOverflow question yet it still blatantly looks like a puzzle
$endgroup$
– Belhenix
Mar 15 at 7:16
|
show 6 more comments
33
33
33
$begingroup$
org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
ScalaTestFailureLocation: SorterTest at (SorterTest.scala:75107)
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:70102)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:6597)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4(SorterTest.scala:72104)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4$adapted(SorterTest.scala:6597)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:84116)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$3(SorterTest.scala:69101)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:83115)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:77109)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:6698)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:6799)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture(TestSuite.scala:85117)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture$(TestSuite.scala:83115)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.withFixture(FunSuite.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:73105)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:72104)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest(FunSuiteLike.scala:84116)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest$(FunSuiteLike.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.runTest(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:70102)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:6597)
Why is this program failing?
Hint:
I've tried to duplicate the code but I got the same problem...
cipher steganography
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
$endgroup$
org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
ScalaTestFailureLocation: SorterTest at (SorterTest.scala:75107)
org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException: org.apache.kafka.clients.consumer.ConsumerRecords@1f6d27cc was empty
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException(Assertions.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.Assertions.newAssertionFailedException$(Assertions.scala:70102)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.newAssertionFailedException(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.Assertions$AssertionsHelper.macroAssert(Assertions.scala:6597)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4(SorterTest.scala:72104)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$4$adapted(SorterTest.scala:6597)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:84116)
at SorterTest.$anonfun$new$3(SorterTest.scala:69101)
at scala.runtime.java8.JFunction0$mcV$sp.apply(JFunction0$mcV$sp.java:83115)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:77109)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf.outcomeOf$(OutcomeOf.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.OutcomeOf$.outcomeOf(OutcomeOf.scala:6698)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.Transformer.apply(Transformer.scala:6799)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike$$anon$1.apply(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture(TestSuite.scala:85117)
at org.scalatest.TestSuite.withFixture$(TestSuite.scala:83115)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.withFixture(FunSuite.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.invokeWithFixture$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:73105)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTest$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:72104)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.runTestImpl(Engine.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest(FunSuiteLike.scala:84116)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.runTest$(FunSuiteLike.scala:69101)
at org.scalatest.FunSuite.runTest(FunSuite.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.FunSuiteLike.$anonfun$runTests$1(FunSuiteLike.scala:6597)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.$anonfun$runTestsInBranch$1(Engine.scala:70102)
at scala.collection.immutable.List.foreach(List.scala:75107)
at org.scalatest.SuperEngine.traverseSubNodes$1(Engine.scala:6597)
Why is this program failing?
Hint:
I've tried to duplicate the code but I got the same problem...
cipher steganography
cipher steganography
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
edited Mar 14 at 22:48
Rupert Morrish
3,6331934
3,6331934
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
asked Mar 14 at 12:37
TurvoTurvo
16827
16827
2
$begingroup$
Perhaps tell is what exactly the problem is that you are encountering in detail, other than a vague “it’s not working?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 14 at 12:45
5
$begingroup$
I really think this should be here, just read it carefully ;P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 12:57
7
$begingroup$
Voting to close, needs [mcve] ;)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Mar 14 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
This is a cipher puzzle, just a bit different ^^
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 13:10
8
$begingroup$
I just love how this looks like a bad StackOverflow question yet it still blatantly looks like a puzzle
$endgroup$
– Belhenix
Mar 15 at 7:16
|
show 6 more comments
2
$begingroup$
Perhaps tell is what exactly the problem is that you are encountering in detail, other than a vague “it’s not working?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 14 at 12:45
5
$begingroup$
I really think this should be here, just read it carefully ;P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 12:57
7
$begingroup$
Voting to close, needs [mcve] ;)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Mar 14 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
This is a cipher puzzle, just a bit different ^^
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 13:10
8
$begingroup$
I just love how this looks like a bad StackOverflow question yet it still blatantly looks like a puzzle
$endgroup$
– Belhenix
Mar 15 at 7:16
2
2
$begingroup$
Perhaps tell is what exactly the problem is that you are encountering in detail, other than a vague “it’s not working?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 14 at 12:45
$begingroup$
Perhaps tell is what exactly the problem is that you are encountering in detail, other than a vague “it’s not working?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 14 at 12:45
5
5
$begingroup$
I really think this should be here, just read it carefully ;P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 12:57
$begingroup$
I really think this should be here, just read it carefully ;P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 12:57
7
7
$begingroup$
Voting to close, needs [mcve] ;)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Mar 14 at 13:05
$begingroup$
Voting to close, needs [mcve] ;)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Mar 14 at 13:05
1
1
$begingroup$
This is a cipher puzzle, just a bit different ^^
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 13:10
$begingroup$
This is a cipher puzzle, just a bit different ^^
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 13:10
8
8
$begingroup$
I just love how this looks like a bad StackOverflow question yet it still blatantly looks like a puzzle
$endgroup$
– Belhenix
Mar 15 at 7:16
$begingroup$
I just love how this looks like a bad StackOverflow question yet it still blatantly looks like a puzzle
$endgroup$
– Belhenix
Mar 15 at 7:16
|
show 6 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
33
$begingroup$
The program is failing because:
Kafka Hates You
It would seem that:
The feeling is mutual. Taking the ascii value of the numbers at the end of the error messages yields: KAFKA HATES ME BECAUSE I HATE KAFKA.
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That's it!! It was my first puzzle so it maybe was too easy, I'll try to create a harder one :P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 15:21
5
$begingroup$
@Turvo don't forget about the "many eyes" effect - sometimes puzzles seem artificially easy because it was solved quickly, but don't forget that there were also 1500+ people who did not solve it.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
Knowing nothing about Scala - would those normally be line numbers? I feel like in any programming language if your line numbers get into 5 digits, you're doing something wrong. I was instantly suspicious of that, especially the 80+ thousand numbers...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 15 at 12:23
$begingroup$
You are right, those numbers are suspicious. I've used uppercase letter's ascii code followed by lowercase letter's because using just 2 or 3 numbers would be too easy (That's why the hint mentioned "duplicated code")
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 12:52
add a comment |
16
$begingroup$
To solve it in the spirit of the riddle, we run:
grep -o ':.*)' < input | sed 's/[^0-9]//g' | xargs node -e "console.log(process.argv.slice(1).map(x => parseInt(parseInt(x.slice(2)) > 122 ? x.slice(1) : x.slice(2))).map(x => String.fromCharCode(x)).join(''))"
which provides us with the reason:
kafkahatesmebecauseihatekafka
So it is unlikely that the problem will be resolved soon...
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is a fantastic answer.
$endgroup$
– LeppyR64
Mar 15 at 2:45
2
$begingroup$
You can also do this by evaluatingString.fromCharCode(...document.querySelector("#question code").textContent.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3)))in the web console.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 9:58
$begingroup$
I love your answers! Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 10:03
3
$begingroup$
fetch("https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80670?&site=puzzling&filter=withbody").then(f=>f.json().then(r=>console.log(String.fromCharCode(...r.items[0].body.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3))))))is another approach.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 10:06
$begingroup$
Pipe stack trace intoperl -lne 'if (/:(dd)(d+))/) print chr($1) . " " . chr($2)'
$endgroup$
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mar 15 at 14:52
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80670%2fcan-anyone-tell-me-why-this-program-fails%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
33
$begingroup$
The program is failing because:
Kafka Hates You
It would seem that:
The feeling is mutual. Taking the ascii value of the numbers at the end of the error messages yields: KAFKA HATES ME BECAUSE I HATE KAFKA.
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That's it!! It was my first puzzle so it maybe was too easy, I'll try to create a harder one :P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 15:21
5
$begingroup$
@Turvo don't forget about the "many eyes" effect - sometimes puzzles seem artificially easy because it was solved quickly, but don't forget that there were also 1500+ people who did not solve it.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
Knowing nothing about Scala - would those normally be line numbers? I feel like in any programming language if your line numbers get into 5 digits, you're doing something wrong. I was instantly suspicious of that, especially the 80+ thousand numbers...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 15 at 12:23
$begingroup$
You are right, those numbers are suspicious. I've used uppercase letter's ascii code followed by lowercase letter's because using just 2 or 3 numbers would be too easy (That's why the hint mentioned "duplicated code")
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 12:52
add a comment |
33
$begingroup$
The program is failing because:
Kafka Hates You
It would seem that:
The feeling is mutual. Taking the ascii value of the numbers at the end of the error messages yields: KAFKA HATES ME BECAUSE I HATE KAFKA.
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
That's it!! It was my first puzzle so it maybe was too easy, I'll try to create a harder one :P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 15:21
5
$begingroup$
@Turvo don't forget about the "many eyes" effect - sometimes puzzles seem artificially easy because it was solved quickly, but don't forget that there were also 1500+ people who did not solve it.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
Knowing nothing about Scala - would those normally be line numbers? I feel like in any programming language if your line numbers get into 5 digits, you're doing something wrong. I was instantly suspicious of that, especially the 80+ thousand numbers...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 15 at 12:23
$begingroup$
You are right, those numbers are suspicious. I've used uppercase letter's ascii code followed by lowercase letter's because using just 2 or 3 numbers would be too easy (That's why the hint mentioned "duplicated code")
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 12:52
add a comment |
33
33
33
$begingroup$
The program is failing because:
Kafka Hates You
It would seem that:
The feeling is mutual. Taking the ascii value of the numbers at the end of the error messages yields: KAFKA HATES ME BECAUSE I HATE KAFKA.
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
$endgroup$
The program is failing because:
Kafka Hates You
It would seem that:
The feeling is mutual. Taking the ascii value of the numbers at the end of the error messages yields: KAFKA HATES ME BECAUSE I HATE KAFKA.
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
answered Mar 14 at 13:20
LeppyR64LeppyR64
10.9k23859
10.9k23859
1
$begingroup$
That's it!! It was my first puzzle so it maybe was too easy, I'll try to create a harder one :P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 15:21
5
$begingroup$
@Turvo don't forget about the "many eyes" effect - sometimes puzzles seem artificially easy because it was solved quickly, but don't forget that there were also 1500+ people who did not solve it.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
Knowing nothing about Scala - would those normally be line numbers? I feel like in any programming language if your line numbers get into 5 digits, you're doing something wrong. I was instantly suspicious of that, especially the 80+ thousand numbers...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 15 at 12:23
$begingroup$
You are right, those numbers are suspicious. I've used uppercase letter's ascii code followed by lowercase letter's because using just 2 or 3 numbers would be too easy (That's why the hint mentioned "duplicated code")
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 12:52
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
That's it!! It was my first puzzle so it maybe was too easy, I'll try to create a harder one :P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 15:21
5
$begingroup$
@Turvo don't forget about the "many eyes" effect - sometimes puzzles seem artificially easy because it was solved quickly, but don't forget that there were also 1500+ people who did not solve it.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 23:23
2
$begingroup$
Knowing nothing about Scala - would those normally be line numbers? I feel like in any programming language if your line numbers get into 5 digits, you're doing something wrong. I was instantly suspicious of that, especially the 80+ thousand numbers...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 15 at 12:23
$begingroup$
You are right, those numbers are suspicious. I've used uppercase letter's ascii code followed by lowercase letter's because using just 2 or 3 numbers would be too easy (That's why the hint mentioned "duplicated code")
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 12:52
1
1
$begingroup$
That's it!! It was my first puzzle so it maybe was too easy, I'll try to create a harder one :P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 15:21
$begingroup$
That's it!! It was my first puzzle so it maybe was too easy, I'll try to create a harder one :P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 15:21
5
5
$begingroup$
@Turvo don't forget about the "many eyes" effect - sometimes puzzles seem artificially easy because it was solved quickly, but don't forget that there were also 1500+ people who did not solve it.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 23:23
$begingroup$
@Turvo don't forget about the "many eyes" effect - sometimes puzzles seem artificially easy because it was solved quickly, but don't forget that there were also 1500+ people who did not solve it.
$endgroup$
– Brandon_J
Mar 14 at 23:23
2
2
$begingroup$
Knowing nothing about Scala - would those normally be line numbers? I feel like in any programming language if your line numbers get into 5 digits, you're doing something wrong. I was instantly suspicious of that, especially the 80+ thousand numbers...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 15 at 12:23
$begingroup$
Knowing nothing about Scala - would those normally be line numbers? I feel like in any programming language if your line numbers get into 5 digits, you're doing something wrong. I was instantly suspicious of that, especially the 80+ thousand numbers...
$endgroup$
– Darrel Hoffman
Mar 15 at 12:23
$begingroup$
You are right, those numbers are suspicious. I've used uppercase letter's ascii code followed by lowercase letter's because using just 2 or 3 numbers would be too easy (That's why the hint mentioned "duplicated code")
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 12:52
$begingroup$
You are right, those numbers are suspicious. I've used uppercase letter's ascii code followed by lowercase letter's because using just 2 or 3 numbers would be too easy (That's why the hint mentioned "duplicated code")
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 12:52
add a comment |
16
$begingroup$
To solve it in the spirit of the riddle, we run:
grep -o ':.*)' < input | sed 's/[^0-9]//g' | xargs node -e "console.log(process.argv.slice(1).map(x => parseInt(parseInt(x.slice(2)) > 122 ? x.slice(1) : x.slice(2))).map(x => String.fromCharCode(x)).join(''))"
which provides us with the reason:
kafkahatesmebecauseihatekafka
So it is unlikely that the problem will be resolved soon...
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is a fantastic answer.
$endgroup$
– LeppyR64
Mar 15 at 2:45
2
$begingroup$
You can also do this by evaluatingString.fromCharCode(...document.querySelector("#question code").textContent.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3)))in the web console.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 9:58
$begingroup$
I love your answers! Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 10:03
3
$begingroup$
fetch("https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80670?&site=puzzling&filter=withbody").then(f=>f.json().then(r=>console.log(String.fromCharCode(...r.items[0].body.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3))))))is another approach.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 10:06
$begingroup$
Pipe stack trace intoperl -lne 'if (/:(dd)(d+))/) print chr($1) . " " . chr($2)'
$endgroup$
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mar 15 at 14:52
add a comment |
16
$begingroup$
To solve it in the spirit of the riddle, we run:
grep -o ':.*)' < input | sed 's/[^0-9]//g' | xargs node -e "console.log(process.argv.slice(1).map(x => parseInt(parseInt(x.slice(2)) > 122 ? x.slice(1) : x.slice(2))).map(x => String.fromCharCode(x)).join(''))"
which provides us with the reason:
kafkahatesmebecauseihatekafka
So it is unlikely that the problem will be resolved soon...
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
This is a fantastic answer.
$endgroup$
– LeppyR64
Mar 15 at 2:45
2
$begingroup$
You can also do this by evaluatingString.fromCharCode(...document.querySelector("#question code").textContent.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3)))in the web console.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 9:58
$begingroup$
I love your answers! Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 10:03
3
$begingroup$
fetch("https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80670?&site=puzzling&filter=withbody").then(f=>f.json().then(r=>console.log(String.fromCharCode(...r.items[0].body.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3))))))is another approach.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 10:06
$begingroup$
Pipe stack trace intoperl -lne 'if (/:(dd)(d+))/) print chr($1) . " " . chr($2)'
$endgroup$
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mar 15 at 14:52
add a comment |
16
16
16
$begingroup$
To solve it in the spirit of the riddle, we run:
grep -o ':.*)' < input | sed 's/[^0-9]//g' | xargs node -e "console.log(process.argv.slice(1).map(x => parseInt(parseInt(x.slice(2)) > 122 ? x.slice(1) : x.slice(2))).map(x => String.fromCharCode(x)).join(''))"
which provides us with the reason:
kafkahatesmebecauseihatekafka
So it is unlikely that the problem will be resolved soon...
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
$endgroup$
To solve it in the spirit of the riddle, we run:
grep -o ':.*)' < input | sed 's/[^0-9]//g' | xargs node -e "console.log(process.argv.slice(1).map(x => parseInt(parseInt(x.slice(2)) > 122 ? x.slice(1) : x.slice(2))).map(x => String.fromCharCode(x)).join(''))"
which provides us with the reason:
kafkahatesmebecauseihatekafka
So it is unlikely that the problem will be resolved soon...
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
answered Mar 14 at 22:09
Igor SowinskiIgor Sowinski
1612
1612
1
$begingroup$
This is a fantastic answer.
$endgroup$
– LeppyR64
Mar 15 at 2:45
2
$begingroup$
You can also do this by evaluatingString.fromCharCode(...document.querySelector("#question code").textContent.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3)))in the web console.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 9:58
$begingroup$
I love your answers! Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 10:03
3
$begingroup$
fetch("https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80670?&site=puzzling&filter=withbody").then(f=>f.json().then(r=>console.log(String.fromCharCode(...r.items[0].body.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3))))))is another approach.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 10:06
$begingroup$
Pipe stack trace intoperl -lne 'if (/:(dd)(d+))/) print chr($1) . " " . chr($2)'
$endgroup$
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mar 15 at 14:52
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
This is a fantastic answer.
$endgroup$
– LeppyR64
Mar 15 at 2:45
2
$begingroup$
You can also do this by evaluatingString.fromCharCode(...document.querySelector("#question code").textContent.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3)))in the web console.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 9:58
$begingroup$
I love your answers! Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 10:03
3
$begingroup$
fetch("https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80670?&site=puzzling&filter=withbody").then(f=>f.json().then(r=>console.log(String.fromCharCode(...r.items[0].body.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3))))))is another approach.
$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 10:06
$begingroup$
Pipe stack trace intoperl -lne 'if (/:(dd)(d+))/) print chr($1) . " " . chr($2)'
$endgroup$
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mar 15 at 14:52
1
1
$begingroup$
This is a fantastic answer.
$endgroup$
– LeppyR64
Mar 15 at 2:45
$begingroup$
This is a fantastic answer.
$endgroup$
– LeppyR64
Mar 15 at 2:45
2
2
$begingroup$
You can also do this by evaluating
String.fromCharCode(...document.querySelector("#question code").textContent.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3))) in the web console.$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 9:58
$begingroup$
You can also do this by evaluating
String.fromCharCode(...document.querySelector("#question code").textContent.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3))) in the web console.$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 9:58
$begingroup$
I love your answers! Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 10:03
$begingroup$
I love your answers! Nice job!
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 15 at 10:03
3
3
$begingroup$
fetch("https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80670?&site=puzzling&filter=withbody").then(f=>f.json().then(r=>console.log(String.fromCharCode(...r.items[0].body.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3)))))) is another approach.$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 10:06
$begingroup$
fetch("https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/80670?&site=puzzling&filter=withbody").then(f=>f.json().then(r=>console.log(String.fromCharCode(...r.items[0].body.match(/:d+/g).map(s=>s.slice(3)))))) is another approach.$endgroup$
– Neil
Mar 15 at 10:06
$begingroup$
Pipe stack trace into
perl -lne 'if (/:(dd)(d+))/) print chr($1) . " " . chr($2)'$endgroup$
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mar 15 at 14:52
$begingroup$
Pipe stack trace into
perl -lne 'if (/:(dd)(d+))/) print chr($1) . " " . chr($2)'$endgroup$
– Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen
Mar 15 at 14:52
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f80670%2fcan-anyone-tell-me-why-this-program-fails%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
2
$begingroup$
Perhaps tell is what exactly the problem is that you are encountering in detail, other than a vague “it’s not working?
$endgroup$
– Rewan Demontay
Mar 14 at 12:45
5
$begingroup$
I really think this should be here, just read it carefully ;P
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 12:57
7
$begingroup$
Voting to close, needs [mcve] ;)
$endgroup$
– Rubio♦
Mar 14 at 13:05
1
$begingroup$
This is a cipher puzzle, just a bit different ^^
$endgroup$
– Turvo
Mar 14 at 13:10
8
$begingroup$
I just love how this looks like a bad StackOverflow question yet it still blatantly looks like a puzzle
$endgroup$
– Belhenix
Mar 15 at 7:16