Struggling to create an efficient index for this query

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2















I am struggling to create an index for a query and unfortunately I cannot change the query at all as it part of an ERP system. The problem is this query has over 1m reads and sometimes a duration of 10s



I Have tried using just the predicate, the seek predicate and a combination of both in different orders to no success.



Here is the query that cannot be changed:



SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID" 
FROM "Database".dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


Here is the script for the table if it helps:



SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO

SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
[timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
[Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
[Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
[URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Type] [int] NOT NULL,
[Note] [image] NULL,
[Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
[Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
[Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Link ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
GO


Here is the stats for the time and IO



 SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 4 ms.

(0 rows affected)
Table 'Record Link'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1018402, physical reads 3, read-ahead reads 1018391, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

(1 row affected)

SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 8234 ms, elapsed time = 12641 ms.


Here is the execution plan:
enter image description here



I would greatly appreciate it if someone could help me create an efficient index for this.



Here is a link to the execution plan:
https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkTxCbdN4










share|improve this question
























  • How hard is the "no change in the query" restriction? Can you remove the hints?

    – ypercubeᵀᴹ
    Feb 6 at 9:59






  • 2





    As a side note, you really ought to not be still on 2017 RTM - there have been 13 cumulative updates since then. You could also help people reproduce the problem by scripting out indexes and statistics and adding that to your question.

    – Paul White
    Feb 6 at 10:59
















2















I am struggling to create an index for a query and unfortunately I cannot change the query at all as it part of an ERP system. The problem is this query has over 1m reads and sometimes a duration of 10s



I Have tried using just the predicate, the seek predicate and a combination of both in different orders to no success.



Here is the query that cannot be changed:



SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID" 
FROM "Database".dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


Here is the script for the table if it helps:



SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO

SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
[timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
[Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
[Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
[URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Type] [int] NOT NULL,
[Note] [image] NULL,
[Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
[Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
[Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Link ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
GO


Here is the stats for the time and IO



 SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 4 ms.

(0 rows affected)
Table 'Record Link'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1018402, physical reads 3, read-ahead reads 1018391, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

(1 row affected)

SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 8234 ms, elapsed time = 12641 ms.


Here is the execution plan:
enter image description here



I would greatly appreciate it if someone could help me create an efficient index for this.



Here is a link to the execution plan:
https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkTxCbdN4










share|improve this question
























  • How hard is the "no change in the query" restriction? Can you remove the hints?

    – ypercubeᵀᴹ
    Feb 6 at 9:59






  • 2





    As a side note, you really ought to not be still on 2017 RTM - there have been 13 cumulative updates since then. You could also help people reproduce the problem by scripting out indexes and statistics and adding that to your question.

    – Paul White
    Feb 6 at 10:59














2












2








2








I am struggling to create an index for a query and unfortunately I cannot change the query at all as it part of an ERP system. The problem is this query has over 1m reads and sometimes a duration of 10s



I Have tried using just the predicate, the seek predicate and a combination of both in different orders to no success.



Here is the query that cannot be changed:



SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID" 
FROM "Database".dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


Here is the script for the table if it helps:



SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO

SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
[timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
[Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
[Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
[URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Type] [int] NOT NULL,
[Note] [image] NULL,
[Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
[Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
[Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Link ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
GO


Here is the stats for the time and IO



 SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 4 ms.

(0 rows affected)
Table 'Record Link'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1018402, physical reads 3, read-ahead reads 1018391, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

(1 row affected)

SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 8234 ms, elapsed time = 12641 ms.


Here is the execution plan:
enter image description here



I would greatly appreciate it if someone could help me create an efficient index for this.



Here is a link to the execution plan:
https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkTxCbdN4










share|improve this question
















I am struggling to create an index for a query and unfortunately I cannot change the query at all as it part of an ERP system. The problem is this query has over 1m reads and sometimes a duration of 10s



I Have tried using just the predicate, the seek predicate and a combination of both in different orders to no success.



Here is the query that cannot be changed:



SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID" 
FROM "Database".dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


Here is the script for the table if it helps:



SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO

SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
[timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
[Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
[Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
[URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Type] [int] NOT NULL,
[Note] [image] NULL,
[Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
[Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
[Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Link ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
GO


Here is the stats for the time and IO



 SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 0 ms.
SQL Server parse and compile time:
CPU time = 0 ms, elapsed time = 4 ms.

(0 rows affected)
Table 'Record Link'. Scan count 1, logical reads 1018402, physical reads 3, read-ahead reads 1018391, lob logical reads 0, lob physical reads 0, lob read-ahead reads 0.

(1 row affected)

SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 8234 ms, elapsed time = 12641 ms.


Here is the execution plan:
enter image description here



I would greatly appreciate it if someone could help me create an efficient index for this.



Here is a link to the execution plan:
https://www.brentozar.com/pastetheplan/?id=BkTxCbdN4







sql-server query-performance index-tuning sql-server-2017






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 6 at 10:57









Paul White

52.7k14281456




52.7k14281456










asked Feb 6 at 7:03









BainAnatorBainAnator

214




214












  • How hard is the "no change in the query" restriction? Can you remove the hints?

    – ypercubeᵀᴹ
    Feb 6 at 9:59






  • 2





    As a side note, you really ought to not be still on 2017 RTM - there have been 13 cumulative updates since then. You could also help people reproduce the problem by scripting out indexes and statistics and adding that to your question.

    – Paul White
    Feb 6 at 10:59


















  • How hard is the "no change in the query" restriction? Can you remove the hints?

    – ypercubeᵀᴹ
    Feb 6 at 9:59






  • 2





    As a side note, you really ought to not be still on 2017 RTM - there have been 13 cumulative updates since then. You could also help people reproduce the problem by scripting out indexes and statistics and adding that to your question.

    – Paul White
    Feb 6 at 10:59

















How hard is the "no change in the query" restriction? Can you remove the hints?

– ypercubeᵀᴹ
Feb 6 at 9:59





How hard is the "no change in the query" restriction? Can you remove the hints?

– ypercubeᵀᴹ
Feb 6 at 9:59




2




2





As a side note, you really ought to not be still on 2017 RTM - there have been 13 cumulative updates since then. You could also help people reproduce the problem by scripting out indexes and statistics and adding that to your question.

– Paul White
Feb 6 at 10:59






As a side note, you really ought to not be still on 2017 RTM - there have been 13 cumulative updates since then. You could also help people reproduce the problem by scripting out indexes and statistics and adding that to your question.

– Paul White
Feb 6 at 10:59











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














If you where to go the route of plan guides as @DenisRubashkin mentioned, you could create an 'empty' plan guide to remove the existing hints: OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50).



An example of a plan guide you could use, you might have to change some datatypes.



EXEC sp_create_plan_guide 
@name = N'Guide1',
@stmt = N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',
@type = N'SQL',
@params = '@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',
@hints = NULL;


@hints will override the existing hints, by not specifying any, OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50) is removed and no other hints are used.



In my tests, while my data is different, this index was used



CREATE INDEX IX_Notify_Company_Link_ID
ON [dbo].[Record Link](Notify,Company,[Link ID])
INCLUDE([To User ID]);


This could not be the most optimal index for your dataset! Used solely as a way to show that the plan guide works. YMMV



A seek predicate on both Notify and Company where used.
They are not very selective in my dataset, resulting in many rows read.



Part of the new plan



enter image description here



PasteThePlan



Comment by @PaulWhite




You might find an addition benefit in parameter embedding using OPTION
(RECOMPILE) in the plan guide.




You would have to change the @hints parameter in the plan guide to



 @hints = 'OPTION(RECOMPILE)';


Keep in mind that your query plan will be recompiled each time, but if it is not executed that frequently it should not be a problem.



Plan with option recompile



enter image description here



A better plan was used, with seek predicates on all 3 key colums.



PasteThePlan



Test Query used



SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',N'@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',@0=100,@1 = 99 ,@2 = 'NNNNNNNV',@3 = 'NNNNNNN',@4=1,@5='NNNNNNN1',@6='NNNNNNN2'


Test Data used



CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
[timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
[Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
[Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
[URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
[Type] [int] NOT NULL,
[Note] [image] NULL,
[Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
[User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
[Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
[Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[Link ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @I INT = 0;
WHILE @I <= 10000
BEGIN
INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
(

[Record ID] ,
[URL1] ,
[URL2] ,
[URL3] ,
[URL4] ,
[Description] ,
[Type] ,
[Note] ,
[Created] ,
[User ID] ,
[Company] ,
[Notify] ,
[To User ID] )
VALUES(convert(varbinary(448),'NNNNNNN'),'NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN',@I,'NNNNNNN',GETDATE(),'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)),'NNNNNNN',1,'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)))
SET @I += 1
END
SET NOCOUNT OFF
INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
(

[Record ID] ,
[URL1] ,
[URL2] ,
[URL3] ,
[URL4] ,
[Description] ,
[Type] ,
[Note] ,
[Created] ,
[User ID] ,
[Company] ,
[Notify] ,
[To User ID] )

SELECT
[Record ID] ,
[URL1] ,
[URL2] ,
[URL3] ,
[URL4] ,
[Description] ,
[Type] ,
[Note] ,
[Created] ,
[User ID] ,
[Company] ,
[Notify] ,
[To User ID]
FROM [dbo].[Record Link]
GO 7





share|improve this answer
































    2














    As you have exactly two Companies it could be, I’d go with an index on (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) INCLUDE ([To User ID]). Having Link ID in the key is redundant because of the clustered index key, but I’d leave it in there because of the explicit sorting.



    Hopefully this will produce a plan that has two Index Seeks, with a Merge Join (Concat) operator that’s pulling the data from them.



    You may need to INCLUDE ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID") to avoid the tipping point of lookups, but see how you go.



    Edited:



    I used this test data:



    INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
    (

    [Record ID] ,
    [URL1] ,
    [URL2] ,
    [URL3] ,
    [URL4] ,
    [Description] ,
    [Type] ,
    [Note] ,
    [Created] ,
    [User ID] ,
    [Company] ,
    [Notify] ,
    [To User ID] )
    VALUES(newid(), newid(), newid(),newid(), newid(), newid(),abs(checksum(newid())) % 100, cast(newid() as varbinary(max)), getdate(), newid(), checksum(newid()), abs(checksum(newid())) % 255,newid())
    go 10000


    INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
    (

    [Record ID] ,
    [URL1] ,
    [URL2] ,
    [URL3] ,
    [URL4] ,
    [Description] ,
    [Type] ,
    [Note] ,
    [Created] ,
    [User ID] ,
    [Company] ,
    [Notify] ,
    [To User ID] )
    select [Record ID] ,
    [URL1] ,
    [URL2] ,
    [URL3] ,
    [URL4] ,
    [Description] ,
    [Type] ,
    [Note] ,
    [Created] ,
    [User ID] ,
    [Company] ,
    [Notify] ,
    [To User ID]
    from [record link]
    go 5


    ...and then my index:



    create index ixTest on [Record Link] (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) include ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID")


    And then I queried the data to get some values that would work:



    declare @0 int = 50;
    declare @1 int = 3000;
    declare @2 nvarchar(30) = N'473788597'
    declare @3 nvarchar(30) = N'508414347'
    declare @4 tinyint = 100;
    declare @5 nvarchar(132) = N'E3CB6DFC-8311-4DB4-9735-F2AF90747DCF'
    declare @6 nvarchar(132) = N'Test2'

    SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
    FROM dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
    WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
    ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


    ...and I got the following plan:



    enter image description here



    It basically does a Nested Loop on the two companies. It's not quite as good as I'd like, because there's still a Sort, but it definitely uses the index.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Unfortunately neither of the suggested indexes were used after creating them.

      – BainAnator
      Feb 6 at 8:16


















    1














    I don't think any index will be used instead of the clustered one because of using the OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN option. The option makes the query optimizer use statistics' density instead of its histogram so estimated cardinality will always be big enough so that the optimizer will deside that scanning of the clustered index will be cheaper than such a big number of Key lookup operations.



    If you can't change the query on the client side, maybe using of Plan Guides is your last resort.






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "182"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f228990%2fstruggling-to-create-an-efficient-index-for-this-query%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      If you where to go the route of plan guides as @DenisRubashkin mentioned, you could create an 'empty' plan guide to remove the existing hints: OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50).



      An example of a plan guide you could use, you might have to change some datatypes.



      EXEC sp_create_plan_guide 
      @name = N'Guide1',
      @stmt = N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
      FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
      WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
      ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',
      @type = N'SQL',
      @params = '@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',
      @hints = NULL;


      @hints will override the existing hints, by not specifying any, OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50) is removed and no other hints are used.



      In my tests, while my data is different, this index was used



      CREATE INDEX IX_Notify_Company_Link_ID
      ON [dbo].[Record Link](Notify,Company,[Link ID])
      INCLUDE([To User ID]);


      This could not be the most optimal index for your dataset! Used solely as a way to show that the plan guide works. YMMV



      A seek predicate on both Notify and Company where used.
      They are not very selective in my dataset, resulting in many rows read.



      Part of the new plan



      enter image description here



      PasteThePlan



      Comment by @PaulWhite




      You might find an addition benefit in parameter embedding using OPTION
      (RECOMPILE) in the plan guide.




      You would have to change the @hints parameter in the plan guide to



       @hints = 'OPTION(RECOMPILE)';


      Keep in mind that your query plan will be recompiled each time, but if it is not executed that frequently it should not be a problem.



      Plan with option recompile



      enter image description here



      A better plan was used, with seek predicates on all 3 key colums.



      PasteThePlan



      Test Query used



      SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
      EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
      FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
      WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
      ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',N'@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',@0=100,@1 = 99 ,@2 = 'NNNNNNNV',@3 = 'NNNNNNN',@4=1,@5='NNNNNNN1',@6='NNNNNNN2'


      Test Data used



      CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
      [timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
      [Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
      [Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
      [URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
      [URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
      [URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
      [URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
      [Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
      [Type] [int] NOT NULL,
      [Note] [image] NULL,
      [Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
      [User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
      [Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
      [Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
      [To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
      CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
      (
      [Link ID] ASC
      )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
      ) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
      GO
      SET NOCOUNT ON;
      DECLARE @I INT = 0;
      WHILE @I <= 10000
      BEGIN
      INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
      (

      [Record ID] ,
      [URL1] ,
      [URL2] ,
      [URL3] ,
      [URL4] ,
      [Description] ,
      [Type] ,
      [Note] ,
      [Created] ,
      [User ID] ,
      [Company] ,
      [Notify] ,
      [To User ID] )
      VALUES(convert(varbinary(448),'NNNNNNN'),'NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN',@I,'NNNNNNN',GETDATE(),'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)),'NNNNNNN',1,'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)))
      SET @I += 1
      END
      SET NOCOUNT OFF
      INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
      (

      [Record ID] ,
      [URL1] ,
      [URL2] ,
      [URL3] ,
      [URL4] ,
      [Description] ,
      [Type] ,
      [Note] ,
      [Created] ,
      [User ID] ,
      [Company] ,
      [Notify] ,
      [To User ID] )

      SELECT
      [Record ID] ,
      [URL1] ,
      [URL2] ,
      [URL3] ,
      [URL4] ,
      [Description] ,
      [Type] ,
      [Note] ,
      [Created] ,
      [User ID] ,
      [Company] ,
      [Notify] ,
      [To User ID]
      FROM [dbo].[Record Link]
      GO 7





      share|improve this answer





























        3














        If you where to go the route of plan guides as @DenisRubashkin mentioned, you could create an 'empty' plan guide to remove the existing hints: OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50).



        An example of a plan guide you could use, you might have to change some datatypes.



        EXEC sp_create_plan_guide 
        @name = N'Guide1',
        @stmt = N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
        FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
        WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
        ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',
        @type = N'SQL',
        @params = '@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',
        @hints = NULL;


        @hints will override the existing hints, by not specifying any, OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50) is removed and no other hints are used.



        In my tests, while my data is different, this index was used



        CREATE INDEX IX_Notify_Company_Link_ID
        ON [dbo].[Record Link](Notify,Company,[Link ID])
        INCLUDE([To User ID]);


        This could not be the most optimal index for your dataset! Used solely as a way to show that the plan guide works. YMMV



        A seek predicate on both Notify and Company where used.
        They are not very selective in my dataset, resulting in many rows read.



        Part of the new plan



        enter image description here



        PasteThePlan



        Comment by @PaulWhite




        You might find an addition benefit in parameter embedding using OPTION
        (RECOMPILE) in the plan guide.




        You would have to change the @hints parameter in the plan guide to



         @hints = 'OPTION(RECOMPILE)';


        Keep in mind that your query plan will be recompiled each time, but if it is not executed that frequently it should not be a problem.



        Plan with option recompile



        enter image description here



        A better plan was used, with seek predicates on all 3 key colums.



        PasteThePlan



        Test Query used



        SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
        EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
        FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
        WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
        ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',N'@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',@0=100,@1 = 99 ,@2 = 'NNNNNNNV',@3 = 'NNNNNNN',@4=1,@5='NNNNNNN1',@6='NNNNNNN2'


        Test Data used



        CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
        [timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
        [Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
        [Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
        [URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
        [URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
        [URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
        [URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
        [Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
        [Type] [int] NOT NULL,
        [Note] [image] NULL,
        [Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
        [User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
        [Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
        [Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
        [To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
        CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
        (
        [Link ID] ASC
        )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
        ) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
        GO
        SET NOCOUNT ON;
        DECLARE @I INT = 0;
        WHILE @I <= 10000
        BEGIN
        INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
        (

        [Record ID] ,
        [URL1] ,
        [URL2] ,
        [URL3] ,
        [URL4] ,
        [Description] ,
        [Type] ,
        [Note] ,
        [Created] ,
        [User ID] ,
        [Company] ,
        [Notify] ,
        [To User ID] )
        VALUES(convert(varbinary(448),'NNNNNNN'),'NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN',@I,'NNNNNNN',GETDATE(),'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)),'NNNNNNN',1,'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)))
        SET @I += 1
        END
        SET NOCOUNT OFF
        INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
        (

        [Record ID] ,
        [URL1] ,
        [URL2] ,
        [URL3] ,
        [URL4] ,
        [Description] ,
        [Type] ,
        [Note] ,
        [Created] ,
        [User ID] ,
        [Company] ,
        [Notify] ,
        [To User ID] )

        SELECT
        [Record ID] ,
        [URL1] ,
        [URL2] ,
        [URL3] ,
        [URL4] ,
        [Description] ,
        [Type] ,
        [Note] ,
        [Created] ,
        [User ID] ,
        [Company] ,
        [Notify] ,
        [To User ID]
        FROM [dbo].[Record Link]
        GO 7





        share|improve this answer



























          3












          3








          3







          If you where to go the route of plan guides as @DenisRubashkin mentioned, you could create an 'empty' plan guide to remove the existing hints: OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50).



          An example of a plan guide you could use, you might have to change some datatypes.



          EXEC sp_create_plan_guide 
          @name = N'Guide1',
          @stmt = N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
          FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
          WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
          ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',
          @type = N'SQL',
          @params = '@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',
          @hints = NULL;


          @hints will override the existing hints, by not specifying any, OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50) is removed and no other hints are used.



          In my tests, while my data is different, this index was used



          CREATE INDEX IX_Notify_Company_Link_ID
          ON [dbo].[Record Link](Notify,Company,[Link ID])
          INCLUDE([To User ID]);


          This could not be the most optimal index for your dataset! Used solely as a way to show that the plan guide works. YMMV



          A seek predicate on both Notify and Company where used.
          They are not very selective in my dataset, resulting in many rows read.



          Part of the new plan



          enter image description here



          PasteThePlan



          Comment by @PaulWhite




          You might find an addition benefit in parameter embedding using OPTION
          (RECOMPILE) in the plan guide.




          You would have to change the @hints parameter in the plan guide to



           @hints = 'OPTION(RECOMPILE)';


          Keep in mind that your query plan will be recompiled each time, but if it is not executed that frequently it should not be a problem.



          Plan with option recompile



          enter image description here



          A better plan was used, with seek predicates on all 3 key colums.



          PasteThePlan



          Test Query used



          SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
          EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
          FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
          WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
          ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',N'@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',@0=100,@1 = 99 ,@2 = 'NNNNNNNV',@3 = 'NNNNNNN',@4=1,@5='NNNNNNN1',@6='NNNNNNN2'


          Test Data used



          CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
          [timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
          [Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
          [Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
          [URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [Type] [int] NOT NULL,
          [Note] [image] NULL,
          [Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
          [User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
          [Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
          [Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
          [To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
          CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
          (
          [Link ID] ASC
          )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
          ) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
          GO
          SET NOCOUNT ON;
          DECLARE @I INT = 0;
          WHILE @I <= 10000
          BEGIN
          INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
          (

          [Record ID] ,
          [URL1] ,
          [URL2] ,
          [URL3] ,
          [URL4] ,
          [Description] ,
          [Type] ,
          [Note] ,
          [Created] ,
          [User ID] ,
          [Company] ,
          [Notify] ,
          [To User ID] )
          VALUES(convert(varbinary(448),'NNNNNNN'),'NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN',@I,'NNNNNNN',GETDATE(),'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)),'NNNNNNN',1,'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)))
          SET @I += 1
          END
          SET NOCOUNT OFF
          INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
          (

          [Record ID] ,
          [URL1] ,
          [URL2] ,
          [URL3] ,
          [URL4] ,
          [Description] ,
          [Type] ,
          [Note] ,
          [Created] ,
          [User ID] ,
          [Company] ,
          [Notify] ,
          [To User ID] )

          SELECT
          [Record ID] ,
          [URL1] ,
          [URL2] ,
          [URL3] ,
          [URL4] ,
          [Description] ,
          [Type] ,
          [Note] ,
          [Created] ,
          [User ID] ,
          [Company] ,
          [Notify] ,
          [To User ID]
          FROM [dbo].[Record Link]
          GO 7





          share|improve this answer















          If you where to go the route of plan guides as @DenisRubashkin mentioned, you could create an 'empty' plan guide to remove the existing hints: OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50).



          An example of a plan guide you could use, you might have to change some datatypes.



          EXEC sp_create_plan_guide 
          @name = N'Guide1',
          @stmt = N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
          FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
          WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
          ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',
          @type = N'SQL',
          @params = '@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',
          @hints = NULL;


          @hints will override the existing hints, by not specifying any, OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50) is removed and no other hints are used.



          In my tests, while my data is different, this index was used



          CREATE INDEX IX_Notify_Company_Link_ID
          ON [dbo].[Record Link](Notify,Company,[Link ID])
          INCLUDE([To User ID]);


          This could not be the most optimal index for your dataset! Used solely as a way to show that the plan guide works. YMMV



          A seek predicate on both Notify and Company where used.
          They are not very selective in my dataset, resulting in many rows read.



          Part of the new plan



          enter image description here



          PasteThePlan



          Comment by @PaulWhite




          You might find an addition benefit in parameter embedding using OPTION
          (RECOMPILE) in the plan guide.




          You would have to change the @hints parameter in the plan guide to



           @hints = 'OPTION(RECOMPILE)';


          Keep in mind that your query plan will be recompiled each time, but if it is not executed that frequently it should not be a problem.



          Plan with option recompile



          enter image description here



          A better plan was used, with seek predicates on all 3 key colums.



          PasteThePlan



          Test Query used



          SET STATISTICS IO, TIME ON;
          EXEC SP_EXECUTESQL N'SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
          FROM test.dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
          WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
          ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)',N'@0 int, @1 int, @2 [nvarchar](30), @3 [nvarchar](30), @4 tinyint, @5 nvarchar(264),@6 nvarchar(264)',@0=100,@1 = 99 ,@2 = 'NNNNNNNV',@3 = 'NNNNNNN',@4=1,@5='NNNNNNN1',@6='NNNNNNN2'


          Test Data used



          CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Record Link](
          [timestamp] [timestamp] NOT NULL,
          [Link ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT FOR REPLICATION NOT NULL,
          [Record ID] [varbinary](448) NOT NULL,
          [URL1] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [URL2] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [URL3] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [URL4] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [Description] [nvarchar](250) NOT NULL,
          [Type] [int] NOT NULL,
          [Note] [image] NULL,
          [Created] [datetime] NOT NULL,
          [User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
          [Company] [nvarchar](30) NOT NULL,
          [Notify] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
          [To User ID] [nvarchar](132) NOT NULL,
          CONSTRAINT [Record Link$0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
          (
          [Link ID] ASC
          )WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON, FILLFACTOR = 80) ON [PRIMARY]
          ) ON [PRIMARY] TEXTIMAGE_ON [PRIMARY]
          GO
          SET NOCOUNT ON;
          DECLARE @I INT = 0;
          WHILE @I <= 10000
          BEGIN
          INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
          (

          [Record ID] ,
          [URL1] ,
          [URL2] ,
          [URL3] ,
          [URL4] ,
          [Description] ,
          [Type] ,
          [Note] ,
          [Created] ,
          [User ID] ,
          [Company] ,
          [Notify] ,
          [To User ID] )
          VALUES(convert(varbinary(448),'NNNNNNN'),'NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN','NNNNNNN',@I,'NNNNNNN',GETDATE(),'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)),'NNNNNNN',1,'NNNNNNN'+CAST(@i as nvarchar(10)))
          SET @I += 1
          END
          SET NOCOUNT OFF
          INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
          (

          [Record ID] ,
          [URL1] ,
          [URL2] ,
          [URL3] ,
          [URL4] ,
          [Description] ,
          [Type] ,
          [Note] ,
          [Created] ,
          [User ID] ,
          [Company] ,
          [Notify] ,
          [To User ID] )

          SELECT
          [Record ID] ,
          [URL1] ,
          [URL2] ,
          [URL3] ,
          [URL4] ,
          [Description] ,
          [Type] ,
          [Note] ,
          [Created] ,
          [User ID] ,
          [Company] ,
          [Notify] ,
          [To User ID]
          FROM [dbo].[Record Link]
          GO 7






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 6 at 11:21

























          answered Feb 6 at 10:34









          Randi VertongenRandi Vertongen

          2,993721




          2,993721























              2














              As you have exactly two Companies it could be, I’d go with an index on (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) INCLUDE ([To User ID]). Having Link ID in the key is redundant because of the clustered index key, but I’d leave it in there because of the explicit sorting.



              Hopefully this will produce a plan that has two Index Seeks, with a Merge Join (Concat) operator that’s pulling the data from them.



              You may need to INCLUDE ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID") to avoid the tipping point of lookups, but see how you go.



              Edited:



              I used this test data:



              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              VALUES(newid(), newid(), newid(),newid(), newid(), newid(),abs(checksum(newid())) % 100, cast(newid() as varbinary(max)), getdate(), newid(), checksum(newid()), abs(checksum(newid())) % 255,newid())
              go 10000


              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              select [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID]
              from [record link]
              go 5


              ...and then my index:



              create index ixTest on [Record Link] (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) include ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID")


              And then I queried the data to get some values that would work:



              declare @0 int = 50;
              declare @1 int = 3000;
              declare @2 nvarchar(30) = N'473788597'
              declare @3 nvarchar(30) = N'508414347'
              declare @4 tinyint = 100;
              declare @5 nvarchar(132) = N'E3CB6DFC-8311-4DB4-9735-F2AF90747DCF'
              declare @6 nvarchar(132) = N'Test2'

              SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
              FROM dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
              WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
              ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


              ...and I got the following plan:



              enter image description here



              It basically does a Nested Loop on the two companies. It's not quite as good as I'd like, because there's still a Sort, but it definitely uses the index.






              share|improve this answer

























              • Unfortunately neither of the suggested indexes were used after creating them.

                – BainAnator
                Feb 6 at 8:16















              2














              As you have exactly two Companies it could be, I’d go with an index on (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) INCLUDE ([To User ID]). Having Link ID in the key is redundant because of the clustered index key, but I’d leave it in there because of the explicit sorting.



              Hopefully this will produce a plan that has two Index Seeks, with a Merge Join (Concat) operator that’s pulling the data from them.



              You may need to INCLUDE ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID") to avoid the tipping point of lookups, but see how you go.



              Edited:



              I used this test data:



              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              VALUES(newid(), newid(), newid(),newid(), newid(), newid(),abs(checksum(newid())) % 100, cast(newid() as varbinary(max)), getdate(), newid(), checksum(newid()), abs(checksum(newid())) % 255,newid())
              go 10000


              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              select [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID]
              from [record link]
              go 5


              ...and then my index:



              create index ixTest on [Record Link] (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) include ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID")


              And then I queried the data to get some values that would work:



              declare @0 int = 50;
              declare @1 int = 3000;
              declare @2 nvarchar(30) = N'473788597'
              declare @3 nvarchar(30) = N'508414347'
              declare @4 tinyint = 100;
              declare @5 nvarchar(132) = N'E3CB6DFC-8311-4DB4-9735-F2AF90747DCF'
              declare @6 nvarchar(132) = N'Test2'

              SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
              FROM dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
              WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
              ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


              ...and I got the following plan:



              enter image description here



              It basically does a Nested Loop on the two companies. It's not quite as good as I'd like, because there's still a Sort, but it definitely uses the index.






              share|improve this answer

























              • Unfortunately neither of the suggested indexes were used after creating them.

                – BainAnator
                Feb 6 at 8:16













              2












              2








              2







              As you have exactly two Companies it could be, I’d go with an index on (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) INCLUDE ([To User ID]). Having Link ID in the key is redundant because of the clustered index key, but I’d leave it in there because of the explicit sorting.



              Hopefully this will produce a plan that has two Index Seeks, with a Merge Join (Concat) operator that’s pulling the data from them.



              You may need to INCLUDE ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID") to avoid the tipping point of lookups, but see how you go.



              Edited:



              I used this test data:



              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              VALUES(newid(), newid(), newid(),newid(), newid(), newid(),abs(checksum(newid())) % 100, cast(newid() as varbinary(max)), getdate(), newid(), checksum(newid()), abs(checksum(newid())) % 255,newid())
              go 10000


              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              select [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID]
              from [record link]
              go 5


              ...and then my index:



              create index ixTest on [Record Link] (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) include ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID")


              And then I queried the data to get some values that would work:



              declare @0 int = 50;
              declare @1 int = 3000;
              declare @2 nvarchar(30) = N'473788597'
              declare @3 nvarchar(30) = N'508414347'
              declare @4 tinyint = 100;
              declare @5 nvarchar(132) = N'E3CB6DFC-8311-4DB4-9735-F2AF90747DCF'
              declare @6 nvarchar(132) = N'Test2'

              SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
              FROM dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
              WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
              ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


              ...and I got the following plan:



              enter image description here



              It basically does a Nested Loop on the two companies. It's not quite as good as I'd like, because there's still a Sort, but it definitely uses the index.






              share|improve this answer















              As you have exactly two Companies it could be, I’d go with an index on (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) INCLUDE ([To User ID]). Having Link ID in the key is redundant because of the clustered index key, but I’d leave it in there because of the explicit sorting.



              Hopefully this will produce a plan that has two Index Seeks, with a Merge Join (Concat) operator that’s pulling the data from them.



              You may need to INCLUDE ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID") to avoid the tipping point of lookups, but see how you go.



              Edited:



              I used this test data:



              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              VALUES(newid(), newid(), newid(),newid(), newid(), newid(),abs(checksum(newid())) % 100, cast(newid() as varbinary(max)), getdate(), newid(), checksum(newid()), abs(checksum(newid())) % 255,newid())
              go 10000


              INSERT INTO [dbo].[Record Link]
              (

              [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID] )
              select [Record ID] ,
              [URL1] ,
              [URL2] ,
              [URL3] ,
              [URL4] ,
              [Description] ,
              [Type] ,
              [Note] ,
              [Created] ,
              [User ID] ,
              [Company] ,
              [Notify] ,
              [To User ID]
              from [record link]
              go 5


              ...and then my index:



              create index ixTest on [Record Link] (Company, Notify, [Link ID]) include ([To User ID], "timestamp","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID")


              And then I queried the data to get some values that would work:



              declare @0 int = 50;
              declare @1 int = 3000;
              declare @2 nvarchar(30) = N'473788597'
              declare @3 nvarchar(30) = N'508414347'
              declare @4 tinyint = 100;
              declare @5 nvarchar(132) = N'E3CB6DFC-8311-4DB4-9735-F2AF90747DCF'
              declare @6 nvarchar(132) = N'Test2'

              SELECT TOP (@0) "timestamp","Link ID","Record ID","URL1","URL2","URL3","URL4","Description","Type","Created","User ID","Company","Notify","To User ID"
              FROM dbo."Record Link" WITH(READUNCOMMITTED)
              WHERE ("Link ID">@1 AND (("Company"=@2 OR "Company"=@3) AND "Notify"=@4 AND ("To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @5 OR "To User ID" COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AI LIKE @6)))
              ORDER BY "Link ID" ASC OPTION(OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN, FAST 50)


              ...and I got the following plan:



              enter image description here



              It basically does a Nested Loop on the two companies. It's not quite as good as I'd like, because there's still a Sort, but it definitely uses the index.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Feb 6 at 11:15

























              answered Feb 6 at 8:04









              Rob FarleyRob Farley

              13.9k12549




              13.9k12549












              • Unfortunately neither of the suggested indexes were used after creating them.

                – BainAnator
                Feb 6 at 8:16

















              • Unfortunately neither of the suggested indexes were used after creating them.

                – BainAnator
                Feb 6 at 8:16
















              Unfortunately neither of the suggested indexes were used after creating them.

              – BainAnator
              Feb 6 at 8:16





              Unfortunately neither of the suggested indexes were used after creating them.

              – BainAnator
              Feb 6 at 8:16











              1














              I don't think any index will be used instead of the clustered one because of using the OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN option. The option makes the query optimizer use statistics' density instead of its histogram so estimated cardinality will always be big enough so that the optimizer will deside that scanning of the clustered index will be cheaper than such a big number of Key lookup operations.



              If you can't change the query on the client side, maybe using of Plan Guides is your last resort.






              share|improve this answer



























                1














                I don't think any index will be used instead of the clustered one because of using the OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN option. The option makes the query optimizer use statistics' density instead of its histogram so estimated cardinality will always be big enough so that the optimizer will deside that scanning of the clustered index will be cheaper than such a big number of Key lookup operations.



                If you can't change the query on the client side, maybe using of Plan Guides is your last resort.






                share|improve this answer

























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  I don't think any index will be used instead of the clustered one because of using the OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN option. The option makes the query optimizer use statistics' density instead of its histogram so estimated cardinality will always be big enough so that the optimizer will deside that scanning of the clustered index will be cheaper than such a big number of Key lookup operations.



                  If you can't change the query on the client side, maybe using of Plan Guides is your last resort.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I don't think any index will be used instead of the clustered one because of using the OPTIMIZE for UNKNOWN option. The option makes the query optimizer use statistics' density instead of its histogram so estimated cardinality will always be big enough so that the optimizer will deside that scanning of the clustered index will be cheaper than such a big number of Key lookup operations.



                  If you can't change the query on the client side, maybe using of Plan Guides is your last resort.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 6 at 9:01









                  Denis RubashkinDenis Rubashkin

                  5587




                  5587



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f228990%2fstruggling-to-create-an-efficient-index-for-this-query%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown






                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Bahrain

                      Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay