“It's stressful this managing lark, …” meaning

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












4
















"Sorry I was a bit short with you earlier, Potter," she said abruptly. "It's stressful this managing lark, you know, I'm starting to think I was a bit hard on Wood sometimes." She was watching Ron over the rim of her goblet with a slight frown on her face.



Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix




What does "It's stressful this managing lark" mean? Does it mean this managing lark is stressful?










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    The structure of this very sentence is analyzed in this book.

    – Alex
    Feb 6 at 6:19












  • Yes, it means 'this managing lark is stressful'.

    – Katinka Hesselink
    Feb 6 at 12:22






  • 1





    The book linked by Alex doesn't mention it so I assume I'm incorrect but I would have thought a comma was required after stressful. If I was speaking I would always pause slightly between the two clauses. I don't think I've ever had cause to write such a sentence but if I did I would replicate the pause with a comma.

    – Eric Nolan
    Feb 6 at 14:00















4
















"Sorry I was a bit short with you earlier, Potter," she said abruptly. "It's stressful this managing lark, you know, I'm starting to think I was a bit hard on Wood sometimes." She was watching Ron over the rim of her goblet with a slight frown on her face.



Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix




What does "It's stressful this managing lark" mean? Does it mean this managing lark is stressful?










share|improve this question

















  • 2





    The structure of this very sentence is analyzed in this book.

    – Alex
    Feb 6 at 6:19












  • Yes, it means 'this managing lark is stressful'.

    – Katinka Hesselink
    Feb 6 at 12:22






  • 1





    The book linked by Alex doesn't mention it so I assume I'm incorrect but I would have thought a comma was required after stressful. If I was speaking I would always pause slightly between the two clauses. I don't think I've ever had cause to write such a sentence but if I did I would replicate the pause with a comma.

    – Eric Nolan
    Feb 6 at 14:00













4












4








4









"Sorry I was a bit short with you earlier, Potter," she said abruptly. "It's stressful this managing lark, you know, I'm starting to think I was a bit hard on Wood sometimes." She was watching Ron over the rim of her goblet with a slight frown on her face.



Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix




What does "It's stressful this managing lark" mean? Does it mean this managing lark is stressful?










share|improve this question















"Sorry I was a bit short with you earlier, Potter," she said abruptly. "It's stressful this managing lark, you know, I'm starting to think I was a bit hard on Wood sometimes." She was watching Ron over the rim of her goblet with a slight frown on her face.



Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix




What does "It's stressful this managing lark" mean? Does it mean this managing lark is stressful?







meaning-in-context






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 6 at 5:47









dandan

5,29222676




5,29222676







  • 2





    The structure of this very sentence is analyzed in this book.

    – Alex
    Feb 6 at 6:19












  • Yes, it means 'this managing lark is stressful'.

    – Katinka Hesselink
    Feb 6 at 12:22






  • 1





    The book linked by Alex doesn't mention it so I assume I'm incorrect but I would have thought a comma was required after stressful. If I was speaking I would always pause slightly between the two clauses. I don't think I've ever had cause to write such a sentence but if I did I would replicate the pause with a comma.

    – Eric Nolan
    Feb 6 at 14:00












  • 2





    The structure of this very sentence is analyzed in this book.

    – Alex
    Feb 6 at 6:19












  • Yes, it means 'this managing lark is stressful'.

    – Katinka Hesselink
    Feb 6 at 12:22






  • 1





    The book linked by Alex doesn't mention it so I assume I'm incorrect but I would have thought a comma was required after stressful. If I was speaking I would always pause slightly between the two clauses. I don't think I've ever had cause to write such a sentence but if I did I would replicate the pause with a comma.

    – Eric Nolan
    Feb 6 at 14:00







2




2





The structure of this very sentence is analyzed in this book.

– Alex
Feb 6 at 6:19






The structure of this very sentence is analyzed in this book.

– Alex
Feb 6 at 6:19














Yes, it means 'this managing lark is stressful'.

– Katinka Hesselink
Feb 6 at 12:22





Yes, it means 'this managing lark is stressful'.

– Katinka Hesselink
Feb 6 at 12:22




1




1





The book linked by Alex doesn't mention it so I assume I'm incorrect but I would have thought a comma was required after stressful. If I was speaking I would always pause slightly between the two clauses. I don't think I've ever had cause to write such a sentence but if I did I would replicate the pause with a comma.

– Eric Nolan
Feb 6 at 14:00





The book linked by Alex doesn't mention it so I assume I'm incorrect but I would have thought a comma was required after stressful. If I was speaking I would always pause slightly between the two clauses. I don't think I've ever had cause to write such a sentence but if I did I would replicate the pause with a comma.

– Eric Nolan
Feb 6 at 14:00










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















5














I think it's an epitome of something called extraposed clause as in such cases, the dummy 'it' leads the sentence.



Let me try an example where clause is used as a subject.




That the restaurants are closed on Sundays is nonsensical.




Here, if you want to make it extraposed, you write -




It is nonsensical that the restaurants are closed on Sundays.




A bit closer to your example can be found here.




What they are proposing to do is horrifying.




but then, extraposing would be...




It's horrifying what they are proposing to do.




So, yes, it means what you got it!






share|improve this answer























  • But "this managing lark" is not a clause.

    – dan
    Feb 6 at 6:33











  • @dan that's what the analysis on that sentence says in the book as stated in the comment of Alex. There it says that the noun phrase takes a different form. Check the link.

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 8:35






  • 2





    The passage to which Alex's comment linked indicates that the sentence in the question could be classified as a dislocation rather than an extraposed clause. What I take from the book is that there is not universal agreement on this classification.

    – David K
    Feb 6 at 14:09











  • @DavidK true that! In fact, I was confused when I heard it for the first time. Luckily, a few English teachers and I were discussing on this topic a week back. That's why I remembered it!

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 16:38










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195565%2fits-stressful-this-managing-lark-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














I think it's an epitome of something called extraposed clause as in such cases, the dummy 'it' leads the sentence.



Let me try an example where clause is used as a subject.




That the restaurants are closed on Sundays is nonsensical.




Here, if you want to make it extraposed, you write -




It is nonsensical that the restaurants are closed on Sundays.




A bit closer to your example can be found here.




What they are proposing to do is horrifying.




but then, extraposing would be...




It's horrifying what they are proposing to do.




So, yes, it means what you got it!






share|improve this answer























  • But "this managing lark" is not a clause.

    – dan
    Feb 6 at 6:33











  • @dan that's what the analysis on that sentence says in the book as stated in the comment of Alex. There it says that the noun phrase takes a different form. Check the link.

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 8:35






  • 2





    The passage to which Alex's comment linked indicates that the sentence in the question could be classified as a dislocation rather than an extraposed clause. What I take from the book is that there is not universal agreement on this classification.

    – David K
    Feb 6 at 14:09











  • @DavidK true that! In fact, I was confused when I heard it for the first time. Luckily, a few English teachers and I were discussing on this topic a week back. That's why I remembered it!

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 16:38















5














I think it's an epitome of something called extraposed clause as in such cases, the dummy 'it' leads the sentence.



Let me try an example where clause is used as a subject.




That the restaurants are closed on Sundays is nonsensical.




Here, if you want to make it extraposed, you write -




It is nonsensical that the restaurants are closed on Sundays.




A bit closer to your example can be found here.




What they are proposing to do is horrifying.




but then, extraposing would be...




It's horrifying what they are proposing to do.




So, yes, it means what you got it!






share|improve this answer























  • But "this managing lark" is not a clause.

    – dan
    Feb 6 at 6:33











  • @dan that's what the analysis on that sentence says in the book as stated in the comment of Alex. There it says that the noun phrase takes a different form. Check the link.

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 8:35






  • 2





    The passage to which Alex's comment linked indicates that the sentence in the question could be classified as a dislocation rather than an extraposed clause. What I take from the book is that there is not universal agreement on this classification.

    – David K
    Feb 6 at 14:09











  • @DavidK true that! In fact, I was confused when I heard it for the first time. Luckily, a few English teachers and I were discussing on this topic a week back. That's why I remembered it!

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 16:38













5












5








5







I think it's an epitome of something called extraposed clause as in such cases, the dummy 'it' leads the sentence.



Let me try an example where clause is used as a subject.




That the restaurants are closed on Sundays is nonsensical.




Here, if you want to make it extraposed, you write -




It is nonsensical that the restaurants are closed on Sundays.




A bit closer to your example can be found here.




What they are proposing to do is horrifying.




but then, extraposing would be...




It's horrifying what they are proposing to do.




So, yes, it means what you got it!






share|improve this answer













I think it's an epitome of something called extraposed clause as in such cases, the dummy 'it' leads the sentence.



Let me try an example where clause is used as a subject.




That the restaurants are closed on Sundays is nonsensical.




Here, if you want to make it extraposed, you write -




It is nonsensical that the restaurants are closed on Sundays.




A bit closer to your example can be found here.




What they are proposing to do is horrifying.




but then, extraposing would be...




It's horrifying what they are proposing to do.




So, yes, it means what you got it!







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Feb 6 at 6:16









Maulik VMaulik V

51.8k67214392




51.8k67214392












  • But "this managing lark" is not a clause.

    – dan
    Feb 6 at 6:33











  • @dan that's what the analysis on that sentence says in the book as stated in the comment of Alex. There it says that the noun phrase takes a different form. Check the link.

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 8:35






  • 2





    The passage to which Alex's comment linked indicates that the sentence in the question could be classified as a dislocation rather than an extraposed clause. What I take from the book is that there is not universal agreement on this classification.

    – David K
    Feb 6 at 14:09











  • @DavidK true that! In fact, I was confused when I heard it for the first time. Luckily, a few English teachers and I were discussing on this topic a week back. That's why I remembered it!

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 16:38

















  • But "this managing lark" is not a clause.

    – dan
    Feb 6 at 6:33











  • @dan that's what the analysis on that sentence says in the book as stated in the comment of Alex. There it says that the noun phrase takes a different form. Check the link.

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 8:35






  • 2





    The passage to which Alex's comment linked indicates that the sentence in the question could be classified as a dislocation rather than an extraposed clause. What I take from the book is that there is not universal agreement on this classification.

    – David K
    Feb 6 at 14:09











  • @DavidK true that! In fact, I was confused when I heard it for the first time. Luckily, a few English teachers and I were discussing on this topic a week back. That's why I remembered it!

    – Maulik V
    Feb 6 at 16:38
















But "this managing lark" is not a clause.

– dan
Feb 6 at 6:33





But "this managing lark" is not a clause.

– dan
Feb 6 at 6:33













@dan that's what the analysis on that sentence says in the book as stated in the comment of Alex. There it says that the noun phrase takes a different form. Check the link.

– Maulik V
Feb 6 at 8:35





@dan that's what the analysis on that sentence says in the book as stated in the comment of Alex. There it says that the noun phrase takes a different form. Check the link.

– Maulik V
Feb 6 at 8:35




2




2





The passage to which Alex's comment linked indicates that the sentence in the question could be classified as a dislocation rather than an extraposed clause. What I take from the book is that there is not universal agreement on this classification.

– David K
Feb 6 at 14:09





The passage to which Alex's comment linked indicates that the sentence in the question could be classified as a dislocation rather than an extraposed clause. What I take from the book is that there is not universal agreement on this classification.

– David K
Feb 6 at 14:09













@DavidK true that! In fact, I was confused when I heard it for the first time. Luckily, a few English teachers and I were discussing on this topic a week back. That's why I remembered it!

– Maulik V
Feb 6 at 16:38





@DavidK true that! In fact, I was confused when I heard it for the first time. Luckily, a few English teachers and I were discussing on this topic a week back. That's why I remembered it!

– Maulik V
Feb 6 at 16:38

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f195565%2fits-stressful-this-managing-lark-meaning%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay