Chainsaw airplane: Feasibility study

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












18












$begingroup$


In my dream I have been chased by a plane which had chainsaw blades instead of wings. That woke up my inner worldbuilder and instead being terrified, I started to wonder if something is even possible. So I summon you, my fellow Worldbuilders to help me with this:



Design an airplane which uses chainsaws to propel itself



  • No magic

  • Ideally it should use only chainsaw to lift and steer

  • Should be able to carry at least one person

  • Ideally, the saws itself should be also capable to cut something without damaging the plane

  • End goal is to this plane being able to cut a person in half without crashing and/or damaging itself

Yes, the plane itself serves for a horror story, so worst case scenario, I could always use some magic and/or handwavium, but still ... Is it possible to have a plane like that?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If I had dreamed about that plane I would have probably opted for lighter dinners... but that wouldn't have been a good worldbuilding question.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 22 at 13:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch I have been fighting cold last week, so I had fevers. I always have such weird dreams when having fever hallucinations :)
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Janicek
    Jan 22 at 13:44






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    OK, just to be clear - you are talking about a vehicle that flies - an airplane, right? It's not a plane in the mathematical sense or even "another plane of existence" (which might mean "alternative world)
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    Jan 22 at 14:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not quite what you want but a step in the right direction is this chainsaw drone. youtube.com/watch?v=6Viwwetf0gU&feature=youtu.be&t=82
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    Jan 22 at 14:44






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Now this was a dream I never saw coming.
    $endgroup$
    – Andon
    Jan 22 at 17:21















18












$begingroup$


In my dream I have been chased by a plane which had chainsaw blades instead of wings. That woke up my inner worldbuilder and instead being terrified, I started to wonder if something is even possible. So I summon you, my fellow Worldbuilders to help me with this:



Design an airplane which uses chainsaws to propel itself



  • No magic

  • Ideally it should use only chainsaw to lift and steer

  • Should be able to carry at least one person

  • Ideally, the saws itself should be also capable to cut something without damaging the plane

  • End goal is to this plane being able to cut a person in half without crashing and/or damaging itself

Yes, the plane itself serves for a horror story, so worst case scenario, I could always use some magic and/or handwavium, but still ... Is it possible to have a plane like that?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If I had dreamed about that plane I would have probably opted for lighter dinners... but that wouldn't have been a good worldbuilding question.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 22 at 13:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch I have been fighting cold last week, so I had fevers. I always have such weird dreams when having fever hallucinations :)
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Janicek
    Jan 22 at 13:44






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    OK, just to be clear - you are talking about a vehicle that flies - an airplane, right? It's not a plane in the mathematical sense or even "another plane of existence" (which might mean "alternative world)
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    Jan 22 at 14:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not quite what you want but a step in the right direction is this chainsaw drone. youtube.com/watch?v=6Viwwetf0gU&feature=youtu.be&t=82
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    Jan 22 at 14:44






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Now this was a dream I never saw coming.
    $endgroup$
    – Andon
    Jan 22 at 17:21













18












18








18


5



$begingroup$


In my dream I have been chased by a plane which had chainsaw blades instead of wings. That woke up my inner worldbuilder and instead being terrified, I started to wonder if something is even possible. So I summon you, my fellow Worldbuilders to help me with this:



Design an airplane which uses chainsaws to propel itself



  • No magic

  • Ideally it should use only chainsaw to lift and steer

  • Should be able to carry at least one person

  • Ideally, the saws itself should be also capable to cut something without damaging the plane

  • End goal is to this plane being able to cut a person in half without crashing and/or damaging itself

Yes, the plane itself serves for a horror story, so worst case scenario, I could always use some magic and/or handwavium, but still ... Is it possible to have a plane like that?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




In my dream I have been chased by a plane which had chainsaw blades instead of wings. That woke up my inner worldbuilder and instead being terrified, I started to wonder if something is even possible. So I summon you, my fellow Worldbuilders to help me with this:



Design an airplane which uses chainsaws to propel itself



  • No magic

  • Ideally it should use only chainsaw to lift and steer

  • Should be able to carry at least one person

  • Ideally, the saws itself should be also capable to cut something without damaging the plane

  • End goal is to this plane being able to cut a person in half without crashing and/or damaging itself

Yes, the plane itself serves for a horror story, so worst case scenario, I could always use some magic and/or handwavium, but still ... Is it possible to have a plane like that?







science-based reality-check weapons aircraft






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 22 at 15:21









Cyn

7,47611240




7,47611240










asked Jan 22 at 13:38









Pavel JanicekPavel Janicek

29.7k23128209




29.7k23128209







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If I had dreamed about that plane I would have probably opted for lighter dinners... but that wouldn't have been a good worldbuilding question.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 22 at 13:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch I have been fighting cold last week, so I had fevers. I always have such weird dreams when having fever hallucinations :)
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Janicek
    Jan 22 at 13:44






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    OK, just to be clear - you are talking about a vehicle that flies - an airplane, right? It's not a plane in the mathematical sense or even "another plane of existence" (which might mean "alternative world)
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    Jan 22 at 14:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not quite what you want but a step in the right direction is this chainsaw drone. youtube.com/watch?v=6Viwwetf0gU&feature=youtu.be&t=82
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    Jan 22 at 14:44






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Now this was a dream I never saw coming.
    $endgroup$
    – Andon
    Jan 22 at 17:21












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    If I had dreamed about that plane I would have probably opted for lighter dinners... but that wouldn't have been a good worldbuilding question.
    $endgroup$
    – L.Dutch
    Jan 22 at 13:42






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    @L.Dutch I have been fighting cold last week, so I had fevers. I always have such weird dreams when having fever hallucinations :)
    $endgroup$
    – Pavel Janicek
    Jan 22 at 13:44






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    OK, just to be clear - you are talking about a vehicle that flies - an airplane, right? It's not a plane in the mathematical sense or even "another plane of existence" (which might mean "alternative world)
    $endgroup$
    – VLAZ
    Jan 22 at 14:07






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    Not quite what you want but a step in the right direction is this chainsaw drone. youtube.com/watch?v=6Viwwetf0gU&feature=youtu.be&t=82
    $endgroup$
    – chasly from UK
    Jan 22 at 14:44






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    Now this was a dream I never saw coming.
    $endgroup$
    – Andon
    Jan 22 at 17:21







2




2




$begingroup$
If I had dreamed about that plane I would have probably opted for lighter dinners... but that wouldn't have been a good worldbuilding question.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Jan 22 at 13:42




$begingroup$
If I had dreamed about that plane I would have probably opted for lighter dinners... but that wouldn't have been a good worldbuilding question.
$endgroup$
– L.Dutch
Jan 22 at 13:42




3




3




$begingroup$
@L.Dutch I have been fighting cold last week, so I had fevers. I always have such weird dreams when having fever hallucinations :)
$endgroup$
– Pavel Janicek
Jan 22 at 13:44




$begingroup$
@L.Dutch I have been fighting cold last week, so I had fevers. I always have such weird dreams when having fever hallucinations :)
$endgroup$
– Pavel Janicek
Jan 22 at 13:44




4




4




$begingroup$
OK, just to be clear - you are talking about a vehicle that flies - an airplane, right? It's not a plane in the mathematical sense or even "another plane of existence" (which might mean "alternative world)
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jan 22 at 14:07




$begingroup$
OK, just to be clear - you are talking about a vehicle that flies - an airplane, right? It's not a plane in the mathematical sense or even "another plane of existence" (which might mean "alternative world)
$endgroup$
– VLAZ
Jan 22 at 14:07




3




3




$begingroup$
Not quite what you want but a step in the right direction is this chainsaw drone. youtube.com/watch?v=6Viwwetf0gU&feature=youtu.be&t=82
$endgroup$
– chasly from UK
Jan 22 at 14:44




$begingroup$
Not quite what you want but a step in the right direction is this chainsaw drone. youtube.com/watch?v=6Viwwetf0gU&feature=youtu.be&t=82
$endgroup$
– chasly from UK
Jan 22 at 14:44




10




10




$begingroup$
Now this was a dream I never saw coming.
$endgroup$
– Andon
Jan 22 at 17:21




$begingroup$
Now this was a dream I never saw coming.
$endgroup$
– Andon
Jan 22 at 17:21










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















22












$begingroup$

No, this will unfortunately (?) not work as advertised.



The basic problem is lift. There are three basic ways I can see a chainsaw mechanism generating lift, and all have insurmountable issues.



One is basically using the mechanism of the saw itself to push air down with, effectively, little scoops instead of teeth. This might work in water, which is a lot heavier (paddle steamers use this to travel forward rather than upward), but with air the volume you'd need to push down would far exceed your available power.



The second, somewhat more practical, is to turn each individual tooth of the chainsaw into a wing, which generates lift as it turns. This is basically how helicopters work, except that their blades only go around in a circle instead of in a pill shape. The problem here is that even if you could get it to work (and the connection of the teeth to the "hub" seems very suspect) it will look and act much more like a helicopter blade than a chainsaw: the "teeth" will be long and thin, and rotating extremely quickly. Trying to saw through things will put immense torque on the teeth and probably break them.



The third option is to taper the profile of the teeth and saw such that the saw itself is a wing. This approach will generate lift, but has issues of its own. One is that the edge of the wing, where the teeth are, is normally where the control surfaces are. Having a bunch of fixed, moving slats in your wing is going to lead to some profoundly odd handling characteristics. It will not fly even remotely like a normal plane.



More problematic to the wing approach is that chainsaws are not designed to saw through things at full speed, the way you see in zombie movies. They're designed to be pushed with slow, constant pressure like any circular saw. (Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it, you push them gradually into it.) Any practical design will have a stall speed that's far faster than its safe chainsawing speed; if it's going fast enough to generate lift, it won't be able to cut through objects fast enough and will become stuck or will fling objects away at high speed.



A vehicle that both flies and chainsaws may be possible (though probably not practical) but a single mechanism that both generates lift and is a usable saw at the same time is not.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    ehm ... a plane generates lift with its wing curvature. What you´d need from the moving parts is thrust. What you are trying to build is kind of a chainsaw helicopter.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel
    Jan 22 at 15:02







  • 22




    $begingroup$
    "Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it" - gives me an idea for a YouTube channel...
    $endgroup$
    – John Dvorak
    Jan 22 at 16:30






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @John Dvorak Please make sure you wear your safety goggles
    $endgroup$
    – Andon
    Jan 22 at 17:20






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @JohnDvorak you may be slow to that idea, look up backyardscientist
    $endgroup$
    – BKlassen
    Jan 22 at 17:30






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your first point about the paddle steamers is a no-go even if you did have significantly more power. Paddle steamers work because they can push backwards off the dense water below, while bringing the paddles in the air above forward. If the paddle wheel was completely submerged, the boat wouldn't go anywhere. Chain "scoops" moving in a circle would push the air in all directions equally, so no amount of power could ever get it to move.
    $endgroup$
    – Nuclear Wang
    Jan 22 at 19:30



















18












$begingroup$

A plane won't be able to do it because wings are not meant to take the shock of an impact. You would also be risking a lot by trying to mow down a person: you'd have to fly too low and you risk bits ending up in the turbines. If you ever read news about what birds do to airplanes, you'll see that never ends well for the plane.



However!



Did you know that drones are not vegan friendly?



No, seriously! Nowadays anyone can buy a drone, and given the idiotic nature of humans, there is always someone being hit by a drone by accident somewhere in the world. In order not to kill nor injure people too much, drone makers try and use shapes and materials that will hurt as little as possible. Tests are usually done by getting the blades on a track and accelerating them against a target which is usually pork, to simulate a blade hitting human flesh. If there is too much damage, the blade gets redesigned and retested.



Take that, vegan drone operators!



Notice that the industry has to make an actual effort to make drones harmless. All you need to do to make them deadly is being lax and using cheaper materials.



You may now think that this doesn't live up to the question because drones are small and won't seat a pilot. Wrong! A company called Ehang is working on pilotable drones:



Science!



You could take most of the housing out to make it more personal:



SCIENCE!



Or even use a bathtub, to turn horror into trash horror:



SCIENCEGASM!



All you need now is for the blades to be replaced with curved chainsaws; Shape the chainsaws so that they are curved like helicopter blades and fly towards your targets. Don't forget to wear a helmet and follow safety procedures!






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    OMG, that drone... Definitely wear your chainsaw chaps... I use pole-saws even for ground level cutting, specifically so I don't have to wear chaps and a ton of other safety gear.
    $endgroup$
    – Harper
    Jan 22 at 16:42











  • $begingroup$
    Ouch! And you can't combine Sawstop technology with the drone blades because then at the first bird strike you're going down...
    $endgroup$
    – manassehkatz
    Jan 22 at 17:09






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Can you please add sources to the photos? I'm really hoping there are schematics for the BathDroneTub
    $endgroup$
    – BruceWayne
    Jan 22 at 18:19






  • 6




    $begingroup$
    @BruceWayne Bathtub guy going (flying) to get groceries
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Jour
    Jan 22 at 19:20






  • 8




    $begingroup$
    Nitpick: "... is working on pilotable drones." Pilotable drones is an oxymoron. If it has a pilot, it is not a drone. But you do picture a very nifty quad-copter, or multi-copter if you prefer not to specify rotor quantity.
    $endgroup$
    – cobaltduck
    Jan 23 at 12:49


















6












$begingroup$

Perhaps the magnus effect might get you close enough to sci-fi plausible here.

It says basically that an object spinning in a fluid generates a force perpendicular to the axis of rotation.



So basically something like this model airplane that uses KFC buckets for wings, just put little chainsaw teeth on the cylinder-wing-things.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    5












    $begingroup$

    This can work



    To fly you fundamentally need two things, lift and thrust. The chainsaw only adds one more consideration which is cutting speed.



    Lift



    Many of the answers so far have focused on the "chain" part of a chainsaw and have completely forgotten that a chainsaw is made up of a bar and a chain. If we utilise both this is much simpler.



    To get the lift with chainsaw is fairly simple. We design a specially shaped chainsaw bar that can serve as an airfoil. Basically this will look more like mounting a chain to the edge of a actual aircraft wing because that's what shape we need for the lift.



    Thrust



    Thrust can be provided by a traditional airplane engine and propeller. If we use a strong enough one it will also be able to power the chainsaws without the need for a second engine. Too me your description sounds like an old spitfire or similar with chainsaw blades on the wings. This should fit perfectly.



    Cutting Speed



    Getting a plane in the air with a cutting chain on the front edge of each wing in the easy part. The hard part is staying in the air while cutting. As others have said traditional chainsaws are designed to cut slowly with constant pressure.



    However it is possible to design a tooth pattern to increase cutting speed.
    This involves making the cutting edge thinner (less material to cut) and increasing the aggression of the cutting angle (deeper cuts). In traditional saw this would raise the stall-point and cause the blade to catch. However as can be seen with competition hot-saws used in timbersports, if we add a bigger engine (usually a 250-400cc motorcycle engine) we can cut faster.



    In our case we already have a thumping huge jet engine we can power our saw off. Combine the massive power with the aggressive tooth pattern and we should be able to reduce the drag from cutting enough to keep us airborn.



    All that increase in power and cutting speed increases the stress on the chain though. So it is likely we will need to make it out of something stronger than steel. There are a number of light weight high strength materials out there. Using one of these will help to reduce weight as well as prevent the chain from breaking.



    Conclusion



    Yes, absolutely we can build a plane with chainsaw for wings. And yes we can make it be able to cut through tree, people and hoards of zombies while remaining airborn. We have the technology, we can build it.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Yep. Pretty much re the flying bit. You don't need an actually airfoil to fly, it's just more efficient because it creates good pressure differentials. A flat wing can fly. A normal plane can fly upside down. Any shape that can deflect air downwards can fly.
      $endgroup$
      – Nathan Cooper
      Jan 23 at 15:02


















    2












    $begingroup$

    This does not fulfill the requirements, but:



    It is certainly possible to build airplanes, helicopters, gyrocopters, airships, hovercraft, and other air vehicles that have payload capacity, the ability to lift more weight than the necessary mechanisms that make it fly, weight devoted to crew, passengers, cargo, weapons, etc. Therefore it is easy to build an aircraft that uses some of that payload capacity for attached chainsaws. Those attached chainsaws would have to work very fast if they could cut through items at the aircraft's normal speeds, so I suggest a plane that can fly as slow as a Wright flyer or other early airplane, and maybe hover almost motionless, that has super speed chainsaws attached.



    This does not fulfill the condition that the chainsaw be part of what drives the aircraft, but other answers show that would be impractical, and even a chainsaw that works at flying speeds would be a major technological development. So maybe you will have to be satisfied with a relatively normal, though unusually slow and low flying, aircraft that has highly advanced super speed chainsaws attached.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "579"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137412%2fchainsaw-airplane-feasibility-study%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes








      5 Answers
      5






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      22












      $begingroup$

      No, this will unfortunately (?) not work as advertised.



      The basic problem is lift. There are three basic ways I can see a chainsaw mechanism generating lift, and all have insurmountable issues.



      One is basically using the mechanism of the saw itself to push air down with, effectively, little scoops instead of teeth. This might work in water, which is a lot heavier (paddle steamers use this to travel forward rather than upward), but with air the volume you'd need to push down would far exceed your available power.



      The second, somewhat more practical, is to turn each individual tooth of the chainsaw into a wing, which generates lift as it turns. This is basically how helicopters work, except that their blades only go around in a circle instead of in a pill shape. The problem here is that even if you could get it to work (and the connection of the teeth to the "hub" seems very suspect) it will look and act much more like a helicopter blade than a chainsaw: the "teeth" will be long and thin, and rotating extremely quickly. Trying to saw through things will put immense torque on the teeth and probably break them.



      The third option is to taper the profile of the teeth and saw such that the saw itself is a wing. This approach will generate lift, but has issues of its own. One is that the edge of the wing, where the teeth are, is normally where the control surfaces are. Having a bunch of fixed, moving slats in your wing is going to lead to some profoundly odd handling characteristics. It will not fly even remotely like a normal plane.



      More problematic to the wing approach is that chainsaws are not designed to saw through things at full speed, the way you see in zombie movies. They're designed to be pushed with slow, constant pressure like any circular saw. (Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it, you push them gradually into it.) Any practical design will have a stall speed that's far faster than its safe chainsawing speed; if it's going fast enough to generate lift, it won't be able to cut through objects fast enough and will become stuck or will fling objects away at high speed.



      A vehicle that both flies and chainsaws may be possible (though probably not practical) but a single mechanism that both generates lift and is a usable saw at the same time is not.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        ehm ... a plane generates lift with its wing curvature. What you´d need from the moving parts is thrust. What you are trying to build is kind of a chainsaw helicopter.
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel
        Jan 22 at 15:02







      • 22




        $begingroup$
        "Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it" - gives me an idea for a YouTube channel...
        $endgroup$
        – John Dvorak
        Jan 22 at 16:30






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @John Dvorak Please make sure you wear your safety goggles
        $endgroup$
        – Andon
        Jan 22 at 17:20






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @JohnDvorak you may be slow to that idea, look up backyardscientist
        $endgroup$
        – BKlassen
        Jan 22 at 17:30






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Your first point about the paddle steamers is a no-go even if you did have significantly more power. Paddle steamers work because they can push backwards off the dense water below, while bringing the paddles in the air above forward. If the paddle wheel was completely submerged, the boat wouldn't go anywhere. Chain "scoops" moving in a circle would push the air in all directions equally, so no amount of power could ever get it to move.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Jan 22 at 19:30
















      22












      $begingroup$

      No, this will unfortunately (?) not work as advertised.



      The basic problem is lift. There are three basic ways I can see a chainsaw mechanism generating lift, and all have insurmountable issues.



      One is basically using the mechanism of the saw itself to push air down with, effectively, little scoops instead of teeth. This might work in water, which is a lot heavier (paddle steamers use this to travel forward rather than upward), but with air the volume you'd need to push down would far exceed your available power.



      The second, somewhat more practical, is to turn each individual tooth of the chainsaw into a wing, which generates lift as it turns. This is basically how helicopters work, except that their blades only go around in a circle instead of in a pill shape. The problem here is that even if you could get it to work (and the connection of the teeth to the "hub" seems very suspect) it will look and act much more like a helicopter blade than a chainsaw: the "teeth" will be long and thin, and rotating extremely quickly. Trying to saw through things will put immense torque on the teeth and probably break them.



      The third option is to taper the profile of the teeth and saw such that the saw itself is a wing. This approach will generate lift, but has issues of its own. One is that the edge of the wing, where the teeth are, is normally where the control surfaces are. Having a bunch of fixed, moving slats in your wing is going to lead to some profoundly odd handling characteristics. It will not fly even remotely like a normal plane.



      More problematic to the wing approach is that chainsaws are not designed to saw through things at full speed, the way you see in zombie movies. They're designed to be pushed with slow, constant pressure like any circular saw. (Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it, you push them gradually into it.) Any practical design will have a stall speed that's far faster than its safe chainsawing speed; if it's going fast enough to generate lift, it won't be able to cut through objects fast enough and will become stuck or will fling objects away at high speed.



      A vehicle that both flies and chainsaws may be possible (though probably not practical) but a single mechanism that both generates lift and is a usable saw at the same time is not.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$








      • 1




        $begingroup$
        ehm ... a plane generates lift with its wing curvature. What you´d need from the moving parts is thrust. What you are trying to build is kind of a chainsaw helicopter.
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel
        Jan 22 at 15:02







      • 22




        $begingroup$
        "Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it" - gives me an idea for a YouTube channel...
        $endgroup$
        – John Dvorak
        Jan 22 at 16:30






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @John Dvorak Please make sure you wear your safety goggles
        $endgroup$
        – Andon
        Jan 22 at 17:20






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @JohnDvorak you may be slow to that idea, look up backyardscientist
        $endgroup$
        – BKlassen
        Jan 22 at 17:30






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Your first point about the paddle steamers is a no-go even if you did have significantly more power. Paddle steamers work because they can push backwards off the dense water below, while bringing the paddles in the air above forward. If the paddle wheel was completely submerged, the boat wouldn't go anywhere. Chain "scoops" moving in a circle would push the air in all directions equally, so no amount of power could ever get it to move.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Jan 22 at 19:30














      22












      22








      22





      $begingroup$

      No, this will unfortunately (?) not work as advertised.



      The basic problem is lift. There are three basic ways I can see a chainsaw mechanism generating lift, and all have insurmountable issues.



      One is basically using the mechanism of the saw itself to push air down with, effectively, little scoops instead of teeth. This might work in water, which is a lot heavier (paddle steamers use this to travel forward rather than upward), but with air the volume you'd need to push down would far exceed your available power.



      The second, somewhat more practical, is to turn each individual tooth of the chainsaw into a wing, which generates lift as it turns. This is basically how helicopters work, except that their blades only go around in a circle instead of in a pill shape. The problem here is that even if you could get it to work (and the connection of the teeth to the "hub" seems very suspect) it will look and act much more like a helicopter blade than a chainsaw: the "teeth" will be long and thin, and rotating extremely quickly. Trying to saw through things will put immense torque on the teeth and probably break them.



      The third option is to taper the profile of the teeth and saw such that the saw itself is a wing. This approach will generate lift, but has issues of its own. One is that the edge of the wing, where the teeth are, is normally where the control surfaces are. Having a bunch of fixed, moving slats in your wing is going to lead to some profoundly odd handling characteristics. It will not fly even remotely like a normal plane.



      More problematic to the wing approach is that chainsaws are not designed to saw through things at full speed, the way you see in zombie movies. They're designed to be pushed with slow, constant pressure like any circular saw. (Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it, you push them gradually into it.) Any practical design will have a stall speed that's far faster than its safe chainsawing speed; if it's going fast enough to generate lift, it won't be able to cut through objects fast enough and will become stuck or will fling objects away at high speed.



      A vehicle that both flies and chainsaws may be possible (though probably not practical) but a single mechanism that both generates lift and is a usable saw at the same time is not.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$



      No, this will unfortunately (?) not work as advertised.



      The basic problem is lift. There are three basic ways I can see a chainsaw mechanism generating lift, and all have insurmountable issues.



      One is basically using the mechanism of the saw itself to push air down with, effectively, little scoops instead of teeth. This might work in water, which is a lot heavier (paddle steamers use this to travel forward rather than upward), but with air the volume you'd need to push down would far exceed your available power.



      The second, somewhat more practical, is to turn each individual tooth of the chainsaw into a wing, which generates lift as it turns. This is basically how helicopters work, except that their blades only go around in a circle instead of in a pill shape. The problem here is that even if you could get it to work (and the connection of the teeth to the "hub" seems very suspect) it will look and act much more like a helicopter blade than a chainsaw: the "teeth" will be long and thin, and rotating extremely quickly. Trying to saw through things will put immense torque on the teeth and probably break them.



      The third option is to taper the profile of the teeth and saw such that the saw itself is a wing. This approach will generate lift, but has issues of its own. One is that the edge of the wing, where the teeth are, is normally where the control surfaces are. Having a bunch of fixed, moving slats in your wing is going to lead to some profoundly odd handling characteristics. It will not fly even remotely like a normal plane.



      More problematic to the wing approach is that chainsaws are not designed to saw through things at full speed, the way you see in zombie movies. They're designed to be pushed with slow, constant pressure like any circular saw. (Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it, you push them gradually into it.) Any practical design will have a stall speed that's far faster than its safe chainsawing speed; if it's going fast enough to generate lift, it won't be able to cut through objects fast enough and will become stuck or will fling objects away at high speed.



      A vehicle that both flies and chainsaws may be possible (though probably not practical) but a single mechanism that both generates lift and is a usable saw at the same time is not.







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Jan 22 at 14:07









      CadenceCadence

      14.1k52749




      14.1k52749







      • 1




        $begingroup$
        ehm ... a plane generates lift with its wing curvature. What you´d need from the moving parts is thrust. What you are trying to build is kind of a chainsaw helicopter.
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel
        Jan 22 at 15:02







      • 22




        $begingroup$
        "Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it" - gives me an idea for a YouTube channel...
        $endgroup$
        – John Dvorak
        Jan 22 at 16:30






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @John Dvorak Please make sure you wear your safety goggles
        $endgroup$
        – Andon
        Jan 22 at 17:20






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @JohnDvorak you may be slow to that idea, look up backyardscientist
        $endgroup$
        – BKlassen
        Jan 22 at 17:30






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Your first point about the paddle steamers is a no-go even if you did have significantly more power. Paddle steamers work because they can push backwards off the dense water below, while bringing the paddles in the air above forward. If the paddle wheel was completely submerged, the boat wouldn't go anywhere. Chain "scoops" moving in a circle would push the air in all directions equally, so no amount of power could ever get it to move.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Jan 22 at 19:30













      • 1




        $begingroup$
        ehm ... a plane generates lift with its wing curvature. What you´d need from the moving parts is thrust. What you are trying to build is kind of a chainsaw helicopter.
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel
        Jan 22 at 15:02







      • 22




        $begingroup$
        "Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it" - gives me an idea for a YouTube channel...
        $endgroup$
        – John Dvorak
        Jan 22 at 16:30






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @John Dvorak Please make sure you wear your safety goggles
        $endgroup$
        – Andon
        Jan 22 at 17:20






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        @JohnDvorak you may be slow to that idea, look up backyardscientist
        $endgroup$
        – BKlassen
        Jan 22 at 17:30






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Your first point about the paddle steamers is a no-go even if you did have significantly more power. Paddle steamers work because they can push backwards off the dense water below, while bringing the paddles in the air above forward. If the paddle wheel was completely submerged, the boat wouldn't go anywhere. Chain "scoops" moving in a circle would push the air in all directions equally, so no amount of power could ever get it to move.
        $endgroup$
        – Nuclear Wang
        Jan 22 at 19:30








      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      ehm ... a plane generates lift with its wing curvature. What you´d need from the moving parts is thrust. What you are trying to build is kind of a chainsaw helicopter.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel
      Jan 22 at 15:02





      $begingroup$
      ehm ... a plane generates lift with its wing curvature. What you´d need from the moving parts is thrust. What you are trying to build is kind of a chainsaw helicopter.
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel
      Jan 22 at 15:02





      22




      22




      $begingroup$
      "Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it" - gives me an idea for a YouTube channel...
      $endgroup$
      – John Dvorak
      Jan 22 at 16:30




      $begingroup$
      "Think of a table saw: you don't throw boards at it" - gives me an idea for a YouTube channel...
      $endgroup$
      – John Dvorak
      Jan 22 at 16:30




      6




      6




      $begingroup$
      @John Dvorak Please make sure you wear your safety goggles
      $endgroup$
      – Andon
      Jan 22 at 17:20




      $begingroup$
      @John Dvorak Please make sure you wear your safety goggles
      $endgroup$
      – Andon
      Jan 22 at 17:20




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDvorak you may be slow to that idea, look up backyardscientist
      $endgroup$
      – BKlassen
      Jan 22 at 17:30




      $begingroup$
      @JohnDvorak you may be slow to that idea, look up backyardscientist
      $endgroup$
      – BKlassen
      Jan 22 at 17:30




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Your first point about the paddle steamers is a no-go even if you did have significantly more power. Paddle steamers work because they can push backwards off the dense water below, while bringing the paddles in the air above forward. If the paddle wheel was completely submerged, the boat wouldn't go anywhere. Chain "scoops" moving in a circle would push the air in all directions equally, so no amount of power could ever get it to move.
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Jan 22 at 19:30





      $begingroup$
      Your first point about the paddle steamers is a no-go even if you did have significantly more power. Paddle steamers work because they can push backwards off the dense water below, while bringing the paddles in the air above forward. If the paddle wheel was completely submerged, the boat wouldn't go anywhere. Chain "scoops" moving in a circle would push the air in all directions equally, so no amount of power could ever get it to move.
      $endgroup$
      – Nuclear Wang
      Jan 22 at 19:30












      18












      $begingroup$

      A plane won't be able to do it because wings are not meant to take the shock of an impact. You would also be risking a lot by trying to mow down a person: you'd have to fly too low and you risk bits ending up in the turbines. If you ever read news about what birds do to airplanes, you'll see that never ends well for the plane.



      However!



      Did you know that drones are not vegan friendly?



      No, seriously! Nowadays anyone can buy a drone, and given the idiotic nature of humans, there is always someone being hit by a drone by accident somewhere in the world. In order not to kill nor injure people too much, drone makers try and use shapes and materials that will hurt as little as possible. Tests are usually done by getting the blades on a track and accelerating them against a target which is usually pork, to simulate a blade hitting human flesh. If there is too much damage, the blade gets redesigned and retested.



      Take that, vegan drone operators!



      Notice that the industry has to make an actual effort to make drones harmless. All you need to do to make them deadly is being lax and using cheaper materials.



      You may now think that this doesn't live up to the question because drones are small and won't seat a pilot. Wrong! A company called Ehang is working on pilotable drones:



      Science!



      You could take most of the housing out to make it more personal:



      SCIENCE!



      Or even use a bathtub, to turn horror into trash horror:



      SCIENCEGASM!



      All you need now is for the blades to be replaced with curved chainsaws; Shape the chainsaws so that they are curved like helicopter blades and fly towards your targets. Don't forget to wear a helmet and follow safety procedures!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        OMG, that drone... Definitely wear your chainsaw chaps... I use pole-saws even for ground level cutting, specifically so I don't have to wear chaps and a ton of other safety gear.
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        Jan 22 at 16:42











      • $begingroup$
        Ouch! And you can't combine Sawstop technology with the drone blades because then at the first bird strike you're going down...
        $endgroup$
        – manassehkatz
        Jan 22 at 17:09






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Can you please add sources to the photos? I'm really hoping there are schematics for the BathDroneTub
        $endgroup$
        – BruceWayne
        Jan 22 at 18:19






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @BruceWayne Bathtub guy going (flying) to get groceries
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel Jour
        Jan 22 at 19:20






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Nitpick: "... is working on pilotable drones." Pilotable drones is an oxymoron. If it has a pilot, it is not a drone. But you do picture a very nifty quad-copter, or multi-copter if you prefer not to specify rotor quantity.
        $endgroup$
        – cobaltduck
        Jan 23 at 12:49















      18












      $begingroup$

      A plane won't be able to do it because wings are not meant to take the shock of an impact. You would also be risking a lot by trying to mow down a person: you'd have to fly too low and you risk bits ending up in the turbines. If you ever read news about what birds do to airplanes, you'll see that never ends well for the plane.



      However!



      Did you know that drones are not vegan friendly?



      No, seriously! Nowadays anyone can buy a drone, and given the idiotic nature of humans, there is always someone being hit by a drone by accident somewhere in the world. In order not to kill nor injure people too much, drone makers try and use shapes and materials that will hurt as little as possible. Tests are usually done by getting the blades on a track and accelerating them against a target which is usually pork, to simulate a blade hitting human flesh. If there is too much damage, the blade gets redesigned and retested.



      Take that, vegan drone operators!



      Notice that the industry has to make an actual effort to make drones harmless. All you need to do to make them deadly is being lax and using cheaper materials.



      You may now think that this doesn't live up to the question because drones are small and won't seat a pilot. Wrong! A company called Ehang is working on pilotable drones:



      Science!



      You could take most of the housing out to make it more personal:



      SCIENCE!



      Or even use a bathtub, to turn horror into trash horror:



      SCIENCEGASM!



      All you need now is for the blades to be replaced with curved chainsaws; Shape the chainsaws so that they are curved like helicopter blades and fly towards your targets. Don't forget to wear a helmet and follow safety procedures!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$








      • 2




        $begingroup$
        OMG, that drone... Definitely wear your chainsaw chaps... I use pole-saws even for ground level cutting, specifically so I don't have to wear chaps and a ton of other safety gear.
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        Jan 22 at 16:42











      • $begingroup$
        Ouch! And you can't combine Sawstop technology with the drone blades because then at the first bird strike you're going down...
        $endgroup$
        – manassehkatz
        Jan 22 at 17:09






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Can you please add sources to the photos? I'm really hoping there are schematics for the BathDroneTub
        $endgroup$
        – BruceWayne
        Jan 22 at 18:19






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @BruceWayne Bathtub guy going (flying) to get groceries
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel Jour
        Jan 22 at 19:20






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Nitpick: "... is working on pilotable drones." Pilotable drones is an oxymoron. If it has a pilot, it is not a drone. But you do picture a very nifty quad-copter, or multi-copter if you prefer not to specify rotor quantity.
        $endgroup$
        – cobaltduck
        Jan 23 at 12:49













      18












      18








      18





      $begingroup$

      A plane won't be able to do it because wings are not meant to take the shock of an impact. You would also be risking a lot by trying to mow down a person: you'd have to fly too low and you risk bits ending up in the turbines. If you ever read news about what birds do to airplanes, you'll see that never ends well for the plane.



      However!



      Did you know that drones are not vegan friendly?



      No, seriously! Nowadays anyone can buy a drone, and given the idiotic nature of humans, there is always someone being hit by a drone by accident somewhere in the world. In order not to kill nor injure people too much, drone makers try and use shapes and materials that will hurt as little as possible. Tests are usually done by getting the blades on a track and accelerating them against a target which is usually pork, to simulate a blade hitting human flesh. If there is too much damage, the blade gets redesigned and retested.



      Take that, vegan drone operators!



      Notice that the industry has to make an actual effort to make drones harmless. All you need to do to make them deadly is being lax and using cheaper materials.



      You may now think that this doesn't live up to the question because drones are small and won't seat a pilot. Wrong! A company called Ehang is working on pilotable drones:



      Science!



      You could take most of the housing out to make it more personal:



      SCIENCE!



      Or even use a bathtub, to turn horror into trash horror:



      SCIENCEGASM!



      All you need now is for the blades to be replaced with curved chainsaws; Shape the chainsaws so that they are curved like helicopter blades and fly towards your targets. Don't forget to wear a helmet and follow safety procedures!






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      A plane won't be able to do it because wings are not meant to take the shock of an impact. You would also be risking a lot by trying to mow down a person: you'd have to fly too low and you risk bits ending up in the turbines. If you ever read news about what birds do to airplanes, you'll see that never ends well for the plane.



      However!



      Did you know that drones are not vegan friendly?



      No, seriously! Nowadays anyone can buy a drone, and given the idiotic nature of humans, there is always someone being hit by a drone by accident somewhere in the world. In order not to kill nor injure people too much, drone makers try and use shapes and materials that will hurt as little as possible. Tests are usually done by getting the blades on a track and accelerating them against a target which is usually pork, to simulate a blade hitting human flesh. If there is too much damage, the blade gets redesigned and retested.



      Take that, vegan drone operators!



      Notice that the industry has to make an actual effort to make drones harmless. All you need to do to make them deadly is being lax and using cheaper materials.



      You may now think that this doesn't live up to the question because drones are small and won't seat a pilot. Wrong! A company called Ehang is working on pilotable drones:



      Science!



      You could take most of the housing out to make it more personal:



      SCIENCE!



      Or even use a bathtub, to turn horror into trash horror:



      SCIENCEGASM!



      All you need now is for the blades to be replaced with curved chainsaws; Shape the chainsaws so that they are curved like helicopter blades and fly towards your targets. Don't forget to wear a helmet and follow safety procedures!







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited Jan 22 at 17:15

























      answered Jan 22 at 14:55









      RenanRenan

      48k13111245




      48k13111245







      • 2




        $begingroup$
        OMG, that drone... Definitely wear your chainsaw chaps... I use pole-saws even for ground level cutting, specifically so I don't have to wear chaps and a ton of other safety gear.
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        Jan 22 at 16:42











      • $begingroup$
        Ouch! And you can't combine Sawstop technology with the drone blades because then at the first bird strike you're going down...
        $endgroup$
        – manassehkatz
        Jan 22 at 17:09






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Can you please add sources to the photos? I'm really hoping there are schematics for the BathDroneTub
        $endgroup$
        – BruceWayne
        Jan 22 at 18:19






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @BruceWayne Bathtub guy going (flying) to get groceries
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel Jour
        Jan 22 at 19:20






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Nitpick: "... is working on pilotable drones." Pilotable drones is an oxymoron. If it has a pilot, it is not a drone. But you do picture a very nifty quad-copter, or multi-copter if you prefer not to specify rotor quantity.
        $endgroup$
        – cobaltduck
        Jan 23 at 12:49












      • 2




        $begingroup$
        OMG, that drone... Definitely wear your chainsaw chaps... I use pole-saws even for ground level cutting, specifically so I don't have to wear chaps and a ton of other safety gear.
        $endgroup$
        – Harper
        Jan 22 at 16:42











      • $begingroup$
        Ouch! And you can't combine Sawstop technology with the drone blades because then at the first bird strike you're going down...
        $endgroup$
        – manassehkatz
        Jan 22 at 17:09






      • 1




        $begingroup$
        Can you please add sources to the photos? I'm really hoping there are schematics for the BathDroneTub
        $endgroup$
        – BruceWayne
        Jan 22 at 18:19






      • 6




        $begingroup$
        @BruceWayne Bathtub guy going (flying) to get groceries
        $endgroup$
        – Daniel Jour
        Jan 22 at 19:20






      • 8




        $begingroup$
        Nitpick: "... is working on pilotable drones." Pilotable drones is an oxymoron. If it has a pilot, it is not a drone. But you do picture a very nifty quad-copter, or multi-copter if you prefer not to specify rotor quantity.
        $endgroup$
        – cobaltduck
        Jan 23 at 12:49







      2




      2




      $begingroup$
      OMG, that drone... Definitely wear your chainsaw chaps... I use pole-saws even for ground level cutting, specifically so I don't have to wear chaps and a ton of other safety gear.
      $endgroup$
      – Harper
      Jan 22 at 16:42





      $begingroup$
      OMG, that drone... Definitely wear your chainsaw chaps... I use pole-saws even for ground level cutting, specifically so I don't have to wear chaps and a ton of other safety gear.
      $endgroup$
      – Harper
      Jan 22 at 16:42













      $begingroup$
      Ouch! And you can't combine Sawstop technology with the drone blades because then at the first bird strike you're going down...
      $endgroup$
      – manassehkatz
      Jan 22 at 17:09




      $begingroup$
      Ouch! And you can't combine Sawstop technology with the drone blades because then at the first bird strike you're going down...
      $endgroup$
      – manassehkatz
      Jan 22 at 17:09




      1




      1




      $begingroup$
      Can you please add sources to the photos? I'm really hoping there are schematics for the BathDroneTub
      $endgroup$
      – BruceWayne
      Jan 22 at 18:19




      $begingroup$
      Can you please add sources to the photos? I'm really hoping there are schematics for the BathDroneTub
      $endgroup$
      – BruceWayne
      Jan 22 at 18:19




      6




      6




      $begingroup$
      @BruceWayne Bathtub guy going (flying) to get groceries
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      Jan 22 at 19:20




      $begingroup$
      @BruceWayne Bathtub guy going (flying) to get groceries
      $endgroup$
      – Daniel Jour
      Jan 22 at 19:20




      8




      8




      $begingroup$
      Nitpick: "... is working on pilotable drones." Pilotable drones is an oxymoron. If it has a pilot, it is not a drone. But you do picture a very nifty quad-copter, or multi-copter if you prefer not to specify rotor quantity.
      $endgroup$
      – cobaltduck
      Jan 23 at 12:49




      $begingroup$
      Nitpick: "... is working on pilotable drones." Pilotable drones is an oxymoron. If it has a pilot, it is not a drone. But you do picture a very nifty quad-copter, or multi-copter if you prefer not to specify rotor quantity.
      $endgroup$
      – cobaltduck
      Jan 23 at 12:49











      6












      $begingroup$

      Perhaps the magnus effect might get you close enough to sci-fi plausible here.

      It says basically that an object spinning in a fluid generates a force perpendicular to the axis of rotation.



      So basically something like this model airplane that uses KFC buckets for wings, just put little chainsaw teeth on the cylinder-wing-things.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        6












        $begingroup$

        Perhaps the magnus effect might get you close enough to sci-fi plausible here.

        It says basically that an object spinning in a fluid generates a force perpendicular to the axis of rotation.



        So basically something like this model airplane that uses KFC buckets for wings, just put little chainsaw teeth on the cylinder-wing-things.






        share|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          6












          6








          6





          $begingroup$

          Perhaps the magnus effect might get you close enough to sci-fi plausible here.

          It says basically that an object spinning in a fluid generates a force perpendicular to the axis of rotation.



          So basically something like this model airplane that uses KFC buckets for wings, just put little chainsaw teeth on the cylinder-wing-things.






          share|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          Perhaps the magnus effect might get you close enough to sci-fi plausible here.

          It says basically that an object spinning in a fluid generates a force perpendicular to the axis of rotation.



          So basically something like this model airplane that uses KFC buckets for wings, just put little chainsaw teeth on the cylinder-wing-things.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Jan 22 at 22:47









          kag0kag0

          1612




          1612





















              5












              $begingroup$

              This can work



              To fly you fundamentally need two things, lift and thrust. The chainsaw only adds one more consideration which is cutting speed.



              Lift



              Many of the answers so far have focused on the "chain" part of a chainsaw and have completely forgotten that a chainsaw is made up of a bar and a chain. If we utilise both this is much simpler.



              To get the lift with chainsaw is fairly simple. We design a specially shaped chainsaw bar that can serve as an airfoil. Basically this will look more like mounting a chain to the edge of a actual aircraft wing because that's what shape we need for the lift.



              Thrust



              Thrust can be provided by a traditional airplane engine and propeller. If we use a strong enough one it will also be able to power the chainsaws without the need for a second engine. Too me your description sounds like an old spitfire or similar with chainsaw blades on the wings. This should fit perfectly.



              Cutting Speed



              Getting a plane in the air with a cutting chain on the front edge of each wing in the easy part. The hard part is staying in the air while cutting. As others have said traditional chainsaws are designed to cut slowly with constant pressure.



              However it is possible to design a tooth pattern to increase cutting speed.
              This involves making the cutting edge thinner (less material to cut) and increasing the aggression of the cutting angle (deeper cuts). In traditional saw this would raise the stall-point and cause the blade to catch. However as can be seen with competition hot-saws used in timbersports, if we add a bigger engine (usually a 250-400cc motorcycle engine) we can cut faster.



              In our case we already have a thumping huge jet engine we can power our saw off. Combine the massive power with the aggressive tooth pattern and we should be able to reduce the drag from cutting enough to keep us airborn.



              All that increase in power and cutting speed increases the stress on the chain though. So it is likely we will need to make it out of something stronger than steel. There are a number of light weight high strength materials out there. Using one of these will help to reduce weight as well as prevent the chain from breaking.



              Conclusion



              Yes, absolutely we can build a plane with chainsaw for wings. And yes we can make it be able to cut through tree, people and hoards of zombies while remaining airborn. We have the technology, we can build it.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Yep. Pretty much re the flying bit. You don't need an actually airfoil to fly, it's just more efficient because it creates good pressure differentials. A flat wing can fly. A normal plane can fly upside down. Any shape that can deflect air downwards can fly.
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Cooper
                Jan 23 at 15:02















              5












              $begingroup$

              This can work



              To fly you fundamentally need two things, lift and thrust. The chainsaw only adds one more consideration which is cutting speed.



              Lift



              Many of the answers so far have focused on the "chain" part of a chainsaw and have completely forgotten that a chainsaw is made up of a bar and a chain. If we utilise both this is much simpler.



              To get the lift with chainsaw is fairly simple. We design a specially shaped chainsaw bar that can serve as an airfoil. Basically this will look more like mounting a chain to the edge of a actual aircraft wing because that's what shape we need for the lift.



              Thrust



              Thrust can be provided by a traditional airplane engine and propeller. If we use a strong enough one it will also be able to power the chainsaws without the need for a second engine. Too me your description sounds like an old spitfire or similar with chainsaw blades on the wings. This should fit perfectly.



              Cutting Speed



              Getting a plane in the air with a cutting chain on the front edge of each wing in the easy part. The hard part is staying in the air while cutting. As others have said traditional chainsaws are designed to cut slowly with constant pressure.



              However it is possible to design a tooth pattern to increase cutting speed.
              This involves making the cutting edge thinner (less material to cut) and increasing the aggression of the cutting angle (deeper cuts). In traditional saw this would raise the stall-point and cause the blade to catch. However as can be seen with competition hot-saws used in timbersports, if we add a bigger engine (usually a 250-400cc motorcycle engine) we can cut faster.



              In our case we already have a thumping huge jet engine we can power our saw off. Combine the massive power with the aggressive tooth pattern and we should be able to reduce the drag from cutting enough to keep us airborn.



              All that increase in power and cutting speed increases the stress on the chain though. So it is likely we will need to make it out of something stronger than steel. There are a number of light weight high strength materials out there. Using one of these will help to reduce weight as well as prevent the chain from breaking.



              Conclusion



              Yes, absolutely we can build a plane with chainsaw for wings. And yes we can make it be able to cut through tree, people and hoards of zombies while remaining airborn. We have the technology, we can build it.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                Yep. Pretty much re the flying bit. You don't need an actually airfoil to fly, it's just more efficient because it creates good pressure differentials. A flat wing can fly. A normal plane can fly upside down. Any shape that can deflect air downwards can fly.
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Cooper
                Jan 23 at 15:02













              5












              5








              5





              $begingroup$

              This can work



              To fly you fundamentally need two things, lift and thrust. The chainsaw only adds one more consideration which is cutting speed.



              Lift



              Many of the answers so far have focused on the "chain" part of a chainsaw and have completely forgotten that a chainsaw is made up of a bar and a chain. If we utilise both this is much simpler.



              To get the lift with chainsaw is fairly simple. We design a specially shaped chainsaw bar that can serve as an airfoil. Basically this will look more like mounting a chain to the edge of a actual aircraft wing because that's what shape we need for the lift.



              Thrust



              Thrust can be provided by a traditional airplane engine and propeller. If we use a strong enough one it will also be able to power the chainsaws without the need for a second engine. Too me your description sounds like an old spitfire or similar with chainsaw blades on the wings. This should fit perfectly.



              Cutting Speed



              Getting a plane in the air with a cutting chain on the front edge of each wing in the easy part. The hard part is staying in the air while cutting. As others have said traditional chainsaws are designed to cut slowly with constant pressure.



              However it is possible to design a tooth pattern to increase cutting speed.
              This involves making the cutting edge thinner (less material to cut) and increasing the aggression of the cutting angle (deeper cuts). In traditional saw this would raise the stall-point and cause the blade to catch. However as can be seen with competition hot-saws used in timbersports, if we add a bigger engine (usually a 250-400cc motorcycle engine) we can cut faster.



              In our case we already have a thumping huge jet engine we can power our saw off. Combine the massive power with the aggressive tooth pattern and we should be able to reduce the drag from cutting enough to keep us airborn.



              All that increase in power and cutting speed increases the stress on the chain though. So it is likely we will need to make it out of something stronger than steel. There are a number of light weight high strength materials out there. Using one of these will help to reduce weight as well as prevent the chain from breaking.



              Conclusion



              Yes, absolutely we can build a plane with chainsaw for wings. And yes we can make it be able to cut through tree, people and hoards of zombies while remaining airborn. We have the technology, we can build it.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              This can work



              To fly you fundamentally need two things, lift and thrust. The chainsaw only adds one more consideration which is cutting speed.



              Lift



              Many of the answers so far have focused on the "chain" part of a chainsaw and have completely forgotten that a chainsaw is made up of a bar and a chain. If we utilise both this is much simpler.



              To get the lift with chainsaw is fairly simple. We design a specially shaped chainsaw bar that can serve as an airfoil. Basically this will look more like mounting a chain to the edge of a actual aircraft wing because that's what shape we need for the lift.



              Thrust



              Thrust can be provided by a traditional airplane engine and propeller. If we use a strong enough one it will also be able to power the chainsaws without the need for a second engine. Too me your description sounds like an old spitfire or similar with chainsaw blades on the wings. This should fit perfectly.



              Cutting Speed



              Getting a plane in the air with a cutting chain on the front edge of each wing in the easy part. The hard part is staying in the air while cutting. As others have said traditional chainsaws are designed to cut slowly with constant pressure.



              However it is possible to design a tooth pattern to increase cutting speed.
              This involves making the cutting edge thinner (less material to cut) and increasing the aggression of the cutting angle (deeper cuts). In traditional saw this would raise the stall-point and cause the blade to catch. However as can be seen with competition hot-saws used in timbersports, if we add a bigger engine (usually a 250-400cc motorcycle engine) we can cut faster.



              In our case we already have a thumping huge jet engine we can power our saw off. Combine the massive power with the aggressive tooth pattern and we should be able to reduce the drag from cutting enough to keep us airborn.



              All that increase in power and cutting speed increases the stress on the chain though. So it is likely we will need to make it out of something stronger than steel. There are a number of light weight high strength materials out there. Using one of these will help to reduce weight as well as prevent the chain from breaking.



              Conclusion



              Yes, absolutely we can build a plane with chainsaw for wings. And yes we can make it be able to cut through tree, people and hoards of zombies while remaining airborn. We have the technology, we can build it.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Jan 23 at 12:17









              Community

              1




              1










              answered Jan 23 at 1:34









              linksassinlinksassin

              1514




              1514











              • $begingroup$
                Yep. Pretty much re the flying bit. You don't need an actually airfoil to fly, it's just more efficient because it creates good pressure differentials. A flat wing can fly. A normal plane can fly upside down. Any shape that can deflect air downwards can fly.
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Cooper
                Jan 23 at 15:02
















              • $begingroup$
                Yep. Pretty much re the flying bit. You don't need an actually airfoil to fly, it's just more efficient because it creates good pressure differentials. A flat wing can fly. A normal plane can fly upside down. Any shape that can deflect air downwards can fly.
                $endgroup$
                – Nathan Cooper
                Jan 23 at 15:02















              $begingroup$
              Yep. Pretty much re the flying bit. You don't need an actually airfoil to fly, it's just more efficient because it creates good pressure differentials. A flat wing can fly. A normal plane can fly upside down. Any shape that can deflect air downwards can fly.
              $endgroup$
              – Nathan Cooper
              Jan 23 at 15:02




              $begingroup$
              Yep. Pretty much re the flying bit. You don't need an actually airfoil to fly, it's just more efficient because it creates good pressure differentials. A flat wing can fly. A normal plane can fly upside down. Any shape that can deflect air downwards can fly.
              $endgroup$
              – Nathan Cooper
              Jan 23 at 15:02











              2












              $begingroup$

              This does not fulfill the requirements, but:



              It is certainly possible to build airplanes, helicopters, gyrocopters, airships, hovercraft, and other air vehicles that have payload capacity, the ability to lift more weight than the necessary mechanisms that make it fly, weight devoted to crew, passengers, cargo, weapons, etc. Therefore it is easy to build an aircraft that uses some of that payload capacity for attached chainsaws. Those attached chainsaws would have to work very fast if they could cut through items at the aircraft's normal speeds, so I suggest a plane that can fly as slow as a Wright flyer or other early airplane, and maybe hover almost motionless, that has super speed chainsaws attached.



              This does not fulfill the condition that the chainsaw be part of what drives the aircraft, but other answers show that would be impractical, and even a chainsaw that works at flying speeds would be a major technological development. So maybe you will have to be satisfied with a relatively normal, though unusually slow and low flying, aircraft that has highly advanced super speed chainsaws attached.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                This does not fulfill the requirements, but:



                It is certainly possible to build airplanes, helicopters, gyrocopters, airships, hovercraft, and other air vehicles that have payload capacity, the ability to lift more weight than the necessary mechanisms that make it fly, weight devoted to crew, passengers, cargo, weapons, etc. Therefore it is easy to build an aircraft that uses some of that payload capacity for attached chainsaws. Those attached chainsaws would have to work very fast if they could cut through items at the aircraft's normal speeds, so I suggest a plane that can fly as slow as a Wright flyer or other early airplane, and maybe hover almost motionless, that has super speed chainsaws attached.



                This does not fulfill the condition that the chainsaw be part of what drives the aircraft, but other answers show that would be impractical, and even a chainsaw that works at flying speeds would be a major technological development. So maybe you will have to be satisfied with a relatively normal, though unusually slow and low flying, aircraft that has highly advanced super speed chainsaws attached.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  This does not fulfill the requirements, but:



                  It is certainly possible to build airplanes, helicopters, gyrocopters, airships, hovercraft, and other air vehicles that have payload capacity, the ability to lift more weight than the necessary mechanisms that make it fly, weight devoted to crew, passengers, cargo, weapons, etc. Therefore it is easy to build an aircraft that uses some of that payload capacity for attached chainsaws. Those attached chainsaws would have to work very fast if they could cut through items at the aircraft's normal speeds, so I suggest a plane that can fly as slow as a Wright flyer or other early airplane, and maybe hover almost motionless, that has super speed chainsaws attached.



                  This does not fulfill the condition that the chainsaw be part of what drives the aircraft, but other answers show that would be impractical, and even a chainsaw that works at flying speeds would be a major technological development. So maybe you will have to be satisfied with a relatively normal, though unusually slow and low flying, aircraft that has highly advanced super speed chainsaws attached.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  This does not fulfill the requirements, but:



                  It is certainly possible to build airplanes, helicopters, gyrocopters, airships, hovercraft, and other air vehicles that have payload capacity, the ability to lift more weight than the necessary mechanisms that make it fly, weight devoted to crew, passengers, cargo, weapons, etc. Therefore it is easy to build an aircraft that uses some of that payload capacity for attached chainsaws. Those attached chainsaws would have to work very fast if they could cut through items at the aircraft's normal speeds, so I suggest a plane that can fly as slow as a Wright flyer or other early airplane, and maybe hover almost motionless, that has super speed chainsaws attached.



                  This does not fulfill the condition that the chainsaw be part of what drives the aircraft, but other answers show that would be impractical, and even a chainsaw that works at flying speeds would be a major technological development. So maybe you will have to be satisfied with a relatively normal, though unusually slow and low flying, aircraft that has highly advanced super speed chainsaws attached.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Jan 22 at 19:20









                  M. A. GoldingM. A. Golding

                  8,625426




                  8,625426



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Worldbuilding Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f137412%2fchainsaw-airplane-feasibility-study%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown






                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Peggy Mitchell

                      Palaiologos

                      The Forum (Inglewood, California)