Water level indicator using ULN2803
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
i made an water level indicator using IC: ULN2803
Refer: Easiest water level indicator
It works well when used on glass of water, but when connect to my rooftop tank all the leds slowly diminishes and turns off. I think this has to do with high resistance of the tank water, but i doubt it since it worked well for first few days.
i am not any expert (clearly) so any help is appreciated.
integrated-circuit uln2003
add a comment |
i made an water level indicator using IC: ULN2803
Refer: Easiest water level indicator
It works well when used on glass of water, but when connect to my rooftop tank all the leds slowly diminishes and turns off. I think this has to do with high resistance of the tank water, but i doubt it since it worked well for first few days.
i am not any expert (clearly) so any help is appreciated.
integrated-circuit uln2003
Certainly @user156047 is right. You might use a pushbutton to power the circuit only when you want to read the level.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:10
@Dorian ok, let me try with non corrosive metal strips and get back.
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
i made an water level indicator using IC: ULN2803
Refer: Easiest water level indicator
It works well when used on glass of water, but when connect to my rooftop tank all the leds slowly diminishes and turns off. I think this has to do with high resistance of the tank water, but i doubt it since it worked well for first few days.
i am not any expert (clearly) so any help is appreciated.
integrated-circuit uln2003
i made an water level indicator using IC: ULN2803
Refer: Easiest water level indicator
It works well when used on glass of water, but when connect to my rooftop tank all the leds slowly diminishes and turns off. I think this has to do with high resistance of the tank water, but i doubt it since it worked well for first few days.
i am not any expert (clearly) so any help is appreciated.
integrated-circuit uln2003
integrated-circuit uln2003
asked Dec 27 '18 at 9:42
Alex RobbinAlex Robbin
313
313
Certainly @user156047 is right. You might use a pushbutton to power the circuit only when you want to read the level.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:10
@Dorian ok, let me try with non corrosive metal strips and get back.
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
Certainly @user156047 is right. You might use a pushbutton to power the circuit only when you want to read the level.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:10
@Dorian ok, let me try with non corrosive metal strips and get back.
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:17
Certainly @user156047 is right. You might use a pushbutton to power the circuit only when you want to read the level.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:10
Certainly @user156047 is right. You might use a pushbutton to power the circuit only when you want to read the level.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:10
@Dorian ok, let me try with non corrosive metal strips and get back.
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:17
@Dorian ok, let me try with non corrosive metal strips and get back.
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:17
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
I'm not big in chemistry, but I believe that it has stopped working because of electrolysis. In other words your contacts have corroded to the point that the resistance is too high.
You could prevent this by using AC, but then the circuit would be a lot more complicated.
I would opt for capacitive sensors, Analog Devices have an interesting app note about
Capacitive Liquid Sensors
Or you can follow this
Instructable
I don't think AC will stop electrolysis but the corrosion must be the issue he's facing.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
@user156047 I too think you are right, but i dont understand anything about Capacitive liquid sensors. But, if i were to replace the contact points with something non-corrosive and have less chance for electrolysis would that work?
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:09
@AlexRobbin Maybe it would be better to use large electrodes. Not only the corrosion but also mud or particles attracted by the current flow might play a role in this. If you have large electrodes they will have a low impedance even covered with some impurities.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:35
For what I remember from my Uni days, there are two possible causes to corrosion, one is electrolysis and the other dissimilar metals. Electrolysis is the splitting of water cells, and that requires I believe 1.23V to happen. Unfortunately this means that for conducting the electricity you will only rely on the impurities of the water. I don't think it is a dissimilar metal issue due to the voltage you use.
– Elmesito
Dec 27 '18 at 10:44
1
You can easily check this by inspecting the probe wires, right?
– immibis
Dec 27 '18 at 11:54
|
show 1 more comment
It's due to corrosion and electrolysis process mostly.
Go with some alternative thing like Float switche. Follow the link
FLOAT SWITCH
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
StackExchange.schematics.init();
);
, "cicuitlab");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "135"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f413967%2fwater-level-indicator-using-uln2803%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I'm not big in chemistry, but I believe that it has stopped working because of electrolysis. In other words your contacts have corroded to the point that the resistance is too high.
You could prevent this by using AC, but then the circuit would be a lot more complicated.
I would opt for capacitive sensors, Analog Devices have an interesting app note about
Capacitive Liquid Sensors
Or you can follow this
Instructable
I don't think AC will stop electrolysis but the corrosion must be the issue he's facing.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
@user156047 I too think you are right, but i dont understand anything about Capacitive liquid sensors. But, if i were to replace the contact points with something non-corrosive and have less chance for electrolysis would that work?
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:09
@AlexRobbin Maybe it would be better to use large electrodes. Not only the corrosion but also mud or particles attracted by the current flow might play a role in this. If you have large electrodes they will have a low impedance even covered with some impurities.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:35
For what I remember from my Uni days, there are two possible causes to corrosion, one is electrolysis and the other dissimilar metals. Electrolysis is the splitting of water cells, and that requires I believe 1.23V to happen. Unfortunately this means that for conducting the electricity you will only rely on the impurities of the water. I don't think it is a dissimilar metal issue due to the voltage you use.
– Elmesito
Dec 27 '18 at 10:44
1
You can easily check this by inspecting the probe wires, right?
– immibis
Dec 27 '18 at 11:54
|
show 1 more comment
I'm not big in chemistry, but I believe that it has stopped working because of electrolysis. In other words your contacts have corroded to the point that the resistance is too high.
You could prevent this by using AC, but then the circuit would be a lot more complicated.
I would opt for capacitive sensors, Analog Devices have an interesting app note about
Capacitive Liquid Sensors
Or you can follow this
Instructable
I don't think AC will stop electrolysis but the corrosion must be the issue he's facing.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
@user156047 I too think you are right, but i dont understand anything about Capacitive liquid sensors. But, if i were to replace the contact points with something non-corrosive and have less chance for electrolysis would that work?
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:09
@AlexRobbin Maybe it would be better to use large electrodes. Not only the corrosion but also mud or particles attracted by the current flow might play a role in this. If you have large electrodes they will have a low impedance even covered with some impurities.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:35
For what I remember from my Uni days, there are two possible causes to corrosion, one is electrolysis and the other dissimilar metals. Electrolysis is the splitting of water cells, and that requires I believe 1.23V to happen. Unfortunately this means that for conducting the electricity you will only rely on the impurities of the water. I don't think it is a dissimilar metal issue due to the voltage you use.
– Elmesito
Dec 27 '18 at 10:44
1
You can easily check this by inspecting the probe wires, right?
– immibis
Dec 27 '18 at 11:54
|
show 1 more comment
I'm not big in chemistry, but I believe that it has stopped working because of electrolysis. In other words your contacts have corroded to the point that the resistance is too high.
You could prevent this by using AC, but then the circuit would be a lot more complicated.
I would opt for capacitive sensors, Analog Devices have an interesting app note about
Capacitive Liquid Sensors
Or you can follow this
Instructable
I'm not big in chemistry, but I believe that it has stopped working because of electrolysis. In other words your contacts have corroded to the point that the resistance is too high.
You could prevent this by using AC, but then the circuit would be a lot more complicated.
I would opt for capacitive sensors, Analog Devices have an interesting app note about
Capacitive Liquid Sensors
Or you can follow this
Instructable
answered Dec 27 '18 at 9:59
ElmesitoElmesito
85119
85119
I don't think AC will stop electrolysis but the corrosion must be the issue he's facing.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
@user156047 I too think you are right, but i dont understand anything about Capacitive liquid sensors. But, if i were to replace the contact points with something non-corrosive and have less chance for electrolysis would that work?
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:09
@AlexRobbin Maybe it would be better to use large electrodes. Not only the corrosion but also mud or particles attracted by the current flow might play a role in this. If you have large electrodes they will have a low impedance even covered with some impurities.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:35
For what I remember from my Uni days, there are two possible causes to corrosion, one is electrolysis and the other dissimilar metals. Electrolysis is the splitting of water cells, and that requires I believe 1.23V to happen. Unfortunately this means that for conducting the electricity you will only rely on the impurities of the water. I don't think it is a dissimilar metal issue due to the voltage you use.
– Elmesito
Dec 27 '18 at 10:44
1
You can easily check this by inspecting the probe wires, right?
– immibis
Dec 27 '18 at 11:54
|
show 1 more comment
I don't think AC will stop electrolysis but the corrosion must be the issue he's facing.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
@user156047 I too think you are right, but i dont understand anything about Capacitive liquid sensors. But, if i were to replace the contact points with something non-corrosive and have less chance for electrolysis would that work?
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:09
@AlexRobbin Maybe it would be better to use large electrodes. Not only the corrosion but also mud or particles attracted by the current flow might play a role in this. If you have large electrodes they will have a low impedance even covered with some impurities.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:35
For what I remember from my Uni days, there are two possible causes to corrosion, one is electrolysis and the other dissimilar metals. Electrolysis is the splitting of water cells, and that requires I believe 1.23V to happen. Unfortunately this means that for conducting the electricity you will only rely on the impurities of the water. I don't think it is a dissimilar metal issue due to the voltage you use.
– Elmesito
Dec 27 '18 at 10:44
1
You can easily check this by inspecting the probe wires, right?
– immibis
Dec 27 '18 at 11:54
I don't think AC will stop electrolysis but the corrosion must be the issue he's facing.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
I don't think AC will stop electrolysis but the corrosion must be the issue he's facing.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:04
@user156047 I too think you are right, but i dont understand anything about Capacitive liquid sensors. But, if i were to replace the contact points with something non-corrosive and have less chance for electrolysis would that work?
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:09
@user156047 I too think you are right, but i dont understand anything about Capacitive liquid sensors. But, if i were to replace the contact points with something non-corrosive and have less chance for electrolysis would that work?
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:09
@AlexRobbin Maybe it would be better to use large electrodes. Not only the corrosion but also mud or particles attracted by the current flow might play a role in this. If you have large electrodes they will have a low impedance even covered with some impurities.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:35
@AlexRobbin Maybe it would be better to use large electrodes. Not only the corrosion but also mud or particles attracted by the current flow might play a role in this. If you have large electrodes they will have a low impedance even covered with some impurities.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:35
For what I remember from my Uni days, there are two possible causes to corrosion, one is electrolysis and the other dissimilar metals. Electrolysis is the splitting of water cells, and that requires I believe 1.23V to happen. Unfortunately this means that for conducting the electricity you will only rely on the impurities of the water. I don't think it is a dissimilar metal issue due to the voltage you use.
– Elmesito
Dec 27 '18 at 10:44
For what I remember from my Uni days, there are two possible causes to corrosion, one is electrolysis and the other dissimilar metals. Electrolysis is the splitting of water cells, and that requires I believe 1.23V to happen. Unfortunately this means that for conducting the electricity you will only rely on the impurities of the water. I don't think it is a dissimilar metal issue due to the voltage you use.
– Elmesito
Dec 27 '18 at 10:44
1
1
You can easily check this by inspecting the probe wires, right?
– immibis
Dec 27 '18 at 11:54
You can easily check this by inspecting the probe wires, right?
– immibis
Dec 27 '18 at 11:54
|
show 1 more comment
It's due to corrosion and electrolysis process mostly.
Go with some alternative thing like Float switche. Follow the link
FLOAT SWITCH
add a comment |
It's due to corrosion and electrolysis process mostly.
Go with some alternative thing like Float switche. Follow the link
FLOAT SWITCH
add a comment |
It's due to corrosion and electrolysis process mostly.
Go with some alternative thing like Float switche. Follow the link
FLOAT SWITCH
It's due to corrosion and electrolysis process mostly.
Go with some alternative thing like Float switche. Follow the link
FLOAT SWITCH
edited Dec 27 '18 at 16:12
answered Dec 27 '18 at 11:44
ElectronElectron
1,045213
1,045213
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f413967%2fwater-level-indicator-using-uln2803%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Certainly @user156047 is right. You might use a pushbutton to power the circuit only when you want to read the level.
– Dorian
Dec 27 '18 at 10:10
@Dorian ok, let me try with non corrosive metal strips and get back.
– Alex Robbin
Dec 27 '18 at 10:17