intertext / shortintertext with revtex gives large spurious spacing

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












2















I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebm
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]
enddocument


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08
















2















I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebm
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]
enddocument


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08














2












2








2








I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebm
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]
enddocument


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?










share|improve this question
















I am in the situation of using intertext/shortintertext with the Revtex document class, but it seems there are some spacing issues.



Consider:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagemathtools
usepackagebm
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]
enddocument


enter image description here



and there is large spacing before and after the and text.
This is not present if I switch out the document class to article, so how to fix this?



ps. Strangely, using shortintertext gives rise to a larger spacing than intertext.. why is this so?







spacing align revtex intertext






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 31 '18 at 21:35







ksgj1

















asked Dec 31 '18 at 20:57









ksgj1ksgj1

353114




353114







  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08













  • 1





    Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

    – Mico
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:06






  • 1





    @Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:08








1




1





Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

– Mico
Dec 31 '18 at 21:06





Does adding the directive raggedbottom in the preamble make a difference?

– Mico
Dec 31 '18 at 21:06




1




1





@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 21:08






@Mico No, unfortunately not. (I placed it right before begindocument). I don't think this is the usual spurious spacing, from, say, poor float placement.

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 21:08











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















5














You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagebm
usepackagelipsum

mathtoolsset
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,


begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[4]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • this works great, thanks!

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:49


















6














I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools, bm, nccmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument

lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]and
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:39







  • 1





    I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

    – Bernard
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:45










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "85"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468079%2fintertext-shortintertext-with-revtex-gives-large-spurious-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagebm
usepackagelipsum

mathtoolsset
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,


begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[4]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • this works great, thanks!

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:49















5














You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagebm
usepackagelipsum

mathtoolsset
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,


begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[4]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • this works great, thanks!

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:49













5












5








5







You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagebm
usepackagelipsum

mathtoolsset
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,


begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[4]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum
enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













You can modify the vertical space before and after both intertext and shortintertext: here's a possibility, adjust to suit your needs.



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
usepackagemathtools
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagebm
usepackagelipsum

mathtoolsset
above-shortintertext-sep=-belowdisplayshortskip,
below-shortintertext-sep=-abovedisplayskip,
above-intertext-sep=0pt, % default
below-intertext-sep=-.5abovedisplayskip,


begindocument
lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
shortintertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[4]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertextand
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum
enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:43









egregegreg

712k8618913175




712k8618913175












  • this works great, thanks!

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:49

















  • this works great, thanks!

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 22:49
















this works great, thanks!

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 22:49





this works great, thanks!

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 22:49











6














I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools, bm, nccmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument

lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]and
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:39







  • 1





    I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

    – Bernard
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:45















6














I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools, bm, nccmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument

lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]and
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer























  • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:39







  • 1





    I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

    – Bernard
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:45













6












6








6







I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools, bm, nccmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument

lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]and
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer













I propose this work-around: use the optional argument for intertext, introduced by package nccmath:



documentclass[aps,prl,reprint]revtex4-1
% documentclassarticle
usepackagenewtxtext,newtxmath
usepackagemathtools, bm, nccmath
usepackagelipsum

begindocument

lipsum*[1]
beginsubequations
beginalign
varepsilon_0(bmq) &= varepsilon_1(bmq) = 0 \
varepsilon_2(bmq) &=beta bigl[ 4(1 - J') + 4J' Q - 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr]\
varepsilon_3(bmq) &= beta bigl[4(1 - J') + 4J' Q + 2(1+2J')sqrt1+Q , bigr] ,, \
intertext[0 ex]and
Q &= a + b + c + d + e + f - 3
endalign
endsubequations
lipsum*[1-3]

enddocument


enter image description here







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 31 '18 at 21:35









BernardBernard

167k769194




167k769194












  • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:39







  • 1





    I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

    – Bernard
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:45

















  • nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

    – ksgj1
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:39







  • 1





    I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

    – Bernard
    Dec 31 '18 at 21:45
















nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 21:39






nccmath redefines the intertext command? is there any other redefinitions that I should worry about when using in conjunction with amsmath, mathtools etc.? (incompatibilities, redefinitions using different syntax) If I load this package I can no longer use shortintertext?

– ksgj1
Dec 31 '18 at 21:39





1




1





I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

– Bernard
Dec 31 '18 at 21:45





I don't think this one is incompatible, as nccmath loads amsmath. I use it mainly for its medium size formula commands and environment, with which I never hadd any problem. The redefinition of intertext is documented on p.12 of the documentation (commented code).

– Bernard
Dec 31 '18 at 21:45

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f468079%2fintertext-shortintertext-with-revtex-gives-large-spurious-spacing%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay