Why are vacancies in solids called as equilibrium defects?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












My professor, when discussing about Random Walk model during diffusion in metals said that "Vacancies are equilibrium defects but dislocations are not". I could not understand why. Why is it so?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • researchgate.net/post/…
    – Sam Farjamirad
    9 hours ago










  • @SolarMike , what has equilibrium have to do with a defect like vacancy?
    – Nitz
    9 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2












My professor, when discussing about Random Walk model during diffusion in metals said that "Vacancies are equilibrium defects but dislocations are not". I could not understand why. Why is it so?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • researchgate.net/post/…
    – Sam Farjamirad
    9 hours ago










  • @SolarMike , what has equilibrium have to do with a defect like vacancy?
    – Nitz
    9 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
2
down vote

favorite
2






2





My professor, when discussing about Random Walk model during diffusion in metals said that "Vacancies are equilibrium defects but dislocations are not". I could not understand why. Why is it so?










share|improve this question







New contributor




Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











My professor, when discussing about Random Walk model during diffusion in metals said that "Vacancies are equilibrium defects but dislocations are not". I could not understand why. Why is it so?







materials metallurgy






share|improve this question







New contributor




Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 10 hours ago









Nitz

112




112




New contributor




Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Nitz is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • researchgate.net/post/…
    – Sam Farjamirad
    9 hours ago










  • @SolarMike , what has equilibrium have to do with a defect like vacancy?
    – Nitz
    9 hours ago
















  • researchgate.net/post/…
    – Sam Farjamirad
    9 hours ago










  • @SolarMike , what has equilibrium have to do with a defect like vacancy?
    – Nitz
    9 hours ago















researchgate.net/post/…
– Sam Farjamirad
9 hours ago




researchgate.net/post/…
– Sam Farjamirad
9 hours ago












@SolarMike , what has equilibrium have to do with a defect like vacancy?
– Nitz
9 hours ago




@SolarMike , what has equilibrium have to do with a defect like vacancy?
– Nitz
9 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote













Imagine you have two boxes separated by a removable partition. Each box is filled with a different pure monatomic gas. When you remove the partition, the gases mix. Their equilibrium state tends toward an equitable mixture at every point in time. The likelihood of the gases spontaneously separating is essentially zero for any appreciable number of atoms. This is modeled by statistical mechanics, and occurs for any similar system consisting of multiple mobile components.



Solids are no different from gases in that they obey the principles of statistical mechanics. In the case of a crystal lattice, vacancies are lattice points with no atom, i e. empty space. All solids are constantly exposed to empty space at their surface, and tend to mix with it. This may sound strange, but remember that atoms in a lattice are mobile, and can shift lattice positions if a neighboring space is available. All of the lattice points at the surface have lots of space available outside the crystal. The same applies at grain boundaries and at dislocations. So by random atomic movement, empty space can diffuse into the lattice and create vacancies. As we established with the two-gas setup, the empty space and solid tend to be in some mixed equilibrium, i.e. the equilibrium concentration of vacancies is non-zero. The only detail remaining is that the mixture isnt equal because the atoms of the solid have strong cohesive forces binding them together. Unlike gases the crystal doesn't evenly diffuse about the room and instantly vaporize. At least, in equilibrium it wouldn't (discounting vapor pressure)!



As for dislocations, their equilibrium concentration is zero because they don't spontaneously form, but can spontaneously leave crystals. Recall that dislocations form in response to a net shear creating an "excess" half plane of atoms, or alternately an "excess" half plane of vacancies. This occurs by a process called "slip". Slip does not occur in equilibrium. Getting a half plane of vacancies into the crystal, all organized along a plane, and done spontaneously, is simply not going to happen by chance. In contrast, an existing dislocation can move spontaneously by absorbing or emitting dislocations in a process called "climb". If a vacancy is absorbed, the half-plane of atoms decreases in number, moving the dislocation line in that direction. If a vacancy is emitted, the opposite occurs. If the dislocation line reaches the surface, it is no longer a dislocation. Thus dislocations can leave the crystal, but can't enter, resulting in a net equilibirum concentration of zero.






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "595"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Nitz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24623%2fwhy-are-vacancies-in-solids-called-as-equilibrium-defects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Imagine you have two boxes separated by a removable partition. Each box is filled with a different pure monatomic gas. When you remove the partition, the gases mix. Their equilibrium state tends toward an equitable mixture at every point in time. The likelihood of the gases spontaneously separating is essentially zero for any appreciable number of atoms. This is modeled by statistical mechanics, and occurs for any similar system consisting of multiple mobile components.



    Solids are no different from gases in that they obey the principles of statistical mechanics. In the case of a crystal lattice, vacancies are lattice points with no atom, i e. empty space. All solids are constantly exposed to empty space at their surface, and tend to mix with it. This may sound strange, but remember that atoms in a lattice are mobile, and can shift lattice positions if a neighboring space is available. All of the lattice points at the surface have lots of space available outside the crystal. The same applies at grain boundaries and at dislocations. So by random atomic movement, empty space can diffuse into the lattice and create vacancies. As we established with the two-gas setup, the empty space and solid tend to be in some mixed equilibrium, i.e. the equilibrium concentration of vacancies is non-zero. The only detail remaining is that the mixture isnt equal because the atoms of the solid have strong cohesive forces binding them together. Unlike gases the crystal doesn't evenly diffuse about the room and instantly vaporize. At least, in equilibrium it wouldn't (discounting vapor pressure)!



    As for dislocations, their equilibrium concentration is zero because they don't spontaneously form, but can spontaneously leave crystals. Recall that dislocations form in response to a net shear creating an "excess" half plane of atoms, or alternately an "excess" half plane of vacancies. This occurs by a process called "slip". Slip does not occur in equilibrium. Getting a half plane of vacancies into the crystal, all organized along a plane, and done spontaneously, is simply not going to happen by chance. In contrast, an existing dislocation can move spontaneously by absorbing or emitting dislocations in a process called "climb". If a vacancy is absorbed, the half-plane of atoms decreases in number, moving the dislocation line in that direction. If a vacancy is emitted, the opposite occurs. If the dislocation line reaches the surface, it is no longer a dislocation. Thus dislocations can leave the crystal, but can't enter, resulting in a net equilibirum concentration of zero.






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Imagine you have two boxes separated by a removable partition. Each box is filled with a different pure monatomic gas. When you remove the partition, the gases mix. Their equilibrium state tends toward an equitable mixture at every point in time. The likelihood of the gases spontaneously separating is essentially zero for any appreciable number of atoms. This is modeled by statistical mechanics, and occurs for any similar system consisting of multiple mobile components.



      Solids are no different from gases in that they obey the principles of statistical mechanics. In the case of a crystal lattice, vacancies are lattice points with no atom, i e. empty space. All solids are constantly exposed to empty space at their surface, and tend to mix with it. This may sound strange, but remember that atoms in a lattice are mobile, and can shift lattice positions if a neighboring space is available. All of the lattice points at the surface have lots of space available outside the crystal. The same applies at grain boundaries and at dislocations. So by random atomic movement, empty space can diffuse into the lattice and create vacancies. As we established with the two-gas setup, the empty space and solid tend to be in some mixed equilibrium, i.e. the equilibrium concentration of vacancies is non-zero. The only detail remaining is that the mixture isnt equal because the atoms of the solid have strong cohesive forces binding them together. Unlike gases the crystal doesn't evenly diffuse about the room and instantly vaporize. At least, in equilibrium it wouldn't (discounting vapor pressure)!



      As for dislocations, their equilibrium concentration is zero because they don't spontaneously form, but can spontaneously leave crystals. Recall that dislocations form in response to a net shear creating an "excess" half plane of atoms, or alternately an "excess" half plane of vacancies. This occurs by a process called "slip". Slip does not occur in equilibrium. Getting a half plane of vacancies into the crystal, all organized along a plane, and done spontaneously, is simply not going to happen by chance. In contrast, an existing dislocation can move spontaneously by absorbing or emitting dislocations in a process called "climb". If a vacancy is absorbed, the half-plane of atoms decreases in number, moving the dislocation line in that direction. If a vacancy is emitted, the opposite occurs. If the dislocation line reaches the surface, it is no longer a dislocation. Thus dislocations can leave the crystal, but can't enter, resulting in a net equilibirum concentration of zero.






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote









        Imagine you have two boxes separated by a removable partition. Each box is filled with a different pure monatomic gas. When you remove the partition, the gases mix. Their equilibrium state tends toward an equitable mixture at every point in time. The likelihood of the gases spontaneously separating is essentially zero for any appreciable number of atoms. This is modeled by statistical mechanics, and occurs for any similar system consisting of multiple mobile components.



        Solids are no different from gases in that they obey the principles of statistical mechanics. In the case of a crystal lattice, vacancies are lattice points with no atom, i e. empty space. All solids are constantly exposed to empty space at their surface, and tend to mix with it. This may sound strange, but remember that atoms in a lattice are mobile, and can shift lattice positions if a neighboring space is available. All of the lattice points at the surface have lots of space available outside the crystal. The same applies at grain boundaries and at dislocations. So by random atomic movement, empty space can diffuse into the lattice and create vacancies. As we established with the two-gas setup, the empty space and solid tend to be in some mixed equilibrium, i.e. the equilibrium concentration of vacancies is non-zero. The only detail remaining is that the mixture isnt equal because the atoms of the solid have strong cohesive forces binding them together. Unlike gases the crystal doesn't evenly diffuse about the room and instantly vaporize. At least, in equilibrium it wouldn't (discounting vapor pressure)!



        As for dislocations, their equilibrium concentration is zero because they don't spontaneously form, but can spontaneously leave crystals. Recall that dislocations form in response to a net shear creating an "excess" half plane of atoms, or alternately an "excess" half plane of vacancies. This occurs by a process called "slip". Slip does not occur in equilibrium. Getting a half plane of vacancies into the crystal, all organized along a plane, and done spontaneously, is simply not going to happen by chance. In contrast, an existing dislocation can move spontaneously by absorbing or emitting dislocations in a process called "climb". If a vacancy is absorbed, the half-plane of atoms decreases in number, moving the dislocation line in that direction. If a vacancy is emitted, the opposite occurs. If the dislocation line reaches the surface, it is no longer a dislocation. Thus dislocations can leave the crystal, but can't enter, resulting in a net equilibirum concentration of zero.






        share|improve this answer














        Imagine you have two boxes separated by a removable partition. Each box is filled with a different pure monatomic gas. When you remove the partition, the gases mix. Their equilibrium state tends toward an equitable mixture at every point in time. The likelihood of the gases spontaneously separating is essentially zero for any appreciable number of atoms. This is modeled by statistical mechanics, and occurs for any similar system consisting of multiple mobile components.



        Solids are no different from gases in that they obey the principles of statistical mechanics. In the case of a crystal lattice, vacancies are lattice points with no atom, i e. empty space. All solids are constantly exposed to empty space at their surface, and tend to mix with it. This may sound strange, but remember that atoms in a lattice are mobile, and can shift lattice positions if a neighboring space is available. All of the lattice points at the surface have lots of space available outside the crystal. The same applies at grain boundaries and at dislocations. So by random atomic movement, empty space can diffuse into the lattice and create vacancies. As we established with the two-gas setup, the empty space and solid tend to be in some mixed equilibrium, i.e. the equilibrium concentration of vacancies is non-zero. The only detail remaining is that the mixture isnt equal because the atoms of the solid have strong cohesive forces binding them together. Unlike gases the crystal doesn't evenly diffuse about the room and instantly vaporize. At least, in equilibrium it wouldn't (discounting vapor pressure)!



        As for dislocations, their equilibrium concentration is zero because they don't spontaneously form, but can spontaneously leave crystals. Recall that dislocations form in response to a net shear creating an "excess" half plane of atoms, or alternately an "excess" half plane of vacancies. This occurs by a process called "slip". Slip does not occur in equilibrium. Getting a half plane of vacancies into the crystal, all organized along a plane, and done spontaneously, is simply not going to happen by chance. In contrast, an existing dislocation can move spontaneously by absorbing or emitting dislocations in a process called "climb". If a vacancy is absorbed, the half-plane of atoms decreases in number, moving the dislocation line in that direction. If a vacancy is emitted, the opposite occurs. If the dislocation line reaches the surface, it is no longer a dislocation. Thus dislocations can leave the crystal, but can't enter, resulting in a net equilibirum concentration of zero.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 3 hours ago

























        answered 7 hours ago









        starrise

        3,4381925




        3,4381925




















            Nitz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            Nitz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Nitz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Nitz is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f24623%2fwhy-are-vacancies-in-solids-called-as-equilibrium-defects%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Bahrain

            Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay