Why are the minimums between these two ILS instrument approaches to the same runway so different?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R are 1095/40. The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R are 1461-1 1/2.



Question: Why are the minimums for the ILS Z so much lower than the minimums for the ILS Y?




Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R



enter image description here




Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R



enter image description here










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite












    The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R are 1095/40. The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R are 1461-1 1/2.



    Question: Why are the minimums for the ILS Z so much lower than the minimums for the ILS Y?




    Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R



    enter image description here




    Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R



    enter image description here










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite











      The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R are 1095/40. The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R are 1461-1 1/2.



      Question: Why are the minimums for the ILS Z so much lower than the minimums for the ILS Y?




      Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R



      enter image description here




      Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R



      enter image description here










      share|improve this question













      The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R are 1095/40. The minimums for the Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R are 1461-1 1/2.



      Question: Why are the minimums for the ILS Z so much lower than the minimums for the ILS Y?




      Van Nuys ILS Z Rwy 16R



      enter image description here




      Van Nuys ILS Y Rwy 16R



      enter image description here







      instrument-flight-rules ils iaps precision-approach






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 11 hours ago









      757toga

      6,5221336




      6,5221336




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          The equipment requirement (in the aircraft) are different for each of these approaches. In the upper-left box of the Z approach, you can see that DME is required to make this approach. This requirement is not listed in the Y approach.



          If your aircraft has the right equipment, you can reduce your minimums by selecting the appropriate approach plate.



          In this particular case, the missed approach procedure from the lower minimums is more precise. The MAP includes DME distances that must be used while executing the missed approach. Without DME onboard the aircraft, you would have to use the less-precise MAP requirements of intersecting VOR radials. This lack of DME and thus a less-precise MAP results in higher minimums.



          In Section 4, para. 140 of the TERPS, the reason for multiple approaches to the same runway, using the same navigation system (ILS in this case) allows better-equipped aircraft to gain an "operational advantage".






          share|improve this answer






















          • I see that, but why does having DME result (allow for) in lower minimums?
            – 757toga
            11 hours ago











          • Answer updated to reflect the answer to this comment, as well as provide just a bit more detail.
            – Jimmy
            11 hours ago










          • I can't find a "Section 140" in the TERPS manual. Can you tell me what page it is on so I can review the info?
            – 757toga
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            Sorry... Paragraph 140, under section 4. Answer updated. It's on the 82nd page of the linked PDF (not "page 82" ... it's actually page 3 following a whole bunch of change-notification pages)
            – Jimmy
            10 hours ago






          • 2




            Doing a bit more research, it seems that when there are approaches being flown into Burbank (just east of VNY) the ILS Z at VNY restriction to be at or below 1750 on the missed until 1.5 dme is to protect for that BUR traffic. I'm not sure what the operational advantage might be, but it must be based on traffic flow. The Y missed approach obviously has higher obstacles to consider in the profile, that normally is why the minimums are what they are. Note the hill at 2126 msl southwest of the airport on the missed appch profile.
            – 757toga
            8 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "528"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56978%2fwhy-are-the-minimums-between-these-two-ils-instrument-approaches-to-the-same-run%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          4
          down vote













          The equipment requirement (in the aircraft) are different for each of these approaches. In the upper-left box of the Z approach, you can see that DME is required to make this approach. This requirement is not listed in the Y approach.



          If your aircraft has the right equipment, you can reduce your minimums by selecting the appropriate approach plate.



          In this particular case, the missed approach procedure from the lower minimums is more precise. The MAP includes DME distances that must be used while executing the missed approach. Without DME onboard the aircraft, you would have to use the less-precise MAP requirements of intersecting VOR radials. This lack of DME and thus a less-precise MAP results in higher minimums.



          In Section 4, para. 140 of the TERPS, the reason for multiple approaches to the same runway, using the same navigation system (ILS in this case) allows better-equipped aircraft to gain an "operational advantage".






          share|improve this answer






















          • I see that, but why does having DME result (allow for) in lower minimums?
            – 757toga
            11 hours ago











          • Answer updated to reflect the answer to this comment, as well as provide just a bit more detail.
            – Jimmy
            11 hours ago










          • I can't find a "Section 140" in the TERPS manual. Can you tell me what page it is on so I can review the info?
            – 757toga
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            Sorry... Paragraph 140, under section 4. Answer updated. It's on the 82nd page of the linked PDF (not "page 82" ... it's actually page 3 following a whole bunch of change-notification pages)
            – Jimmy
            10 hours ago






          • 2




            Doing a bit more research, it seems that when there are approaches being flown into Burbank (just east of VNY) the ILS Z at VNY restriction to be at or below 1750 on the missed until 1.5 dme is to protect for that BUR traffic. I'm not sure what the operational advantage might be, but it must be based on traffic flow. The Y missed approach obviously has higher obstacles to consider in the profile, that normally is why the minimums are what they are. Note the hill at 2126 msl southwest of the airport on the missed appch profile.
            – 757toga
            8 hours ago















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          The equipment requirement (in the aircraft) are different for each of these approaches. In the upper-left box of the Z approach, you can see that DME is required to make this approach. This requirement is not listed in the Y approach.



          If your aircraft has the right equipment, you can reduce your minimums by selecting the appropriate approach plate.



          In this particular case, the missed approach procedure from the lower minimums is more precise. The MAP includes DME distances that must be used while executing the missed approach. Without DME onboard the aircraft, you would have to use the less-precise MAP requirements of intersecting VOR radials. This lack of DME and thus a less-precise MAP results in higher minimums.



          In Section 4, para. 140 of the TERPS, the reason for multiple approaches to the same runway, using the same navigation system (ILS in this case) allows better-equipped aircraft to gain an "operational advantage".






          share|improve this answer






















          • I see that, but why does having DME result (allow for) in lower minimums?
            – 757toga
            11 hours ago











          • Answer updated to reflect the answer to this comment, as well as provide just a bit more detail.
            – Jimmy
            11 hours ago










          • I can't find a "Section 140" in the TERPS manual. Can you tell me what page it is on so I can review the info?
            – 757toga
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            Sorry... Paragraph 140, under section 4. Answer updated. It's on the 82nd page of the linked PDF (not "page 82" ... it's actually page 3 following a whole bunch of change-notification pages)
            – Jimmy
            10 hours ago






          • 2




            Doing a bit more research, it seems that when there are approaches being flown into Burbank (just east of VNY) the ILS Z at VNY restriction to be at or below 1750 on the missed until 1.5 dme is to protect for that BUR traffic. I'm not sure what the operational advantage might be, but it must be based on traffic flow. The Y missed approach obviously has higher obstacles to consider in the profile, that normally is why the minimums are what they are. Note the hill at 2126 msl southwest of the airport on the missed appch profile.
            – 757toga
            8 hours ago













          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          The equipment requirement (in the aircraft) are different for each of these approaches. In the upper-left box of the Z approach, you can see that DME is required to make this approach. This requirement is not listed in the Y approach.



          If your aircraft has the right equipment, you can reduce your minimums by selecting the appropriate approach plate.



          In this particular case, the missed approach procedure from the lower minimums is more precise. The MAP includes DME distances that must be used while executing the missed approach. Without DME onboard the aircraft, you would have to use the less-precise MAP requirements of intersecting VOR radials. This lack of DME and thus a less-precise MAP results in higher minimums.



          In Section 4, para. 140 of the TERPS, the reason for multiple approaches to the same runway, using the same navigation system (ILS in this case) allows better-equipped aircraft to gain an "operational advantage".






          share|improve this answer














          The equipment requirement (in the aircraft) are different for each of these approaches. In the upper-left box of the Z approach, you can see that DME is required to make this approach. This requirement is not listed in the Y approach.



          If your aircraft has the right equipment, you can reduce your minimums by selecting the appropriate approach plate.



          In this particular case, the missed approach procedure from the lower minimums is more precise. The MAP includes DME distances that must be used while executing the missed approach. Without DME onboard the aircraft, you would have to use the less-precise MAP requirements of intersecting VOR radials. This lack of DME and thus a less-precise MAP results in higher minimums.



          In Section 4, para. 140 of the TERPS, the reason for multiple approaches to the same runway, using the same navigation system (ILS in this case) allows better-equipped aircraft to gain an "operational advantage".







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 10 hours ago

























          answered 11 hours ago









          Jimmy

          1,772517




          1,772517











          • I see that, but why does having DME result (allow for) in lower minimums?
            – 757toga
            11 hours ago











          • Answer updated to reflect the answer to this comment, as well as provide just a bit more detail.
            – Jimmy
            11 hours ago










          • I can't find a "Section 140" in the TERPS manual. Can you tell me what page it is on so I can review the info?
            – 757toga
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            Sorry... Paragraph 140, under section 4. Answer updated. It's on the 82nd page of the linked PDF (not "page 82" ... it's actually page 3 following a whole bunch of change-notification pages)
            – Jimmy
            10 hours ago






          • 2




            Doing a bit more research, it seems that when there are approaches being flown into Burbank (just east of VNY) the ILS Z at VNY restriction to be at or below 1750 on the missed until 1.5 dme is to protect for that BUR traffic. I'm not sure what the operational advantage might be, but it must be based on traffic flow. The Y missed approach obviously has higher obstacles to consider in the profile, that normally is why the minimums are what they are. Note the hill at 2126 msl southwest of the airport on the missed appch profile.
            – 757toga
            8 hours ago

















          • I see that, but why does having DME result (allow for) in lower minimums?
            – 757toga
            11 hours ago











          • Answer updated to reflect the answer to this comment, as well as provide just a bit more detail.
            – Jimmy
            11 hours ago










          • I can't find a "Section 140" in the TERPS manual. Can you tell me what page it is on so I can review the info?
            – 757toga
            10 hours ago






          • 1




            Sorry... Paragraph 140, under section 4. Answer updated. It's on the 82nd page of the linked PDF (not "page 82" ... it's actually page 3 following a whole bunch of change-notification pages)
            – Jimmy
            10 hours ago






          • 2




            Doing a bit more research, it seems that when there are approaches being flown into Burbank (just east of VNY) the ILS Z at VNY restriction to be at or below 1750 on the missed until 1.5 dme is to protect for that BUR traffic. I'm not sure what the operational advantage might be, but it must be based on traffic flow. The Y missed approach obviously has higher obstacles to consider in the profile, that normally is why the minimums are what they are. Note the hill at 2126 msl southwest of the airport on the missed appch profile.
            – 757toga
            8 hours ago
















          I see that, but why does having DME result (allow for) in lower minimums?
          – 757toga
          11 hours ago





          I see that, but why does having DME result (allow for) in lower minimums?
          – 757toga
          11 hours ago













          Answer updated to reflect the answer to this comment, as well as provide just a bit more detail.
          – Jimmy
          11 hours ago




          Answer updated to reflect the answer to this comment, as well as provide just a bit more detail.
          – Jimmy
          11 hours ago












          I can't find a "Section 140" in the TERPS manual. Can you tell me what page it is on so I can review the info?
          – 757toga
          10 hours ago




          I can't find a "Section 140" in the TERPS manual. Can you tell me what page it is on so I can review the info?
          – 757toga
          10 hours ago




          1




          1




          Sorry... Paragraph 140, under section 4. Answer updated. It's on the 82nd page of the linked PDF (not "page 82" ... it's actually page 3 following a whole bunch of change-notification pages)
          – Jimmy
          10 hours ago




          Sorry... Paragraph 140, under section 4. Answer updated. It's on the 82nd page of the linked PDF (not "page 82" ... it's actually page 3 following a whole bunch of change-notification pages)
          – Jimmy
          10 hours ago




          2




          2




          Doing a bit more research, it seems that when there are approaches being flown into Burbank (just east of VNY) the ILS Z at VNY restriction to be at or below 1750 on the missed until 1.5 dme is to protect for that BUR traffic. I'm not sure what the operational advantage might be, but it must be based on traffic flow. The Y missed approach obviously has higher obstacles to consider in the profile, that normally is why the minimums are what they are. Note the hill at 2126 msl southwest of the airport on the missed appch profile.
          – 757toga
          8 hours ago





          Doing a bit more research, it seems that when there are approaches being flown into Burbank (just east of VNY) the ILS Z at VNY restriction to be at or below 1750 on the missed until 1.5 dme is to protect for that BUR traffic. I'm not sure what the operational advantage might be, but it must be based on traffic flow. The Y missed approach obviously has higher obstacles to consider in the profile, that normally is why the minimums are what they are. Note the hill at 2126 msl southwest of the airport on the missed appch profile.
          – 757toga
          8 hours ago


















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faviation.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f56978%2fwhy-are-the-minimums-between-these-two-ils-instrument-approaches-to-the-same-run%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay