Should I ask for a pay raise for employees I manage?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1












I talked with one of my team members about another guy who is quitting. During the talk, he mentioned that it might be because there was no pay raise for the past 2 years. These guys (one who I was talking to and another guy who is quitting) are very good at their job, work hard, and love the company and I think it's unfair not to give them any pay raise. I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting.



I want to give background of the company. The company is a startup and there is no procedure about pay raise. As a startup, we need to save money wherever we can but this really affects the company because we actually end up spending more money recruiting people and time to train them.



I plan to talk to the owner (I report to him) about pay raise for everyone in my team but not sure if that is a good idea.



P.S. I am their manager and I got a good raise every year.










share|improve this question























  • Has the employee who is quitting ever brought the lack of pay to conversation? This would change your approach for how you go about asking your manager. It's one thing for people to work and wait to be acknowledged, but it's another to actually ask your manager for a pay bump (within reason of course). One of the best things I've experienced at a company was having an open communication culture, that made me feel like my manager was actually in my corner when it came to wage conversations.
    – knocked loose
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    "I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting." Well, obviously.
    – only_pro
    1 hour ago
















up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1












I talked with one of my team members about another guy who is quitting. During the talk, he mentioned that it might be because there was no pay raise for the past 2 years. These guys (one who I was talking to and another guy who is quitting) are very good at their job, work hard, and love the company and I think it's unfair not to give them any pay raise. I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting.



I want to give background of the company. The company is a startup and there is no procedure about pay raise. As a startup, we need to save money wherever we can but this really affects the company because we actually end up spending more money recruiting people and time to train them.



I plan to talk to the owner (I report to him) about pay raise for everyone in my team but not sure if that is a good idea.



P.S. I am their manager and I got a good raise every year.










share|improve this question























  • Has the employee who is quitting ever brought the lack of pay to conversation? This would change your approach for how you go about asking your manager. It's one thing for people to work and wait to be acknowledged, but it's another to actually ask your manager for a pay bump (within reason of course). One of the best things I've experienced at a company was having an open communication culture, that made me feel like my manager was actually in my corner when it came to wage conversations.
    – knocked loose
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    "I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting." Well, obviously.
    – only_pro
    1 hour ago












up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1






1





I talked with one of my team members about another guy who is quitting. During the talk, he mentioned that it might be because there was no pay raise for the past 2 years. These guys (one who I was talking to and another guy who is quitting) are very good at their job, work hard, and love the company and I think it's unfair not to give them any pay raise. I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting.



I want to give background of the company. The company is a startup and there is no procedure about pay raise. As a startup, we need to save money wherever we can but this really affects the company because we actually end up spending more money recruiting people and time to train them.



I plan to talk to the owner (I report to him) about pay raise for everyone in my team but not sure if that is a good idea.



P.S. I am their manager and I got a good raise every year.










share|improve this question















I talked with one of my team members about another guy who is quitting. During the talk, he mentioned that it might be because there was no pay raise for the past 2 years. These guys (one who I was talking to and another guy who is quitting) are very good at their job, work hard, and love the company and I think it's unfair not to give them any pay raise. I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting.



I want to give background of the company. The company is a startup and there is no procedure about pay raise. As a startup, we need to save money wherever we can but this really affects the company because we actually end up spending more money recruiting people and time to train them.



I plan to talk to the owner (I report to him) about pay raise for everyone in my team but not sure if that is a good idea.



P.S. I am their manager and I got a good raise every year.







salary






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 49 mins ago









Dukeling

9,50832549




9,50832549










asked 4 hours ago









Code Project

403128




403128











  • Has the employee who is quitting ever brought the lack of pay to conversation? This would change your approach for how you go about asking your manager. It's one thing for people to work and wait to be acknowledged, but it's another to actually ask your manager for a pay bump (within reason of course). One of the best things I've experienced at a company was having an open communication culture, that made me feel like my manager was actually in my corner when it came to wage conversations.
    – knocked loose
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    "I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting." Well, obviously.
    – only_pro
    1 hour ago
















  • Has the employee who is quitting ever brought the lack of pay to conversation? This would change your approach for how you go about asking your manager. It's one thing for people to work and wait to be acknowledged, but it's another to actually ask your manager for a pay bump (within reason of course). One of the best things I've experienced at a company was having an open communication culture, that made me feel like my manager was actually in my corner when it came to wage conversations.
    – knocked loose
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    "I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting." Well, obviously.
    – only_pro
    1 hour ago















Has the employee who is quitting ever brought the lack of pay to conversation? This would change your approach for how you go about asking your manager. It's one thing for people to work and wait to be acknowledged, but it's another to actually ask your manager for a pay bump (within reason of course). One of the best things I've experienced at a company was having an open communication culture, that made me feel like my manager was actually in my corner when it came to wage conversations.
– knocked loose
1 hour ago




Has the employee who is quitting ever brought the lack of pay to conversation? This would change your approach for how you go about asking your manager. It's one thing for people to work and wait to be acknowledged, but it's another to actually ask your manager for a pay bump (within reason of course). One of the best things I've experienced at a company was having an open communication culture, that made me feel like my manager was actually in my corner when it came to wage conversations.
– knocked loose
1 hour ago




1




1




"I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting." Well, obviously.
– only_pro
1 hour ago




"I also think that this can actually be the reason why people are quitting." Well, obviously.
– only_pro
1 hour ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
35
down vote













Yes. As as manager, part of your job is going to bat for the people who work for you, and part of that is asking for pay raises. Especially if you are getting a good raise, you should be asking (and should have been asking) for a decent raise for your good workers.



If no-one was getting raises, that would be different, but as long as there is money for raises for managers, the manager has an obligation to take care of their workers, and pay raises are a very clear sign on whether an employee is valued or not.






share|improve this answer




















  • it's not so much "bat for them" as "bat for your team", which is subtly different. You're not meant to argue for a team member per say but, i think, for the good of the team. in this way the person you're arguing for then weighs against "good of the company" vs "good for this team".
    – bharal
    3 hours ago






  • 5




    @bharal fyi the phrase is per se, I believe
    – Sharlike
    3 hours ago










  • @bharal And really, if you have good employees and a good team, then what is good for the employee will help retain them, which is good for the team, and that is also good for the company. The raises benefit the company too, since you're keeping the good employees.
    – thursdaysgeek
    3 hours ago










  • @thursdaysgeek sure, it just makes the manager look different when they argue for it. One positions them as the ceo of a team, the other as caring for team-mates well being. The other thing is that happy team members, while good for the company, might not be as good as a lower burn rate for the company (barring one-off recruiter expenses!), which a vc will care very much about.
    – bharal
    3 hours ago

















up vote
5
down vote













Don't talk to the manager about "a" (singular) pay raise for your staff. Talk to him about what the policy will be for implementing raises - typically, organizations pay out a cost of living increase on a known, regular schedule (ie annually) plus merit increases for strong employees, plus promotion increases when a title changes due to someone taking on more responsibility. It sounds like your organization doesn't have any of these standards in place.



It's fair to represent to the owner that you know of frustrations among the team due to lack of raises recently, but you want to solve the problem for good - not just for now. Getting everyone a raise right now doesn't really do anything except postpone the conversation about raise policy until the next time people get upset.






share|improve this answer




















  • This... particularly cost of living increments. 2 years without a pay rise pretty much means your effective income has dropped 4-5% over that time. And you have developers that have gained 2 years experience, and could probably get a 10% hike if they moved.
    – HorusKol
    33 mins ago

















up vote
1
down vote













Yes, you should. Ideally, a person should know company politics before joining - what results are expected and what can be achieved. Especially, if you want to work with top performers and people who care about company - if they won't get reward, you'll be left with mediocre who can't find job in other place - and it may cost more.



There are other things to consider:
If employee will continue to work, will he improve, get new knowledge, grow further?
Can company easily replace an employee?
Can old/new employee bring new energy/ideas?






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    -3
    down vote













    It really depends on you relationship with the owner and how you go about doing it.



    Personally, I would not go ask the owner to give raises to everyone on my team. This is essentially asking the owner to take money out of their own pocket. Remember, this is a start up. There is a very good chance the owner can't afford raises for everyone. I would not do this unless you were willing to take a pay cut in order for them to get the raise.



    What I would do is talk to the owner about the fact that you have heard someone is leaving because they have not received a raise. Even go as far as to highlight the loss the company will incur if this person leaves. Then, let the owner decide what the next course of action is.






    share|improve this answer


















    • 3




      maybe my answer isn't clear enough: don't go asking for raises if you don't have a way to recoup the cost. The company is start up and more than likely, can't afford to give everyone yearly raises. Its pretty easy to go in there and ask the owner to take money directly out of their pocket to give to someone else. I wouldn't do that unless I was willing to do the same. Instead, present the issue and let the owner make that decision.
      – SaggingRufus
      4 hours ago






    • 1




      @Bilkokuya ill try to see if I can edit it. I understand where you were coming from.
      – SaggingRufus
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      i think its fine for a manager of a team to argue for raises for people on the team, regardless of the company's position. the manager is, effectively, the ceo of that team, and has to push to get the best results possible. if that means ensuring a higher salary to maintain quality, then so be it. the owner/snr manager can push back, of course, based on the needs of the company vs the needs of the company from that team.
      – bharal
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      sorry, i downvoted because of the "you might be asked to pay for it", which is just really really unlikely.
      – bharal
      3 hours ago






    • 1




      @SaggingRufus I don't follow. If the manager won't stay when given a pay cut or not given a raise, that's just what the managees are doing. The manager isn't trying to talk people out of quitting for better pay while getting a raise, and so is doing what he or she is expecting employees to do. If you're talking about a pay cut for the owner, that's ridiculous. The owner(s) get paid out of revenue minus expenses, and if people contributing to the company leave because of low pay, then revenue is going to go down if they were worth hiring in the first place.
      – David Thornley
      2 hours ago










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "423"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: false,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122351%2fshould-i-ask-for-a-pay-raise-for-employees-i-manage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest

























    StackExchange.ready(function ()
    $("#show-editor-button input, #show-editor-button button").click(function ()
    var showEditor = function()
    $("#show-editor-button").hide();
    $("#post-form").removeClass("dno");
    StackExchange.editor.finallyInit();
    ;

    var useFancy = $(this).data('confirm-use-fancy');
    if(useFancy == 'True')
    var popupTitle = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-title');
    var popupBody = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-body');
    var popupAccept = $(this).data('confirm-fancy-accept-button');

    $(this).loadPopup(
    url: '/post/self-answer-popup',
    loaded: function(popup)
    var pTitle = $(popup).find('h2');
    var pBody = $(popup).find('.popup-body');
    var pSubmit = $(popup).find('.popup-submit');

    pTitle.text(popupTitle);
    pBody.html(popupBody);
    pSubmit.val(popupAccept).click(showEditor);

    )
    else
    var confirmText = $(this).data('confirm-text');
    if (confirmText ? confirm(confirmText) : true)
    showEditor();


    );
    );






    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    35
    down vote













    Yes. As as manager, part of your job is going to bat for the people who work for you, and part of that is asking for pay raises. Especially if you are getting a good raise, you should be asking (and should have been asking) for a decent raise for your good workers.



    If no-one was getting raises, that would be different, but as long as there is money for raises for managers, the manager has an obligation to take care of their workers, and pay raises are a very clear sign on whether an employee is valued or not.






    share|improve this answer




















    • it's not so much "bat for them" as "bat for your team", which is subtly different. You're not meant to argue for a team member per say but, i think, for the good of the team. in this way the person you're arguing for then weighs against "good of the company" vs "good for this team".
      – bharal
      3 hours ago






    • 5




      @bharal fyi the phrase is per se, I believe
      – Sharlike
      3 hours ago










    • @bharal And really, if you have good employees and a good team, then what is good for the employee will help retain them, which is good for the team, and that is also good for the company. The raises benefit the company too, since you're keeping the good employees.
      – thursdaysgeek
      3 hours ago










    • @thursdaysgeek sure, it just makes the manager look different when they argue for it. One positions them as the ceo of a team, the other as caring for team-mates well being. The other thing is that happy team members, while good for the company, might not be as good as a lower burn rate for the company (barring one-off recruiter expenses!), which a vc will care very much about.
      – bharal
      3 hours ago














    up vote
    35
    down vote













    Yes. As as manager, part of your job is going to bat for the people who work for you, and part of that is asking for pay raises. Especially if you are getting a good raise, you should be asking (and should have been asking) for a decent raise for your good workers.



    If no-one was getting raises, that would be different, but as long as there is money for raises for managers, the manager has an obligation to take care of their workers, and pay raises are a very clear sign on whether an employee is valued or not.






    share|improve this answer




















    • it's not so much "bat for them" as "bat for your team", which is subtly different. You're not meant to argue for a team member per say but, i think, for the good of the team. in this way the person you're arguing for then weighs against "good of the company" vs "good for this team".
      – bharal
      3 hours ago






    • 5




      @bharal fyi the phrase is per se, I believe
      – Sharlike
      3 hours ago










    • @bharal And really, if you have good employees and a good team, then what is good for the employee will help retain them, which is good for the team, and that is also good for the company. The raises benefit the company too, since you're keeping the good employees.
      – thursdaysgeek
      3 hours ago










    • @thursdaysgeek sure, it just makes the manager look different when they argue for it. One positions them as the ceo of a team, the other as caring for team-mates well being. The other thing is that happy team members, while good for the company, might not be as good as a lower burn rate for the company (barring one-off recruiter expenses!), which a vc will care very much about.
      – bharal
      3 hours ago












    up vote
    35
    down vote










    up vote
    35
    down vote









    Yes. As as manager, part of your job is going to bat for the people who work for you, and part of that is asking for pay raises. Especially if you are getting a good raise, you should be asking (and should have been asking) for a decent raise for your good workers.



    If no-one was getting raises, that would be different, but as long as there is money for raises for managers, the manager has an obligation to take care of their workers, and pay raises are a very clear sign on whether an employee is valued or not.






    share|improve this answer












    Yes. As as manager, part of your job is going to bat for the people who work for you, and part of that is asking for pay raises. Especially if you are getting a good raise, you should be asking (and should have been asking) for a decent raise for your good workers.



    If no-one was getting raises, that would be different, but as long as there is money for raises for managers, the manager has an obligation to take care of their workers, and pay raises are a very clear sign on whether an employee is valued or not.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 4 hours ago









    thursdaysgeek

    27.1k1248107




    27.1k1248107











    • it's not so much "bat for them" as "bat for your team", which is subtly different. You're not meant to argue for a team member per say but, i think, for the good of the team. in this way the person you're arguing for then weighs against "good of the company" vs "good for this team".
      – bharal
      3 hours ago






    • 5




      @bharal fyi the phrase is per se, I believe
      – Sharlike
      3 hours ago










    • @bharal And really, if you have good employees and a good team, then what is good for the employee will help retain them, which is good for the team, and that is also good for the company. The raises benefit the company too, since you're keeping the good employees.
      – thursdaysgeek
      3 hours ago










    • @thursdaysgeek sure, it just makes the manager look different when they argue for it. One positions them as the ceo of a team, the other as caring for team-mates well being. The other thing is that happy team members, while good for the company, might not be as good as a lower burn rate for the company (barring one-off recruiter expenses!), which a vc will care very much about.
      – bharal
      3 hours ago
















    • it's not so much "bat for them" as "bat for your team", which is subtly different. You're not meant to argue for a team member per say but, i think, for the good of the team. in this way the person you're arguing for then weighs against "good of the company" vs "good for this team".
      – bharal
      3 hours ago






    • 5




      @bharal fyi the phrase is per se, I believe
      – Sharlike
      3 hours ago










    • @bharal And really, if you have good employees and a good team, then what is good for the employee will help retain them, which is good for the team, and that is also good for the company. The raises benefit the company too, since you're keeping the good employees.
      – thursdaysgeek
      3 hours ago










    • @thursdaysgeek sure, it just makes the manager look different when they argue for it. One positions them as the ceo of a team, the other as caring for team-mates well being. The other thing is that happy team members, while good for the company, might not be as good as a lower burn rate for the company (barring one-off recruiter expenses!), which a vc will care very much about.
      – bharal
      3 hours ago















    it's not so much "bat for them" as "bat for your team", which is subtly different. You're not meant to argue for a team member per say but, i think, for the good of the team. in this way the person you're arguing for then weighs against "good of the company" vs "good for this team".
    – bharal
    3 hours ago




    it's not so much "bat for them" as "bat for your team", which is subtly different. You're not meant to argue for a team member per say but, i think, for the good of the team. in this way the person you're arguing for then weighs against "good of the company" vs "good for this team".
    – bharal
    3 hours ago




    5




    5




    @bharal fyi the phrase is per se, I believe
    – Sharlike
    3 hours ago




    @bharal fyi the phrase is per se, I believe
    – Sharlike
    3 hours ago












    @bharal And really, if you have good employees and a good team, then what is good for the employee will help retain them, which is good for the team, and that is also good for the company. The raises benefit the company too, since you're keeping the good employees.
    – thursdaysgeek
    3 hours ago




    @bharal And really, if you have good employees and a good team, then what is good for the employee will help retain them, which is good for the team, and that is also good for the company. The raises benefit the company too, since you're keeping the good employees.
    – thursdaysgeek
    3 hours ago












    @thursdaysgeek sure, it just makes the manager look different when they argue for it. One positions them as the ceo of a team, the other as caring for team-mates well being. The other thing is that happy team members, while good for the company, might not be as good as a lower burn rate for the company (barring one-off recruiter expenses!), which a vc will care very much about.
    – bharal
    3 hours ago




    @thursdaysgeek sure, it just makes the manager look different when they argue for it. One positions them as the ceo of a team, the other as caring for team-mates well being. The other thing is that happy team members, while good for the company, might not be as good as a lower burn rate for the company (barring one-off recruiter expenses!), which a vc will care very much about.
    – bharal
    3 hours ago












    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Don't talk to the manager about "a" (singular) pay raise for your staff. Talk to him about what the policy will be for implementing raises - typically, organizations pay out a cost of living increase on a known, regular schedule (ie annually) plus merit increases for strong employees, plus promotion increases when a title changes due to someone taking on more responsibility. It sounds like your organization doesn't have any of these standards in place.



    It's fair to represent to the owner that you know of frustrations among the team due to lack of raises recently, but you want to solve the problem for good - not just for now. Getting everyone a raise right now doesn't really do anything except postpone the conversation about raise policy until the next time people get upset.






    share|improve this answer




















    • This... particularly cost of living increments. 2 years without a pay rise pretty much means your effective income has dropped 4-5% over that time. And you have developers that have gained 2 years experience, and could probably get a 10% hike if they moved.
      – HorusKol
      33 mins ago














    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Don't talk to the manager about "a" (singular) pay raise for your staff. Talk to him about what the policy will be for implementing raises - typically, organizations pay out a cost of living increase on a known, regular schedule (ie annually) plus merit increases for strong employees, plus promotion increases when a title changes due to someone taking on more responsibility. It sounds like your organization doesn't have any of these standards in place.



    It's fair to represent to the owner that you know of frustrations among the team due to lack of raises recently, but you want to solve the problem for good - not just for now. Getting everyone a raise right now doesn't really do anything except postpone the conversation about raise policy until the next time people get upset.






    share|improve this answer




















    • This... particularly cost of living increments. 2 years without a pay rise pretty much means your effective income has dropped 4-5% over that time. And you have developers that have gained 2 years experience, and could probably get a 10% hike if they moved.
      – HorusKol
      33 mins ago












    up vote
    5
    down vote










    up vote
    5
    down vote









    Don't talk to the manager about "a" (singular) pay raise for your staff. Talk to him about what the policy will be for implementing raises - typically, organizations pay out a cost of living increase on a known, regular schedule (ie annually) plus merit increases for strong employees, plus promotion increases when a title changes due to someone taking on more responsibility. It sounds like your organization doesn't have any of these standards in place.



    It's fair to represent to the owner that you know of frustrations among the team due to lack of raises recently, but you want to solve the problem for good - not just for now. Getting everyone a raise right now doesn't really do anything except postpone the conversation about raise policy until the next time people get upset.






    share|improve this answer












    Don't talk to the manager about "a" (singular) pay raise for your staff. Talk to him about what the policy will be for implementing raises - typically, organizations pay out a cost of living increase on a known, regular schedule (ie annually) plus merit increases for strong employees, plus promotion increases when a title changes due to someone taking on more responsibility. It sounds like your organization doesn't have any of these standards in place.



    It's fair to represent to the owner that you know of frustrations among the team due to lack of raises recently, but you want to solve the problem for good - not just for now. Getting everyone a raise right now doesn't really do anything except postpone the conversation about raise policy until the next time people get upset.







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered 1 hour ago









    dwizum

    7,46421836




    7,46421836











    • This... particularly cost of living increments. 2 years without a pay rise pretty much means your effective income has dropped 4-5% over that time. And you have developers that have gained 2 years experience, and could probably get a 10% hike if they moved.
      – HorusKol
      33 mins ago
















    • This... particularly cost of living increments. 2 years without a pay rise pretty much means your effective income has dropped 4-5% over that time. And you have developers that have gained 2 years experience, and could probably get a 10% hike if they moved.
      – HorusKol
      33 mins ago















    This... particularly cost of living increments. 2 years without a pay rise pretty much means your effective income has dropped 4-5% over that time. And you have developers that have gained 2 years experience, and could probably get a 10% hike if they moved.
    – HorusKol
    33 mins ago




    This... particularly cost of living increments. 2 years without a pay rise pretty much means your effective income has dropped 4-5% over that time. And you have developers that have gained 2 years experience, and could probably get a 10% hike if they moved.
    – HorusKol
    33 mins ago










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Yes, you should. Ideally, a person should know company politics before joining - what results are expected and what can be achieved. Especially, if you want to work with top performers and people who care about company - if they won't get reward, you'll be left with mediocre who can't find job in other place - and it may cost more.



    There are other things to consider:
    If employee will continue to work, will he improve, get new knowledge, grow further?
    Can company easily replace an employee?
    Can old/new employee bring new energy/ideas?






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Yes, you should. Ideally, a person should know company politics before joining - what results are expected and what can be achieved. Especially, if you want to work with top performers and people who care about company - if they won't get reward, you'll be left with mediocre who can't find job in other place - and it may cost more.



      There are other things to consider:
      If employee will continue to work, will he improve, get new knowledge, grow further?
      Can company easily replace an employee?
      Can old/new employee bring new energy/ideas?






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Yes, you should. Ideally, a person should know company politics before joining - what results are expected and what can be achieved. Especially, if you want to work with top performers and people who care about company - if they won't get reward, you'll be left with mediocre who can't find job in other place - and it may cost more.



        There are other things to consider:
        If employee will continue to work, will he improve, get new knowledge, grow further?
        Can company easily replace an employee?
        Can old/new employee bring new energy/ideas?






        share|improve this answer














        Yes, you should. Ideally, a person should know company politics before joining - what results are expected and what can be achieved. Especially, if you want to work with top performers and people who care about company - if they won't get reward, you'll be left with mediocre who can't find job in other place - and it may cost more.



        There are other things to consider:
        If employee will continue to work, will he improve, get new knowledge, grow further?
        Can company easily replace an employee?
        Can old/new employee bring new energy/ideas?







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 6 mins ago

























        answered 20 mins ago









        Justas

        41429




        41429




















            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            It really depends on you relationship with the owner and how you go about doing it.



            Personally, I would not go ask the owner to give raises to everyone on my team. This is essentially asking the owner to take money out of their own pocket. Remember, this is a start up. There is a very good chance the owner can't afford raises for everyone. I would not do this unless you were willing to take a pay cut in order for them to get the raise.



            What I would do is talk to the owner about the fact that you have heard someone is leaving because they have not received a raise. Even go as far as to highlight the loss the company will incur if this person leaves. Then, let the owner decide what the next course of action is.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              maybe my answer isn't clear enough: don't go asking for raises if you don't have a way to recoup the cost. The company is start up and more than likely, can't afford to give everyone yearly raises. Its pretty easy to go in there and ask the owner to take money directly out of their pocket to give to someone else. I wouldn't do that unless I was willing to do the same. Instead, present the issue and let the owner make that decision.
              – SaggingRufus
              4 hours ago






            • 1




              @Bilkokuya ill try to see if I can edit it. I understand where you were coming from.
              – SaggingRufus
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              i think its fine for a manager of a team to argue for raises for people on the team, regardless of the company's position. the manager is, effectively, the ceo of that team, and has to push to get the best results possible. if that means ensuring a higher salary to maintain quality, then so be it. the owner/snr manager can push back, of course, based on the needs of the company vs the needs of the company from that team.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              sorry, i downvoted because of the "you might be asked to pay for it", which is just really really unlikely.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              @SaggingRufus I don't follow. If the manager won't stay when given a pay cut or not given a raise, that's just what the managees are doing. The manager isn't trying to talk people out of quitting for better pay while getting a raise, and so is doing what he or she is expecting employees to do. If you're talking about a pay cut for the owner, that's ridiculous. The owner(s) get paid out of revenue minus expenses, and if people contributing to the company leave because of low pay, then revenue is going to go down if they were worth hiring in the first place.
              – David Thornley
              2 hours ago














            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            It really depends on you relationship with the owner and how you go about doing it.



            Personally, I would not go ask the owner to give raises to everyone on my team. This is essentially asking the owner to take money out of their own pocket. Remember, this is a start up. There is a very good chance the owner can't afford raises for everyone. I would not do this unless you were willing to take a pay cut in order for them to get the raise.



            What I would do is talk to the owner about the fact that you have heard someone is leaving because they have not received a raise. Even go as far as to highlight the loss the company will incur if this person leaves. Then, let the owner decide what the next course of action is.






            share|improve this answer


















            • 3




              maybe my answer isn't clear enough: don't go asking for raises if you don't have a way to recoup the cost. The company is start up and more than likely, can't afford to give everyone yearly raises. Its pretty easy to go in there and ask the owner to take money directly out of their pocket to give to someone else. I wouldn't do that unless I was willing to do the same. Instead, present the issue and let the owner make that decision.
              – SaggingRufus
              4 hours ago






            • 1




              @Bilkokuya ill try to see if I can edit it. I understand where you were coming from.
              – SaggingRufus
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              i think its fine for a manager of a team to argue for raises for people on the team, regardless of the company's position. the manager is, effectively, the ceo of that team, and has to push to get the best results possible. if that means ensuring a higher salary to maintain quality, then so be it. the owner/snr manager can push back, of course, based on the needs of the company vs the needs of the company from that team.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              sorry, i downvoted because of the "you might be asked to pay for it", which is just really really unlikely.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              @SaggingRufus I don't follow. If the manager won't stay when given a pay cut or not given a raise, that's just what the managees are doing. The manager isn't trying to talk people out of quitting for better pay while getting a raise, and so is doing what he or she is expecting employees to do. If you're talking about a pay cut for the owner, that's ridiculous. The owner(s) get paid out of revenue minus expenses, and if people contributing to the company leave because of low pay, then revenue is going to go down if they were worth hiring in the first place.
              – David Thornley
              2 hours ago












            up vote
            -3
            down vote










            up vote
            -3
            down vote









            It really depends on you relationship with the owner and how you go about doing it.



            Personally, I would not go ask the owner to give raises to everyone on my team. This is essentially asking the owner to take money out of their own pocket. Remember, this is a start up. There is a very good chance the owner can't afford raises for everyone. I would not do this unless you were willing to take a pay cut in order for them to get the raise.



            What I would do is talk to the owner about the fact that you have heard someone is leaving because they have not received a raise. Even go as far as to highlight the loss the company will incur if this person leaves. Then, let the owner decide what the next course of action is.






            share|improve this answer














            It really depends on you relationship with the owner and how you go about doing it.



            Personally, I would not go ask the owner to give raises to everyone on my team. This is essentially asking the owner to take money out of their own pocket. Remember, this is a start up. There is a very good chance the owner can't afford raises for everyone. I would not do this unless you were willing to take a pay cut in order for them to get the raise.



            What I would do is talk to the owner about the fact that you have heard someone is leaving because they have not received a raise. Even go as far as to highlight the loss the company will incur if this person leaves. Then, let the owner decide what the next course of action is.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 4 hours ago









            SaggingRufus

            9,33862751




            9,33862751







            • 3




              maybe my answer isn't clear enough: don't go asking for raises if you don't have a way to recoup the cost. The company is start up and more than likely, can't afford to give everyone yearly raises. Its pretty easy to go in there and ask the owner to take money directly out of their pocket to give to someone else. I wouldn't do that unless I was willing to do the same. Instead, present the issue and let the owner make that decision.
              – SaggingRufus
              4 hours ago






            • 1




              @Bilkokuya ill try to see if I can edit it. I understand where you were coming from.
              – SaggingRufus
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              i think its fine for a manager of a team to argue for raises for people on the team, regardless of the company's position. the manager is, effectively, the ceo of that team, and has to push to get the best results possible. if that means ensuring a higher salary to maintain quality, then so be it. the owner/snr manager can push back, of course, based on the needs of the company vs the needs of the company from that team.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              sorry, i downvoted because of the "you might be asked to pay for it", which is just really really unlikely.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              @SaggingRufus I don't follow. If the manager won't stay when given a pay cut or not given a raise, that's just what the managees are doing. The manager isn't trying to talk people out of quitting for better pay while getting a raise, and so is doing what he or she is expecting employees to do. If you're talking about a pay cut for the owner, that's ridiculous. The owner(s) get paid out of revenue minus expenses, and if people contributing to the company leave because of low pay, then revenue is going to go down if they were worth hiring in the first place.
              – David Thornley
              2 hours ago












            • 3




              maybe my answer isn't clear enough: don't go asking for raises if you don't have a way to recoup the cost. The company is start up and more than likely, can't afford to give everyone yearly raises. Its pretty easy to go in there and ask the owner to take money directly out of their pocket to give to someone else. I wouldn't do that unless I was willing to do the same. Instead, present the issue and let the owner make that decision.
              – SaggingRufus
              4 hours ago






            • 1




              @Bilkokuya ill try to see if I can edit it. I understand where you were coming from.
              – SaggingRufus
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              i think its fine for a manager of a team to argue for raises for people on the team, regardless of the company's position. the manager is, effectively, the ceo of that team, and has to push to get the best results possible. if that means ensuring a higher salary to maintain quality, then so be it. the owner/snr manager can push back, of course, based on the needs of the company vs the needs of the company from that team.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              sorry, i downvoted because of the "you might be asked to pay for it", which is just really really unlikely.
              – bharal
              3 hours ago






            • 1




              @SaggingRufus I don't follow. If the manager won't stay when given a pay cut or not given a raise, that's just what the managees are doing. The manager isn't trying to talk people out of quitting for better pay while getting a raise, and so is doing what he or she is expecting employees to do. If you're talking about a pay cut for the owner, that's ridiculous. The owner(s) get paid out of revenue minus expenses, and if people contributing to the company leave because of low pay, then revenue is going to go down if they were worth hiring in the first place.
              – David Thornley
              2 hours ago







            3




            3




            maybe my answer isn't clear enough: don't go asking for raises if you don't have a way to recoup the cost. The company is start up and more than likely, can't afford to give everyone yearly raises. Its pretty easy to go in there and ask the owner to take money directly out of their pocket to give to someone else. I wouldn't do that unless I was willing to do the same. Instead, present the issue and let the owner make that decision.
            – SaggingRufus
            4 hours ago




            maybe my answer isn't clear enough: don't go asking for raises if you don't have a way to recoup the cost. The company is start up and more than likely, can't afford to give everyone yearly raises. Its pretty easy to go in there and ask the owner to take money directly out of their pocket to give to someone else. I wouldn't do that unless I was willing to do the same. Instead, present the issue and let the owner make that decision.
            – SaggingRufus
            4 hours ago




            1




            1




            @Bilkokuya ill try to see if I can edit it. I understand where you were coming from.
            – SaggingRufus
            3 hours ago




            @Bilkokuya ill try to see if I can edit it. I understand where you were coming from.
            – SaggingRufus
            3 hours ago




            1




            1




            i think its fine for a manager of a team to argue for raises for people on the team, regardless of the company's position. the manager is, effectively, the ceo of that team, and has to push to get the best results possible. if that means ensuring a higher salary to maintain quality, then so be it. the owner/snr manager can push back, of course, based on the needs of the company vs the needs of the company from that team.
            – bharal
            3 hours ago




            i think its fine for a manager of a team to argue for raises for people on the team, regardless of the company's position. the manager is, effectively, the ceo of that team, and has to push to get the best results possible. if that means ensuring a higher salary to maintain quality, then so be it. the owner/snr manager can push back, of course, based on the needs of the company vs the needs of the company from that team.
            – bharal
            3 hours ago




            1




            1




            sorry, i downvoted because of the "you might be asked to pay for it", which is just really really unlikely.
            – bharal
            3 hours ago




            sorry, i downvoted because of the "you might be asked to pay for it", which is just really really unlikely.
            – bharal
            3 hours ago




            1




            1




            @SaggingRufus I don't follow. If the manager won't stay when given a pay cut or not given a raise, that's just what the managees are doing. The manager isn't trying to talk people out of quitting for better pay while getting a raise, and so is doing what he or she is expecting employees to do. If you're talking about a pay cut for the owner, that's ridiculous. The owner(s) get paid out of revenue minus expenses, and if people contributing to the company leave because of low pay, then revenue is going to go down if they were worth hiring in the first place.
            – David Thornley
            2 hours ago




            @SaggingRufus I don't follow. If the manager won't stay when given a pay cut or not given a raise, that's just what the managees are doing. The manager isn't trying to talk people out of quitting for better pay while getting a raise, and so is doing what he or she is expecting employees to do. If you're talking about a pay cut for the owner, that's ridiculous. The owner(s) get paid out of revenue minus expenses, and if people contributing to the company leave because of low pay, then revenue is going to go down if they were worth hiring in the first place.
            – David Thornley
            2 hours ago

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworkplace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f122351%2fshould-i-ask-for-a-pay-raise-for-employees-i-manage%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest

















































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?