RPM subpackage name

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1












Is it possible to make a subpackage without the inherited prefix from the master package?



I have a project that has a single install and need to split this into multiple packages, but the subpackages seem to inherit the name from the master package in the form of "package_name-subpackage_name".










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    3
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Is it possible to make a subpackage without the inherited prefix from the master package?



    I have a project that has a single install and need to split this into multiple packages, but the subpackages seem to inherit the name from the master package in the form of "package_name-subpackage_name".










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      3
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Is it possible to make a subpackage without the inherited prefix from the master package?



      I have a project that has a single install and need to split this into multiple packages, but the subpackages seem to inherit the name from the master package in the form of "package_name-subpackage_name".










      share|improve this question













      Is it possible to make a subpackage without the inherited prefix from the master package?



      I have a project that has a single install and need to split this into multiple packages, but the subpackages seem to inherit the name from the master package in the form of "package_name-subpackage_name".







      rpm






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 22 '13 at 14:29









      Let_Me_Be

      4,39473157




      4,39473157




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes. Use %package -n subpackage; this will suppress the prepending of the base package name.



          This is all pretty clear in the RPM docs.






          share|improve this answer






















          • Thanks. I still have a problem though, the build still creates the top package, how do I stop this?
            – Let_Me_Be
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:52










          • @Let_Me_Be I don't remember offhand if you can even do that. I suggest not worrying about it; either generate the empty package and just don't install it, or (better, I think) use it to install some simple documentation about the collection of subpackages.
            – mattdm
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:59










          • The "RPM docs" link is now broken.
            – Nathan Craike
            56 mins ago










          • @NathanCraike Fixed.
            – mattdm
            34 mins ago










          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73284%2frpm-subpackage-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes. Use %package -n subpackage; this will suppress the prepending of the base package name.



          This is all pretty clear in the RPM docs.






          share|improve this answer






















          • Thanks. I still have a problem though, the build still creates the top package, how do I stop this?
            – Let_Me_Be
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:52










          • @Let_Me_Be I don't remember offhand if you can even do that. I suggest not worrying about it; either generate the empty package and just don't install it, or (better, I think) use it to install some simple documentation about the collection of subpackages.
            – mattdm
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:59










          • The "RPM docs" link is now broken.
            – Nathan Craike
            56 mins ago










          • @NathanCraike Fixed.
            – mattdm
            34 mins ago














          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          Yes. Use %package -n subpackage; this will suppress the prepending of the base package name.



          This is all pretty clear in the RPM docs.






          share|improve this answer






















          • Thanks. I still have a problem though, the build still creates the top package, how do I stop this?
            – Let_Me_Be
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:52










          • @Let_Me_Be I don't remember offhand if you can even do that. I suggest not worrying about it; either generate the empty package and just don't install it, or (better, I think) use it to install some simple documentation about the collection of subpackages.
            – mattdm
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:59










          • The "RPM docs" link is now broken.
            – Nathan Craike
            56 mins ago










          • @NathanCraike Fixed.
            – mattdm
            34 mins ago












          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted






          Yes. Use %package -n subpackage; this will suppress the prepending of the base package name.



          This is all pretty clear in the RPM docs.






          share|improve this answer














          Yes. Use %package -n subpackage; this will suppress the prepending of the base package name.



          This is all pretty clear in the RPM docs.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 35 mins ago

























          answered Apr 22 '13 at 14:35









          mattdm

          27.5k1172110




          27.5k1172110











          • Thanks. I still have a problem though, the build still creates the top package, how do I stop this?
            – Let_Me_Be
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:52










          • @Let_Me_Be I don't remember offhand if you can even do that. I suggest not worrying about it; either generate the empty package and just don't install it, or (better, I think) use it to install some simple documentation about the collection of subpackages.
            – mattdm
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:59










          • The "RPM docs" link is now broken.
            – Nathan Craike
            56 mins ago










          • @NathanCraike Fixed.
            – mattdm
            34 mins ago
















          • Thanks. I still have a problem though, the build still creates the top package, how do I stop this?
            – Let_Me_Be
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:52










          • @Let_Me_Be I don't remember offhand if you can even do that. I suggest not worrying about it; either generate the empty package and just don't install it, or (better, I think) use it to install some simple documentation about the collection of subpackages.
            – mattdm
            Apr 22 '13 at 14:59










          • The "RPM docs" link is now broken.
            – Nathan Craike
            56 mins ago










          • @NathanCraike Fixed.
            – mattdm
            34 mins ago















          Thanks. I still have a problem though, the build still creates the top package, how do I stop this?
          – Let_Me_Be
          Apr 22 '13 at 14:52




          Thanks. I still have a problem though, the build still creates the top package, how do I stop this?
          – Let_Me_Be
          Apr 22 '13 at 14:52












          @Let_Me_Be I don't remember offhand if you can even do that. I suggest not worrying about it; either generate the empty package and just don't install it, or (better, I think) use it to install some simple documentation about the collection of subpackages.
          – mattdm
          Apr 22 '13 at 14:59




          @Let_Me_Be I don't remember offhand if you can even do that. I suggest not worrying about it; either generate the empty package and just don't install it, or (better, I think) use it to install some simple documentation about the collection of subpackages.
          – mattdm
          Apr 22 '13 at 14:59












          The "RPM docs" link is now broken.
          – Nathan Craike
          56 mins ago




          The "RPM docs" link is now broken.
          – Nathan Craike
          56 mins ago












          @NathanCraike Fixed.
          – mattdm
          34 mins ago




          @NathanCraike Fixed.
          – mattdm
          34 mins ago

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f73284%2frpm-subpackage-name%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay