Can you attack while you have two targets grappled?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












The scenario:



Fighter McFighterson has found himself between two opponents. He decides that he is best-off by grappling both of them so that his team can fire away. Maybe he'll pin them later with his Grappler feat, who knows?



McFighterson Succeeds and now has an enemy in each hand.




Can Fighter McFighterson make attacks against either (or both) of his two grappled opponents?



Either Unarmed Attacks, or using each of them as an improvised weapon against the other.




Related: What is an unarmed strike

Related: Enemies as Weapons










share|improve this question





















  • How can you grapple two creatures at once?
    – Kieveli
    1 hour ago










  • Related: increasing grappler utility
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago







  • 3




    @Kieveli Grappling only requires the use of one hand.
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago














up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












The scenario:



Fighter McFighterson has found himself between two opponents. He decides that he is best-off by grappling both of them so that his team can fire away. Maybe he'll pin them later with his Grappler feat, who knows?



McFighterson Succeeds and now has an enemy in each hand.




Can Fighter McFighterson make attacks against either (or both) of his two grappled opponents?



Either Unarmed Attacks, or using each of them as an improvised weapon against the other.




Related: What is an unarmed strike

Related: Enemies as Weapons










share|improve this question





















  • How can you grapple two creatures at once?
    – Kieveli
    1 hour ago










  • Related: increasing grappler utility
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago







  • 3




    @Kieveli Grappling only requires the use of one hand.
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago












up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1






1





The scenario:



Fighter McFighterson has found himself between two opponents. He decides that he is best-off by grappling both of them so that his team can fire away. Maybe he'll pin them later with his Grappler feat, who knows?



McFighterson Succeeds and now has an enemy in each hand.




Can Fighter McFighterson make attacks against either (or both) of his two grappled opponents?



Either Unarmed Attacks, or using each of them as an improvised weapon against the other.




Related: What is an unarmed strike

Related: Enemies as Weapons










share|improve this question













The scenario:



Fighter McFighterson has found himself between two opponents. He decides that he is best-off by grappling both of them so that his team can fire away. Maybe he'll pin them later with his Grappler feat, who knows?



McFighterson Succeeds and now has an enemy in each hand.




Can Fighter McFighterson make attacks against either (or both) of his two grappled opponents?



Either Unarmed Attacks, or using each of them as an improvised weapon against the other.




Related: What is an unarmed strike

Related: Enemies as Weapons







dnd-5e spells grapple unarmed-combat






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









goodguy5

4,99911853




4,99911853











  • How can you grapple two creatures at once?
    – Kieveli
    1 hour ago










  • Related: increasing grappler utility
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago







  • 3




    @Kieveli Grappling only requires the use of one hand.
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago
















  • How can you grapple two creatures at once?
    – Kieveli
    1 hour ago










  • Related: increasing grappler utility
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago







  • 3




    @Kieveli Grappling only requires the use of one hand.
    – goodguy5
    1 hour ago















How can you grapple two creatures at once?
– Kieveli
1 hour ago




How can you grapple two creatures at once?
– Kieveli
1 hour ago












Related: increasing grappler utility
– goodguy5
1 hour ago





Related: increasing grappler utility
– goodguy5
1 hour ago





3




3




@Kieveli Grappling only requires the use of one hand.
– goodguy5
1 hour ago




@Kieveli Grappling only requires the use of one hand.
– goodguy5
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













Yes, McFighterson the fighter can.



From the PHB errata:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on unarmed strikes should read as
follows: “Instead of using a weapon to make a melee weapon attack,
you can use an unarmed strike: a punch, kick, head-butt, or similar
forceful blow (none of which count as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed
strike deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 + your Strength modifier.
You are proficient with your unarmed strikes.”




Cut and dry. He can even multi-attack with unarmed attacks such as: headbutts, knee blows or kicks.



Weapon attacks for the fighter would require at least one hand free, but unarmed attacks now clearly have no such restriction.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • Just not for a ton of damage :)
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • Sure. But its not always about the damage :). Those two goons are ready to fail any dex checks thrown at them and (if this was at my table) disadvantage (advantage to the checking PC) on Intimidation checks to drop combat all together.
    – BaronBart
    54 mins ago


















up vote
1
down vote













Yes, you can make as many unarmed attacks as you can utilizing your Attack Action, any Extra Attacks, or any Bonus Action against either or both of those grappled target.



For clarity, I understand that, and intend to communicate that: a PC may only use a bonus action to make this unarmed attack if they have some sort of ability/feature/item that would grant them the ability to make it. One cannot simply decide to use a bonus action and punch/kick/head-butt something. Thank you various reputable users from the comment section for your helpful advice and discussion.



If you want to attack them with unarmed strikes in the same turn that you have grappled them then you:



  1. will need to have spent from your attack action using to successfully grapple each opponent .

  2. Have them within reach.

  3. Have a free hand per opponent.


  4. Be no smaller than one size smaller than your target (PHB page 195):




    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple. If you're able to make multiple attacks with the Attack action, this attack replaces one of them. The target of your grapple must be no more than one size larger than you, and it must be within your reach. Using at least one free hand...




  5. Use any remaining extra attacks or bonus action attacks to make your unarmed strikes.


Note the rules governing unarmed strikes that needn't require a free hand as they aren't a weapon, or that the strike be a punch. You may strike either target with your available knee, foot, head, mutant 3rd arm, etc.



PHB Errata V1 DTD 2015:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on
unarmed strikes should read as follows:
“Instead of using a weapon to make a
melee weapon attack, you can use an unarmed
strike
: a punch, kick, head-butt, or
similar forceful blow (none of which count
as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed strike
deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 +
your Strength modifier. You are proficient
with your unarmed strikes.”




If you want to attack them on the round after you have grappled them, then all attacks you can use during your Attack action and any bonus action attacks can be used to make unarmed strikes against those grappled opponents.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • How is the Fighter gaining access to bonus action unarmed strikes?
    – David Coffron
    57 mins ago










  • @DavidCoffron I'm reading "any bonus action" as indicating if you have a bonus action for attacking, then it can be used in the same fashion. IOW Token isn't expecting to know every possible source of lowercase-a-attacks and leaves the door open that someone could use a bonus action attack this way. Am I reading you right, Token?
    – nitsua60♦
    51 mins ago






  • 1




    Yes @nitusa60 "any bonus action if one is available through any unaccounted for feature/trait/ability that all collectively may be too numerous to list". That is, I think, as accurately as I can put it. Basically, if you have a bonus unarmed strike somehow, go for it.
    – Token
    48 mins ago











  • For clarity, the only official way right now to gain a bonus action unarmed strike at the moment is through the Martial Arts monk feature and the War Priest cleric feature; but your answer is future proofed so no problems from me. :)
    – David Coffron
    39 mins ago











  • @Token You may want to revise the wording of the answer itself with edits, since comments are only temporary, and votes are on the wording of the answer rather than answer+comments.
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    38 mins ago










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135198%2fcan-you-attack-while-you-have-two-targets-grappled%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
6
down vote













Yes, McFighterson the fighter can.



From the PHB errata:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on unarmed strikes should read as
follows: “Instead of using a weapon to make a melee weapon attack,
you can use an unarmed strike: a punch, kick, head-butt, or similar
forceful blow (none of which count as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed
strike deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 + your Strength modifier.
You are proficient with your unarmed strikes.”




Cut and dry. He can even multi-attack with unarmed attacks such as: headbutts, knee blows or kicks.



Weapon attacks for the fighter would require at least one hand free, but unarmed attacks now clearly have no such restriction.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • Just not for a ton of damage :)
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • Sure. But its not always about the damage :). Those two goons are ready to fail any dex checks thrown at them and (if this was at my table) disadvantage (advantage to the checking PC) on Intimidation checks to drop combat all together.
    – BaronBart
    54 mins ago















up vote
6
down vote













Yes, McFighterson the fighter can.



From the PHB errata:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on unarmed strikes should read as
follows: “Instead of using a weapon to make a melee weapon attack,
you can use an unarmed strike: a punch, kick, head-butt, or similar
forceful blow (none of which count as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed
strike deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 + your Strength modifier.
You are proficient with your unarmed strikes.”




Cut and dry. He can even multi-attack with unarmed attacks such as: headbutts, knee blows or kicks.



Weapon attacks for the fighter would require at least one hand free, but unarmed attacks now clearly have no such restriction.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • Just not for a ton of damage :)
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • Sure. But its not always about the damage :). Those two goons are ready to fail any dex checks thrown at them and (if this was at my table) disadvantage (advantage to the checking PC) on Intimidation checks to drop combat all together.
    – BaronBart
    54 mins ago













up vote
6
down vote










up vote
6
down vote









Yes, McFighterson the fighter can.



From the PHB errata:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on unarmed strikes should read as
follows: “Instead of using a weapon to make a melee weapon attack,
you can use an unarmed strike: a punch, kick, head-butt, or similar
forceful blow (none of which count as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed
strike deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 + your Strength modifier.
You are proficient with your unarmed strikes.”




Cut and dry. He can even multi-attack with unarmed attacks such as: headbutts, knee blows or kicks.



Weapon attacks for the fighter would require at least one hand free, but unarmed attacks now clearly have no such restriction.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Yes, McFighterson the fighter can.



From the PHB errata:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on unarmed strikes should read as
follows: “Instead of using a weapon to make a melee weapon attack,
you can use an unarmed strike: a punch, kick, head-butt, or similar
forceful blow (none of which count as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed
strike deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 + your Strength modifier.
You are proficient with your unarmed strikes.”




Cut and dry. He can even multi-attack with unarmed attacks such as: headbutts, knee blows or kicks.



Weapon attacks for the fighter would require at least one hand free, but unarmed attacks now clearly have no such restriction.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 37 mins ago









V2Blast

17.5k247112




17.5k247112






New contributor




BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 1 hour ago









BaronBart

1816




1816




New contributor




BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






BaronBart is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Just not for a ton of damage :)
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • Sure. But its not always about the damage :). Those two goons are ready to fail any dex checks thrown at them and (if this was at my table) disadvantage (advantage to the checking PC) on Intimidation checks to drop combat all together.
    – BaronBart
    54 mins ago

















  • Just not for a ton of damage :)
    – NautArch
    1 hour ago










  • Sure. But its not always about the damage :). Those two goons are ready to fail any dex checks thrown at them and (if this was at my table) disadvantage (advantage to the checking PC) on Intimidation checks to drop combat all together.
    – BaronBart
    54 mins ago
















Just not for a ton of damage :)
– NautArch
1 hour ago




Just not for a ton of damage :)
– NautArch
1 hour ago












Sure. But its not always about the damage :). Those two goons are ready to fail any dex checks thrown at them and (if this was at my table) disadvantage (advantage to the checking PC) on Intimidation checks to drop combat all together.
– BaronBart
54 mins ago





Sure. But its not always about the damage :). Those two goons are ready to fail any dex checks thrown at them and (if this was at my table) disadvantage (advantage to the checking PC) on Intimidation checks to drop combat all together.
– BaronBart
54 mins ago













up vote
1
down vote













Yes, you can make as many unarmed attacks as you can utilizing your Attack Action, any Extra Attacks, or any Bonus Action against either or both of those grappled target.



For clarity, I understand that, and intend to communicate that: a PC may only use a bonus action to make this unarmed attack if they have some sort of ability/feature/item that would grant them the ability to make it. One cannot simply decide to use a bonus action and punch/kick/head-butt something. Thank you various reputable users from the comment section for your helpful advice and discussion.



If you want to attack them with unarmed strikes in the same turn that you have grappled them then you:



  1. will need to have spent from your attack action using to successfully grapple each opponent .

  2. Have them within reach.

  3. Have a free hand per opponent.


  4. Be no smaller than one size smaller than your target (PHB page 195):




    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple. If you're able to make multiple attacks with the Attack action, this attack replaces one of them. The target of your grapple must be no more than one size larger than you, and it must be within your reach. Using at least one free hand...




  5. Use any remaining extra attacks or bonus action attacks to make your unarmed strikes.


Note the rules governing unarmed strikes that needn't require a free hand as they aren't a weapon, or that the strike be a punch. You may strike either target with your available knee, foot, head, mutant 3rd arm, etc.



PHB Errata V1 DTD 2015:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on
unarmed strikes should read as follows:
“Instead of using a weapon to make a
melee weapon attack, you can use an unarmed
strike
: a punch, kick, head-butt, or
similar forceful blow (none of which count
as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed strike
deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 +
your Strength modifier. You are proficient
with your unarmed strikes.”




If you want to attack them on the round after you have grappled them, then all attacks you can use during your Attack action and any bonus action attacks can be used to make unarmed strikes against those grappled opponents.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • How is the Fighter gaining access to bonus action unarmed strikes?
    – David Coffron
    57 mins ago










  • @DavidCoffron I'm reading "any bonus action" as indicating if you have a bonus action for attacking, then it can be used in the same fashion. IOW Token isn't expecting to know every possible source of lowercase-a-attacks and leaves the door open that someone could use a bonus action attack this way. Am I reading you right, Token?
    – nitsua60♦
    51 mins ago






  • 1




    Yes @nitusa60 "any bonus action if one is available through any unaccounted for feature/trait/ability that all collectively may be too numerous to list". That is, I think, as accurately as I can put it. Basically, if you have a bonus unarmed strike somehow, go for it.
    – Token
    48 mins ago











  • For clarity, the only official way right now to gain a bonus action unarmed strike at the moment is through the Martial Arts monk feature and the War Priest cleric feature; but your answer is future proofed so no problems from me. :)
    – David Coffron
    39 mins ago











  • @Token You may want to revise the wording of the answer itself with edits, since comments are only temporary, and votes are on the wording of the answer rather than answer+comments.
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    38 mins ago














up vote
1
down vote













Yes, you can make as many unarmed attacks as you can utilizing your Attack Action, any Extra Attacks, or any Bonus Action against either or both of those grappled target.



For clarity, I understand that, and intend to communicate that: a PC may only use a bonus action to make this unarmed attack if they have some sort of ability/feature/item that would grant them the ability to make it. One cannot simply decide to use a bonus action and punch/kick/head-butt something. Thank you various reputable users from the comment section for your helpful advice and discussion.



If you want to attack them with unarmed strikes in the same turn that you have grappled them then you:



  1. will need to have spent from your attack action using to successfully grapple each opponent .

  2. Have them within reach.

  3. Have a free hand per opponent.


  4. Be no smaller than one size smaller than your target (PHB page 195):




    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple. If you're able to make multiple attacks with the Attack action, this attack replaces one of them. The target of your grapple must be no more than one size larger than you, and it must be within your reach. Using at least one free hand...




  5. Use any remaining extra attacks or bonus action attacks to make your unarmed strikes.


Note the rules governing unarmed strikes that needn't require a free hand as they aren't a weapon, or that the strike be a punch. You may strike either target with your available knee, foot, head, mutant 3rd arm, etc.



PHB Errata V1 DTD 2015:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on
unarmed strikes should read as follows:
“Instead of using a weapon to make a
melee weapon attack, you can use an unarmed
strike
: a punch, kick, head-butt, or
similar forceful blow (none of which count
as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed strike
deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 +
your Strength modifier. You are proficient
with your unarmed strikes.”




If you want to attack them on the round after you have grappled them, then all attacks you can use during your Attack action and any bonus action attacks can be used to make unarmed strikes against those grappled opponents.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

















  • How is the Fighter gaining access to bonus action unarmed strikes?
    – David Coffron
    57 mins ago










  • @DavidCoffron I'm reading "any bonus action" as indicating if you have a bonus action for attacking, then it can be used in the same fashion. IOW Token isn't expecting to know every possible source of lowercase-a-attacks and leaves the door open that someone could use a bonus action attack this way. Am I reading you right, Token?
    – nitsua60♦
    51 mins ago






  • 1




    Yes @nitusa60 "any bonus action if one is available through any unaccounted for feature/trait/ability that all collectively may be too numerous to list". That is, I think, as accurately as I can put it. Basically, if you have a bonus unarmed strike somehow, go for it.
    – Token
    48 mins ago











  • For clarity, the only official way right now to gain a bonus action unarmed strike at the moment is through the Martial Arts monk feature and the War Priest cleric feature; but your answer is future proofed so no problems from me. :)
    – David Coffron
    39 mins ago











  • @Token You may want to revise the wording of the answer itself with edits, since comments are only temporary, and votes are on the wording of the answer rather than answer+comments.
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    38 mins ago












up vote
1
down vote










up vote
1
down vote









Yes, you can make as many unarmed attacks as you can utilizing your Attack Action, any Extra Attacks, or any Bonus Action against either or both of those grappled target.



For clarity, I understand that, and intend to communicate that: a PC may only use a bonus action to make this unarmed attack if they have some sort of ability/feature/item that would grant them the ability to make it. One cannot simply decide to use a bonus action and punch/kick/head-butt something. Thank you various reputable users from the comment section for your helpful advice and discussion.



If you want to attack them with unarmed strikes in the same turn that you have grappled them then you:



  1. will need to have spent from your attack action using to successfully grapple each opponent .

  2. Have them within reach.

  3. Have a free hand per opponent.


  4. Be no smaller than one size smaller than your target (PHB page 195):




    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple. If you're able to make multiple attacks with the Attack action, this attack replaces one of them. The target of your grapple must be no more than one size larger than you, and it must be within your reach. Using at least one free hand...




  5. Use any remaining extra attacks or bonus action attacks to make your unarmed strikes.


Note the rules governing unarmed strikes that needn't require a free hand as they aren't a weapon, or that the strike be a punch. You may strike either target with your available knee, foot, head, mutant 3rd arm, etc.



PHB Errata V1 DTD 2015:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on
unarmed strikes should read as follows:
“Instead of using a weapon to make a
melee weapon attack, you can use an unarmed
strike
: a punch, kick, head-butt, or
similar forceful blow (none of which count
as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed strike
deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 +
your Strength modifier. You are proficient
with your unarmed strikes.”




If you want to attack them on the round after you have grappled them, then all attacks you can use during your Attack action and any bonus action attacks can be used to make unarmed strikes against those grappled opponents.






share|improve this answer










New contributor




Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









Yes, you can make as many unarmed attacks as you can utilizing your Attack Action, any Extra Attacks, or any Bonus Action against either or both of those grappled target.



For clarity, I understand that, and intend to communicate that: a PC may only use a bonus action to make this unarmed attack if they have some sort of ability/feature/item that would grant them the ability to make it. One cannot simply decide to use a bonus action and punch/kick/head-butt something. Thank you various reputable users from the comment section for your helpful advice and discussion.



If you want to attack them with unarmed strikes in the same turn that you have grappled them then you:



  1. will need to have spent from your attack action using to successfully grapple each opponent .

  2. Have them within reach.

  3. Have a free hand per opponent.


  4. Be no smaller than one size smaller than your target (PHB page 195):




    When you want to grab a creature or wrestle with it, you can use the Attack action to make a special melee attack, a grapple. If you're able to make multiple attacks with the Attack action, this attack replaces one of them. The target of your grapple must be no more than one size larger than you, and it must be within your reach. Using at least one free hand...




  5. Use any remaining extra attacks or bonus action attacks to make your unarmed strikes.


Note the rules governing unarmed strikes that needn't require a free hand as they aren't a weapon, or that the strike be a punch. You may strike either target with your available knee, foot, head, mutant 3rd arm, etc.



PHB Errata V1 DTD 2015:




Melee Attacks (p. 195). The rule on
unarmed strikes should read as follows:
“Instead of using a weapon to make a
melee weapon attack, you can use an unarmed
strike
: a punch, kick, head-butt, or
similar forceful blow (none of which count
as weapons). On a hit, an unarmed strike
deals bludgeoning damage equal to 1 +
your Strength modifier. You are proficient
with your unarmed strikes.”




If you want to attack them on the round after you have grappled them, then all attacks you can use during your Attack action and any bonus action attacks can be used to make unarmed strikes against those grappled opponents.







share|improve this answer










New contributor




Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 29 mins ago





















New contributor




Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered 58 mins ago









Token

694




694




New contributor




Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Token is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • How is the Fighter gaining access to bonus action unarmed strikes?
    – David Coffron
    57 mins ago










  • @DavidCoffron I'm reading "any bonus action" as indicating if you have a bonus action for attacking, then it can be used in the same fashion. IOW Token isn't expecting to know every possible source of lowercase-a-attacks and leaves the door open that someone could use a bonus action attack this way. Am I reading you right, Token?
    – nitsua60♦
    51 mins ago






  • 1




    Yes @nitusa60 "any bonus action if one is available through any unaccounted for feature/trait/ability that all collectively may be too numerous to list". That is, I think, as accurately as I can put it. Basically, if you have a bonus unarmed strike somehow, go for it.
    – Token
    48 mins ago











  • For clarity, the only official way right now to gain a bonus action unarmed strike at the moment is through the Martial Arts monk feature and the War Priest cleric feature; but your answer is future proofed so no problems from me. :)
    – David Coffron
    39 mins ago











  • @Token You may want to revise the wording of the answer itself with edits, since comments are only temporary, and votes are on the wording of the answer rather than answer+comments.
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    38 mins ago
















  • How is the Fighter gaining access to bonus action unarmed strikes?
    – David Coffron
    57 mins ago










  • @DavidCoffron I'm reading "any bonus action" as indicating if you have a bonus action for attacking, then it can be used in the same fashion. IOW Token isn't expecting to know every possible source of lowercase-a-attacks and leaves the door open that someone could use a bonus action attack this way. Am I reading you right, Token?
    – nitsua60♦
    51 mins ago






  • 1




    Yes @nitusa60 "any bonus action if one is available through any unaccounted for feature/trait/ability that all collectively may be too numerous to list". That is, I think, as accurately as I can put it. Basically, if you have a bonus unarmed strike somehow, go for it.
    – Token
    48 mins ago











  • For clarity, the only official way right now to gain a bonus action unarmed strike at the moment is through the Martial Arts monk feature and the War Priest cleric feature; but your answer is future proofed so no problems from me. :)
    – David Coffron
    39 mins ago











  • @Token You may want to revise the wording of the answer itself with edits, since comments are only temporary, and votes are on the wording of the answer rather than answer+comments.
    – SevenSidedDie♦
    38 mins ago















How is the Fighter gaining access to bonus action unarmed strikes?
– David Coffron
57 mins ago




How is the Fighter gaining access to bonus action unarmed strikes?
– David Coffron
57 mins ago












@DavidCoffron I'm reading "any bonus action" as indicating if you have a bonus action for attacking, then it can be used in the same fashion. IOW Token isn't expecting to know every possible source of lowercase-a-attacks and leaves the door open that someone could use a bonus action attack this way. Am I reading you right, Token?
– nitsua60♦
51 mins ago




@DavidCoffron I'm reading "any bonus action" as indicating if you have a bonus action for attacking, then it can be used in the same fashion. IOW Token isn't expecting to know every possible source of lowercase-a-attacks and leaves the door open that someone could use a bonus action attack this way. Am I reading you right, Token?
– nitsua60♦
51 mins ago




1




1




Yes @nitusa60 "any bonus action if one is available through any unaccounted for feature/trait/ability that all collectively may be too numerous to list". That is, I think, as accurately as I can put it. Basically, if you have a bonus unarmed strike somehow, go for it.
– Token
48 mins ago





Yes @nitusa60 "any bonus action if one is available through any unaccounted for feature/trait/ability that all collectively may be too numerous to list". That is, I think, as accurately as I can put it. Basically, if you have a bonus unarmed strike somehow, go for it.
– Token
48 mins ago













For clarity, the only official way right now to gain a bonus action unarmed strike at the moment is through the Martial Arts monk feature and the War Priest cleric feature; but your answer is future proofed so no problems from me. :)
– David Coffron
39 mins ago





For clarity, the only official way right now to gain a bonus action unarmed strike at the moment is through the Martial Arts monk feature and the War Priest cleric feature; but your answer is future proofed so no problems from me. :)
– David Coffron
39 mins ago













@Token You may want to revise the wording of the answer itself with edits, since comments are only temporary, and votes are on the wording of the answer rather than answer+comments.
– SevenSidedDie♦
38 mins ago




@Token You may want to revise the wording of the answer itself with edits, since comments are only temporary, and votes are on the wording of the answer rather than answer+comments.
– SevenSidedDie♦
38 mins ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f135198%2fcan-you-attack-while-you-have-two-targets-grappled%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?