Only copy one key-column into merged DataFrame

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Consider the following DataFrames:



df1 = pd.DataFrame('a': [0, 1, 2, 3], 'b': list('abcd'))
df2 = pd.DataFrame('c': list('abcd'), 'd': 'Alex')


In this instance, df1['b'] and df2['c'] are the key columns. So when merging:



df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c')
a b c d
0 0 a a Alex
1 1 b b Alex
2 2 c c Alex
3 3 d d Alex


I end up with both key columns in the resultant DataFrame when I only need one. I've been using:



df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')


Is there a way to only keep one key column?










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    6
    down vote

    favorite












    Consider the following DataFrames:



    df1 = pd.DataFrame('a': [0, 1, 2, 3], 'b': list('abcd'))
    df2 = pd.DataFrame('c': list('abcd'), 'd': 'Alex')


    In this instance, df1['b'] and df2['c'] are the key columns. So when merging:



    df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c')
    a b c d
    0 0 a a Alex
    1 1 b b Alex
    2 2 c c Alex
    3 3 d d Alex


    I end up with both key columns in the resultant DataFrame when I only need one. I've been using:



    df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')


    Is there a way to only keep one key column?










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      6
      down vote

      favorite











      Consider the following DataFrames:



      df1 = pd.DataFrame('a': [0, 1, 2, 3], 'b': list('abcd'))
      df2 = pd.DataFrame('c': list('abcd'), 'd': 'Alex')


      In this instance, df1['b'] and df2['c'] are the key columns. So when merging:



      df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c')
      a b c d
      0 0 a a Alex
      1 1 b b Alex
      2 2 c c Alex
      3 3 d d Alex


      I end up with both key columns in the resultant DataFrame when I only need one. I've been using:



      df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')


      Is there a way to only keep one key column?










      share|improve this question













      Consider the following DataFrames:



      df1 = pd.DataFrame('a': [0, 1, 2, 3], 'b': list('abcd'))
      df2 = pd.DataFrame('c': list('abcd'), 'd': 'Alex')


      In this instance, df1['b'] and df2['c'] are the key columns. So when merging:



      df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c')
      a b c d
      0 0 a a Alex
      1 1 b b Alex
      2 2 c c Alex
      3 3 d d Alex


      I end up with both key columns in the resultant DataFrame when I only need one. I've been using:



      df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')


      Is there a way to only keep one key column?







      python pandas merge






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      Alex

      434318




      434318






















          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote













          One way is to set b and c as the index of your frames respectively, and use join followed by reset_index:



          df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()

          b a d
          0 a 0 Alex
          1 b 1 Alex
          2 c 2 Alex
          3 d 3 Alex


          This will be faster than the merge/drop method on large dataframes, mostly because drop is slow. @Bill's method is faster than my suggestion, and @W-B & @PiRsquared easily outspeed the other suggestions:



          import timeit

          df1 = pd.concat((df1 for _ in range(1000)))
          df2 = pd.concat((df2 for _ in range(1000)))

          def index_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
          return df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()


          def merge_method(df1 = df1, df2=df2):
          return df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')

          def rename_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
          return df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)

          def index_method2(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
          return df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')

          def assign_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
          return df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()

          def map_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
          return df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

          >>> timeit.timeit(index_method, number=10) / 10
          0.7853091600998596
          >>> timeit.timeit(merge_method, number=10) / 10
          1.1696729859002517
          >>> timeit.timeit(rename_method, number=10) / 10
          0.4291436871004407
          >>> timeit.timeit(index_method2, number=10) / 10
          0.5037374985004135
          >>> timeit.timeit(assign_method, number=10) / 10
          0.0038641377999738325
          >>> timeit.timeit(map_method, number=10) / 10
          0.006620216699957382





          share|improve this answer


















          • 3




            df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')
            – piRSquared
            46 mins ago






          • 2




            Would you like testing my speed ?
            – W-B
            42 mins ago






          • 2




            @W-B, I just did, it's far faster!
            – sacul
            40 mins ago










          • @sacul thank you :-)
            – W-B
            38 mins ago

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Another way is to give b and c the same name. At least for the merge operation.



          df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)
          a c d
          0 0 a Alex
          1 1 b Alex
          2 2 c Alex
          3 3 d Alex





          share|improve this answer



























            up vote
            4
            down vote













            Or use one set_index and left_index=True and right_on paramater:



            df1.set_index('b').merge(df2, left_index=True, right_on='c')


            Output:



             a c d
            0 0 a Alex
            1 1 b Alex
            2 2 c Alex
            3 3 d Alex





            share|improve this answer



























              up vote
              4
              down vote













              After set_index you ca directly assign the value



              df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()
              Out[233]:
              b a c
              0 a 0 Alex
              1 b 1 Alex
              2 c 2 Alex
              3 d 3 Alex





              share|improve this answer



























                up vote
                4
                down vote













                map



                Obnoxious (not recommended) method that I was compelled to put down because I accidentally posted a duplicate answer to someone else.



                df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                a b d
                0 0 a Alex
                1 1 b Alex
                2 2 c Alex
                3 3 d Alex





                share|improve this answer






















                • Wait, why not use map in this case of bringing only one column?
                  – ALollz
                  27 mins ago







                • 1




                  Because it isn't generalized. It's very specific to this toy problem. If we truly were bringing over one column, then I'd agree.
                  – piRSquared
                  26 mins ago











                Your Answer






                StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
                StackExchange.snippets.init();
                );
                );
                , "code-snippets");

                StackExchange.ready(function()
                var channelOptions =
                tags: "".split(" "),
                id: "1"
                ;
                initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

                StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
                // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
                if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
                StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
                createEditor();
                );

                else
                createEditor();

                );

                function createEditor()
                StackExchange.prepareEditor(
                heartbeatType: 'answer',
                convertImagesToLinks: true,
                noModals: true,
                showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
                reputationToPostImages: 10,
                bindNavPrevention: true,
                postfix: "",
                imageUploader:
                brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
                contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
                allowUrls: true
                ,
                onDemand: true,
                discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
                ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
                );



                );













                 

                draft saved


                draft discarded


















                StackExchange.ready(
                function ()
                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53215736%2fonly-copy-one-key-column-into-merged-dataframe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                );

                Post as a guest






























                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes








                5 Answers
                5






                active

                oldest

                votes









                active

                oldest

                votes






                active

                oldest

                votes








                up vote
                5
                down vote













                One way is to set b and c as the index of your frames respectively, and use join followed by reset_index:



                df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()

                b a d
                0 a 0 Alex
                1 b 1 Alex
                2 c 2 Alex
                3 d 3 Alex


                This will be faster than the merge/drop method on large dataframes, mostly because drop is slow. @Bill's method is faster than my suggestion, and @W-B & @PiRsquared easily outspeed the other suggestions:



                import timeit

                df1 = pd.concat((df1 for _ in range(1000)))
                df2 = pd.concat((df2 for _ in range(1000)))

                def index_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()


                def merge_method(df1 = df1, df2=df2):
                return df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')

                def rename_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)

                def index_method2(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')

                def assign_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()

                def map_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method, number=10) / 10
                0.7853091600998596
                >>> timeit.timeit(merge_method, number=10) / 10
                1.1696729859002517
                >>> timeit.timeit(rename_method, number=10) / 10
                0.4291436871004407
                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method2, number=10) / 10
                0.5037374985004135
                >>> timeit.timeit(assign_method, number=10) / 10
                0.0038641377999738325
                >>> timeit.timeit(map_method, number=10) / 10
                0.006620216699957382





                share|improve this answer


















                • 3




                  df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')
                  – piRSquared
                  46 mins ago






                • 2




                  Would you like testing my speed ?
                  – W-B
                  42 mins ago






                • 2




                  @W-B, I just did, it's far faster!
                  – sacul
                  40 mins ago










                • @sacul thank you :-)
                  – W-B
                  38 mins ago














                up vote
                5
                down vote













                One way is to set b and c as the index of your frames respectively, and use join followed by reset_index:



                df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()

                b a d
                0 a 0 Alex
                1 b 1 Alex
                2 c 2 Alex
                3 d 3 Alex


                This will be faster than the merge/drop method on large dataframes, mostly because drop is slow. @Bill's method is faster than my suggestion, and @W-B & @PiRsquared easily outspeed the other suggestions:



                import timeit

                df1 = pd.concat((df1 for _ in range(1000)))
                df2 = pd.concat((df2 for _ in range(1000)))

                def index_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()


                def merge_method(df1 = df1, df2=df2):
                return df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')

                def rename_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)

                def index_method2(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')

                def assign_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()

                def map_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method, number=10) / 10
                0.7853091600998596
                >>> timeit.timeit(merge_method, number=10) / 10
                1.1696729859002517
                >>> timeit.timeit(rename_method, number=10) / 10
                0.4291436871004407
                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method2, number=10) / 10
                0.5037374985004135
                >>> timeit.timeit(assign_method, number=10) / 10
                0.0038641377999738325
                >>> timeit.timeit(map_method, number=10) / 10
                0.006620216699957382





                share|improve this answer


















                • 3




                  df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')
                  – piRSquared
                  46 mins ago






                • 2




                  Would you like testing my speed ?
                  – W-B
                  42 mins ago






                • 2




                  @W-B, I just did, it's far faster!
                  – sacul
                  40 mins ago










                • @sacul thank you :-)
                  – W-B
                  38 mins ago












                up vote
                5
                down vote










                up vote
                5
                down vote









                One way is to set b and c as the index of your frames respectively, and use join followed by reset_index:



                df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()

                b a d
                0 a 0 Alex
                1 b 1 Alex
                2 c 2 Alex
                3 d 3 Alex


                This will be faster than the merge/drop method on large dataframes, mostly because drop is slow. @Bill's method is faster than my suggestion, and @W-B & @PiRsquared easily outspeed the other suggestions:



                import timeit

                df1 = pd.concat((df1 for _ in range(1000)))
                df2 = pd.concat((df2 for _ in range(1000)))

                def index_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()


                def merge_method(df1 = df1, df2=df2):
                return df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')

                def rename_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)

                def index_method2(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')

                def assign_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()

                def map_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method, number=10) / 10
                0.7853091600998596
                >>> timeit.timeit(merge_method, number=10) / 10
                1.1696729859002517
                >>> timeit.timeit(rename_method, number=10) / 10
                0.4291436871004407
                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method2, number=10) / 10
                0.5037374985004135
                >>> timeit.timeit(assign_method, number=10) / 10
                0.0038641377999738325
                >>> timeit.timeit(map_method, number=10) / 10
                0.006620216699957382





                share|improve this answer














                One way is to set b and c as the index of your frames respectively, and use join followed by reset_index:



                df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()

                b a d
                0 a 0 Alex
                1 b 1 Alex
                2 c 2 Alex
                3 d 3 Alex


                This will be faster than the merge/drop method on large dataframes, mostly because drop is slow. @Bill's method is faster than my suggestion, and @W-B & @PiRsquared easily outspeed the other suggestions:



                import timeit

                df1 = pd.concat((df1 for _ in range(1000)))
                df2 = pd.concat((df2 for _ in range(1000)))

                def index_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').join(df2.set_index('c')).reset_index()


                def merge_method(df1 = df1, df2=df2):
                return df1.merge(df2, left_on='b', right_on='c').drop('c', axis='columns')

                def rename_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)

                def index_method2(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')

                def assign_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()

                def map_method(df1 = df1, df2 = df2):
                return df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method, number=10) / 10
                0.7853091600998596
                >>> timeit.timeit(merge_method, number=10) / 10
                1.1696729859002517
                >>> timeit.timeit(rename_method, number=10) / 10
                0.4291436871004407
                >>> timeit.timeit(index_method2, number=10) / 10
                0.5037374985004135
                >>> timeit.timeit(assign_method, number=10) / 10
                0.0038641377999738325
                >>> timeit.timeit(map_method, number=10) / 10
                0.006620216699957382






                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 38 mins ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                sacul

                25.8k41638




                25.8k41638







                • 3




                  df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')
                  – piRSquared
                  46 mins ago






                • 2




                  Would you like testing my speed ?
                  – W-B
                  42 mins ago






                • 2




                  @W-B, I just did, it's far faster!
                  – sacul
                  40 mins ago










                • @sacul thank you :-)
                  – W-B
                  38 mins ago












                • 3




                  df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')
                  – piRSquared
                  46 mins ago






                • 2




                  Would you like testing my speed ?
                  – W-B
                  42 mins ago






                • 2




                  @W-B, I just did, it's far faster!
                  – sacul
                  40 mins ago










                • @sacul thank you :-)
                  – W-B
                  38 mins ago







                3




                3




                df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')
                – piRSquared
                46 mins ago




                df1.join(df2.set_index('c'), on='b')
                – piRSquared
                46 mins ago




                2




                2




                Would you like testing my speed ?
                – W-B
                42 mins ago




                Would you like testing my speed ?
                – W-B
                42 mins ago




                2




                2




                @W-B, I just did, it's far faster!
                – sacul
                40 mins ago




                @W-B, I just did, it's far faster!
                – sacul
                40 mins ago












                @sacul thank you :-)
                – W-B
                38 mins ago




                @sacul thank you :-)
                – W-B
                38 mins ago












                up vote
                4
                down vote













                Another way is to give b and c the same name. At least for the merge operation.



                df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)
                a c d
                0 0 a Alex
                1 1 b Alex
                2 2 c Alex
                3 3 d Alex





                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  4
                  down vote













                  Another way is to give b and c the same name. At least for the merge operation.



                  df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)
                  a c d
                  0 0 a Alex
                  1 1 b Alex
                  2 2 c Alex
                  3 3 d Alex





                  share|improve this answer






















                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    4
                    down vote









                    Another way is to give b and c the same name. At least for the merge operation.



                    df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)
                    a c d
                    0 0 a Alex
                    1 1 b Alex
                    2 2 c Alex
                    3 3 d Alex





                    share|improve this answer












                    Another way is to give b and c the same name. At least for the merge operation.



                    df1.rename('b': 'c', axis=1).merge(df2)
                    a c d
                    0 0 a Alex
                    1 1 b Alex
                    2 2 c Alex
                    3 3 d Alex






                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 56 mins ago









                    Bill

                    1,97411827




                    1,97411827




















                        up vote
                        4
                        down vote













                        Or use one set_index and left_index=True and right_on paramater:



                        df1.set_index('b').merge(df2, left_index=True, right_on='c')


                        Output:



                         a c d
                        0 0 a Alex
                        1 1 b Alex
                        2 2 c Alex
                        3 3 d Alex





                        share|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          4
                          down vote













                          Or use one set_index and left_index=True and right_on paramater:



                          df1.set_index('b').merge(df2, left_index=True, right_on='c')


                          Output:



                           a c d
                          0 0 a Alex
                          1 1 b Alex
                          2 2 c Alex
                          3 3 d Alex





                          share|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            4
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            4
                            down vote









                            Or use one set_index and left_index=True and right_on paramater:



                            df1.set_index('b').merge(df2, left_index=True, right_on='c')


                            Output:



                             a c d
                            0 0 a Alex
                            1 1 b Alex
                            2 2 c Alex
                            3 3 d Alex





                            share|improve this answer












                            Or use one set_index and left_index=True and right_on paramater:



                            df1.set_index('b').merge(df2, left_index=True, right_on='c')


                            Output:



                             a c d
                            0 0 a Alex
                            1 1 b Alex
                            2 2 c Alex
                            3 3 d Alex






                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 50 mins ago









                            Scott Boston

                            48.2k52451




                            48.2k52451




















                                up vote
                                4
                                down vote













                                After set_index you ca directly assign the value



                                df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()
                                Out[233]:
                                b a c
                                0 a 0 Alex
                                1 b 1 Alex
                                2 c 2 Alex
                                3 d 3 Alex





                                share|improve this answer
























                                  up vote
                                  4
                                  down vote













                                  After set_index you ca directly assign the value



                                  df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()
                                  Out[233]:
                                  b a c
                                  0 a 0 Alex
                                  1 b 1 Alex
                                  2 c 2 Alex
                                  3 d 3 Alex





                                  share|improve this answer






















                                    up vote
                                    4
                                    down vote










                                    up vote
                                    4
                                    down vote









                                    After set_index you ca directly assign the value



                                    df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()
                                    Out[233]:
                                    b a c
                                    0 a 0 Alex
                                    1 b 1 Alex
                                    2 c 2 Alex
                                    3 d 3 Alex





                                    share|improve this answer












                                    After set_index you ca directly assign the value



                                    df1.set_index('b').assign(c=df2.set_index('c').d).reset_index()
                                    Out[233]:
                                    b a c
                                    0 a 0 Alex
                                    1 b 1 Alex
                                    2 c 2 Alex
                                    3 d 3 Alex






                                    share|improve this answer












                                    share|improve this answer



                                    share|improve this answer










                                    answered 43 mins ago









                                    W-B

                                    90.5k72754




                                    90.5k72754




















                                        up vote
                                        4
                                        down vote













                                        map



                                        Obnoxious (not recommended) method that I was compelled to put down because I accidentally posted a duplicate answer to someone else.



                                        df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                                        a b d
                                        0 0 a Alex
                                        1 1 b Alex
                                        2 2 c Alex
                                        3 3 d Alex





                                        share|improve this answer






















                                        • Wait, why not use map in this case of bringing only one column?
                                          – ALollz
                                          27 mins ago







                                        • 1




                                          Because it isn't generalized. It's very specific to this toy problem. If we truly were bringing over one column, then I'd agree.
                                          – piRSquared
                                          26 mins ago















                                        up vote
                                        4
                                        down vote













                                        map



                                        Obnoxious (not recommended) method that I was compelled to put down because I accidentally posted a duplicate answer to someone else.



                                        df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                                        a b d
                                        0 0 a Alex
                                        1 1 b Alex
                                        2 2 c Alex
                                        3 3 d Alex





                                        share|improve this answer






















                                        • Wait, why not use map in this case of bringing only one column?
                                          – ALollz
                                          27 mins ago







                                        • 1




                                          Because it isn't generalized. It's very specific to this toy problem. If we truly were bringing over one column, then I'd agree.
                                          – piRSquared
                                          26 mins ago













                                        up vote
                                        4
                                        down vote










                                        up vote
                                        4
                                        down vote









                                        map



                                        Obnoxious (not recommended) method that I was compelled to put down because I accidentally posted a duplicate answer to someone else.



                                        df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                                        a b d
                                        0 0 a Alex
                                        1 1 b Alex
                                        2 2 c Alex
                                        3 3 d Alex





                                        share|improve this answer














                                        map



                                        Obnoxious (not recommended) method that I was compelled to put down because I accidentally posted a duplicate answer to someone else.



                                        df1.assign(d=df1.b.map(dict(df2.values)))

                                        a b d
                                        0 0 a Alex
                                        1 1 b Alex
                                        2 2 c Alex
                                        3 3 d Alex






                                        share|improve this answer














                                        share|improve this answer



                                        share|improve this answer








                                        edited 42 mins ago

























                                        answered 49 mins ago









                                        piRSquared

                                        147k21130264




                                        147k21130264











                                        • Wait, why not use map in this case of bringing only one column?
                                          – ALollz
                                          27 mins ago







                                        • 1




                                          Because it isn't generalized. It's very specific to this toy problem. If we truly were bringing over one column, then I'd agree.
                                          – piRSquared
                                          26 mins ago

















                                        • Wait, why not use map in this case of bringing only one column?
                                          – ALollz
                                          27 mins ago







                                        • 1




                                          Because it isn't generalized. It's very specific to this toy problem. If we truly were bringing over one column, then I'd agree.
                                          – piRSquared
                                          26 mins ago
















                                        Wait, why not use map in this case of bringing only one column?
                                        – ALollz
                                        27 mins ago





                                        Wait, why not use map in this case of bringing only one column?
                                        – ALollz
                                        27 mins ago





                                        1




                                        1




                                        Because it isn't generalized. It's very specific to this toy problem. If we truly were bringing over one column, then I'd agree.
                                        – piRSquared
                                        26 mins ago





                                        Because it isn't generalized. It's very specific to this toy problem. If we truly were bringing over one column, then I'd agree.
                                        – piRSquared
                                        26 mins ago


















                                         

                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded















































                                         


                                        draft saved


                                        draft discarded














                                        StackExchange.ready(
                                        function ()
                                        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f53215736%2fonly-copy-one-key-column-into-merged-dataframe%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                        );

                                        Post as a guest













































































                                        Popular posts from this blog

                                        How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                        Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                                        How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?