How to use spectrum analyser to find problem frequencies

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I would like be able to identify problems in a mix by looking at the spectrum analyser, now I realize that mixing is done with the ears, not the eyes but I mix in a room with bad acoustics so I cannot rely only on what I hear. How do problems in a mix look in a spectrum analyser? (by problems I mean things like resonances, mud or anything that can make a song sound bad)










share|improve this question







New contributor




lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Sadly, if there were reasonably simple algorithms which could process the output of a complex FFT and give you the info you want, everyone would be using them. There aren't.
    – Carl Witthoft
    5 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I would like be able to identify problems in a mix by looking at the spectrum analyser, now I realize that mixing is done with the ears, not the eyes but I mix in a room with bad acoustics so I cannot rely only on what I hear. How do problems in a mix look in a spectrum analyser? (by problems I mean things like resonances, mud or anything that can make a song sound bad)










share|improve this question







New contributor




lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 1




    Sadly, if there were reasonably simple algorithms which could process the output of a complex FFT and give you the info you want, everyone would be using them. There aren't.
    – Carl Witthoft
    5 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I would like be able to identify problems in a mix by looking at the spectrum analyser, now I realize that mixing is done with the ears, not the eyes but I mix in a room with bad acoustics so I cannot rely only on what I hear. How do problems in a mix look in a spectrum analyser? (by problems I mean things like resonances, mud or anything that can make a song sound bad)










share|improve this question







New contributor




lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











I would like be able to identify problems in a mix by looking at the spectrum analyser, now I realize that mixing is done with the ears, not the eyes but I mix in a room with bad acoustics so I cannot rely only on what I hear. How do problems in a mix look in a spectrum analyser? (by problems I mean things like resonances, mud or anything that can make a song sound bad)







software mixing






share|improve this question







New contributor




lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 7 hours ago









lost-mid

111




111




New contributor




lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






lost-mid is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    Sadly, if there were reasonably simple algorithms which could process the output of a complex FFT and give you the info you want, everyone would be using them. There aren't.
    – Carl Witthoft
    5 hours ago












  • 1




    Sadly, if there were reasonably simple algorithms which could process the output of a complex FFT and give you the info you want, everyone would be using them. There aren't.
    – Carl Witthoft
    5 hours ago







1




1




Sadly, if there were reasonably simple algorithms which could process the output of a complex FFT and give you the info you want, everyone would be using them. There aren't.
– Carl Witthoft
5 hours ago




Sadly, if there were reasonably simple algorithms which could process the output of a complex FFT and give you the info you want, everyone would be using them. There aren't.
– Carl Witthoft
5 hours ago










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote













Welcome to our Q&A board! :-)



Long story short: resonances are frequencies with especially high amplitude (so look at especially bright stripes on spectrum analyser), mud is too much lower frequencies (and that is not so obvious to tell by only looking at the spectrum).



But in my opinion it is impossible to make a good mix just by looking, you REALLY need to HEAR it. If the acoustics of the room is a problem no worries - just equip yourself with proper headphones. Better mix on the headphones than on monitors in room with bad acoustics. I recommend for example Sennheiser HD600, they have lot of detail and do not enhance the sound (the characteristic is flat as possible). Of course it's not the only model, you should browse more audio engineering-related forums to find other recommended models.



Also, please use search function, there was quite similar question recently - How to identify mud and resonance in a mix






share|improve this answer
















  • 3




    Can't quite agree with the advice of mixing with headphones. In particular “mud” will generally not be as obvious on headphones as it is on speakers. Good as supplementary aid, yes, but dangerous if you rely solely on them.
    – leftaroundabout
    5 hours ago

















up vote
3
down vote













We ALL mix in a room with bad acoustics (and using imperfect monitors)! That's why we get nice and close to our monitor speakers - more direct sound, less room sound - and why we take our mixes to different playback systems - car stereo, home hi-fi, phone and earbuds, boom-box - to check what a range of listners will hear. With experience, we get to know how a mix needs to sound on our studio monitors.



There's one thing a spectrum analyser CAN be invaluable for. It's easy to over-do the low bass. YOU may not have a playback system that goes (audibly) down to 20Hz... (The flip-side of this is that sometimes 'compatibility' isn't the way to go. If you're making EDM aimed at club systems, do a 'Club mix' with room-shaking bass, a 'Radio mix' without.)






share|improve this answer




















  • I agree. Plus there are few DIY inexpensive tricks to improve acoustic for mixing. I've heard that putting behind you books on the shelves improves much the clarity, but haven't tried that yet.
    – Wookie88
    5 hours ago










  • Yes, a full bookshelf is certainly non-reflective, and might even be a pretty good bass trap! Studio clutter is GOOD!
    – Laurence Payne
    36 mins ago

















up vote
0
down vote













I use a spectrum analyzer to equalize the sound in the room, the monitors and the room will have their own resonances which can be identified with the analyzer. When the peaks are attenuated and the weak frequencies boosted to achieve flat response in the room then the listener/engineer has the most ideal possibility of adjusting the mix to accurately represent the original sound as it was recorded. That said, spectrum analyzers and equalizers have their limitations, well designed rooms and flat responding monitors are also very important.






share|improve this answer




















  • You can't 'eq out' a bad room. Fix the room, and play as accurate a signal as possible into it.
    – Laurence Payne
    34 mins ago










Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "240"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






lost-mid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76283%2fhow-to-use-spectrum-analyser-to-find-problem-frequencies%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
3
down vote













Welcome to our Q&A board! :-)



Long story short: resonances are frequencies with especially high amplitude (so look at especially bright stripes on spectrum analyser), mud is too much lower frequencies (and that is not so obvious to tell by only looking at the spectrum).



But in my opinion it is impossible to make a good mix just by looking, you REALLY need to HEAR it. If the acoustics of the room is a problem no worries - just equip yourself with proper headphones. Better mix on the headphones than on monitors in room with bad acoustics. I recommend for example Sennheiser HD600, they have lot of detail and do not enhance the sound (the characteristic is flat as possible). Of course it's not the only model, you should browse more audio engineering-related forums to find other recommended models.



Also, please use search function, there was quite similar question recently - How to identify mud and resonance in a mix






share|improve this answer
















  • 3




    Can't quite agree with the advice of mixing with headphones. In particular “mud” will generally not be as obvious on headphones as it is on speakers. Good as supplementary aid, yes, but dangerous if you rely solely on them.
    – leftaroundabout
    5 hours ago














up vote
3
down vote













Welcome to our Q&A board! :-)



Long story short: resonances are frequencies with especially high amplitude (so look at especially bright stripes on spectrum analyser), mud is too much lower frequencies (and that is not so obvious to tell by only looking at the spectrum).



But in my opinion it is impossible to make a good mix just by looking, you REALLY need to HEAR it. If the acoustics of the room is a problem no worries - just equip yourself with proper headphones. Better mix on the headphones than on monitors in room with bad acoustics. I recommend for example Sennheiser HD600, they have lot of detail and do not enhance the sound (the characteristic is flat as possible). Of course it's not the only model, you should browse more audio engineering-related forums to find other recommended models.



Also, please use search function, there was quite similar question recently - How to identify mud and resonance in a mix






share|improve this answer
















  • 3




    Can't quite agree with the advice of mixing with headphones. In particular “mud” will generally not be as obvious on headphones as it is on speakers. Good as supplementary aid, yes, but dangerous if you rely solely on them.
    – leftaroundabout
    5 hours ago












up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









Welcome to our Q&A board! :-)



Long story short: resonances are frequencies with especially high amplitude (so look at especially bright stripes on spectrum analyser), mud is too much lower frequencies (and that is not so obvious to tell by only looking at the spectrum).



But in my opinion it is impossible to make a good mix just by looking, you REALLY need to HEAR it. If the acoustics of the room is a problem no worries - just equip yourself with proper headphones. Better mix on the headphones than on monitors in room with bad acoustics. I recommend for example Sennheiser HD600, they have lot of detail and do not enhance the sound (the characteristic is flat as possible). Of course it's not the only model, you should browse more audio engineering-related forums to find other recommended models.



Also, please use search function, there was quite similar question recently - How to identify mud and resonance in a mix






share|improve this answer












Welcome to our Q&A board! :-)



Long story short: resonances are frequencies with especially high amplitude (so look at especially bright stripes on spectrum analyser), mud is too much lower frequencies (and that is not so obvious to tell by only looking at the spectrum).



But in my opinion it is impossible to make a good mix just by looking, you REALLY need to HEAR it. If the acoustics of the room is a problem no worries - just equip yourself with proper headphones. Better mix on the headphones than on monitors in room with bad acoustics. I recommend for example Sennheiser HD600, they have lot of detail and do not enhance the sound (the characteristic is flat as possible). Of course it's not the only model, you should browse more audio engineering-related forums to find other recommended models.



Also, please use search function, there was quite similar question recently - How to identify mud and resonance in a mix







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 6 hours ago









Wookie88

29918




29918







  • 3




    Can't quite agree with the advice of mixing with headphones. In particular “mud” will generally not be as obvious on headphones as it is on speakers. Good as supplementary aid, yes, but dangerous if you rely solely on them.
    – leftaroundabout
    5 hours ago












  • 3




    Can't quite agree with the advice of mixing with headphones. In particular “mud” will generally not be as obvious on headphones as it is on speakers. Good as supplementary aid, yes, but dangerous if you rely solely on them.
    – leftaroundabout
    5 hours ago







3




3




Can't quite agree with the advice of mixing with headphones. In particular “mud” will generally not be as obvious on headphones as it is on speakers. Good as supplementary aid, yes, but dangerous if you rely solely on them.
– leftaroundabout
5 hours ago




Can't quite agree with the advice of mixing with headphones. In particular “mud” will generally not be as obvious on headphones as it is on speakers. Good as supplementary aid, yes, but dangerous if you rely solely on them.
– leftaroundabout
5 hours ago










up vote
3
down vote













We ALL mix in a room with bad acoustics (and using imperfect monitors)! That's why we get nice and close to our monitor speakers - more direct sound, less room sound - and why we take our mixes to different playback systems - car stereo, home hi-fi, phone and earbuds, boom-box - to check what a range of listners will hear. With experience, we get to know how a mix needs to sound on our studio monitors.



There's one thing a spectrum analyser CAN be invaluable for. It's easy to over-do the low bass. YOU may not have a playback system that goes (audibly) down to 20Hz... (The flip-side of this is that sometimes 'compatibility' isn't the way to go. If you're making EDM aimed at club systems, do a 'Club mix' with room-shaking bass, a 'Radio mix' without.)






share|improve this answer




















  • I agree. Plus there are few DIY inexpensive tricks to improve acoustic for mixing. I've heard that putting behind you books on the shelves improves much the clarity, but haven't tried that yet.
    – Wookie88
    5 hours ago










  • Yes, a full bookshelf is certainly non-reflective, and might even be a pretty good bass trap! Studio clutter is GOOD!
    – Laurence Payne
    36 mins ago














up vote
3
down vote













We ALL mix in a room with bad acoustics (and using imperfect monitors)! That's why we get nice and close to our monitor speakers - more direct sound, less room sound - and why we take our mixes to different playback systems - car stereo, home hi-fi, phone and earbuds, boom-box - to check what a range of listners will hear. With experience, we get to know how a mix needs to sound on our studio monitors.



There's one thing a spectrum analyser CAN be invaluable for. It's easy to over-do the low bass. YOU may not have a playback system that goes (audibly) down to 20Hz... (The flip-side of this is that sometimes 'compatibility' isn't the way to go. If you're making EDM aimed at club systems, do a 'Club mix' with room-shaking bass, a 'Radio mix' without.)






share|improve this answer




















  • I agree. Plus there are few DIY inexpensive tricks to improve acoustic for mixing. I've heard that putting behind you books on the shelves improves much the clarity, but haven't tried that yet.
    – Wookie88
    5 hours ago










  • Yes, a full bookshelf is certainly non-reflective, and might even be a pretty good bass trap! Studio clutter is GOOD!
    – Laurence Payne
    36 mins ago












up vote
3
down vote










up vote
3
down vote









We ALL mix in a room with bad acoustics (and using imperfect monitors)! That's why we get nice and close to our monitor speakers - more direct sound, less room sound - and why we take our mixes to different playback systems - car stereo, home hi-fi, phone and earbuds, boom-box - to check what a range of listners will hear. With experience, we get to know how a mix needs to sound on our studio monitors.



There's one thing a spectrum analyser CAN be invaluable for. It's easy to over-do the low bass. YOU may not have a playback system that goes (audibly) down to 20Hz... (The flip-side of this is that sometimes 'compatibility' isn't the way to go. If you're making EDM aimed at club systems, do a 'Club mix' with room-shaking bass, a 'Radio mix' without.)






share|improve this answer












We ALL mix in a room with bad acoustics (and using imperfect monitors)! That's why we get nice and close to our monitor speakers - more direct sound, less room sound - and why we take our mixes to different playback systems - car stereo, home hi-fi, phone and earbuds, boom-box - to check what a range of listners will hear. With experience, we get to know how a mix needs to sound on our studio monitors.



There's one thing a spectrum analyser CAN be invaluable for. It's easy to over-do the low bass. YOU may not have a playback system that goes (audibly) down to 20Hz... (The flip-side of this is that sometimes 'compatibility' isn't the way to go. If you're making EDM aimed at club systems, do a 'Club mix' with room-shaking bass, a 'Radio mix' without.)







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 5 hours ago









Laurence Payne

29.2k1451




29.2k1451











  • I agree. Plus there are few DIY inexpensive tricks to improve acoustic for mixing. I've heard that putting behind you books on the shelves improves much the clarity, but haven't tried that yet.
    – Wookie88
    5 hours ago










  • Yes, a full bookshelf is certainly non-reflective, and might even be a pretty good bass trap! Studio clutter is GOOD!
    – Laurence Payne
    36 mins ago
















  • I agree. Plus there are few DIY inexpensive tricks to improve acoustic for mixing. I've heard that putting behind you books on the shelves improves much the clarity, but haven't tried that yet.
    – Wookie88
    5 hours ago










  • Yes, a full bookshelf is certainly non-reflective, and might even be a pretty good bass trap! Studio clutter is GOOD!
    – Laurence Payne
    36 mins ago















I agree. Plus there are few DIY inexpensive tricks to improve acoustic for mixing. I've heard that putting behind you books on the shelves improves much the clarity, but haven't tried that yet.
– Wookie88
5 hours ago




I agree. Plus there are few DIY inexpensive tricks to improve acoustic for mixing. I've heard that putting behind you books on the shelves improves much the clarity, but haven't tried that yet.
– Wookie88
5 hours ago












Yes, a full bookshelf is certainly non-reflective, and might even be a pretty good bass trap! Studio clutter is GOOD!
– Laurence Payne
36 mins ago




Yes, a full bookshelf is certainly non-reflective, and might even be a pretty good bass trap! Studio clutter is GOOD!
– Laurence Payne
36 mins ago










up vote
0
down vote













I use a spectrum analyzer to equalize the sound in the room, the monitors and the room will have their own resonances which can be identified with the analyzer. When the peaks are attenuated and the weak frequencies boosted to achieve flat response in the room then the listener/engineer has the most ideal possibility of adjusting the mix to accurately represent the original sound as it was recorded. That said, spectrum analyzers and equalizers have their limitations, well designed rooms and flat responding monitors are also very important.






share|improve this answer




















  • You can't 'eq out' a bad room. Fix the room, and play as accurate a signal as possible into it.
    – Laurence Payne
    34 mins ago














up vote
0
down vote













I use a spectrum analyzer to equalize the sound in the room, the monitors and the room will have their own resonances which can be identified with the analyzer. When the peaks are attenuated and the weak frequencies boosted to achieve flat response in the room then the listener/engineer has the most ideal possibility of adjusting the mix to accurately represent the original sound as it was recorded. That said, spectrum analyzers and equalizers have their limitations, well designed rooms and flat responding monitors are also very important.






share|improve this answer




















  • You can't 'eq out' a bad room. Fix the room, and play as accurate a signal as possible into it.
    – Laurence Payne
    34 mins ago












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









I use a spectrum analyzer to equalize the sound in the room, the monitors and the room will have their own resonances which can be identified with the analyzer. When the peaks are attenuated and the weak frequencies boosted to achieve flat response in the room then the listener/engineer has the most ideal possibility of adjusting the mix to accurately represent the original sound as it was recorded. That said, spectrum analyzers and equalizers have their limitations, well designed rooms and flat responding monitors are also very important.






share|improve this answer












I use a spectrum analyzer to equalize the sound in the room, the monitors and the room will have their own resonances which can be identified with the analyzer. When the peaks are attenuated and the weak frequencies boosted to achieve flat response in the room then the listener/engineer has the most ideal possibility of adjusting the mix to accurately represent the original sound as it was recorded. That said, spectrum analyzers and equalizers have their limitations, well designed rooms and flat responding monitors are also very important.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 4 hours ago









skinny peacock

1,7922321




1,7922321











  • You can't 'eq out' a bad room. Fix the room, and play as accurate a signal as possible into it.
    – Laurence Payne
    34 mins ago
















  • You can't 'eq out' a bad room. Fix the room, and play as accurate a signal as possible into it.
    – Laurence Payne
    34 mins ago















You can't 'eq out' a bad room. Fix the room, and play as accurate a signal as possible into it.
– Laurence Payne
34 mins ago




You can't 'eq out' a bad room. Fix the room, and play as accurate a signal as possible into it.
– Laurence Payne
34 mins ago










lost-mid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









 

draft saved


draft discarded


















lost-mid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












lost-mid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











lost-mid is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmusic.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f76283%2fhow-to-use-spectrum-analyser-to-find-problem-frequencies%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

Peggy Mitchell

The Forum (Inglewood, California)

Palaiologos