Proving false or true a matrix statement

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



What does it mean?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



    If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



    I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



    I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



    What does it mean?










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



      If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



      I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



      I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



      What does it mean?










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



      If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



      I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



      I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



      What does it mean?







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      lisyarus

      10.1k21433




      10.1k21433






      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      Forextrader

      112




      112




      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



          $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
          = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
          = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



            $$ I - fracJn+1 =
            left[beginarraycccc
            1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
            0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
            vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
            0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
            endarrayright]
            -
            left[beginarraycccc
            frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
            frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
            vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
            frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
            endarrayright]$$



            $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
            fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
            frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
            vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
            frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
            endarrayright] $$



            An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2963656%2fproving-false-or-true-a-matrix-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              3
              down vote













              It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



              $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
              = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
              = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



                $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
                = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
                = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



                  $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
                  = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
                  = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



                  $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
                  = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
                  = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  lisyarus

                  10.1k21433




                  10.1k21433




















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                      $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                      left[beginarraycccc
                      1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                      0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                      vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                      0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                      endarrayright]
                      -
                      left[beginarraycccc
                      frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                      frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                      vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                      frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                      endarrayright]$$



                      $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                      fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                      frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                      vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                      frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                      endarrayright] $$



                      An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                        $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                        left[beginarraycccc
                        1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                        0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                        vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                        0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                        endarrayright]
                        -
                        left[beginarraycccc
                        frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                        frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                        vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                        frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                        endarrayright]$$



                        $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                        fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                        frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                        vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                        frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                        endarrayright] $$



                        An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote









                          The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                          $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                          0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                          endarrayright]
                          -
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          endarrayright]$$



                          $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                          fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                          endarrayright] $$



                          An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                          $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                          0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                          endarrayright]
                          -
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          endarrayright]$$



                          $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                          fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                          endarrayright] $$



                          An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited 55 mins ago

























                          answered 1 hour ago









                          M. Nestor

                          5239




                          5239




















                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


















                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2963656%2fproving-false-or-true-a-matrix-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                              How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?