Proving false or true a matrix statement

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



What does it mean?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite












    I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



    If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



    I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



    I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



    What does it mean?










    share|cite|improve this question









    New contributor




    Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite











      I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



      If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



      I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



      I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



      What does it mean?










      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      I am suppose to figure out if this is false or true.



      If $I$ is the $n$ x $n$ identity matrix, and $J$ is an $n$ x $n$ matrix consisting entirely of ones, then the matrix $A = I - fracJn+1$ is idempotent (ie $A^2$ = $A$)



      I understand obviously what $I$ and $J$ are, my issue is with the $A = I - fracJn+1$



      I searched my textbook and found no reference to it.



      What does it mean?







      linear-algebra






      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question









      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited 2 hours ago









      lisyarus

      10.1k21433




      10.1k21433






      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 hours ago









      Forextrader

      112




      112




      New contributor




      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Forextrader is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



          $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
          = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
          = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            2
            down vote













            The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



            $$ I - fracJn+1 =
            left[beginarraycccc
            1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
            0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
            vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
            0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
            endarrayright]
            -
            left[beginarraycccc
            frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
            frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
            vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
            frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
            endarrayright]$$



            $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
            fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
            frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
            vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
            frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
            endarrayright] $$



            An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






            share|cite|improve this answer






















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "69"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2963656%2fproving-false-or-true-a-matrix-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              3
              down vote













              It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



              $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
              = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
              = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                3
                down vote













                It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



                $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
                = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
                = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  3
                  down vote









                  It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



                  $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
                  = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
                  = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  It is not hard to manually obtain $J^2=nJ$. Now it's just a matter of some matrix algebra:



                  $$A^2=(I-frac1n+1J)^2=I^2-frac1n+1IJ-frac1n+1JI+frac1(n+1)^2J^2 = \
                  = I - frac2n+1J + fracn(n+1)^2J = I + fracn-2(n+1)(n+1)^2J = \
                  = I + frac-n-1(n+1)^2J = I - frac1n+1J = A$$







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  lisyarus

                  10.1k21433




                  10.1k21433




















                      up vote
                      2
                      down vote













                      The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                      $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                      left[beginarraycccc
                      1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                      0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                      vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                      0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                      endarrayright]
                      -
                      left[beginarraycccc
                      frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                      frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                      vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                      frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                      endarrayright]$$



                      $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                      fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                      frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                      vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                      frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                      endarrayright] $$



                      An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






                      share|cite|improve this answer


























                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                        $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                        left[beginarraycccc
                        1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                        0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                        vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                        0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                        endarrayright]
                        -
                        left[beginarraycccc
                        frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                        frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                        vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                        frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                        endarrayright]$$



                        $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                        fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                        frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                        vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                        frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                        endarrayright] $$



                        An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote









                          The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                          $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                          0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                          endarrayright]
                          -
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          endarrayright]$$



                          $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                          fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                          endarrayright] $$



                          An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.






                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          The expression $A = I - fracJn+1$ is matrix addition, where $fracJn+1$ represents scalar multiplication of the matrix $J$ by $frac1n+1$. Since the matrix $J$ consists completely of $1$s, each entry of the scaled matrix $fracJn+1$ is $frac1n+1$. Here is the matrix addition:



                          $$ I - fracJn+1 =
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          1 & 0 & cdots & 0 \
                          0 & 1 & cdots & 0 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          0 & 0 & cdots & 1 \
                          endarrayright]
                          -
                          left[beginarraycccc
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac1n+1 & frac1n+1 & cdots & frac1n+1 \
                          endarrayright]$$



                          $$ implies A = left[beginarraycccc
                          fracnn+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          frac-1n+1 & fracnn+1 & cdots & frac-1n+1 \
                          vdots & vdots & ddots & vdots \
                          frac-1n+1 & frac-1n+1 & cdots & fracnn+1 \
                          endarrayright] $$



                          An interesting matrix. You could describe it by $A_ij=fracnn+1$ if $i=j$ and $A_ij=frac-1n+1$ if $ineq j$.







                          share|cite|improve this answer














                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer








                          edited 55 mins ago

























                          answered 1 hour ago









                          M. Nestor

                          5239




                          5239




















                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


















                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              Forextrader is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2963656%2fproving-false-or-true-a-matrix-statement%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Christian Cage

                              How to properly install USB display driver for Fresco Logic FL2000DX on Ubuntu?