Is there any indication that epic spells could return to the Realms?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












In the Forgotten Realms (before Mystra's ban) the great arcanists of Netheril designed and frequently used epic level spells such as Proctiv's move mountain, a 10th level spell used to raise a mountain and turn it upside down ready to be turned into a floating city.



Have any of the developers mentioned (or even hinted at) the future leading to a lax in Mystra's ban (and therefore an increase in spells possible)? Not necessarily players being able to achieve these spells but rather NPCs like Elminster and arcane casters of similar power.










share|improve this question























  • Related question: Are characters limited to 20th level in 5e?
    – Quadratic Wizard
    6 hours ago










  • Asking about Mystra's ban is a completely different question to asking about epic spells, and I'm not sure why you're mentioning the Spellplague here at all.
    – Miniman
    47 mins ago










  • @miniman mystra's ban is what prevents spells higher than 9th from being cast. I had thought that the spellplague was caused by mystra's ban but I now realize it is seperate
    – rpgstar
    11 mins ago















up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












In the Forgotten Realms (before Mystra's ban) the great arcanists of Netheril designed and frequently used epic level spells such as Proctiv's move mountain, a 10th level spell used to raise a mountain and turn it upside down ready to be turned into a floating city.



Have any of the developers mentioned (or even hinted at) the future leading to a lax in Mystra's ban (and therefore an increase in spells possible)? Not necessarily players being able to achieve these spells but rather NPCs like Elminster and arcane casters of similar power.










share|improve this question























  • Related question: Are characters limited to 20th level in 5e?
    – Quadratic Wizard
    6 hours ago










  • Asking about Mystra's ban is a completely different question to asking about epic spells, and I'm not sure why you're mentioning the Spellplague here at all.
    – Miniman
    47 mins ago










  • @miniman mystra's ban is what prevents spells higher than 9th from being cast. I had thought that the spellplague was caused by mystra's ban but I now realize it is seperate
    – rpgstar
    11 mins ago













up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





In the Forgotten Realms (before Mystra's ban) the great arcanists of Netheril designed and frequently used epic level spells such as Proctiv's move mountain, a 10th level spell used to raise a mountain and turn it upside down ready to be turned into a floating city.



Have any of the developers mentioned (or even hinted at) the future leading to a lax in Mystra's ban (and therefore an increase in spells possible)? Not necessarily players being able to achieve these spells but rather NPCs like Elminster and arcane casters of similar power.










share|improve this question















In the Forgotten Realms (before Mystra's ban) the great arcanists of Netheril designed and frequently used epic level spells such as Proctiv's move mountain, a 10th level spell used to raise a mountain and turn it upside down ready to be turned into a floating city.



Have any of the developers mentioned (or even hinted at) the future leading to a lax in Mystra's ban (and therefore an increase in spells possible)? Not necessarily players being able to achieve these spells but rather NPCs like Elminster and arcane casters of similar power.







dnd-5e dungeons-and-dragons forgotten-realms lore






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 7 mins ago









V2Blast

16.8k242107




16.8k242107










asked 6 hours ago









rpgstar

1,261330




1,261330











  • Related question: Are characters limited to 20th level in 5e?
    – Quadratic Wizard
    6 hours ago










  • Asking about Mystra's ban is a completely different question to asking about epic spells, and I'm not sure why you're mentioning the Spellplague here at all.
    – Miniman
    47 mins ago










  • @miniman mystra's ban is what prevents spells higher than 9th from being cast. I had thought that the spellplague was caused by mystra's ban but I now realize it is seperate
    – rpgstar
    11 mins ago

















  • Related question: Are characters limited to 20th level in 5e?
    – Quadratic Wizard
    6 hours ago










  • Asking about Mystra's ban is a completely different question to asking about epic spells, and I'm not sure why you're mentioning the Spellplague here at all.
    – Miniman
    47 mins ago










  • @miniman mystra's ban is what prevents spells higher than 9th from being cast. I had thought that the spellplague was caused by mystra's ban but I now realize it is seperate
    – rpgstar
    11 mins ago
















Related question: Are characters limited to 20th level in 5e?
– Quadratic Wizard
6 hours ago




Related question: Are characters limited to 20th level in 5e?
– Quadratic Wizard
6 hours ago












Asking about Mystra's ban is a completely different question to asking about epic spells, and I'm not sure why you're mentioning the Spellplague here at all.
– Miniman
47 mins ago




Asking about Mystra's ban is a completely different question to asking about epic spells, and I'm not sure why you're mentioning the Spellplague here at all.
– Miniman
47 mins ago












@miniman mystra's ban is what prevents spells higher than 9th from being cast. I had thought that the spellplague was caused by mystra's ban but I now realize it is seperate
– rpgstar
11 mins ago





@miniman mystra's ban is what prevents spells higher than 9th from being cast. I had thought that the spellplague was caused by mystra's ban but I now realize it is seperate
– rpgstar
11 mins ago











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
11
down vote













It's unlikely. Level 20 is defined as a hard cap in D&D 5th edition.



According to a Twitter exchange with Jeremy Crawford:




Q: Could an NPC with class levels get to a character level above 20 as long as they're multiclassed? If 20 isn't the max, what would be their max level?



Crawford: The maximum character level in D&D is 20.



Q: Hopefully subject to change as we get more higher level content over the next few years?



Crawford: If you'd like to keep improving at 20th level, see "Epic Boons" (DMG, 231), which details way to get more powerful at the level cap.




DMG p.231 is quite specific that the hard cap is level 20:




Epic boons can also be used as a form of advancement, a way to provide greater power to characters who have no more levels to gain.




And on page 38 it is even more specific:




Characters who reach 20th level have attained the pinnacle of mortal achievement ... Their ultimate destinies com to pass. A cleric might be taken up into the heavens to serve as a god's right hand ... Characters gain no more levels at this point, but they can still advance in meaningful ways and continue performing epic deeds that resound throughout the multiverse.




This is different to D&D third edition, where NPCs above 20th level were already described in the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer (2000) and Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (2001).



Support for epic-level play was limited in D&D third edition, as most campaigns never reached that level, which limited the value of content for that tier. Between this, and D&D 5e's more limited release schedule, it's unlikely that we'd see an official Epic Level Handbook, although there are already some third-party and homebrew solutions readily available online.



D&D 5e's epic boons are described as granting such incredible things as a single extra 9th level spell slot, but not 10th level spells or beyond, at least not in the hands of player characters. There's nothing stopping an adventure module from having rituals, artifacts, creatures or even NPCs capable of wielding power beyond 9th level spells, but it's not within the scope of what's available to player characters.



At a panel introducing the first 5e-era Forgotten Realms novels, James Wyatt revealed that the novels would focus on stories of low-level characters, rather than the epic and deific conflicts that appeared during earlier editions of D&D. It seems clear that both in the game and in the world lore in general, the intent for this edition is to focus on ordinary heroes and not beings like Elminster or Mystra.






share|improve this answer






















  • Good answer, to the usual urge of people to "turn it up to 11" regardless of how far the dials go.
    – KorvinStarmast
    3 hours ago










  • thanks for that... not quite what I was looking for though. I've added the [lore] tag and tried to clarify. I was hoping for developer intentions as far as the FR story goes and Mystra's ban
    – rpgstar
    1 hour ago










  • @rpgstar developer intent questions are off-topic.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago











  • @PurpleMonkey This question is about lore intent, rather than rule intent, however. There's a long two-part panel video I can't quite find that introduced the first 5e Realms novels, and it discusses WotC's plans to intentionally limit Realms to sub-epic for the forseeable future.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @QuadraticWizard: I don't see how "lore intent" questions are any different from "rule intent" questions in terms of the reason(s) they're no longer allowed here: "The site prefers questions that marshal its users' expertise. A question asking only about designer intent doesn't marshal that expertise. Further, the site's users have no special way to communicate with game designers."
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133862%2fis-there-any-indication-that-epic-spells-could-return-to-the-realms%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
11
down vote













It's unlikely. Level 20 is defined as a hard cap in D&D 5th edition.



According to a Twitter exchange with Jeremy Crawford:




Q: Could an NPC with class levels get to a character level above 20 as long as they're multiclassed? If 20 isn't the max, what would be their max level?



Crawford: The maximum character level in D&D is 20.



Q: Hopefully subject to change as we get more higher level content over the next few years?



Crawford: If you'd like to keep improving at 20th level, see "Epic Boons" (DMG, 231), which details way to get more powerful at the level cap.




DMG p.231 is quite specific that the hard cap is level 20:




Epic boons can also be used as a form of advancement, a way to provide greater power to characters who have no more levels to gain.




And on page 38 it is even more specific:




Characters who reach 20th level have attained the pinnacle of mortal achievement ... Their ultimate destinies com to pass. A cleric might be taken up into the heavens to serve as a god's right hand ... Characters gain no more levels at this point, but they can still advance in meaningful ways and continue performing epic deeds that resound throughout the multiverse.




This is different to D&D third edition, where NPCs above 20th level were already described in the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer (2000) and Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (2001).



Support for epic-level play was limited in D&D third edition, as most campaigns never reached that level, which limited the value of content for that tier. Between this, and D&D 5e's more limited release schedule, it's unlikely that we'd see an official Epic Level Handbook, although there are already some third-party and homebrew solutions readily available online.



D&D 5e's epic boons are described as granting such incredible things as a single extra 9th level spell slot, but not 10th level spells or beyond, at least not in the hands of player characters. There's nothing stopping an adventure module from having rituals, artifacts, creatures or even NPCs capable of wielding power beyond 9th level spells, but it's not within the scope of what's available to player characters.



At a panel introducing the first 5e-era Forgotten Realms novels, James Wyatt revealed that the novels would focus on stories of low-level characters, rather than the epic and deific conflicts that appeared during earlier editions of D&D. It seems clear that both in the game and in the world lore in general, the intent for this edition is to focus on ordinary heroes and not beings like Elminster or Mystra.






share|improve this answer






















  • Good answer, to the usual urge of people to "turn it up to 11" regardless of how far the dials go.
    – KorvinStarmast
    3 hours ago










  • thanks for that... not quite what I was looking for though. I've added the [lore] tag and tried to clarify. I was hoping for developer intentions as far as the FR story goes and Mystra's ban
    – rpgstar
    1 hour ago










  • @rpgstar developer intent questions are off-topic.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago











  • @PurpleMonkey This question is about lore intent, rather than rule intent, however. There's a long two-part panel video I can't quite find that introduced the first 5e Realms novels, and it discusses WotC's plans to intentionally limit Realms to sub-epic for the forseeable future.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @QuadraticWizard: I don't see how "lore intent" questions are any different from "rule intent" questions in terms of the reason(s) they're no longer allowed here: "The site prefers questions that marshal its users' expertise. A question asking only about designer intent doesn't marshal that expertise. Further, the site's users have no special way to communicate with game designers."
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago














up vote
11
down vote













It's unlikely. Level 20 is defined as a hard cap in D&D 5th edition.



According to a Twitter exchange with Jeremy Crawford:




Q: Could an NPC with class levels get to a character level above 20 as long as they're multiclassed? If 20 isn't the max, what would be their max level?



Crawford: The maximum character level in D&D is 20.



Q: Hopefully subject to change as we get more higher level content over the next few years?



Crawford: If you'd like to keep improving at 20th level, see "Epic Boons" (DMG, 231), which details way to get more powerful at the level cap.




DMG p.231 is quite specific that the hard cap is level 20:




Epic boons can also be used as a form of advancement, a way to provide greater power to characters who have no more levels to gain.




And on page 38 it is even more specific:




Characters who reach 20th level have attained the pinnacle of mortal achievement ... Their ultimate destinies com to pass. A cleric might be taken up into the heavens to serve as a god's right hand ... Characters gain no more levels at this point, but they can still advance in meaningful ways and continue performing epic deeds that resound throughout the multiverse.




This is different to D&D third edition, where NPCs above 20th level were already described in the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer (2000) and Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (2001).



Support for epic-level play was limited in D&D third edition, as most campaigns never reached that level, which limited the value of content for that tier. Between this, and D&D 5e's more limited release schedule, it's unlikely that we'd see an official Epic Level Handbook, although there are already some third-party and homebrew solutions readily available online.



D&D 5e's epic boons are described as granting such incredible things as a single extra 9th level spell slot, but not 10th level spells or beyond, at least not in the hands of player characters. There's nothing stopping an adventure module from having rituals, artifacts, creatures or even NPCs capable of wielding power beyond 9th level spells, but it's not within the scope of what's available to player characters.



At a panel introducing the first 5e-era Forgotten Realms novels, James Wyatt revealed that the novels would focus on stories of low-level characters, rather than the epic and deific conflicts that appeared during earlier editions of D&D. It seems clear that both in the game and in the world lore in general, the intent for this edition is to focus on ordinary heroes and not beings like Elminster or Mystra.






share|improve this answer






















  • Good answer, to the usual urge of people to "turn it up to 11" regardless of how far the dials go.
    – KorvinStarmast
    3 hours ago










  • thanks for that... not quite what I was looking for though. I've added the [lore] tag and tried to clarify. I was hoping for developer intentions as far as the FR story goes and Mystra's ban
    – rpgstar
    1 hour ago










  • @rpgstar developer intent questions are off-topic.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago











  • @PurpleMonkey This question is about lore intent, rather than rule intent, however. There's a long two-part panel video I can't quite find that introduced the first 5e Realms novels, and it discusses WotC's plans to intentionally limit Realms to sub-epic for the forseeable future.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @QuadraticWizard: I don't see how "lore intent" questions are any different from "rule intent" questions in terms of the reason(s) they're no longer allowed here: "The site prefers questions that marshal its users' expertise. A question asking only about designer intent doesn't marshal that expertise. Further, the site's users have no special way to communicate with game designers."
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago












up vote
11
down vote










up vote
11
down vote









It's unlikely. Level 20 is defined as a hard cap in D&D 5th edition.



According to a Twitter exchange with Jeremy Crawford:




Q: Could an NPC with class levels get to a character level above 20 as long as they're multiclassed? If 20 isn't the max, what would be their max level?



Crawford: The maximum character level in D&D is 20.



Q: Hopefully subject to change as we get more higher level content over the next few years?



Crawford: If you'd like to keep improving at 20th level, see "Epic Boons" (DMG, 231), which details way to get more powerful at the level cap.




DMG p.231 is quite specific that the hard cap is level 20:




Epic boons can also be used as a form of advancement, a way to provide greater power to characters who have no more levels to gain.




And on page 38 it is even more specific:




Characters who reach 20th level have attained the pinnacle of mortal achievement ... Their ultimate destinies com to pass. A cleric might be taken up into the heavens to serve as a god's right hand ... Characters gain no more levels at this point, but they can still advance in meaningful ways and continue performing epic deeds that resound throughout the multiverse.




This is different to D&D third edition, where NPCs above 20th level were already described in the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer (2000) and Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (2001).



Support for epic-level play was limited in D&D third edition, as most campaigns never reached that level, which limited the value of content for that tier. Between this, and D&D 5e's more limited release schedule, it's unlikely that we'd see an official Epic Level Handbook, although there are already some third-party and homebrew solutions readily available online.



D&D 5e's epic boons are described as granting such incredible things as a single extra 9th level spell slot, but not 10th level spells or beyond, at least not in the hands of player characters. There's nothing stopping an adventure module from having rituals, artifacts, creatures or even NPCs capable of wielding power beyond 9th level spells, but it's not within the scope of what's available to player characters.



At a panel introducing the first 5e-era Forgotten Realms novels, James Wyatt revealed that the novels would focus on stories of low-level characters, rather than the epic and deific conflicts that appeared during earlier editions of D&D. It seems clear that both in the game and in the world lore in general, the intent for this edition is to focus on ordinary heroes and not beings like Elminster or Mystra.






share|improve this answer














It's unlikely. Level 20 is defined as a hard cap in D&D 5th edition.



According to a Twitter exchange with Jeremy Crawford:




Q: Could an NPC with class levels get to a character level above 20 as long as they're multiclassed? If 20 isn't the max, what would be their max level?



Crawford: The maximum character level in D&D is 20.



Q: Hopefully subject to change as we get more higher level content over the next few years?



Crawford: If you'd like to keep improving at 20th level, see "Epic Boons" (DMG, 231), which details way to get more powerful at the level cap.




DMG p.231 is quite specific that the hard cap is level 20:




Epic boons can also be used as a form of advancement, a way to provide greater power to characters who have no more levels to gain.




And on page 38 it is even more specific:




Characters who reach 20th level have attained the pinnacle of mortal achievement ... Their ultimate destinies com to pass. A cleric might be taken up into the heavens to serve as a god's right hand ... Characters gain no more levels at this point, but they can still advance in meaningful ways and continue performing epic deeds that resound throughout the multiverse.




This is different to D&D third edition, where NPCs above 20th level were already described in the Living Greyhawk Gazetteer (2000) and Forgotten Realms Campaign Setting (2001).



Support for epic-level play was limited in D&D third edition, as most campaigns never reached that level, which limited the value of content for that tier. Between this, and D&D 5e's more limited release schedule, it's unlikely that we'd see an official Epic Level Handbook, although there are already some third-party and homebrew solutions readily available online.



D&D 5e's epic boons are described as granting such incredible things as a single extra 9th level spell slot, but not 10th level spells or beyond, at least not in the hands of player characters. There's nothing stopping an adventure module from having rituals, artifacts, creatures or even NPCs capable of wielding power beyond 9th level spells, but it's not within the scope of what's available to player characters.



At a panel introducing the first 5e-era Forgotten Realms novels, James Wyatt revealed that the novels would focus on stories of low-level characters, rather than the epic and deific conflicts that appeared during earlier editions of D&D. It seems clear that both in the game and in the world lore in general, the intent for this edition is to focus on ordinary heroes and not beings like Elminster or Mystra.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 1 hour ago

























answered 5 hours ago









Quadratic Wizard

21.9k370123




21.9k370123











  • Good answer, to the usual urge of people to "turn it up to 11" regardless of how far the dials go.
    – KorvinStarmast
    3 hours ago










  • thanks for that... not quite what I was looking for though. I've added the [lore] tag and tried to clarify. I was hoping for developer intentions as far as the FR story goes and Mystra's ban
    – rpgstar
    1 hour ago










  • @rpgstar developer intent questions are off-topic.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago











  • @PurpleMonkey This question is about lore intent, rather than rule intent, however. There's a long two-part panel video I can't quite find that introduced the first 5e Realms novels, and it discusses WotC's plans to intentionally limit Realms to sub-epic for the forseeable future.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @QuadraticWizard: I don't see how "lore intent" questions are any different from "rule intent" questions in terms of the reason(s) they're no longer allowed here: "The site prefers questions that marshal its users' expertise. A question asking only about designer intent doesn't marshal that expertise. Further, the site's users have no special way to communicate with game designers."
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago
















  • Good answer, to the usual urge of people to "turn it up to 11" regardless of how far the dials go.
    – KorvinStarmast
    3 hours ago










  • thanks for that... not quite what I was looking for though. I've added the [lore] tag and tried to clarify. I was hoping for developer intentions as far as the FR story goes and Mystra's ban
    – rpgstar
    1 hour ago










  • @rpgstar developer intent questions are off-topic.
    – Purple Monkey
    1 hour ago











  • @PurpleMonkey This question is about lore intent, rather than rule intent, however. There's a long two-part panel video I can't quite find that introduced the first 5e Realms novels, and it discusses WotC's plans to intentionally limit Realms to sub-epic for the forseeable future.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    1 hour ago






  • 1




    @QuadraticWizard: I don't see how "lore intent" questions are any different from "rule intent" questions in terms of the reason(s) they're no longer allowed here: "The site prefers questions that marshal its users' expertise. A question asking only about designer intent doesn't marshal that expertise. Further, the site's users have no special way to communicate with game designers."
    – V2Blast
    1 hour ago















Good answer, to the usual urge of people to "turn it up to 11" regardless of how far the dials go.
– KorvinStarmast
3 hours ago




Good answer, to the usual urge of people to "turn it up to 11" regardless of how far the dials go.
– KorvinStarmast
3 hours ago












thanks for that... not quite what I was looking for though. I've added the [lore] tag and tried to clarify. I was hoping for developer intentions as far as the FR story goes and Mystra's ban
– rpgstar
1 hour ago




thanks for that... not quite what I was looking for though. I've added the [lore] tag and tried to clarify. I was hoping for developer intentions as far as the FR story goes and Mystra's ban
– rpgstar
1 hour ago












@rpgstar developer intent questions are off-topic.
– Purple Monkey
1 hour ago





@rpgstar developer intent questions are off-topic.
– Purple Monkey
1 hour ago













@PurpleMonkey This question is about lore intent, rather than rule intent, however. There's a long two-part panel video I can't quite find that introduced the first 5e Realms novels, and it discusses WotC's plans to intentionally limit Realms to sub-epic for the forseeable future.
– Quadratic Wizard
1 hour ago




@PurpleMonkey This question is about lore intent, rather than rule intent, however. There's a long two-part panel video I can't quite find that introduced the first 5e Realms novels, and it discusses WotC's plans to intentionally limit Realms to sub-epic for the forseeable future.
– Quadratic Wizard
1 hour ago




1




1




@QuadraticWizard: I don't see how "lore intent" questions are any different from "rule intent" questions in terms of the reason(s) they're no longer allowed here: "The site prefers questions that marshal its users' expertise. A question asking only about designer intent doesn't marshal that expertise. Further, the site's users have no special way to communicate with game designers."
– V2Blast
1 hour ago




@QuadraticWizard: I don't see how "lore intent" questions are any different from "rule intent" questions in terms of the reason(s) they're no longer allowed here: "The site prefers questions that marshal its users' expertise. A question asking only about designer intent doesn't marshal that expertise. Further, the site's users have no special way to communicate with game designers."
– V2Blast
1 hour ago

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133862%2fis-there-any-indication-that-epic-spells-could-return-to-the-realms%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?