Exhibit a reduced residue system mod 7 composed entirely of powers of 3

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












By trial, I configured that $3,3^2,3^3,3^4,3^5,3^6$ is a reduced residue system composed entirely of powers of $3$. However, why this is happening? Is it true for all relatively prime numbers, though?










share|cite|improve this question























  • $3$ is a generator of the cyclic group $U(7)$, the group of units of the ring $BbbZ/7BbbZ$. Have a look at this site for this, it has been answered here, for $U(p)$ and more generally. For a duplicate with $p=31$, see here.
    – Dietrich Burde
    4 hours ago










  • @DietrichBurde My comment was in response to an earlier one of yours. I'm now deleting it.
    – Ethan Bolker
    4 hours ago














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












By trial, I configured that $3,3^2,3^3,3^4,3^5,3^6$ is a reduced residue system composed entirely of powers of $3$. However, why this is happening? Is it true for all relatively prime numbers, though?










share|cite|improve this question























  • $3$ is a generator of the cyclic group $U(7)$, the group of units of the ring $BbbZ/7BbbZ$. Have a look at this site for this, it has been answered here, for $U(p)$ and more generally. For a duplicate with $p=31$, see here.
    – Dietrich Burde
    4 hours ago










  • @DietrichBurde My comment was in response to an earlier one of yours. I'm now deleting it.
    – Ethan Bolker
    4 hours ago












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











By trial, I configured that $3,3^2,3^3,3^4,3^5,3^6$ is a reduced residue system composed entirely of powers of $3$. However, why this is happening? Is it true for all relatively prime numbers, though?










share|cite|improve this question















By trial, I configured that $3,3^2,3^3,3^4,3^5,3^6$ is a reduced residue system composed entirely of powers of $3$. However, why this is happening? Is it true for all relatively prime numbers, though?







elementary-number-theory modular-arithmetic






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 3 hours ago









Ethan Bolker

37.7k543100




37.7k543100










asked 4 hours ago









Maged Saeed

297212




297212











  • $3$ is a generator of the cyclic group $U(7)$, the group of units of the ring $BbbZ/7BbbZ$. Have a look at this site for this, it has been answered here, for $U(p)$ and more generally. For a duplicate with $p=31$, see here.
    – Dietrich Burde
    4 hours ago










  • @DietrichBurde My comment was in response to an earlier one of yours. I'm now deleting it.
    – Ethan Bolker
    4 hours ago
















  • $3$ is a generator of the cyclic group $U(7)$, the group of units of the ring $BbbZ/7BbbZ$. Have a look at this site for this, it has been answered here, for $U(p)$ and more generally. For a duplicate with $p=31$, see here.
    – Dietrich Burde
    4 hours ago










  • @DietrichBurde My comment was in response to an earlier one of yours. I'm now deleting it.
    – Ethan Bolker
    4 hours ago















$3$ is a generator of the cyclic group $U(7)$, the group of units of the ring $BbbZ/7BbbZ$. Have a look at this site for this, it has been answered here, for $U(p)$ and more generally. For a duplicate with $p=31$, see here.
– Dietrich Burde
4 hours ago




$3$ is a generator of the cyclic group $U(7)$, the group of units of the ring $BbbZ/7BbbZ$. Have a look at this site for this, it has been answered here, for $U(p)$ and more generally. For a duplicate with $p=31$, see here.
– Dietrich Burde
4 hours ago












@DietrichBurde My comment was in response to an earlier one of yours. I'm now deleting it.
– Ethan Bolker
4 hours ago




@DietrichBurde My comment was in response to an earlier one of yours. I'm now deleting it.
– Ethan Bolker
4 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










No, it is not true for all relatively prime numbers. For example try powers of $2$ and you will find out it is not a reduced residue system. Now why is that happening? If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then by Euler's theorem $a^phi(n)equiv 1$(mod $n$). Now, if $phi(n)$ is also the smallest natural number $m$ for which $a^mequiv 1$(mod $n$) then $a$ is called a primitive root mod $n$. In that case all invertible elements mod $n$ are powers of $a$. It follows from the fact that if you look at the set $1,a,a^2,...,a^phi(n)-1$ then it contains $phi(n)$ different elements. Let's prove that. Suppose $a^iequiv a^j$(mod $n$) for $0leq i<jleqphi(n)-1$. Then by multiplying both sides by $a^-i$ we get $a^j-iequiv 1$(mod $n$) when $1leq j-i<phi(n)$ which contradicts the fact that $a$ is a primitive root. So that is what happening in your case-$3$ is a primitive root mod $7$. By the way, not every natural number $n$ has primitive roots, but every prime number does. And if $n$ has a primitive root then there are actually $phi(phi(n))$ of them.






share|cite|improve this answer





























    up vote
    2
    down vote













    Trial was the right way to go.



    This is happening because $3$ is a primitive root for $7$: a number whose powers fill out the reduced residue system.



    Every prime modulus has primitive roots. There is no easy way to find them. $2$ is not one for $7$ as you can tell by looking at the sequence of its powers, modulo $7$. They repeat with period $3$, not $6$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      2
      down vote













      Yes, that works with the number $3$. However, it doesn't work if you use $2$ instead of $3$, because any power of $2$ is congruent to $1$, $2$, or $4$ modulo $7$. And if you were working with $13$ instead of $7$, $3$ wouldn't work either, because every power of $3$ is congruent to $1$, $3$, or $9$ modulo $13$. You must check it case by case.






      share|cite|improve this answer



























        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Hint $bmod 7!:, overbrace3^large 6equiv 1^large murm Fermat, 3^large 2,3^large 3notequiv 1,Rightarrow, 3,$ has order $,6,,$ by below




        Order Test $, ,a,$ has order $,niff a^ n = 1,$ but $,a^n/p not= 1,$ for every prime $,pmid n.,$



        Proof $ (Leftarrow) $ If $,a,$ has $,rmcolor#c00order k,$ then $,kmid n.,$ If $,k < n,$ then $,k,$ is proper divisor of $,n,$ therefore $,k,$ must omit at least one prime $,p,$ from the unique prime factorization of $,n,,$ hence
        $,kmid n/p,,$ say $, kj = n/p,,$ so $,a^n/p = (color#c00a^k)^j= color#c001^j= 1,,$ contra hypothesis. $ (Rightarrow) $ By definition of order.



        Remark $ $ It is a classical result that the group of units (invertibles) of $,Bbb Z/n,$ is cyclic $iff n = 1,2,4, p^k,$ or $,2p^k,,$ for $p$ an odd prime.






        share|cite|improve this answer






















        • @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will happily elaborate.
          – Bill Dubuque
          3 hours ago










        Your Answer




        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: false,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2959592%2fexhibit-a-reduced-residue-system-mod-7-composed-entirely-of-powers-of-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest






























        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes








        4 Answers
        4






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        3
        down vote



        accepted










        No, it is not true for all relatively prime numbers. For example try powers of $2$ and you will find out it is not a reduced residue system. Now why is that happening? If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then by Euler's theorem $a^phi(n)equiv 1$(mod $n$). Now, if $phi(n)$ is also the smallest natural number $m$ for which $a^mequiv 1$(mod $n$) then $a$ is called a primitive root mod $n$. In that case all invertible elements mod $n$ are powers of $a$. It follows from the fact that if you look at the set $1,a,a^2,...,a^phi(n)-1$ then it contains $phi(n)$ different elements. Let's prove that. Suppose $a^iequiv a^j$(mod $n$) for $0leq i<jleqphi(n)-1$. Then by multiplying both sides by $a^-i$ we get $a^j-iequiv 1$(mod $n$) when $1leq j-i<phi(n)$ which contradicts the fact that $a$ is a primitive root. So that is what happening in your case-$3$ is a primitive root mod $7$. By the way, not every natural number $n$ has primitive roots, but every prime number does. And if $n$ has a primitive root then there are actually $phi(phi(n))$ of them.






        share|cite|improve this answer


























          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          No, it is not true for all relatively prime numbers. For example try powers of $2$ and you will find out it is not a reduced residue system. Now why is that happening? If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then by Euler's theorem $a^phi(n)equiv 1$(mod $n$). Now, if $phi(n)$ is also the smallest natural number $m$ for which $a^mequiv 1$(mod $n$) then $a$ is called a primitive root mod $n$. In that case all invertible elements mod $n$ are powers of $a$. It follows from the fact that if you look at the set $1,a,a^2,...,a^phi(n)-1$ then it contains $phi(n)$ different elements. Let's prove that. Suppose $a^iequiv a^j$(mod $n$) for $0leq i<jleqphi(n)-1$. Then by multiplying both sides by $a^-i$ we get $a^j-iequiv 1$(mod $n$) when $1leq j-i<phi(n)$ which contradicts the fact that $a$ is a primitive root. So that is what happening in your case-$3$ is a primitive root mod $7$. By the way, not every natural number $n$ has primitive roots, but every prime number does. And if $n$ has a primitive root then there are actually $phi(phi(n))$ of them.






          share|cite|improve this answer
























            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            3
            down vote



            accepted






            No, it is not true for all relatively prime numbers. For example try powers of $2$ and you will find out it is not a reduced residue system. Now why is that happening? If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then by Euler's theorem $a^phi(n)equiv 1$(mod $n$). Now, if $phi(n)$ is also the smallest natural number $m$ for which $a^mequiv 1$(mod $n$) then $a$ is called a primitive root mod $n$. In that case all invertible elements mod $n$ are powers of $a$. It follows from the fact that if you look at the set $1,a,a^2,...,a^phi(n)-1$ then it contains $phi(n)$ different elements. Let's prove that. Suppose $a^iequiv a^j$(mod $n$) for $0leq i<jleqphi(n)-1$. Then by multiplying both sides by $a^-i$ we get $a^j-iequiv 1$(mod $n$) when $1leq j-i<phi(n)$ which contradicts the fact that $a$ is a primitive root. So that is what happening in your case-$3$ is a primitive root mod $7$. By the way, not every natural number $n$ has primitive roots, but every prime number does. And if $n$ has a primitive root then there are actually $phi(phi(n))$ of them.






            share|cite|improve this answer














            No, it is not true for all relatively prime numbers. For example try powers of $2$ and you will find out it is not a reduced residue system. Now why is that happening? If $gcd(a,n)=1$ then by Euler's theorem $a^phi(n)equiv 1$(mod $n$). Now, if $phi(n)$ is also the smallest natural number $m$ for which $a^mequiv 1$(mod $n$) then $a$ is called a primitive root mod $n$. In that case all invertible elements mod $n$ are powers of $a$. It follows from the fact that if you look at the set $1,a,a^2,...,a^phi(n)-1$ then it contains $phi(n)$ different elements. Let's prove that. Suppose $a^iequiv a^j$(mod $n$) for $0leq i<jleqphi(n)-1$. Then by multiplying both sides by $a^-i$ we get $a^j-iequiv 1$(mod $n$) when $1leq j-i<phi(n)$ which contradicts the fact that $a$ is a primitive root. So that is what happening in your case-$3$ is a primitive root mod $7$. By the way, not every natural number $n$ has primitive roots, but every prime number does. And if $n$ has a primitive root then there are actually $phi(phi(n))$ of them.







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited 4 hours ago

























            answered 4 hours ago









            Mark

            5,019315




            5,019315




















                up vote
                2
                down vote













                Trial was the right way to go.



                This is happening because $3$ is a primitive root for $7$: a number whose powers fill out the reduced residue system.



                Every prime modulus has primitive roots. There is no easy way to find them. $2$ is not one for $7$ as you can tell by looking at the sequence of its powers, modulo $7$. They repeat with period $3$, not $6$.






                share|cite|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote













                  Trial was the right way to go.



                  This is happening because $3$ is a primitive root for $7$: a number whose powers fill out the reduced residue system.



                  Every prime modulus has primitive roots. There is no easy way to find them. $2$ is not one for $7$ as you can tell by looking at the sequence of its powers, modulo $7$. They repeat with period $3$, not $6$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer






















                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    2
                    down vote









                    Trial was the right way to go.



                    This is happening because $3$ is a primitive root for $7$: a number whose powers fill out the reduced residue system.



                    Every prime modulus has primitive roots. There is no easy way to find them. $2$ is not one for $7$ as you can tell by looking at the sequence of its powers, modulo $7$. They repeat with period $3$, not $6$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    Trial was the right way to go.



                    This is happening because $3$ is a primitive root for $7$: a number whose powers fill out the reduced residue system.



                    Every prime modulus has primitive roots. There is no easy way to find them. $2$ is not one for $7$ as you can tell by looking at the sequence of its powers, modulo $7$. They repeat with period $3$, not $6$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered 4 hours ago









                    Ethan Bolker

                    37.7k543100




                    37.7k543100




















                        up vote
                        2
                        down vote













                        Yes, that works with the number $3$. However, it doesn't work if you use $2$ instead of $3$, because any power of $2$ is congruent to $1$, $2$, or $4$ modulo $7$. And if you were working with $13$ instead of $7$, $3$ wouldn't work either, because every power of $3$ is congruent to $1$, $3$, or $9$ modulo $13$. You must check it case by case.






                        share|cite|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          2
                          down vote













                          Yes, that works with the number $3$. However, it doesn't work if you use $2$ instead of $3$, because any power of $2$ is congruent to $1$, $2$, or $4$ modulo $7$. And if you were working with $13$ instead of $7$, $3$ wouldn't work either, because every power of $3$ is congruent to $1$, $3$, or $9$ modulo $13$. You must check it case by case.






                          share|cite|improve this answer






















                            up vote
                            2
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            2
                            down vote









                            Yes, that works with the number $3$. However, it doesn't work if you use $2$ instead of $3$, because any power of $2$ is congruent to $1$, $2$, or $4$ modulo $7$. And if you were working with $13$ instead of $7$, $3$ wouldn't work either, because every power of $3$ is congruent to $1$, $3$, or $9$ modulo $13$. You must check it case by case.






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            Yes, that works with the number $3$. However, it doesn't work if you use $2$ instead of $3$, because any power of $2$ is congruent to $1$, $2$, or $4$ modulo $7$. And if you were working with $13$ instead of $7$, $3$ wouldn't work either, because every power of $3$ is congruent to $1$, $3$, or $9$ modulo $13$. You must check it case by case.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 4 hours ago









                            José Carlos Santos

                            130k17105191




                            130k17105191




















                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Hint $bmod 7!:, overbrace3^large 6equiv 1^large murm Fermat, 3^large 2,3^large 3notequiv 1,Rightarrow, 3,$ has order $,6,,$ by below




                                Order Test $, ,a,$ has order $,niff a^ n = 1,$ but $,a^n/p not= 1,$ for every prime $,pmid n.,$



                                Proof $ (Leftarrow) $ If $,a,$ has $,rmcolor#c00order k,$ then $,kmid n.,$ If $,k < n,$ then $,k,$ is proper divisor of $,n,$ therefore $,k,$ must omit at least one prime $,p,$ from the unique prime factorization of $,n,,$ hence
                                $,kmid n/p,,$ say $, kj = n/p,,$ so $,a^n/p = (color#c00a^k)^j= color#c001^j= 1,,$ contra hypothesis. $ (Rightarrow) $ By definition of order.



                                Remark $ $ It is a classical result that the group of units (invertibles) of $,Bbb Z/n,$ is cyclic $iff n = 1,2,4, p^k,$ or $,2p^k,,$ for $p$ an odd prime.






                                share|cite|improve this answer






















                                • @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will happily elaborate.
                                  – Bill Dubuque
                                  3 hours ago














                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote













                                Hint $bmod 7!:, overbrace3^large 6equiv 1^large murm Fermat, 3^large 2,3^large 3notequiv 1,Rightarrow, 3,$ has order $,6,,$ by below




                                Order Test $, ,a,$ has order $,niff a^ n = 1,$ but $,a^n/p not= 1,$ for every prime $,pmid n.,$



                                Proof $ (Leftarrow) $ If $,a,$ has $,rmcolor#c00order k,$ then $,kmid n.,$ If $,k < n,$ then $,k,$ is proper divisor of $,n,$ therefore $,k,$ must omit at least one prime $,p,$ from the unique prime factorization of $,n,,$ hence
                                $,kmid n/p,,$ say $, kj = n/p,,$ so $,a^n/p = (color#c00a^k)^j= color#c001^j= 1,,$ contra hypothesis. $ (Rightarrow) $ By definition of order.



                                Remark $ $ It is a classical result that the group of units (invertibles) of $,Bbb Z/n,$ is cyclic $iff n = 1,2,4, p^k,$ or $,2p^k,,$ for $p$ an odd prime.






                                share|cite|improve this answer






















                                • @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will happily elaborate.
                                  – Bill Dubuque
                                  3 hours ago












                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote










                                up vote
                                0
                                down vote









                                Hint $bmod 7!:, overbrace3^large 6equiv 1^large murm Fermat, 3^large 2,3^large 3notequiv 1,Rightarrow, 3,$ has order $,6,,$ by below




                                Order Test $, ,a,$ has order $,niff a^ n = 1,$ but $,a^n/p not= 1,$ for every prime $,pmid n.,$



                                Proof $ (Leftarrow) $ If $,a,$ has $,rmcolor#c00order k,$ then $,kmid n.,$ If $,k < n,$ then $,k,$ is proper divisor of $,n,$ therefore $,k,$ must omit at least one prime $,p,$ from the unique prime factorization of $,n,,$ hence
                                $,kmid n/p,,$ say $, kj = n/p,,$ so $,a^n/p = (color#c00a^k)^j= color#c001^j= 1,,$ contra hypothesis. $ (Rightarrow) $ By definition of order.



                                Remark $ $ It is a classical result that the group of units (invertibles) of $,Bbb Z/n,$ is cyclic $iff n = 1,2,4, p^k,$ or $,2p^k,,$ for $p$ an odd prime.






                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                Hint $bmod 7!:, overbrace3^large 6equiv 1^large murm Fermat, 3^large 2,3^large 3notequiv 1,Rightarrow, 3,$ has order $,6,,$ by below




                                Order Test $, ,a,$ has order $,niff a^ n = 1,$ but $,a^n/p not= 1,$ for every prime $,pmid n.,$



                                Proof $ (Leftarrow) $ If $,a,$ has $,rmcolor#c00order k,$ then $,kmid n.,$ If $,k < n,$ then $,k,$ is proper divisor of $,n,$ therefore $,k,$ must omit at least one prime $,p,$ from the unique prime factorization of $,n,,$ hence
                                $,kmid n/p,,$ say $, kj = n/p,,$ so $,a^n/p = (color#c00a^k)^j= color#c001^j= 1,,$ contra hypothesis. $ (Rightarrow) $ By definition of order.



                                Remark $ $ It is a classical result that the group of units (invertibles) of $,Bbb Z/n,$ is cyclic $iff n = 1,2,4, p^k,$ or $,2p^k,,$ for $p$ an odd prime.







                                share|cite|improve this answer














                                share|cite|improve this answer



                                share|cite|improve this answer








                                edited 3 hours ago

























                                answered 4 hours ago









                                Bill Dubuque

                                204k29189613




                                204k29189613











                                • @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will happily elaborate.
                                  – Bill Dubuque
                                  3 hours ago
















                                • @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will happily elaborate.
                                  – Bill Dubuque
                                  3 hours ago















                                @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will happily elaborate.
                                – Bill Dubuque
                                3 hours ago




                                @Downvoter If something is not clear then please feel welcome to ask questions and I will happily elaborate.
                                – Bill Dubuque
                                3 hours ago

















                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded















































                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2959592%2fexhibit-a-reduced-residue-system-mod-7-composed-entirely-of-powers-of-3%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest













































































                                YTjhrT e jDzNEmcHq8iToOUWsxTOVs BeC2vqN GoO8 OctV GyCWCQ0Cep
                                a,8ELiDoLx3cGOoQz5jH,oxKZI40xuL,rPzRXBvg090RTVy E,BO34WcPn80YCsi9UbLA7q

                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

                                Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS