Double vertical bar with dash through it

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+









share|improve this question



















  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+









share|improve this question



















  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+









share|improve this question















Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+






symbols






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 28 at 10:57









Phelype Oleinik

17.5k43771




17.5k43771










asked Sep 28 at 4:44









leastaction

18111




18111







  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55













  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55








1




1




There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
– marmot
Sep 28 at 4:47




There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
– marmot
Sep 28 at 4:47












I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
– leastaction
Sep 28 at 4:55





I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
– leastaction
Sep 28 at 4:55











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

begindocument

$adplus b$

enddocument


enter image description here



Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

newcommanddpl@s[2]%
smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

makeatother


begindocument

$adplus btplus c$

enddocument


enter image description here



With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

newcommanddpl@s[2]%
smashooalign%
$m@th#1#2$cr
hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
%

makeatother


begindocument

$adplus b$

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    6
    down vote













    You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    makeatletter
    newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
    newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
    makeatother
    begindocument
    $a vparallel b$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
















    • 2




      The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
      – Henri Menke
      Sep 28 at 4:58

















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



    There is the following unicode character: á»».



    %%Compile with XeLaTeX
    documentclassarticle

    usepackagefontspec
    setmainfontJunicode

    begindocument
    á»»
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer






















    • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
      – Phelype Oleinik
      Sep 28 at 11:01










    • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
      – Crocodopolis
      Sep 28 at 11:07










    • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
      – Phelype Oleinik
      Sep 28 at 11:10










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452878%2fdouble-vertical-bar-with-dash-through-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

    begindocument

    $adplus b$

    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



    A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackagegraphicx

    makeatletter
    DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
    DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
    newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
    makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

    newcommanddpl@s[2]%
    smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

    makeatother


    begindocument

    $adplus btplus c$

    enddocument


    enter image description here



    With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackagegraphicx

    makeatletter
    DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
    newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
    makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

    newcommanddpl@s[2]%
    smashooalign%
    $m@th#1#2$cr
    hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
    %

    makeatother


    begindocument

    $adplus b$

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath

      newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

      begindocument

      $adplus b$

      enddocument


      enter image description here



      Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



      A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackagegraphicx

      makeatletter
      DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
      DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
      newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
      makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

      newcommanddpl@s[2]%
      smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

      makeatother


      begindocument

      $adplus btplus c$

      enddocument


      enter image description here



      With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackagegraphicx

      makeatletter
      DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
      newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
      makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

      newcommanddpl@s[2]%
      smashooalign%
      $m@th#1#2$cr
      hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
      %

      makeatother


      begindocument

      $adplus b$

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



        A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus btplus c$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign%
        $m@th#1#2$cr
        hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
        %

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer














        Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



        A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus btplus c$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign%
        $m@th#1#2$cr
        hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
        %

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Sep 28 at 9:47

























        answered Sep 28 at 9:16









        egreg

        687k8418313078




        687k8418313078




















            up vote
            6
            down vote













            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer
















            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58














            up vote
            6
            down vote













            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer
















            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58












            up vote
            6
            down vote










            up vote
            6
            down vote









            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer












            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Sep 28 at 4:56









            Henri Menke

            65.7k7145253




            65.7k7145253







            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58












            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58







            2




            2




            The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
            – Henri Menke
            Sep 28 at 4:58




            The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
            – Henri Menke
            Sep 28 at 4:58










            up vote
            2
            down vote













            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer






















            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10














            up vote
            2
            down vote













            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer






















            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer














            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 28 at 11:07

























            answered Sep 28 at 9:51









            Crocodopolis

            3117




            3117











            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10
















            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10















            With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:01




            With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:01












            Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
            – Crocodopolis
            Sep 28 at 11:07




            Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
            – Crocodopolis
            Sep 28 at 11:07












            You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:10




            You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:10

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452878%2fdouble-vertical-bar-with-dash-through-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?