Double vertical bar with dash through it

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+









share|improve this question



















  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55















up vote
2
down vote

favorite












Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+









share|improve this question



















  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55













up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+









share|improve this question















Is there a predefined symbol that looks like this



symbol



which is something like Vdash but with the hyphen (dash) going through it?




Edit: I am using the following for now...



 defdplus+!!!+






symbols






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Sep 28 at 10:57









Phelype Oleinik

17.5k43771




17.5k43771










asked Sep 28 at 4:44









leastaction

18111




18111







  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55













  • 1




    There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
    – marmot
    Sep 28 at 4:47










  • I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
    – leastaction
    Sep 28 at 4:55








1




1




There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
– marmot
Sep 28 at 4:47




There is nparallel, which, however, has diagonal line instead of the horizontal one.
– marmot
Sep 28 at 4:47












I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
– leastaction
Sep 28 at 4:55





I've edited my post to include the command I am using for now.
– leastaction
Sep 28 at 4:55











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath

newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

begindocument

$adplus b$

enddocument


enter image description here



Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

newcommanddpl@s[2]%
smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

makeatother


begindocument

$adplus btplus c$

enddocument


enter image description here



With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



documentclassarticle
usepackageamsmath
usepackagegraphicx

makeatletter
DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

newcommanddpl@s[2]%
smashooalign%
$m@th#1#2$cr
hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
%

makeatother


begindocument

$adplus b$

enddocument


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    6
    down vote













    You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    makeatletter
    newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
    newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
    makeatother
    begindocument
    $a vparallel b$
    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer
















    • 2




      The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
      – Henri Menke
      Sep 28 at 4:58

















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



    There is the following unicode character: á»».



    %%Compile with XeLaTeX
    documentclassarticle

    usepackagefontspec
    setmainfontJunicode

    begindocument
    á»»
    enddocument





    share|improve this answer






















    • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
      – Phelype Oleinik
      Sep 28 at 11:01










    • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
      – Crocodopolis
      Sep 28 at 11:07










    • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
      – Phelype Oleinik
      Sep 28 at 11:10










    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452878%2fdouble-vertical-bar-with-dash-through-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath

    newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

    begindocument

    $adplus b$

    enddocument


    enter image description here



    Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



    A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackagegraphicx

    makeatletter
    DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
    DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
    newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
    makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

    newcommanddpl@s[2]%
    smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

    makeatother


    begindocument

    $adplus btplus c$

    enddocument


    enter image description here



    With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



    documentclassarticle
    usepackageamsmath
    usepackagegraphicx

    makeatletter
    DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
    newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
    makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

    newcommanddpl@s[2]%
    smashooalign%
    $m@th#1#2$cr
    hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
    %

    makeatother


    begindocument

    $adplus b$

    enddocument


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath

      newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

      begindocument

      $adplus b$

      enddocument


      enter image description here



      Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



      A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackagegraphicx

      makeatletter
      DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
      DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
      newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
      makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

      newcommanddpl@s[2]%
      smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

      makeatother


      begindocument

      $adplus btplus c$

      enddocument


      enter image description here



      With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



      documentclassarticle
      usepackageamsmath
      usepackagegraphicx

      makeatletter
      DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
      newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
      makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

      newcommanddpl@s[2]%
      smashooalign%
      $m@th#1#2$cr
      hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
      %

      makeatother


      begindocument

      $adplus b$

      enddocument


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



        A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus btplus c$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign%
        $m@th#1#2$cr
        hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
        %

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer














        Your approach is almost OK, you just need to set the type of the symbol, avoiding two consecutive Bin symbols.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath

        newcommanddplusmathbin+mspace-9mu+

        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        Act on the amount of backing up with some experiments. Here -9mu is the same as your !!!.



        A symbol that's as wide as the minus, with the bonus of tplus with three bars.



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        DeclareRobustCommandtplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s+
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign$m@th#1#2$crhfilrotate@minus#1hfilrotate@minus#1hfilcr%

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus btplus c$

        enddocument


        enter image description here



        With less space between the vertical bars (but no tplus in this case):



        documentclassarticle
        usepackageamsmath
        usepackagegraphicx

        makeatletter
        DeclareRobustCommanddplusmathbinvphantom+mathpalettedpl@s-
        newcommandrotate@minus[1]%
        makebox[0pt]rotatebox[origin=c]90scalebox1.09[1]$m@th#1-$%

        newcommanddpl@s[2]%
        smashooalign%
        $m@th#1#2$cr
        hfilrotate@minus#1hskip0pt plus 0.5filrotate@minus#1hfilcr
        %

        makeatother


        begindocument

        $adplus b$

        enddocument


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Sep 28 at 9:47

























        answered Sep 28 at 9:16









        egreg

        687k8418313078




        687k8418313078




















            up vote
            6
            down vote













            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer
















            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58














            up vote
            6
            down vote













            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer
















            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58












            up vote
            6
            down vote










            up vote
            6
            down vote









            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer












            You could use ooalign to superimpose parallel and the minus sign.



            documentclassarticle
            usepackageamsmath
            makeatletter
            newcommand*vparallelmathbinmathpalette@vparallelrelax
            newcommand*@vparallel[2]ooalign$m@th#1parallel$crhidewidth$m@th#1-$hidewidthcr
            makeatother
            begindocument
            $a vparallel b$
            enddocument


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Sep 28 at 4:56









            Henri Menke

            65.7k7145253




            65.7k7145253







            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58












            • 2




              The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
              – Henri Menke
              Sep 28 at 4:58







            2




            2




            The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
            – Henri Menke
            Sep 28 at 4:58




            The amsmath package is not strictly necessary for this example, but every document which contains serious math typesetting should use its features.
            – Henri Menke
            Sep 28 at 4:58










            up vote
            2
            down vote













            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer






















            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10














            up vote
            2
            down vote













            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer






















            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10












            up vote
            2
            down vote










            up vote
            2
            down vote









            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument





            share|improve this answer














            All other answers think in the direction of math mode, but there is no indication that this is what OP needs.



            There is the following unicode character: á»».



            %%Compile with XeLaTeX
            documentclassarticle

            usepackagefontspec
            setmainfontJunicode

            begindocument
            á»»
            enddocument






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Sep 28 at 11:07

























            answered Sep 28 at 9:51









            Crocodopolis

            3117




            3117











            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10
















            • With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:01










            • Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
              – Crocodopolis
              Sep 28 at 11:07










            • You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
              – Phelype Oleinik
              Sep 28 at 11:10















            With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:01




            With your code I get either an error, compiling with pdfTeX or nothing at all, with XeTeX or LuaTeX. Please clarify how this answers the question.
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:01












            Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
            – Crocodopolis
            Sep 28 at 11:07




            Thanks for noticing. Corrected to use Junicode instead
            – Crocodopolis
            Sep 28 at 11:07












            You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:10




            You're welcome :) Either way, the symbol looks very different in my opinion...
            – Phelype Oleinik
            Sep 28 at 11:10

















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f452878%2fdouble-vertical-bar-with-dash-through-it%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Christian Cage

            How to properly install USB display driver for Fresco Logic FL2000DX on Ubuntu?