How does the differential cap at the input to an ADC/amplifier help reduce noise?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












I often see differential amplifiers/ADCs with a conditioning circuit that looks like this:



enter image description here



I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things. So far as I can figure out it's basically there to help ease the tolerance mismatch on the two common mode capacitors. In other words suppose that the two common mode caps have a tolerance of +/-20% -- that could ostensibly lead to a worst case scenario (C1 = .8C and C2 = 1.2C) with a large difference in cutoff frequencies for the common mode filters. This would mean that for a certain range of frequencies (e.g. those between the two cutoff frequencies in particular) common mode nose at those frequencies would appear as differential noise. Is the differential cap there to effectively reduce this effect? If the differential cap is much larger than the common mode caps then all of a sudden the tolerances on the common mode caps would seem to have a reduced effect.



Is that it? Is there any other way that differential capacitor helps reduce noise?










share|improve this question

























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    I often see differential amplifiers/ADCs with a conditioning circuit that looks like this:



    enter image description here



    I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things. So far as I can figure out it's basically there to help ease the tolerance mismatch on the two common mode capacitors. In other words suppose that the two common mode caps have a tolerance of +/-20% -- that could ostensibly lead to a worst case scenario (C1 = .8C and C2 = 1.2C) with a large difference in cutoff frequencies for the common mode filters. This would mean that for a certain range of frequencies (e.g. those between the two cutoff frequencies in particular) common mode nose at those frequencies would appear as differential noise. Is the differential cap there to effectively reduce this effect? If the differential cap is much larger than the common mode caps then all of a sudden the tolerances on the common mode caps would seem to have a reduced effect.



    Is that it? Is there any other way that differential capacitor helps reduce noise?










    share|improve this question























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      I often see differential amplifiers/ADCs with a conditioning circuit that looks like this:



      enter image description here



      I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things. So far as I can figure out it's basically there to help ease the tolerance mismatch on the two common mode capacitors. In other words suppose that the two common mode caps have a tolerance of +/-20% -- that could ostensibly lead to a worst case scenario (C1 = .8C and C2 = 1.2C) with a large difference in cutoff frequencies for the common mode filters. This would mean that for a certain range of frequencies (e.g. those between the two cutoff frequencies in particular) common mode nose at those frequencies would appear as differential noise. Is the differential cap there to effectively reduce this effect? If the differential cap is much larger than the common mode caps then all of a sudden the tolerances on the common mode caps would seem to have a reduced effect.



      Is that it? Is there any other way that differential capacitor helps reduce noise?










      share|improve this question













      I often see differential amplifiers/ADCs with a conditioning circuit that looks like this:



      enter image description here



      I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things. So far as I can figure out it's basically there to help ease the tolerance mismatch on the two common mode capacitors. In other words suppose that the two common mode caps have a tolerance of +/-20% -- that could ostensibly lead to a worst case scenario (C1 = .8C and C2 = 1.2C) with a large difference in cutoff frequencies for the common mode filters. This would mean that for a certain range of frequencies (e.g. those between the two cutoff frequencies in particular) common mode nose at those frequencies would appear as differential noise. Is the differential cap there to effectively reduce this effect? If the differential cap is much larger than the common mode caps then all of a sudden the tolerances on the common mode caps would seem to have a reduced effect.



      Is that it? Is there any other way that differential capacitor helps reduce noise?







      filter noise






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Aug 15 at 5:22









      Doov

      818414




      818414




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          6
          down vote













          In my experience with several ADCs, the ADC can take a surge of current when initially calculating a sample. This can modify the voltage at the input i.e. there is the possibility of a measurement error.



          These types of ADCs are referred to as charge-redistribution successive-approximation devices or sometimes switched-capacitor ADCs: -



          enter image description here



          Analog Devices source here.



          Adding a capacitor at the input means that this surge of current does not significantly "alter" the voltage being measured because the external capacitor chosen at the input is many times the value of the internal capacitors.



          The AD source above describes how the effect can also compromise the reference voltage and this, of course, is also relevant to protecting the integrity of the input signal.




          I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things.




          It also does what you say in your question i.e. it will reduce mismatch between the two CM capacitors but I would say that this is secondary to its main purpose.






          share|improve this answer





























            up vote
            1
            down vote













            CM 20% mismatch resulting in ~ 4dB less attenuation of CM noise is not too significant as the potential to rise in DM impedance from ground path ESL and ESR effects for caps in the mOhm impedance range.



            The CM cap does both CM and DM attenuation but the series input R’s in the ADC and transient switched cap loads, the diff cap does a better job to maintain the SRF of the caps.



            Any nH rise ESL in the CM path of CM caps also lowers the self resonant frequency of those caps to attenuate the step load capacitance from ultra high speed C switches in the cap switched SAR ADC.






            share|improve this answer






















              Your Answer




              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("schematics", function ()
              StackExchange.schematics.init();
              );
              , "cicuitlab");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "135"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: false,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );













               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f391104%2fhow-does-the-differential-cap-at-the-input-to-an-adc-amplifier-help-reduce-noise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              6
              down vote













              In my experience with several ADCs, the ADC can take a surge of current when initially calculating a sample. This can modify the voltage at the input i.e. there is the possibility of a measurement error.



              These types of ADCs are referred to as charge-redistribution successive-approximation devices or sometimes switched-capacitor ADCs: -



              enter image description here



              Analog Devices source here.



              Adding a capacitor at the input means that this surge of current does not significantly "alter" the voltage being measured because the external capacitor chosen at the input is many times the value of the internal capacitors.



              The AD source above describes how the effect can also compromise the reference voltage and this, of course, is also relevant to protecting the integrity of the input signal.




              I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things.




              It also does what you say in your question i.e. it will reduce mismatch between the two CM capacitors but I would say that this is secondary to its main purpose.






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                6
                down vote













                In my experience with several ADCs, the ADC can take a surge of current when initially calculating a sample. This can modify the voltage at the input i.e. there is the possibility of a measurement error.



                These types of ADCs are referred to as charge-redistribution successive-approximation devices or sometimes switched-capacitor ADCs: -



                enter image description here



                Analog Devices source here.



                Adding a capacitor at the input means that this surge of current does not significantly "alter" the voltage being measured because the external capacitor chosen at the input is many times the value of the internal capacitors.



                The AD source above describes how the effect can also compromise the reference voltage and this, of course, is also relevant to protecting the integrity of the input signal.




                I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things.




                It also does what you say in your question i.e. it will reduce mismatch between the two CM capacitors but I would say that this is secondary to its main purpose.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  6
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  6
                  down vote









                  In my experience with several ADCs, the ADC can take a surge of current when initially calculating a sample. This can modify the voltage at the input i.e. there is the possibility of a measurement error.



                  These types of ADCs are referred to as charge-redistribution successive-approximation devices or sometimes switched-capacitor ADCs: -



                  enter image description here



                  Analog Devices source here.



                  Adding a capacitor at the input means that this surge of current does not significantly "alter" the voltage being measured because the external capacitor chosen at the input is many times the value of the internal capacitors.



                  The AD source above describes how the effect can also compromise the reference voltage and this, of course, is also relevant to protecting the integrity of the input signal.




                  I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things.




                  It also does what you say in your question i.e. it will reduce mismatch between the two CM capacitors but I would say that this is secondary to its main purpose.






                  share|improve this answer














                  In my experience with several ADCs, the ADC can take a surge of current when initially calculating a sample. This can modify the voltage at the input i.e. there is the possibility of a measurement error.



                  These types of ADCs are referred to as charge-redistribution successive-approximation devices or sometimes switched-capacitor ADCs: -



                  enter image description here



                  Analog Devices source here.



                  Adding a capacitor at the input means that this surge of current does not significantly "alter" the voltage being measured because the external capacitor chosen at the input is many times the value of the internal capacitors.



                  The AD source above describes how the effect can also compromise the reference voltage and this, of course, is also relevant to protecting the integrity of the input signal.




                  I'm trying to figure out how Cdiff helps reduce noise/improve things.




                  It also does what you say in your question i.e. it will reduce mismatch between the two CM capacitors but I would say that this is secondary to its main purpose.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Aug 15 at 8:46

























                  answered Aug 15 at 7:13









                  Andy aka

                  230k10171390




                  230k10171390






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      CM 20% mismatch resulting in ~ 4dB less attenuation of CM noise is not too significant as the potential to rise in DM impedance from ground path ESL and ESR effects for caps in the mOhm impedance range.



                      The CM cap does both CM and DM attenuation but the series input R’s in the ADC and transient switched cap loads, the diff cap does a better job to maintain the SRF of the caps.



                      Any nH rise ESL in the CM path of CM caps also lowers the self resonant frequency of those caps to attenuate the step load capacitance from ultra high speed C switches in the cap switched SAR ADC.






                      share|improve this answer


























                        up vote
                        1
                        down vote













                        CM 20% mismatch resulting in ~ 4dB less attenuation of CM noise is not too significant as the potential to rise in DM impedance from ground path ESL and ESR effects for caps in the mOhm impedance range.



                        The CM cap does both CM and DM attenuation but the series input R’s in the ADC and transient switched cap loads, the diff cap does a better job to maintain the SRF of the caps.



                        Any nH rise ESL in the CM path of CM caps also lowers the self resonant frequency of those caps to attenuate the step load capacitance from ultra high speed C switches in the cap switched SAR ADC.






                        share|improve this answer
























                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          1
                          down vote









                          CM 20% mismatch resulting in ~ 4dB less attenuation of CM noise is not too significant as the potential to rise in DM impedance from ground path ESL and ESR effects for caps in the mOhm impedance range.



                          The CM cap does both CM and DM attenuation but the series input R’s in the ADC and transient switched cap loads, the diff cap does a better job to maintain the SRF of the caps.



                          Any nH rise ESL in the CM path of CM caps also lowers the self resonant frequency of those caps to attenuate the step load capacitance from ultra high speed C switches in the cap switched SAR ADC.






                          share|improve this answer














                          CM 20% mismatch resulting in ~ 4dB less attenuation of CM noise is not too significant as the potential to rise in DM impedance from ground path ESL and ESR effects for caps in the mOhm impedance range.



                          The CM cap does both CM and DM attenuation but the series input R’s in the ADC and transient switched cap loads, the diff cap does a better job to maintain the SRF of the caps.



                          Any nH rise ESL in the CM path of CM caps also lowers the self resonant frequency of those caps to attenuate the step load capacitance from ultra high speed C switches in the cap switched SAR ADC.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited Aug 15 at 14:51

























                          answered Aug 15 at 14:45









                          Tony EE rocketscientist

                          58k22085




                          58k22085



























                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded















































                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f391104%2fhow-does-the-differential-cap-at-the-input-to-an-adc-amplifier-help-reduce-noise%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                              How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?