CentOs 7 Python Issue “-bash: python: command not found”

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!



I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.



Just typing "python" returns:



-bash: python: command not found 


which python gives:



/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin) 


However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.



alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:



 python auto /usr/bin/python3.4


-v python returns nothing.



type -a python gives:



 -bash: type: python: not found


declare -p PATH outputs



declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/‌​bin:/home/myusername/bin"


I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.



I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:



$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python


but:



$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.



Edit 2:



ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4

So perhaps a linking error still?



Edit 3:



This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.



yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm










share|improve this question























  • Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 29 '15 at 23:26










  • Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:25














up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2












I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!



I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.



Just typing "python" returns:



-bash: python: command not found 


which python gives:



/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin) 


However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.



alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:



 python auto /usr/bin/python3.4


-v python returns nothing.



type -a python gives:



 -bash: type: python: not found


declare -p PATH outputs



declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/‌​bin:/home/myusername/bin"


I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.



I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:



$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python


but:



$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.



Edit 2:



ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4

So perhaps a linking error still?



Edit 3:



This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.



yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm










share|improve this question























  • Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 29 '15 at 23:26










  • Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:25












up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
1
down vote

favorite
2






2





I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!



I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.



Just typing "python" returns:



-bash: python: command not found 


which python gives:



/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin) 


However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.



alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:



 python auto /usr/bin/python3.4


-v python returns nothing.



type -a python gives:



 -bash: type: python: not found


declare -p PATH outputs



declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/‌​bin:/home/myusername/bin"


I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.



I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:



$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python


but:



$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.



Edit 2:



ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4

So perhaps a linking error still?



Edit 3:



This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.



yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm










share|improve this question















I asked this at stackoverflow, but just realized it might be best here. If I need to delete it over there or should not have posted here, please let me know. I am still new to this site. Thanks in advance!



I'm using centos 7 and was trying to install python 3.4 alongside python 2.6 (2.7?) the default install. I was attempting to change my bashrc file with an alias to make python 3.4 the default from the shell. It did not work, and I commented out the script, resourced bashrc, and now the system acts as if it can no longer find python, default or otherwise.



Just typing "python" returns:



-bash: python: command not found 


which python gives:



/usr/bin/which: no python in (/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/bin:/home/myusername/bin) 


However there is a python install in both /usr/bin and /usr/sbin.



alternatives --list | grep -i python yields:



 python auto /usr/bin/python3.4


-v python returns nothing.



type -a python gives:



 -bash: type: python: not found


declare -p PATH outputs



declare -x PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/sbin:/home/myusername/.local/‌​bin:/home/myusername/bin"


I am not entirely sure where to go from here, and any help would be much appreciated.



I do seem to have /usr/bin/python:



$ ls -l /usr/bin/python
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Jun 25 15:39 /usr/bin/python -> /etc/alternatives/python


but:



$ ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python) gives:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


I do not know if this is relevant, but /etc/alternatives/python was pink looking in the terminal.



Edit 2:



ls -l /usr/local/bin/ prints -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 101 Sep 4 2014 2to3-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 241 Sep 4 2014 easy_install-3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 99 Sep 4 2014 idle3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 213 Sep 4 2014 pip3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 84 Sep 4 2014 pydoc3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4
-rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 17544 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3066 Sep 4 2014 python3.4m-config
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 236 Sep 4 2014 pyvenv-3.4

So perhaps a linking error still?



Edit 3:



This is the series of commands which I used to install python 3.



yum install scl-utils
sudo yum install scl-utils
sudo wget https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python33/epel-7-x86_64/download/rhscl-python33-epel-7-x86_64.noarch.rpm
sudo yum install rhscl-python33-*.noarch.rpm







centos python path python3






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jun 30 '15 at 16:12

























asked Jun 29 '15 at 22:23









Aerdowaith

1114




1114











  • Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 29 '15 at 23:26










  • Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:25
















  • Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 29 '15 at 23:26










  • Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:25















Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26




Please don't cross-post. If you think this is a better fit (and you're probably right), please delete your question from SO. Otherwise, both will end up being closed.
– terdon♦
Jun 29 '15 at 23:26












Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25




Thank you for informing me, the other post has been deleted.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:25










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.






share|improve this answer






















  • I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:26










  • Bash returned: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:29











  • @Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:41










  • Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:52











  • @Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:57

















up vote
-1
down vote













You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.



Enabling a Software Collection






share|improve this answer




















  • Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 10 at 16:14










  • Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
    – feeble
    Jul 11 at 16:30










  • :-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 11 at 16:34











Your Answer







StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212961%2fcentos-7-python-issue-bash-python-command-not-found%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
0
down vote













It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.






share|improve this answer






















  • I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:26










  • Bash returned: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:29











  • @Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:41










  • Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:52











  • @Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:57














up vote
0
down vote













It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.






share|improve this answer






















  • I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:26










  • Bash returned: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:29











  • @Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:41










  • Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:52











  • @Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:57












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.






share|improve this answer














It looks like you've lost your python installation. You have a link at /usr/bin/python which is pointing to /etc/alternatives/python. However, that itself is a link that is pointing to /usr/bin/python3.4 a file which apparently doesn't exist:



ls: cannot access /usr/bin/python3.4: No such file or directory


So, it looks like you simply haven't installed python3.4. I suggest you ask a new question, explaining exactly how you installed it.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Jun 30 '15 at 15:57

























answered Jun 30 '15 at 0:38









terdon♦

123k28232404




123k28232404











  • I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:26










  • Bash returned: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:29











  • @Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:41










  • Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:52











  • @Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:57
















  • I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:26










  • Bash returned: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:29











  • @Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:41










  • Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
    – Aerdowaith
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:52











  • @Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
    – terdon♦
    Jun 30 '15 at 15:57















I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26




I will try adding that link and reply back with how it goes. Thanks!
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:26












Bash returned: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29





Bash returned: ln: failed to create symbolic link '/usr/bin/python': File exists So apparently this link already exists, or am I not understanding the message?
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:29













@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41




@Aerdowaith no, you're understanding it perfectly. That's odd. Please edit your question and add the output of ls -l /usr/bin/python and ls -l $(readlink -f /usr/bin/python).
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:41












Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52





Links and symbolic links are a concept I have yet to fully grasp, so I wanted to make sure.
– Aerdowaith
Jun 30 '15 at 15:52













@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57




@Aerdowaith OK, see updated answer. You don't have python3.4 installed.
– terdon♦
Jun 30 '15 at 15:57












up vote
-1
down vote













You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.



Enabling a Software Collection






share|improve this answer




















  • Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 10 at 16:14










  • Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
    – feeble
    Jul 11 at 16:30










  • :-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 11 at 16:34















up vote
-1
down vote













You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.



Enabling a Software Collection






share|improve this answer




















  • Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 10 at 16:14










  • Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
    – feeble
    Jul 11 at 16:30










  • :-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 11 at 16:34













up vote
-1
down vote










up vote
-1
down vote









You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.



Enabling a Software Collection






share|improve this answer












You used scl. It's a software collections install of python 3.4. You need to refer to the scl docs on running it. It's not what you would expect.



Enabling a Software Collection







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Oct 26 '17 at 20:04









feeble

191




191











  • Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 10 at 16:14










  • Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
    – feeble
    Jul 11 at 16:30










  • :-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 11 at 16:34

















  • Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 10 at 16:14










  • Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
    – feeble
    Jul 11 at 16:30










  • :-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
    – Kusalananda
    Jul 11 at 16:34
















Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14




Rather than just providing a link, it would be better if the gist of the contents of that other site could be summarised in the answer.
– Kusalananda
Jul 10 at 16:14












Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30




Sounds like you are being lazy. Be a big boy and read the doc.
– feeble
Jul 11 at 16:30












:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34





:-) "Always quote the most relevant part of an important link, in case the target site is unreachable or goes permanently offline."
– Kusalananda
Jul 11 at 16:34


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f212961%2fcentos-7-python-issue-bash-python-command-not-found%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?