why are .pc files not listed in one place

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I am on Debian buster. I was reading the manpage of pkg-config and found that .pc files are and can be listed in many places . From the manpage -




pkg-config retrieves information about packages from special
metadata files. These files are named after the package, and has a .pc
extension. On most systems, pkg-config looks in /usr/lib/pkgconfig,
/usr/share/pkgconfig, /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig and
/usr/local/share/pkgconfig for these files. It will additionally look
in the colon-separated (on Windows, semicolon-separated) list of
directories specified by the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable.




  • From pkg-config manpage

sure enough I saw that there are packages in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig/ , while I can understand the /usr/local/.. part for locally compiled/built apps. I do not understand why there is a distinction between /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig . Is it something to do with some things need to be in userspace https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_space or something else entirely ?







share|improve this question
























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I am on Debian buster. I was reading the manpage of pkg-config and found that .pc files are and can be listed in many places . From the manpage -




    pkg-config retrieves information about packages from special
    metadata files. These files are named after the package, and has a .pc
    extension. On most systems, pkg-config looks in /usr/lib/pkgconfig,
    /usr/share/pkgconfig, /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig and
    /usr/local/share/pkgconfig for these files. It will additionally look
    in the colon-separated (on Windows, semicolon-separated) list of
    directories specified by the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable.




    • From pkg-config manpage

    sure enough I saw that there are packages in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig/ , while I can understand the /usr/local/.. part for locally compiled/built apps. I do not understand why there is a distinction between /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig . Is it something to do with some things need to be in userspace https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_space or something else entirely ?







    share|improve this question






















      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I am on Debian buster. I was reading the manpage of pkg-config and found that .pc files are and can be listed in many places . From the manpage -




      pkg-config retrieves information about packages from special
      metadata files. These files are named after the package, and has a .pc
      extension. On most systems, pkg-config looks in /usr/lib/pkgconfig,
      /usr/share/pkgconfig, /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig and
      /usr/local/share/pkgconfig for these files. It will additionally look
      in the colon-separated (on Windows, semicolon-separated) list of
      directories specified by the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable.




      • From pkg-config manpage

      sure enough I saw that there are packages in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig/ , while I can understand the /usr/local/.. part for locally compiled/built apps. I do not understand why there is a distinction between /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig . Is it something to do with some things need to be in userspace https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_space or something else entirely ?







      share|improve this question












      I am on Debian buster. I was reading the manpage of pkg-config and found that .pc files are and can be listed in many places . From the manpage -




      pkg-config retrieves information about packages from special
      metadata files. These files are named after the package, and has a .pc
      extension. On most systems, pkg-config looks in /usr/lib/pkgconfig,
      /usr/share/pkgconfig, /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig and
      /usr/local/share/pkgconfig for these files. It will additionally look
      in the colon-separated (on Windows, semicolon-separated) list of
      directories specified by the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable.




      • From pkg-config manpage

      sure enough I saw that there are packages in /usr/lib/pkgconfig/, /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig/ , while I can understand the /usr/local/.. part for locally compiled/built apps. I do not understand why there is a distinction between /usr/lib/pkgconfig/ and /usr/share/pkgconfig . Is it something to do with some things need to be in userspace https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_space or something else entirely ?









      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Feb 8 at 17:28









      shirish

      3,26342273




      3,26342273




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          The distinction is related to architecture independence. .pc files which might be architecture-specific go in /usr/lib (on Debian, /usr/lib/pkgconfig for pre-multiarch packages, /usr/lib/<triplet>/pkgconfig for multiarch packages), .pc files which are sure to be architecture-independent can go in /usr/share (only /usr/share/pkgconfig, no need to distinguish triplets here).






          share|improve this answer




















            Your Answer







            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: false,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );








             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f422869%2fwhy-are-pc-files-not-listed-in-one-place%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest






























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            The distinction is related to architecture independence. .pc files which might be architecture-specific go in /usr/lib (on Debian, /usr/lib/pkgconfig for pre-multiarch packages, /usr/lib/<triplet>/pkgconfig for multiarch packages), .pc files which are sure to be architecture-independent can go in /usr/share (only /usr/share/pkgconfig, no need to distinguish triplets here).






            share|improve this answer
























              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              The distinction is related to architecture independence. .pc files which might be architecture-specific go in /usr/lib (on Debian, /usr/lib/pkgconfig for pre-multiarch packages, /usr/lib/<triplet>/pkgconfig for multiarch packages), .pc files which are sure to be architecture-independent can go in /usr/share (only /usr/share/pkgconfig, no need to distinguish triplets here).






              share|improve this answer






















                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted






                The distinction is related to architecture independence. .pc files which might be architecture-specific go in /usr/lib (on Debian, /usr/lib/pkgconfig for pre-multiarch packages, /usr/lib/<triplet>/pkgconfig for multiarch packages), .pc files which are sure to be architecture-independent can go in /usr/share (only /usr/share/pkgconfig, no need to distinguish triplets here).






                share|improve this answer












                The distinction is related to architecture independence. .pc files which might be architecture-specific go in /usr/lib (on Debian, /usr/lib/pkgconfig for pre-multiarch packages, /usr/lib/<triplet>/pkgconfig for multiarch packages), .pc files which are sure to be architecture-independent can go in /usr/share (only /usr/share/pkgconfig, no need to distinguish triplets here).







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Feb 8 at 17:36









                Stephen Kitt

                142k22308369




                142k22308369






















                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded


























                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f422869%2fwhy-are-pc-files-not-listed-in-one-place%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest













































































                    Popular posts from this blog

                    How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                    Bahrain

                    Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay