Unable to apt-get update on Kali Linux [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-6
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Invalid signature for Kali Linux repositories : “The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository”

    5 answers



  • Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?

    5 answers



When I try to apt-get update it says:




Get:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease [30.5 kB]
Err:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
E: The repository 'http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.



My /etc/apt/source.list looks like this: 



deb http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# For source package access, uncomment the following line
# deb-src http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 L$

#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 LI$


What should I do ? thanks!




apt kali-linux




share|improve this question














marked as duplicate by Rui F Ribeiro, Wouter Verhelst, Jeff Schaller, sebasth, G-Man Feb 7 at 18:36


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    @RuiFRibeiro I'm not defending the quality of this question, but I think if there's an actual answer, we should try to use it. "Note that I do not propose systematically closing Kali questions! Each question should be judged on its merit."
    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 7 at 17:10















up vote
-6
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Invalid signature for Kali Linux repositories : “The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository”

    5 answers



  • Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?

    5 answers



When I try to apt-get update it says:




Get:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease [30.5 kB]
Err:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
E: The repository 'http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.



My /etc/apt/source.list looks like this: 



deb http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# For source package access, uncomment the following line
# deb-src http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 L$

#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 LI$


What should I do ? thanks!




apt kali-linux




share|improve this question














marked as duplicate by Rui F Ribeiro, Wouter Verhelst, Jeff Schaller, sebasth, G-Man Feb 7 at 18:36


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 1




    @RuiFRibeiro I'm not defending the quality of this question, but I think if there's an actual answer, we should try to use it. "Note that I do not propose systematically closing Kali questions! Each question should be judged on its merit."
    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 7 at 17:10













up vote
-6
down vote

favorite









up vote
-6
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • Invalid signature for Kali Linux repositories : “The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository”

    5 answers



  • Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?

    5 answers



When I try to apt-get update it says:




Get:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease [30.5 kB]
Err:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
E: The repository 'http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.



My /etc/apt/source.list looks like this: 



deb http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# For source package access, uncomment the following line
# deb-src http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 L$

#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 LI$


What should I do ? thanks!




apt kali-linux




share|improve this question















This question already has an answer here:



  • Invalid signature for Kali Linux repositories : “The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository”

    5 answers



  • Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?

    5 answers



When I try to apt-get update it says:




Get:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease [30.5 kB]
Err:1 http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://archive-3.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository <devel@kali.org>
E: The repository 'http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling InRelease' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.



My /etc/apt/source.list looks like this: 



deb http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# For source package access, uncomment the following line
# deb-src http://http.kali.org/kali kali-rolling main contrib non-free
# deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 L$

#deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 2017.3 _Kali-rolling_ - Official Snapshot amd64 LI$


What should I do ? thanks!





This question already has an answer here:



  • Invalid signature for Kali Linux repositories : “The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG ED444FF07D8D0BF6 Kali Linux Repository”

    5 answers



  • Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?

    5 answers





apt kali-linux





share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 7 at 10:41









Nolwennig

1455




1455










asked Feb 7 at 10:04









darklight81

111




111




marked as duplicate by Rui F Ribeiro, Wouter Verhelst, Jeff Schaller, sebasth, G-Man Feb 7 at 18:36


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Rui F Ribeiro, Wouter Verhelst, Jeff Schaller, sebasth, G-Man Feb 7 at 18:36


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.









  • 1




    @RuiFRibeiro I'm not defending the quality of this question, but I think if there's an actual answer, we should try to use it. "Note that I do not propose systematically closing Kali questions! Each question should be judged on its merit."
    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 7 at 17:10













  • 1




    @RuiFRibeiro I'm not defending the quality of this question, but I think if there's an actual answer, we should try to use it. "Note that I do not propose systematically closing Kali questions! Each question should be judged on its merit."
    – Jeff Schaller
    Feb 7 at 17:10








1




1




@RuiFRibeiro I'm not defending the quality of this question, but I think if there's an actual answer, we should try to use it. "Note that I do not propose systematically closing Kali questions! Each question should be judged on its merit."
– Jeff Schaller
Feb 7 at 17:10





@RuiFRibeiro I'm not defending the quality of this question, but I think if there's an actual answer, we should try to use it. "Note that I do not propose systematically closing Kali questions! Each question should be judged on its merit."
– Jeff Schaller
Feb 7 at 17:10











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













Actually, your keys are outdated; you need to first update your keys. Try: wget -q -O - archive.kali.org/archive-key.asc | apt-key add and you’re good to go.



Check out their Tweet






share|improve this answer





























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Actually, your keys are outdated; you need to first update your keys. Try: wget -q -O - archive.kali.org/archive-key.asc | apt-key add and you’re good to go.



    Check out their Tweet






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Actually, your keys are outdated; you need to first update your keys. Try: wget -q -O - archive.kali.org/archive-key.asc | apt-key add and you’re good to go.



      Check out their Tweet






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Actually, your keys are outdated; you need to first update your keys. Try: wget -q -O - archive.kali.org/archive-key.asc | apt-key add and you’re good to go.



        Check out their Tweet






        share|improve this answer














        Actually, your keys are outdated; you need to first update your keys. Try: wget -q -O - archive.kali.org/archive-key.asc | apt-key add and you’re good to go.



        Check out their Tweet







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Feb 7 at 17:00









        Jeff Schaller

        31.3k846105




        31.3k846105










        answered Feb 7 at 10:21









        Krishna Deshpande KD

        266




        266












            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
            Read more

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
            Read more

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

            Image
            Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
            Read more