Debian 9, APT, and “GPG error: … InRelease: The following signatures were invalid:”

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












I publish a Debian repository. It was signed with a 4096-bit GPG key, and has been merrily in use from Debian 7 and Debian 8 systems for some time. Recently, one of my users reported that Debian 9 was having problems with it. Specifically, apt-get update was yielding:


Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: A71733F3CEBD655CB25A0DDCE1E3A497555CE68F
W: The repository 'http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease' is not signed.


Note that unlike the people at "Repo APT secure - apt-get update GPG signature were invalid" and "Frustrated with aptly and GPG signing" I am not using aptly. So clearly I am not suffering from an aptly bug of any kind. (-:



So what is the problem?







share|improve this question






















  • Note that that's a different error message, asks what the end user can do rather than looking at things from the repository publisher's perspective, and that that question is from March 2016 when the change discussed here happened to APT in November 2016.
    – JdeBP
    Aug 18 '17 at 22:10










  • I agree the perspective is different.
    – Stephen Kitt
    Aug 19 '17 at 7:14















up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2












I publish a Debian repository. It was signed with a 4096-bit GPG key, and has been merrily in use from Debian 7 and Debian 8 systems for some time. Recently, one of my users reported that Debian 9 was having problems with it. Specifically, apt-get update was yielding:


Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: A71733F3CEBD655CB25A0DDCE1E3A497555CE68F
W: The repository 'http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease' is not signed.


Note that unlike the people at "Repo APT secure - apt-get update GPG signature were invalid" and "Frustrated with aptly and GPG signing" I am not using aptly. So clearly I am not suffering from an aptly bug of any kind. (-:



So what is the problem?







share|improve this question






















  • Note that that's a different error message, asks what the end user can do rather than looking at things from the repository publisher's perspective, and that that question is from March 2016 when the change discussed here happened to APT in November 2016.
    – JdeBP
    Aug 18 '17 at 22:10










  • I agree the perspective is different.
    – Stephen Kitt
    Aug 19 '17 at 7:14













up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
5
down vote

favorite
2






2





I publish a Debian repository. It was signed with a 4096-bit GPG key, and has been merrily in use from Debian 7 and Debian 8 systems for some time. Recently, one of my users reported that Debian 9 was having problems with it. Specifically, apt-get update was yielding:


Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: A71733F3CEBD655CB25A0DDCE1E3A497555CE68F
W: The repository 'http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease' is not signed.


Note that unlike the people at "Repo APT secure - apt-get update GPG signature were invalid" and "Frustrated with aptly and GPG signing" I am not using aptly. So clearly I am not suffering from an aptly bug of any kind. (-:



So what is the problem?







share|improve this question














I publish a Debian repository. It was signed with a 4096-bit GPG key, and has been merrily in use from Debian 7 and Debian 8 systems for some time. Recently, one of my users reported that Debian 9 was having problems with it. Specifically, apt-get update was yielding:


Reading package lists... Done
W: GPG error: http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease: The following signatures were invalid: A71733F3CEBD655CB25A0DDCE1E3A497555CE68F
W: The repository 'http://Debian-repository.JdeBP.info. stable InRelease' is not signed.


Note that unlike the people at "Repo APT secure - apt-get update GPG signature were invalid" and "Frustrated with aptly and GPG signing" I am not using aptly. So clearly I am not suffering from an aptly bug of any kind. (-:



So what is the problem?









share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Aug 18 '17 at 20:51









Stephen Kitt

142k22308369




142k22308369










asked Aug 18 '17 at 20:07









JdeBP

28.4k459133




28.4k459133











  • Note that that's a different error message, asks what the end user can do rather than looking at things from the repository publisher's perspective, and that that question is from March 2016 when the change discussed here happened to APT in November 2016.
    – JdeBP
    Aug 18 '17 at 22:10










  • I agree the perspective is different.
    – Stephen Kitt
    Aug 19 '17 at 7:14

















  • Note that that's a different error message, asks what the end user can do rather than looking at things from the repository publisher's perspective, and that that question is from March 2016 when the change discussed here happened to APT in November 2016.
    – JdeBP
    Aug 18 '17 at 22:10










  • I agree the perspective is different.
    – Stephen Kitt
    Aug 19 '17 at 7:14
















Note that that's a different error message, asks what the end user can do rather than looking at things from the repository publisher's perspective, and that that question is from March 2016 when the change discussed here happened to APT in November 2016.
– JdeBP
Aug 18 '17 at 22:10




Note that that's a different error message, asks what the end user can do rather than looking at things from the repository publisher's perspective, and that that question is from March 2016 when the change discussed here happened to APT in November 2016.
– JdeBP
Aug 18 '17 at 22:10












I agree the perspective is different.
– Stephen Kitt
Aug 19 '17 at 7:14





I agree the perspective is different.
– Stephen Kitt
Aug 19 '17 at 7:14











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
6
down vote













The cause of the problem is that with no update to the Debian wiki or other similar doco, and pretty much only a couple of largely Ubuntu-related announcements on a non-Debian personal WWW site, support for keys that state a preference for SHA-1 encryption has been turned off in APT as of Debian 9. (Specifically, it was turned off in APT version 1.4~beta1, and Debian 9 has version 1.4.7.)



So a repository publisher needs to do two things:



  • Adjust the personal-digest-preferences and personal-cipher-preferences in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf to eliminate SHA-1 from one's GPG preferences. This prevents the problem coming back with new keys.

  • Adjust the preferences that are contained in the current repository signing key to eliminate SHA-1 from there too. For that one needs to:

    • Run
      gpg --edit-key "$key_fingerprint"
      substituting the appropriate key fingerprint, then edit the key preferences with the pref and setpref commands, then save the key to the keyring.

    • Export the public key of the updated key from the keyring to a file.

    • Re-sign the repository with the modified signing key.

    • Publish the updated signing key's public key file.


Note that it is not necessary to generate a new signing key, and that the updated key with SHA-1 removed will continue to interoperate with the older Debian 8 APT.



Further reading



  • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-14). Dropping SHA-1 support in APT. juliank.wordpress.com.

  • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-15). Clarifications and updates on APT + SHA1. juliank.wordpress.com.





share|improve this answer





























    up vote
    1
    down vote













    As JdeBP already pointed out, as of Debian 9 apt no longer supports SHA-1, meaning the InRelease file needs to be created with SHA-256 instead (the same goes for Release.pg).



    What fixed it for me was specifying -digest-algo SHA256 as a parameter to gpg, so the complete sequence would be:




    1. Create the package:



      dpkg-deb --build $PACKAGE_NAME-1.0/
      sudo rm $SOME_TEMP_PATH/*
      mv $PACKAGE_NAME_name-1.0.deb $SOME_TEMP_PATH/
      dpkg-scanpackages $SOME_TEMP_PATH /dev/null | gzip -9c > $SOME_TEMP_PATH/Packages.gz
      sudo rm $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER/*
      sudo cp $SOME_TEMP_PATH/* $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER
      cd $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER



    2. Sign it:



      apt-ftparchive --md5 --sha256 release . > Release 
      gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --armor --output Release.gpg --detach-sign Release
      gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --clearsign --output InRelease Release


    Signing could also be done from the temp folder and then copying to the web server folder the complete thing, or you might want to play around with paths, namely the "." used when calling apt-ftparchive, if you want to store your .debs in a separate tree.






    share|improve this answer






















      Your Answer







      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: false,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );








       

      draft saved


      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f387053%2fdebian-9-apt-and-gpg-error-inrelease-the-following-signatures-were-inva%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest






























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      6
      down vote













      The cause of the problem is that with no update to the Debian wiki or other similar doco, and pretty much only a couple of largely Ubuntu-related announcements on a non-Debian personal WWW site, support for keys that state a preference for SHA-1 encryption has been turned off in APT as of Debian 9. (Specifically, it was turned off in APT version 1.4~beta1, and Debian 9 has version 1.4.7.)



      So a repository publisher needs to do two things:



      • Adjust the personal-digest-preferences and personal-cipher-preferences in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf to eliminate SHA-1 from one's GPG preferences. This prevents the problem coming back with new keys.

      • Adjust the preferences that are contained in the current repository signing key to eliminate SHA-1 from there too. For that one needs to:

        • Run
          gpg --edit-key "$key_fingerprint"
          substituting the appropriate key fingerprint, then edit the key preferences with the pref and setpref commands, then save the key to the keyring.

        • Export the public key of the updated key from the keyring to a file.

        • Re-sign the repository with the modified signing key.

        • Publish the updated signing key's public key file.


      Note that it is not necessary to generate a new signing key, and that the updated key with SHA-1 removed will continue to interoperate with the older Debian 8 APT.



      Further reading



      • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-14). Dropping SHA-1 support in APT. juliank.wordpress.com.

      • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-15). Clarifications and updates on APT + SHA1. juliank.wordpress.com.





      share|improve this answer


























        up vote
        6
        down vote













        The cause of the problem is that with no update to the Debian wiki or other similar doco, and pretty much only a couple of largely Ubuntu-related announcements on a non-Debian personal WWW site, support for keys that state a preference for SHA-1 encryption has been turned off in APT as of Debian 9. (Specifically, it was turned off in APT version 1.4~beta1, and Debian 9 has version 1.4.7.)



        So a repository publisher needs to do two things:



        • Adjust the personal-digest-preferences and personal-cipher-preferences in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf to eliminate SHA-1 from one's GPG preferences. This prevents the problem coming back with new keys.

        • Adjust the preferences that are contained in the current repository signing key to eliminate SHA-1 from there too. For that one needs to:

          • Run
            gpg --edit-key "$key_fingerprint"
            substituting the appropriate key fingerprint, then edit the key preferences with the pref and setpref commands, then save the key to the keyring.

          • Export the public key of the updated key from the keyring to a file.

          • Re-sign the repository with the modified signing key.

          • Publish the updated signing key's public key file.


        Note that it is not necessary to generate a new signing key, and that the updated key with SHA-1 removed will continue to interoperate with the older Debian 8 APT.



        Further reading



        • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-14). Dropping SHA-1 support in APT. juliank.wordpress.com.

        • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-15). Clarifications and updates on APT + SHA1. juliank.wordpress.com.





        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          6
          down vote










          up vote
          6
          down vote









          The cause of the problem is that with no update to the Debian wiki or other similar doco, and pretty much only a couple of largely Ubuntu-related announcements on a non-Debian personal WWW site, support for keys that state a preference for SHA-1 encryption has been turned off in APT as of Debian 9. (Specifically, it was turned off in APT version 1.4~beta1, and Debian 9 has version 1.4.7.)



          So a repository publisher needs to do two things:



          • Adjust the personal-digest-preferences and personal-cipher-preferences in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf to eliminate SHA-1 from one's GPG preferences. This prevents the problem coming back with new keys.

          • Adjust the preferences that are contained in the current repository signing key to eliminate SHA-1 from there too. For that one needs to:

            • Run
              gpg --edit-key "$key_fingerprint"
              substituting the appropriate key fingerprint, then edit the key preferences with the pref and setpref commands, then save the key to the keyring.

            • Export the public key of the updated key from the keyring to a file.

            • Re-sign the repository with the modified signing key.

            • Publish the updated signing key's public key file.


          Note that it is not necessary to generate a new signing key, and that the updated key with SHA-1 removed will continue to interoperate with the older Debian 8 APT.



          Further reading



          • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-14). Dropping SHA-1 support in APT. juliank.wordpress.com.

          • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-15). Clarifications and updates on APT + SHA1. juliank.wordpress.com.





          share|improve this answer














          The cause of the problem is that with no update to the Debian wiki or other similar doco, and pretty much only a couple of largely Ubuntu-related announcements on a non-Debian personal WWW site, support for keys that state a preference for SHA-1 encryption has been turned off in APT as of Debian 9. (Specifically, it was turned off in APT version 1.4~beta1, and Debian 9 has version 1.4.7.)



          So a repository publisher needs to do two things:



          • Adjust the personal-digest-preferences and personal-cipher-preferences in $HOME/.gnupg/gpg.conf to eliminate SHA-1 from one's GPG preferences. This prevents the problem coming back with new keys.

          • Adjust the preferences that are contained in the current repository signing key to eliminate SHA-1 from there too. For that one needs to:

            • Run
              gpg --edit-key "$key_fingerprint"
              substituting the appropriate key fingerprint, then edit the key preferences with the pref and setpref commands, then save the key to the keyring.

            • Export the public key of the updated key from the keyring to a file.

            • Re-sign the repository with the modified signing key.

            • Publish the updated signing key's public key file.


          Note that it is not necessary to generate a new signing key, and that the updated key with SHA-1 removed will continue to interoperate with the older Debian 8 APT.



          Further reading



          • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-14). Dropping SHA-1 support in APT. juliank.wordpress.com.

          • Julian Andres Klode (2016-03-15). Clarifications and updates on APT + SHA1. juliank.wordpress.com.






          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Feb 10 at 8:03

























          answered Aug 18 '17 at 20:07









          JdeBP

          28.4k459133




          28.4k459133






















              up vote
              1
              down vote













              As JdeBP already pointed out, as of Debian 9 apt no longer supports SHA-1, meaning the InRelease file needs to be created with SHA-256 instead (the same goes for Release.pg).



              What fixed it for me was specifying -digest-algo SHA256 as a parameter to gpg, so the complete sequence would be:




              1. Create the package:



                dpkg-deb --build $PACKAGE_NAME-1.0/
                sudo rm $SOME_TEMP_PATH/*
                mv $PACKAGE_NAME_name-1.0.deb $SOME_TEMP_PATH/
                dpkg-scanpackages $SOME_TEMP_PATH /dev/null | gzip -9c > $SOME_TEMP_PATH/Packages.gz
                sudo rm $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER/*
                sudo cp $SOME_TEMP_PATH/* $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER
                cd $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER



              2. Sign it:



                apt-ftparchive --md5 --sha256 release . > Release 
                gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --armor --output Release.gpg --detach-sign Release
                gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --clearsign --output InRelease Release


              Signing could also be done from the temp folder and then copying to the web server folder the complete thing, or you might want to play around with paths, namely the "." used when calling apt-ftparchive, if you want to store your .debs in a separate tree.






              share|improve this answer


























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                As JdeBP already pointed out, as of Debian 9 apt no longer supports SHA-1, meaning the InRelease file needs to be created with SHA-256 instead (the same goes for Release.pg).



                What fixed it for me was specifying -digest-algo SHA256 as a parameter to gpg, so the complete sequence would be:




                1. Create the package:



                  dpkg-deb --build $PACKAGE_NAME-1.0/
                  sudo rm $SOME_TEMP_PATH/*
                  mv $PACKAGE_NAME_name-1.0.deb $SOME_TEMP_PATH/
                  dpkg-scanpackages $SOME_TEMP_PATH /dev/null | gzip -9c > $SOME_TEMP_PATH/Packages.gz
                  sudo rm $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER/*
                  sudo cp $SOME_TEMP_PATH/* $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER
                  cd $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER



                2. Sign it:



                  apt-ftparchive --md5 --sha256 release . > Release 
                  gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --armor --output Release.gpg --detach-sign Release
                  gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --clearsign --output InRelease Release


                Signing could also be done from the temp folder and then copying to the web server folder the complete thing, or you might want to play around with paths, namely the "." used when calling apt-ftparchive, if you want to store your .debs in a separate tree.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  As JdeBP already pointed out, as of Debian 9 apt no longer supports SHA-1, meaning the InRelease file needs to be created with SHA-256 instead (the same goes for Release.pg).



                  What fixed it for me was specifying -digest-algo SHA256 as a parameter to gpg, so the complete sequence would be:




                  1. Create the package:



                    dpkg-deb --build $PACKAGE_NAME-1.0/
                    sudo rm $SOME_TEMP_PATH/*
                    mv $PACKAGE_NAME_name-1.0.deb $SOME_TEMP_PATH/
                    dpkg-scanpackages $SOME_TEMP_PATH /dev/null | gzip -9c > $SOME_TEMP_PATH/Packages.gz
                    sudo rm $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER/*
                    sudo cp $SOME_TEMP_PATH/* $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER
                    cd $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER



                  2. Sign it:



                    apt-ftparchive --md5 --sha256 release . > Release 
                    gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --armor --output Release.gpg --detach-sign Release
                    gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --clearsign --output InRelease Release


                  Signing could also be done from the temp folder and then copying to the web server folder the complete thing, or you might want to play around with paths, namely the "." used when calling apt-ftparchive, if you want to store your .debs in a separate tree.






                  share|improve this answer














                  As JdeBP already pointed out, as of Debian 9 apt no longer supports SHA-1, meaning the InRelease file needs to be created with SHA-256 instead (the same goes for Release.pg).



                  What fixed it for me was specifying -digest-algo SHA256 as a parameter to gpg, so the complete sequence would be:




                  1. Create the package:



                    dpkg-deb --build $PACKAGE_NAME-1.0/
                    sudo rm $SOME_TEMP_PATH/*
                    mv $PACKAGE_NAME_name-1.0.deb $SOME_TEMP_PATH/
                    dpkg-scanpackages $SOME_TEMP_PATH /dev/null | gzip -9c > $SOME_TEMP_PATH/Packages.gz
                    sudo rm $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER/*
                    sudo cp $SOME_TEMP_PATH/* $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER
                    cd $PATH_TO_REPO_IN_WWW_SERVER



                  2. Sign it:



                    apt-ftparchive --md5 --sha256 release . > Release 
                    gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --armor --output Release.gpg --detach-sign Release
                    gpg --digest-algo SHA256 --clearsign --output InRelease Release


                  Signing could also be done from the temp folder and then copying to the web server folder the complete thing, or you might want to play around with paths, namely the "." used when calling apt-ftparchive, if you want to store your .debs in a separate tree.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited Mar 27 at 9:50









                  perror

                  1,82841833




                  1,82841833










                  answered Mar 27 at 8:28









                  Ricardo Rodrigues

                  111




                  111






















                       

                      draft saved


                      draft discarded


























                       


                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f387053%2fdebian-9-apt-and-gpg-error-inrelease-the-following-signatures-were-inva%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest













































































                      Popular posts from this blog

                      How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                      Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                      How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?