Ignore spacing between echo strings

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I use echo to print two strings into a file in either of these two commands:



echo -e "n""x" >> ~/file
echo -e "n" "x" >> ~/file


The first result is:





x


The second result is:





x


I assume you didn't miss the extra space.



I most desire that the second command would behave like the first one because the extra space between "n" and "x" makes it more comfortable to read the command.



Given it's not possible naturally in Bash 4.3.48(1), is there any syntax that will allow it or at least, come close to it?



The main goal is to have a spacing, or at least some placeholder/separator, that will give me a some kind of separation between the two strings, for more comfortable reading, but without having that extra space above.



Please show any way you know. I'm open to use something else than echo (though I'd prefer to avoid here-string).




Note, I used the term "string" for "n". I'm not sure it's correct here, but it's the best term I have to describe that.







share|improve this question
















  • 2




    why not echo -e "n x" ?
    – RomanPerekhrest
    Feb 7 at 12:29






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:32






  • 1




    While I'm sure there is a way to do what you want (There is almost always a way), to be clear: You are asking for a way to bypass the rules of the shell in order to make it easier for you to read? What about the people that come after you and read it?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:39







  • 1




    @RomanPerekhrest it makes a single space before x in the second line... I don't want that single space before x. I want space only in the command itself for ease of read.
    – user9303970
    Feb 7 at 13:06






  • 2




    The same result could be had with echo; echo x; >file.
    – Kusalananda
    Feb 7 at 13:17














up vote
2
down vote

favorite












I use echo to print two strings into a file in either of these two commands:



echo -e "n""x" >> ~/file
echo -e "n" "x" >> ~/file


The first result is:





x


The second result is:





x


I assume you didn't miss the extra space.



I most desire that the second command would behave like the first one because the extra space between "n" and "x" makes it more comfortable to read the command.



Given it's not possible naturally in Bash 4.3.48(1), is there any syntax that will allow it or at least, come close to it?



The main goal is to have a spacing, or at least some placeholder/separator, that will give me a some kind of separation between the two strings, for more comfortable reading, but without having that extra space above.



Please show any way you know. I'm open to use something else than echo (though I'd prefer to avoid here-string).




Note, I used the term "string" for "n". I'm not sure it's correct here, but it's the best term I have to describe that.







share|improve this question
















  • 2




    why not echo -e "n x" ?
    – RomanPerekhrest
    Feb 7 at 12:29






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:32






  • 1




    While I'm sure there is a way to do what you want (There is almost always a way), to be clear: You are asking for a way to bypass the rules of the shell in order to make it easier for you to read? What about the people that come after you and read it?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:39







  • 1




    @RomanPerekhrest it makes a single space before x in the second line... I don't want that single space before x. I want space only in the command itself for ease of read.
    – user9303970
    Feb 7 at 13:06






  • 2




    The same result could be had with echo; echo x; >file.
    – Kusalananda
    Feb 7 at 13:17












up vote
2
down vote

favorite









up vote
2
down vote

favorite











I use echo to print two strings into a file in either of these two commands:



echo -e "n""x" >> ~/file
echo -e "n" "x" >> ~/file


The first result is:





x


The second result is:





x


I assume you didn't miss the extra space.



I most desire that the second command would behave like the first one because the extra space between "n" and "x" makes it more comfortable to read the command.



Given it's not possible naturally in Bash 4.3.48(1), is there any syntax that will allow it or at least, come close to it?



The main goal is to have a spacing, or at least some placeholder/separator, that will give me a some kind of separation between the two strings, for more comfortable reading, but without having that extra space above.



Please show any way you know. I'm open to use something else than echo (though I'd prefer to avoid here-string).




Note, I used the term "string" for "n". I'm not sure it's correct here, but it's the best term I have to describe that.







share|improve this question












I use echo to print two strings into a file in either of these two commands:



echo -e "n""x" >> ~/file
echo -e "n" "x" >> ~/file


The first result is:





x


The second result is:





x


I assume you didn't miss the extra space.



I most desire that the second command would behave like the first one because the extra space between "n" and "x" makes it more comfortable to read the command.



Given it's not possible naturally in Bash 4.3.48(1), is there any syntax that will allow it or at least, come close to it?



The main goal is to have a spacing, or at least some placeholder/separator, that will give me a some kind of separation between the two strings, for more comfortable reading, but without having that extra space above.



Please show any way you know. I'm open to use something else than echo (though I'd prefer to avoid here-string).




Note, I used the term "string" for "n". I'm not sure it's correct here, but it's the best term I have to describe that.









share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Feb 7 at 12:26









user9303970

123224




123224







  • 2




    why not echo -e "n x" ?
    – RomanPerekhrest
    Feb 7 at 12:29






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:32






  • 1




    While I'm sure there is a way to do what you want (There is almost always a way), to be clear: You are asking for a way to bypass the rules of the shell in order to make it easier for you to read? What about the people that come after you and read it?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:39







  • 1




    @RomanPerekhrest it makes a single space before x in the second line... I don't want that single space before x. I want space only in the command itself for ease of read.
    – user9303970
    Feb 7 at 13:06






  • 2




    The same result could be had with echo; echo x; >file.
    – Kusalananda
    Feb 7 at 13:17












  • 2




    why not echo -e "n x" ?
    – RomanPerekhrest
    Feb 7 at 12:29






  • 1




    Possible duplicate of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:32






  • 1




    While I'm sure there is a way to do what you want (There is almost always a way), to be clear: You are asking for a way to bypass the rules of the shell in order to make it easier for you to read? What about the people that come after you and read it?
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 12:39







  • 1




    @RomanPerekhrest it makes a single space before x in the second line... I don't want that single space before x. I want space only in the command itself for ease of read.
    – user9303970
    Feb 7 at 13:06






  • 2




    The same result could be had with echo; echo x; >file.
    – Kusalananda
    Feb 7 at 13:17







2




2




why not echo -e "n x" ?
– RomanPerekhrest
Feb 7 at 12:29




why not echo -e "n x" ?
– RomanPerekhrest
Feb 7 at 12:29




1




1




Possible duplicate of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters?
– Jesse_b
Feb 7 at 12:32




Possible duplicate of Why does my shell script choke on whitespace or other special characters?
– Jesse_b
Feb 7 at 12:32




1




1




While I'm sure there is a way to do what you want (There is almost always a way), to be clear: You are asking for a way to bypass the rules of the shell in order to make it easier for you to read? What about the people that come after you and read it?
– Jesse_b
Feb 7 at 12:39





While I'm sure there is a way to do what you want (There is almost always a way), to be clear: You are asking for a way to bypass the rules of the shell in order to make it easier for you to read? What about the people that come after you and read it?
– Jesse_b
Feb 7 at 12:39





1




1




@RomanPerekhrest it makes a single space before x in the second line... I don't want that single space before x. I want space only in the command itself for ease of read.
– user9303970
Feb 7 at 13:06




@RomanPerekhrest it makes a single space before x in the second line... I don't want that single space before x. I want space only in the command itself for ease of read.
– user9303970
Feb 7 at 13:06




2




2




The same result could be had with echo; echo x; >file.
– Kusalananda
Feb 7 at 13:17




The same result could be had with echo; echo x; >file.
– Kusalananda
Feb 7 at 13:17










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
3
down vote



accepted










You can do this with the printf command:



printf 'n%sn' 'x' >file


With echo, I was able to accomplish this using tr to delete whitespace:



echo -e 'n x' | tr -d ' ' >file


Can also be written as (but please don't):



echo -e 'n' 'x' | tr -d ' ' >file


Results:



$ cat file

x


I suppose it could also easily be argued that these will actually make your command harder to read.






share|improve this answer






















  • Nice! Thanks. What's the %s in printf? I didn't find in man printf.
    – user9303970
    Feb 7 at 13:17






  • 2




    @user9303970 It's a placeholder for a string which will be inserted from the arguments after the format string (n%sn). man printf probably documents the C library function printf(), but it's using the same format string placeholders as printf in the shell. %s is for "a string" while %d is for "a decimal integer", etc. One could also specify field widths, left or right alignments etc.
    – Kusalananda
    Feb 7 at 13:29






  • 1




    What Kusalananda said ^^. I'm not great with printf but the bash-hackers wiki on printf is a good reference for me anyway.
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 13:31

















up vote
3
down vote













If the key point is visually separating the two strings (n and x, here) in the script source, I suppose you could put them in variables:



str1='n'
str2='x'
echo -e "$str1$str2" >> file


The parameter expansions are of course back-to-back, but the strings themselves aren't.



Or with printf, but adding the tailing newline must be done separately:



 printf %s $'n' 'x'; echo; >> file


%s of course doesn't expand backslash-escapes from the argument string, but in Bash we can use the $'...' ANSI-C quoting that does. echo to get the final newline.



Or define a function to do what you want ("$*" concatenates the arguments to the function, without delimiter since IFS was cleared here):



output() local IFS=; echo -e "$*"; 
output "n" "x"





share|improve this answer






















  • yes, printf "%s" arg arg ... is the answer.
    – glenn jackman
    Feb 7 at 13:39

















up vote
1
down vote













If the objective is specifically to write a newline and an x
(and another newline?) to a file,
without having n and x appear consecutively (i.e., nx)
in your command
(and without including an undesired space in your output),
a very simple approach is



 echo; echo "x"; >> file


(to write newline, x, newline), or



 echo; echo -n "x"; >> file


(to write newline and x, but no newline at the end). 
You can also use parentheses instead of braces for grouping:



(echo; echo "x") >> file


Note that, with braces, you must have whitespace
(space(s), tab(s) and/or newline(s)) after the opening ,
and you must have a ; (and/or newline(s)) before the closing . 
Or you can do two totally separate (not grouped) commands
that do redirection independently:



echo >> file
echo "x" >> file


Or use Jesse_b’s answer:



printf 'n%sn' 'x' >> file


(to write newline, x, newline), or



printf 'n%s' 'x' >> file


(to write newline and x, but no newline at the end).




But if the objective is more general —
to write a bunch of strings (with no intervening spaces),
while separating them by spaces on the command line, consider



printf '%b' string …


where %b is the conversion format to print a string
with sequences interpreted (in contrast to %s,
which prints strings literally). 
For example,



printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


will write newlinefootabbar;
i.e.,


 
foo bar

(with no newline at the end). 
You could also say

printf '%b%b%b%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


but you don’t need to;
the format will be applied as many times as necessary
to display all the arguments. 
Therefore, if you want to add a newline at the end,



printf '%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


will not work; it will add a newline after each argument. 
You can do



printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar 'n'


(adding a newline as a final argument), or



printf '%b%b%b%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


(counting the arguments), or



 printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar; echo;


Yet another approach, if you’re using bash, is



printf '%s' $'n' foo $'t' bar


using bash’s $'text…' notation
to interpret sequences. 
Applying this to the original question, we would get



printf '%s' $'n' x





share|improve this answer




















  • Of course I had finished typing my answer before I saw this one.
    – G-Man
    Feb 7 at 17:51










  • Thumbed for the rich, didactic answer.
    – user9303970
    Feb 8 at 0:44










  • G-Man, as you suggested I checked the bytes of the files. Indeed there was a change of one byte. Without any of the two changes, at the start, the file had 2188 bytes. With n%s it had 2217. I then changed it to n%sn and got 2218, so that extra n%sn is all the change. I thank you Jesse_b and G-Man for your help.
    – user9303970
    Feb 8 at 0:59

















up vote
1
down vote













You can use the %b (interpret backquoted arguments) of bash printf:



$ printf %b \n x >> file


Of course, you can quote the n:



$ printf %b 'n' x >> file


But be very careful with what you feed to printf as any backquoted value instead of x will be interpreted by printf.



Or, since you are using bash, it allows a newline to be generated with $'n':



$ printf '%s' $'n' x >>file


Somewhat safer than %b.



Or, if you want a variable:



$ nl=$'n'
$ printf '%s' "$nl" x >> file


Or you can define a function:



$ separate() local IFS=; printf %b "$*"; 
$ separate 'n' 'x' '*'


The local IFS= will ensure the arguments are joined together (no spaces in between) by "$*"






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer







    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: false,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );








     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f422525%2fignore-spacing-between-echo-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest






























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    You can do this with the printf command:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >file


    With echo, I was able to accomplish this using tr to delete whitespace:



    echo -e 'n x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Can also be written as (but please don't):



    echo -e 'n' 'x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Results:



    $ cat file

    x


    I suppose it could also easily be argued that these will actually make your command harder to read.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Nice! Thanks. What's the %s in printf? I didn't find in man printf.
      – user9303970
      Feb 7 at 13:17






    • 2




      @user9303970 It's a placeholder for a string which will be inserted from the arguments after the format string (n%sn). man printf probably documents the C library function printf(), but it's using the same format string placeholders as printf in the shell. %s is for "a string" while %d is for "a decimal integer", etc. One could also specify field widths, left or right alignments etc.
      – Kusalananda
      Feb 7 at 13:29






    • 1




      What Kusalananda said ^^. I'm not great with printf but the bash-hackers wiki on printf is a good reference for me anyway.
      – Jesse_b
      Feb 7 at 13:31














    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted










    You can do this with the printf command:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >file


    With echo, I was able to accomplish this using tr to delete whitespace:



    echo -e 'n x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Can also be written as (but please don't):



    echo -e 'n' 'x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Results:



    $ cat file

    x


    I suppose it could also easily be argued that these will actually make your command harder to read.






    share|improve this answer






















    • Nice! Thanks. What's the %s in printf? I didn't find in man printf.
      – user9303970
      Feb 7 at 13:17






    • 2




      @user9303970 It's a placeholder for a string which will be inserted from the arguments after the format string (n%sn). man printf probably documents the C library function printf(), but it's using the same format string placeholders as printf in the shell. %s is for "a string" while %d is for "a decimal integer", etc. One could also specify field widths, left or right alignments etc.
      – Kusalananda
      Feb 7 at 13:29






    • 1




      What Kusalananda said ^^. I'm not great with printf but the bash-hackers wiki on printf is a good reference for me anyway.
      – Jesse_b
      Feb 7 at 13:31












    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    3
    down vote



    accepted






    You can do this with the printf command:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >file


    With echo, I was able to accomplish this using tr to delete whitespace:



    echo -e 'n x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Can also be written as (but please don't):



    echo -e 'n' 'x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Results:



    $ cat file

    x


    I suppose it could also easily be argued that these will actually make your command harder to read.






    share|improve this answer














    You can do this with the printf command:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >file


    With echo, I was able to accomplish this using tr to delete whitespace:



    echo -e 'n x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Can also be written as (but please don't):



    echo -e 'n' 'x' | tr -d ' ' >file


    Results:



    $ cat file

    x


    I suppose it could also easily be argued that these will actually make your command harder to read.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Feb 7 at 18:33

























    answered Feb 7 at 12:51









    Jesse_b

    10.4k22658




    10.4k22658











    • Nice! Thanks. What's the %s in printf? I didn't find in man printf.
      – user9303970
      Feb 7 at 13:17






    • 2




      @user9303970 It's a placeholder for a string which will be inserted from the arguments after the format string (n%sn). man printf probably documents the C library function printf(), but it's using the same format string placeholders as printf in the shell. %s is for "a string" while %d is for "a decimal integer", etc. One could also specify field widths, left or right alignments etc.
      – Kusalananda
      Feb 7 at 13:29






    • 1




      What Kusalananda said ^^. I'm not great with printf but the bash-hackers wiki on printf is a good reference for me anyway.
      – Jesse_b
      Feb 7 at 13:31
















    • Nice! Thanks. What's the %s in printf? I didn't find in man printf.
      – user9303970
      Feb 7 at 13:17






    • 2




      @user9303970 It's a placeholder for a string which will be inserted from the arguments after the format string (n%sn). man printf probably documents the C library function printf(), but it's using the same format string placeholders as printf in the shell. %s is for "a string" while %d is for "a decimal integer", etc. One could also specify field widths, left or right alignments etc.
      – Kusalananda
      Feb 7 at 13:29






    • 1




      What Kusalananda said ^^. I'm not great with printf but the bash-hackers wiki on printf is a good reference for me anyway.
      – Jesse_b
      Feb 7 at 13:31















    Nice! Thanks. What's the %s in printf? I didn't find in man printf.
    – user9303970
    Feb 7 at 13:17




    Nice! Thanks. What's the %s in printf? I didn't find in man printf.
    – user9303970
    Feb 7 at 13:17




    2




    2




    @user9303970 It's a placeholder for a string which will be inserted from the arguments after the format string (n%sn). man printf probably documents the C library function printf(), but it's using the same format string placeholders as printf in the shell. %s is for "a string" while %d is for "a decimal integer", etc. One could also specify field widths, left or right alignments etc.
    – Kusalananda
    Feb 7 at 13:29




    @user9303970 It's a placeholder for a string which will be inserted from the arguments after the format string (n%sn). man printf probably documents the C library function printf(), but it's using the same format string placeholders as printf in the shell. %s is for "a string" while %d is for "a decimal integer", etc. One could also specify field widths, left or right alignments etc.
    – Kusalananda
    Feb 7 at 13:29




    1




    1




    What Kusalananda said ^^. I'm not great with printf but the bash-hackers wiki on printf is a good reference for me anyway.
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 13:31




    What Kusalananda said ^^. I'm not great with printf but the bash-hackers wiki on printf is a good reference for me anyway.
    – Jesse_b
    Feb 7 at 13:31












    up vote
    3
    down vote













    If the key point is visually separating the two strings (n and x, here) in the script source, I suppose you could put them in variables:



    str1='n'
    str2='x'
    echo -e "$str1$str2" >> file


    The parameter expansions are of course back-to-back, but the strings themselves aren't.



    Or with printf, but adding the tailing newline must be done separately:



     printf %s $'n' 'x'; echo; >> file


    %s of course doesn't expand backslash-escapes from the argument string, but in Bash we can use the $'...' ANSI-C quoting that does. echo to get the final newline.



    Or define a function to do what you want ("$*" concatenates the arguments to the function, without delimiter since IFS was cleared here):



    output() local IFS=; echo -e "$*"; 
    output "n" "x"





    share|improve this answer






















    • yes, printf "%s" arg arg ... is the answer.
      – glenn jackman
      Feb 7 at 13:39














    up vote
    3
    down vote













    If the key point is visually separating the two strings (n and x, here) in the script source, I suppose you could put them in variables:



    str1='n'
    str2='x'
    echo -e "$str1$str2" >> file


    The parameter expansions are of course back-to-back, but the strings themselves aren't.



    Or with printf, but adding the tailing newline must be done separately:



     printf %s $'n' 'x'; echo; >> file


    %s of course doesn't expand backslash-escapes from the argument string, but in Bash we can use the $'...' ANSI-C quoting that does. echo to get the final newline.



    Or define a function to do what you want ("$*" concatenates the arguments to the function, without delimiter since IFS was cleared here):



    output() local IFS=; echo -e "$*"; 
    output "n" "x"





    share|improve this answer






















    • yes, printf "%s" arg arg ... is the answer.
      – glenn jackman
      Feb 7 at 13:39












    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    If the key point is visually separating the two strings (n and x, here) in the script source, I suppose you could put them in variables:



    str1='n'
    str2='x'
    echo -e "$str1$str2" >> file


    The parameter expansions are of course back-to-back, but the strings themselves aren't.



    Or with printf, but adding the tailing newline must be done separately:



     printf %s $'n' 'x'; echo; >> file


    %s of course doesn't expand backslash-escapes from the argument string, but in Bash we can use the $'...' ANSI-C quoting that does. echo to get the final newline.



    Or define a function to do what you want ("$*" concatenates the arguments to the function, without delimiter since IFS was cleared here):



    output() local IFS=; echo -e "$*"; 
    output "n" "x"





    share|improve this answer














    If the key point is visually separating the two strings (n and x, here) in the script source, I suppose you could put them in variables:



    str1='n'
    str2='x'
    echo -e "$str1$str2" >> file


    The parameter expansions are of course back-to-back, but the strings themselves aren't.



    Or with printf, but adding the tailing newline must be done separately:



     printf %s $'n' 'x'; echo; >> file


    %s of course doesn't expand backslash-escapes from the argument string, but in Bash we can use the $'...' ANSI-C quoting that does. echo to get the final newline.



    Or define a function to do what you want ("$*" concatenates the arguments to the function, without delimiter since IFS was cleared here):



    output() local IFS=; echo -e "$*"; 
    output "n" "x"






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Feb 7 at 13:52

























    answered Feb 7 at 13:31









    ilkkachu

    49.6k673137




    49.6k673137











    • yes, printf "%s" arg arg ... is the answer.
      – glenn jackman
      Feb 7 at 13:39
















    • yes, printf "%s" arg arg ... is the answer.
      – glenn jackman
      Feb 7 at 13:39















    yes, printf "%s" arg arg ... is the answer.
    – glenn jackman
    Feb 7 at 13:39




    yes, printf "%s" arg arg ... is the answer.
    – glenn jackman
    Feb 7 at 13:39










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    If the objective is specifically to write a newline and an x
    (and another newline?) to a file,
    without having n and x appear consecutively (i.e., nx)
    in your command
    (and without including an undesired space in your output),
    a very simple approach is



     echo; echo "x"; >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



     echo; echo -n "x"; >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end). 
    You can also use parentheses instead of braces for grouping:



    (echo; echo "x") >> file


    Note that, with braces, you must have whitespace
    (space(s), tab(s) and/or newline(s)) after the opening ,
    and you must have a ; (and/or newline(s)) before the closing . 
    Or you can do two totally separate (not grouped) commands
    that do redirection independently:



    echo >> file
    echo "x" >> file


    Or use Jesse_b’s answer:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



    printf 'n%s' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end).




    But if the objective is more general —
    to write a bunch of strings (with no intervening spaces),
    while separating them by spaces on the command line, consider



    printf '%b' string …


    where %b is the conversion format to print a string
    with sequences interpreted (in contrast to %s,
    which prints strings literally). 
    For example,



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will write newlinefootabbar;
    i.e.,


     
    foo bar

    (with no newline at the end). 
    You could also say

    printf '%b%b%b%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    but you don’t need to;
    the format will be applied as many times as necessary
    to display all the arguments. 
    Therefore, if you want to add a newline at the end,



    printf '%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will not work; it will add a newline after each argument. 
    You can do



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar 'n'


    (adding a newline as a final argument), or



    printf '%b%b%b%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    (counting the arguments), or



     printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar; echo;


    Yet another approach, if you’re using bash, is



    printf '%s' $'n' foo $'t' bar


    using bash’s $'text…' notation
    to interpret sequences. 
    Applying this to the original question, we would get



    printf '%s' $'n' x





    share|improve this answer




















    • Of course I had finished typing my answer before I saw this one.
      – G-Man
      Feb 7 at 17:51










    • Thumbed for the rich, didactic answer.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:44










    • G-Man, as you suggested I checked the bytes of the files. Indeed there was a change of one byte. Without any of the two changes, at the start, the file had 2188 bytes. With n%s it had 2217. I then changed it to n%sn and got 2218, so that extra n%sn is all the change. I thank you Jesse_b and G-Man for your help.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:59














    up vote
    1
    down vote













    If the objective is specifically to write a newline and an x
    (and another newline?) to a file,
    without having n and x appear consecutively (i.e., nx)
    in your command
    (and without including an undesired space in your output),
    a very simple approach is



     echo; echo "x"; >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



     echo; echo -n "x"; >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end). 
    You can also use parentheses instead of braces for grouping:



    (echo; echo "x") >> file


    Note that, with braces, you must have whitespace
    (space(s), tab(s) and/or newline(s)) after the opening ,
    and you must have a ; (and/or newline(s)) before the closing . 
    Or you can do two totally separate (not grouped) commands
    that do redirection independently:



    echo >> file
    echo "x" >> file


    Or use Jesse_b’s answer:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



    printf 'n%s' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end).




    But if the objective is more general —
    to write a bunch of strings (with no intervening spaces),
    while separating them by spaces on the command line, consider



    printf '%b' string …


    where %b is the conversion format to print a string
    with sequences interpreted (in contrast to %s,
    which prints strings literally). 
    For example,



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will write newlinefootabbar;
    i.e.,


     
    foo bar

    (with no newline at the end). 
    You could also say

    printf '%b%b%b%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    but you don’t need to;
    the format will be applied as many times as necessary
    to display all the arguments. 
    Therefore, if you want to add a newline at the end,



    printf '%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will not work; it will add a newline after each argument. 
    You can do



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar 'n'


    (adding a newline as a final argument), or



    printf '%b%b%b%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    (counting the arguments), or



     printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar; echo;


    Yet another approach, if you’re using bash, is



    printf '%s' $'n' foo $'t' bar


    using bash’s $'text…' notation
    to interpret sequences. 
    Applying this to the original question, we would get



    printf '%s' $'n' x





    share|improve this answer




















    • Of course I had finished typing my answer before I saw this one.
      – G-Man
      Feb 7 at 17:51










    • Thumbed for the rich, didactic answer.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:44










    • G-Man, as you suggested I checked the bytes of the files. Indeed there was a change of one byte. Without any of the two changes, at the start, the file had 2188 bytes. With n%s it had 2217. I then changed it to n%sn and got 2218, so that extra n%sn is all the change. I thank you Jesse_b and G-Man for your help.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:59












    up vote
    1
    down vote










    up vote
    1
    down vote









    If the objective is specifically to write a newline and an x
    (and another newline?) to a file,
    without having n and x appear consecutively (i.e., nx)
    in your command
    (and without including an undesired space in your output),
    a very simple approach is



     echo; echo "x"; >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



     echo; echo -n "x"; >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end). 
    You can also use parentheses instead of braces for grouping:



    (echo; echo "x") >> file


    Note that, with braces, you must have whitespace
    (space(s), tab(s) and/or newline(s)) after the opening ,
    and you must have a ; (and/or newline(s)) before the closing . 
    Or you can do two totally separate (not grouped) commands
    that do redirection independently:



    echo >> file
    echo "x" >> file


    Or use Jesse_b’s answer:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



    printf 'n%s' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end).




    But if the objective is more general —
    to write a bunch of strings (with no intervening spaces),
    while separating them by spaces on the command line, consider



    printf '%b' string …


    where %b is the conversion format to print a string
    with sequences interpreted (in contrast to %s,
    which prints strings literally). 
    For example,



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will write newlinefootabbar;
    i.e.,


     
    foo bar

    (with no newline at the end). 
    You could also say

    printf '%b%b%b%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    but you don’t need to;
    the format will be applied as many times as necessary
    to display all the arguments. 
    Therefore, if you want to add a newline at the end,



    printf '%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will not work; it will add a newline after each argument. 
    You can do



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar 'n'


    (adding a newline as a final argument), or



    printf '%b%b%b%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    (counting the arguments), or



     printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar; echo;


    Yet another approach, if you’re using bash, is



    printf '%s' $'n' foo $'t' bar


    using bash’s $'text…' notation
    to interpret sequences. 
    Applying this to the original question, we would get



    printf '%s' $'n' x





    share|improve this answer












    If the objective is specifically to write a newline and an x
    (and another newline?) to a file,
    without having n and x appear consecutively (i.e., nx)
    in your command
    (and without including an undesired space in your output),
    a very simple approach is



     echo; echo "x"; >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



     echo; echo -n "x"; >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end). 
    You can also use parentheses instead of braces for grouping:



    (echo; echo "x") >> file


    Note that, with braces, you must have whitespace
    (space(s), tab(s) and/or newline(s)) after the opening ,
    and you must have a ; (and/or newline(s)) before the closing . 
    Or you can do two totally separate (not grouped) commands
    that do redirection independently:



    echo >> file
    echo "x" >> file


    Or use Jesse_b’s answer:



    printf 'n%sn' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline, x, newline), or



    printf 'n%s' 'x' >> file


    (to write newline and x, but no newline at the end).




    But if the objective is more general —
    to write a bunch of strings (with no intervening spaces),
    while separating them by spaces on the command line, consider



    printf '%b' string …


    where %b is the conversion format to print a string
    with sequences interpreted (in contrast to %s,
    which prints strings literally). 
    For example,



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will write newlinefootabbar;
    i.e.,


     
    foo bar

    (with no newline at the end). 
    You could also say

    printf '%b%b%b%b' 'n' foo 't' bar


    but you don’t need to;
    the format will be applied as many times as necessary
    to display all the arguments. 
    Therefore, if you want to add a newline at the end,



    printf '%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    will not work; it will add a newline after each argument. 
    You can do



    printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar 'n'


    (adding a newline as a final argument), or



    printf '%b%b%b%bn' 'n' foo 't' bar


    (counting the arguments), or



     printf '%b' 'n' foo 't' bar; echo;


    Yet another approach, if you’re using bash, is



    printf '%s' $'n' foo $'t' bar


    using bash’s $'text…' notation
    to interpret sequences. 
    Applying this to the original question, we would get



    printf '%s' $'n' x






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Feb 7 at 17:42









    G-Man

    11.5k82656




    11.5k82656











    • Of course I had finished typing my answer before I saw this one.
      – G-Man
      Feb 7 at 17:51










    • Thumbed for the rich, didactic answer.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:44










    • G-Man, as you suggested I checked the bytes of the files. Indeed there was a change of one byte. Without any of the two changes, at the start, the file had 2188 bytes. With n%s it had 2217. I then changed it to n%sn and got 2218, so that extra n%sn is all the change. I thank you Jesse_b and G-Man for your help.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:59
















    • Of course I had finished typing my answer before I saw this one.
      – G-Man
      Feb 7 at 17:51










    • Thumbed for the rich, didactic answer.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:44










    • G-Man, as you suggested I checked the bytes of the files. Indeed there was a change of one byte. Without any of the two changes, at the start, the file had 2188 bytes. With n%s it had 2217. I then changed it to n%sn and got 2218, so that extra n%sn is all the change. I thank you Jesse_b and G-Man for your help.
      – user9303970
      Feb 8 at 0:59















    Of course I had finished typing my answer before I saw this one.
    – G-Man
    Feb 7 at 17:51




    Of course I had finished typing my answer before I saw this one.
    – G-Man
    Feb 7 at 17:51












    Thumbed for the rich, didactic answer.
    – user9303970
    Feb 8 at 0:44




    Thumbed for the rich, didactic answer.
    – user9303970
    Feb 8 at 0:44












    G-Man, as you suggested I checked the bytes of the files. Indeed there was a change of one byte. Without any of the two changes, at the start, the file had 2188 bytes. With n%s it had 2217. I then changed it to n%sn and got 2218, so that extra n%sn is all the change. I thank you Jesse_b and G-Man for your help.
    – user9303970
    Feb 8 at 0:59




    G-Man, as you suggested I checked the bytes of the files. Indeed there was a change of one byte. Without any of the two changes, at the start, the file had 2188 bytes. With n%s it had 2217. I then changed it to n%sn and got 2218, so that extra n%sn is all the change. I thank you Jesse_b and G-Man for your help.
    – user9303970
    Feb 8 at 0:59










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    You can use the %b (interpret backquoted arguments) of bash printf:



    $ printf %b \n x >> file


    Of course, you can quote the n:



    $ printf %b 'n' x >> file


    But be very careful with what you feed to printf as any backquoted value instead of x will be interpreted by printf.



    Or, since you are using bash, it allows a newline to be generated with $'n':



    $ printf '%s' $'n' x >>file


    Somewhat safer than %b.



    Or, if you want a variable:



    $ nl=$'n'
    $ printf '%s' "$nl" x >> file


    Or you can define a function:



    $ separate() local IFS=; printf %b "$*"; 
    $ separate 'n' 'x' '*'


    The local IFS= will ensure the arguments are joined together (no spaces in between) by "$*"






    share|improve this answer


























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      You can use the %b (interpret backquoted arguments) of bash printf:



      $ printf %b \n x >> file


      Of course, you can quote the n:



      $ printf %b 'n' x >> file


      But be very careful with what you feed to printf as any backquoted value instead of x will be interpreted by printf.



      Or, since you are using bash, it allows a newline to be generated with $'n':



      $ printf '%s' $'n' x >>file


      Somewhat safer than %b.



      Or, if you want a variable:



      $ nl=$'n'
      $ printf '%s' "$nl" x >> file


      Or you can define a function:



      $ separate() local IFS=; printf %b "$*"; 
      $ separate 'n' 'x' '*'


      The local IFS= will ensure the arguments are joined together (no spaces in between) by "$*"






      share|improve this answer
























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        You can use the %b (interpret backquoted arguments) of bash printf:



        $ printf %b \n x >> file


        Of course, you can quote the n:



        $ printf %b 'n' x >> file


        But be very careful with what you feed to printf as any backquoted value instead of x will be interpreted by printf.



        Or, since you are using bash, it allows a newline to be generated with $'n':



        $ printf '%s' $'n' x >>file


        Somewhat safer than %b.



        Or, if you want a variable:



        $ nl=$'n'
        $ printf '%s' "$nl" x >> file


        Or you can define a function:



        $ separate() local IFS=; printf %b "$*"; 
        $ separate 'n' 'x' '*'


        The local IFS= will ensure the arguments are joined together (no spaces in between) by "$*"






        share|improve this answer














        You can use the %b (interpret backquoted arguments) of bash printf:



        $ printf %b \n x >> file


        Of course, you can quote the n:



        $ printf %b 'n' x >> file


        But be very careful with what you feed to printf as any backquoted value instead of x will be interpreted by printf.



        Or, since you are using bash, it allows a newline to be generated with $'n':



        $ printf '%s' $'n' x >>file


        Somewhat safer than %b.



        Or, if you want a variable:



        $ nl=$'n'
        $ printf '%s' "$nl" x >> file


        Or you can define a function:



        $ separate() local IFS=; printf %b "$*"; 
        $ separate 'n' 'x' '*'


        The local IFS= will ensure the arguments are joined together (no spaces in between) by "$*"







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Feb 7 at 18:06

























        answered Feb 7 at 17:32









        Isaac

        6,6381734




        6,6381734






















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


























             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f422525%2fignore-spacing-between-echo-strings%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest













































































            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?