Solaris10 , disk io sar -d output interpretation

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Question: in sar -d output ..you have %busy column. How is this value calculated? can this value be more than 100%?







share|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    Question: in sar -d output ..you have %busy column. How is this value calculated? can this value be more than 100%?







    share|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      Question: in sar -d output ..you have %busy column. How is this value calculated? can this value be more than 100%?







      share|improve this question














      Question: in sar -d output ..you have %busy column. How is this value calculated? can this value be more than 100%?









      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Mar 6 at 13:37









      Jeff Schaller

      31.2k846105




      31.2k846105










      asked Mar 6 at 13:26









      Anil Kumar

      1




      1




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote














          How is this value calculated?




          This is the percentage of time the device is being read from or written to.




          Can it be more than 100%?




          No, technically it shouldn't ever be possible for it to be greater than 100%, It can be 100% but this just means that the disk was doing 100% IO operation for the measurement interval.



          Being 100% however is not necessarily a bad thing. If you are looking for disk bottle necks you should be more interested in the other stats sar provides await,rd_sec/s,wr_sec/s...etc






          share|improve this answer




















          • device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv sd5 171 474.2 472 13333 158.7 846 sd5,a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,b 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,d 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,e 166 28 0 0 0 0 sd5,f 241 21.2 5 4867 1442.1 3026.3 sd5,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,h 171 440.3 469 9878 136.8 802.8 when i look at the sar data it looks like this..it has values 171..
            – Anil Kumar
            Mar 8 at 15:21











          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );








           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428507%2fsolaris10-disk-io-sar-d-output-interpretation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote














          How is this value calculated?




          This is the percentage of time the device is being read from or written to.




          Can it be more than 100%?




          No, technically it shouldn't ever be possible for it to be greater than 100%, It can be 100% but this just means that the disk was doing 100% IO operation for the measurement interval.



          Being 100% however is not necessarily a bad thing. If you are looking for disk bottle necks you should be more interested in the other stats sar provides await,rd_sec/s,wr_sec/s...etc






          share|improve this answer




















          • device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv sd5 171 474.2 472 13333 158.7 846 sd5,a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,b 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,d 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,e 166 28 0 0 0 0 sd5,f 241 21.2 5 4867 1442.1 3026.3 sd5,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,h 171 440.3 469 9878 136.8 802.8 when i look at the sar data it looks like this..it has values 171..
            – Anil Kumar
            Mar 8 at 15:21















          up vote
          0
          down vote














          How is this value calculated?




          This is the percentage of time the device is being read from or written to.




          Can it be more than 100%?




          No, technically it shouldn't ever be possible for it to be greater than 100%, It can be 100% but this just means that the disk was doing 100% IO operation for the measurement interval.



          Being 100% however is not necessarily a bad thing. If you are looking for disk bottle necks you should be more interested in the other stats sar provides await,rd_sec/s,wr_sec/s...etc






          share|improve this answer




















          • device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv sd5 171 474.2 472 13333 158.7 846 sd5,a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,b 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,d 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,e 166 28 0 0 0 0 sd5,f 241 21.2 5 4867 1442.1 3026.3 sd5,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,h 171 440.3 469 9878 136.8 802.8 when i look at the sar data it looks like this..it has values 171..
            – Anil Kumar
            Mar 8 at 15:21













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote










          How is this value calculated?




          This is the percentage of time the device is being read from or written to.




          Can it be more than 100%?




          No, technically it shouldn't ever be possible for it to be greater than 100%, It can be 100% but this just means that the disk was doing 100% IO operation for the measurement interval.



          Being 100% however is not necessarily a bad thing. If you are looking for disk bottle necks you should be more interested in the other stats sar provides await,rd_sec/s,wr_sec/s...etc






          share|improve this answer













          How is this value calculated?




          This is the percentage of time the device is being read from or written to.




          Can it be more than 100%?




          No, technically it shouldn't ever be possible for it to be greater than 100%, It can be 100% but this just means that the disk was doing 100% IO operation for the measurement interval.



          Being 100% however is not necessarily a bad thing. If you are looking for disk bottle necks you should be more interested in the other stats sar provides await,rd_sec/s,wr_sec/s...etc







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Mar 6 at 14:47









          alpha

          1,241317




          1,241317











          • device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv sd5 171 474.2 472 13333 158.7 846 sd5,a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,b 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,d 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,e 166 28 0 0 0 0 sd5,f 241 21.2 5 4867 1442.1 3026.3 sd5,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,h 171 440.3 469 9878 136.8 802.8 when i look at the sar data it looks like this..it has values 171..
            – Anil Kumar
            Mar 8 at 15:21

















          • device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv sd5 171 474.2 472 13333 158.7 846 sd5,a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,b 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,d 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,e 166 28 0 0 0 0 sd5,f 241 21.2 5 4867 1442.1 3026.3 sd5,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,h 171 440.3 469 9878 136.8 802.8 when i look at the sar data it looks like this..it has values 171..
            – Anil Kumar
            Mar 8 at 15:21
















          device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv sd5 171 474.2 472 13333 158.7 846 sd5,a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,b 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,d 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,e 166 28 0 0 0 0 sd5,f 241 21.2 5 4867 1442.1 3026.3 sd5,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,h 171 440.3 469 9878 136.8 802.8 when i look at the sar data it looks like this..it has values 171..
          – Anil Kumar
          Mar 8 at 15:21





          device %busy avque r+w/s blks/s avwait avserv sd5 171 474.2 472 13333 158.7 846 sd5,a 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,b 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,c 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,d 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,e 166 28 0 0 0 0 sd5,f 241 21.2 5 4867 1442.1 3026.3 sd5,g 0 0 0 0 0 0 sd5,h 171 440.3 469 9878 136.8 802.8 when i look at the sar data it looks like this..it has values 171..
          – Anil Kumar
          Mar 8 at 15:21













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


























           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f428507%2fsolaris10-disk-io-sar-d-output-interpretation%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay