How to undo shutdown? [duplicate]

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
-1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?

    3 answers



If Linux shuts down, but the computer stays in terminal, I can still print the sysRq help, but no longer enter commands.



Is there any way to escape that and undo shutdown while circumventing the Linux death sin, called reb***ing?







share|improve this question











marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, jimmij, Timothy Martin, G-Man Apr 30 at 20:59


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • Given unix.stackexchange.com/questions/440229 and the fact that on PC/AT-alike and PC98-alike systems there no such thing as "computer in terminal" (there being a display adapter, that is either in text or graphics mode), I suspect that a lot of important information is missing from this question. For all we know, systemd has put up messages about already reaching shutdown.target that you aren't telling us about, as in previous questions.
    – JdeBP
    Apr 30 at 6:41














up vote
-1
down vote

favorite













This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?

    3 answers



If Linux shuts down, but the computer stays in terminal, I can still print the sysRq help, but no longer enter commands.



Is there any way to escape that and undo shutdown while circumventing the Linux death sin, called reb***ing?







share|improve this question











marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, jimmij, Timothy Martin, G-Man Apr 30 at 20:59


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.














  • Given unix.stackexchange.com/questions/440229 and the fact that on PC/AT-alike and PC98-alike systems there no such thing as "computer in terminal" (there being a display adapter, that is either in text or graphics mode), I suspect that a lot of important information is missing from this question. For all we know, systemd has put up messages about already reaching shutdown.target that you aren't telling us about, as in previous questions.
    – JdeBP
    Apr 30 at 6:41












up vote
-1
down vote

favorite









up vote
-1
down vote

favorite












This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?

    3 answers



If Linux shuts down, but the computer stays in terminal, I can still print the sysRq help, but no longer enter commands.



Is there any way to escape that and undo shutdown while circumventing the Linux death sin, called reb***ing?







share|improve this question












This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?

    3 answers



If Linux shuts down, but the computer stays in terminal, I can still print the sysRq help, but no longer enter commands.



Is there any way to escape that and undo shutdown while circumventing the Linux death sin, called reb***ing?





This question already has an answer here:



  • Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?

    3 answers









share|improve this question










share|improve this question




share|improve this question









asked Apr 29 at 17:59









neverMind9

22110




22110




marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, jimmij, Timothy Martin, G-Man Apr 30 at 20:59


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Jeff Schaller, Romeo Ninov, jimmij, Timothy Martin, G-Man Apr 30 at 20:59


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.













  • Given unix.stackexchange.com/questions/440229 and the fact that on PC/AT-alike and PC98-alike systems there no such thing as "computer in terminal" (there being a display adapter, that is either in text or graphics mode), I suspect that a lot of important information is missing from this question. For all we know, systemd has put up messages about already reaching shutdown.target that you aren't telling us about, as in previous questions.
    – JdeBP
    Apr 30 at 6:41
















  • Given unix.stackexchange.com/questions/440229 and the fact that on PC/AT-alike and PC98-alike systems there no such thing as "computer in terminal" (there being a display adapter, that is either in text or graphics mode), I suspect that a lot of important information is missing from this question. For all we know, systemd has put up messages about already reaching shutdown.target that you aren't telling us about, as in previous questions.
    – JdeBP
    Apr 30 at 6:41















Given unix.stackexchange.com/questions/440229 and the fact that on PC/AT-alike and PC98-alike systems there no such thing as "computer in terminal" (there being a display adapter, that is either in text or graphics mode), I suspect that a lot of important information is missing from this question. For all we know, systemd has put up messages about already reaching shutdown.target that you aren't telling us about, as in previous questions.
– JdeBP
Apr 30 at 6:41




Given unix.stackexchange.com/questions/440229 and the fact that on PC/AT-alike and PC98-alike systems there no such thing as "computer in terminal" (there being a display adapter, that is either in text or graphics mode), I suspect that a lot of important information is missing from this question. For all we know, systemd has put up messages about already reaching shutdown.target that you aren't telling us about, as in previous questions.
– JdeBP
Apr 30 at 6:41










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













You can cancel a pending shutdown with:



shutdown -c


However, this assumes that the initial shutdown command was given with a time interval that isn't "+0" or "now".






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    You can cancel a shutdown with shutdown -c or by hitting just pressing Ctrl+C



    This seems like a repeat of this question.
    Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?






    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      If there is no longer any process running that would handle a login attempt (i.e. getty on the console or serial port, or sshd or similar for network connections), then there is very little you can do.



      If there is a chance that the init would still be providing a getty process for the console, but the current holder of the console has hung for some reason, you might try Alt-SysRq-k to kill the hung process and hope that init will start a new one for you. But if you've ended up in that state at the tail end of a shutdown, it might not help, as init has already stopped the gettys and not starting any new ones.



      The talk of rebooting being a "death sin" is a bit of hyperbole aimed to head off bad habits that some new Linux users may have inherited from their previous operating systems. There is a time and place for everything, including a hard reboot. If you're reasonably sure that there are no other options, then so be it: a large uptime is usually not a goal per se, but a side effect of tight SLAs. And if you have a tight SLA, you want to quickly investigate what has gone wrong, and then do whatever it takes to get the system back up and running ASAP. Once that's done, you can dig into logs and crash dumps to try and find out the root cause and if possible, prevent it from happening again.



      I'we worked as enterprise Linux/Unix sysadmin for almost 20 years now. During that time, I've seen quite a few systems so hopelessly wedged that the only solution was to reboot them. Sometimes the reason was broken hardware; other times, an application with a memory leak, or an application acting like a fork bomb when a database connection was not available (a tiny bug in error handling code :-/ ).






      share|improve this answer




























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        1
        down vote













        You can cancel a pending shutdown with:



        shutdown -c


        However, this assumes that the initial shutdown command was given with a time interval that isn't "+0" or "now".






        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          1
          down vote













          You can cancel a pending shutdown with:



          shutdown -c


          However, this assumes that the initial shutdown command was given with a time interval that isn't "+0" or "now".






          share|improve this answer























            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            You can cancel a pending shutdown with:



            shutdown -c


            However, this assumes that the initial shutdown command was given with a time interval that isn't "+0" or "now".






            share|improve this answer













            You can cancel a pending shutdown with:



            shutdown -c


            However, this assumes that the initial shutdown command was given with a time interval that isn't "+0" or "now".







            share|improve this answer













            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer











            answered Apr 29 at 18:47









            grog_7

            262




            262






















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                You can cancel a shutdown with shutdown -c or by hitting just pressing Ctrl+C



                This seems like a repeat of this question.
                Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?






                share|improve this answer

























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  You can cancel a shutdown with shutdown -c or by hitting just pressing Ctrl+C



                  This seems like a repeat of this question.
                  Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?






                  share|improve this answer























                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    You can cancel a shutdown with shutdown -c or by hitting just pressing Ctrl+C



                    This seems like a repeat of this question.
                    Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?






                    share|improve this answer













                    You can cancel a shutdown with shutdown -c or by hitting just pressing Ctrl+C



                    This seems like a repeat of this question.
                    Is it possible to stop a shutdown command?







                    share|improve this answer













                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer











                    answered Apr 29 at 19:12









                    rockower

                    1145




                    1145




















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        If there is no longer any process running that would handle a login attempt (i.e. getty on the console or serial port, or sshd or similar for network connections), then there is very little you can do.



                        If there is a chance that the init would still be providing a getty process for the console, but the current holder of the console has hung for some reason, you might try Alt-SysRq-k to kill the hung process and hope that init will start a new one for you. But if you've ended up in that state at the tail end of a shutdown, it might not help, as init has already stopped the gettys and not starting any new ones.



                        The talk of rebooting being a "death sin" is a bit of hyperbole aimed to head off bad habits that some new Linux users may have inherited from their previous operating systems. There is a time and place for everything, including a hard reboot. If you're reasonably sure that there are no other options, then so be it: a large uptime is usually not a goal per se, but a side effect of tight SLAs. And if you have a tight SLA, you want to quickly investigate what has gone wrong, and then do whatever it takes to get the system back up and running ASAP. Once that's done, you can dig into logs and crash dumps to try and find out the root cause and if possible, prevent it from happening again.



                        I'we worked as enterprise Linux/Unix sysadmin for almost 20 years now. During that time, I've seen quite a few systems so hopelessly wedged that the only solution was to reboot them. Sometimes the reason was broken hardware; other times, an application with a memory leak, or an application acting like a fork bomb when a database connection was not available (a tiny bug in error handling code :-/ ).






                        share|improve this answer

























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          If there is no longer any process running that would handle a login attempt (i.e. getty on the console or serial port, or sshd or similar for network connections), then there is very little you can do.



                          If there is a chance that the init would still be providing a getty process for the console, but the current holder of the console has hung for some reason, you might try Alt-SysRq-k to kill the hung process and hope that init will start a new one for you. But if you've ended up in that state at the tail end of a shutdown, it might not help, as init has already stopped the gettys and not starting any new ones.



                          The talk of rebooting being a "death sin" is a bit of hyperbole aimed to head off bad habits that some new Linux users may have inherited from their previous operating systems. There is a time and place for everything, including a hard reboot. If you're reasonably sure that there are no other options, then so be it: a large uptime is usually not a goal per se, but a side effect of tight SLAs. And if you have a tight SLA, you want to quickly investigate what has gone wrong, and then do whatever it takes to get the system back up and running ASAP. Once that's done, you can dig into logs and crash dumps to try and find out the root cause and if possible, prevent it from happening again.



                          I'we worked as enterprise Linux/Unix sysadmin for almost 20 years now. During that time, I've seen quite a few systems so hopelessly wedged that the only solution was to reboot them. Sometimes the reason was broken hardware; other times, an application with a memory leak, or an application acting like a fork bomb when a database connection was not available (a tiny bug in error handling code :-/ ).






                          share|improve this answer























                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            If there is no longer any process running that would handle a login attempt (i.e. getty on the console or serial port, or sshd or similar for network connections), then there is very little you can do.



                            If there is a chance that the init would still be providing a getty process for the console, but the current holder of the console has hung for some reason, you might try Alt-SysRq-k to kill the hung process and hope that init will start a new one for you. But if you've ended up in that state at the tail end of a shutdown, it might not help, as init has already stopped the gettys and not starting any new ones.



                            The talk of rebooting being a "death sin" is a bit of hyperbole aimed to head off bad habits that some new Linux users may have inherited from their previous operating systems. There is a time and place for everything, including a hard reboot. If you're reasonably sure that there are no other options, then so be it: a large uptime is usually not a goal per se, but a side effect of tight SLAs. And if you have a tight SLA, you want to quickly investigate what has gone wrong, and then do whatever it takes to get the system back up and running ASAP. Once that's done, you can dig into logs and crash dumps to try and find out the root cause and if possible, prevent it from happening again.



                            I'we worked as enterprise Linux/Unix sysadmin for almost 20 years now. During that time, I've seen quite a few systems so hopelessly wedged that the only solution was to reboot them. Sometimes the reason was broken hardware; other times, an application with a memory leak, or an application acting like a fork bomb when a database connection was not available (a tiny bug in error handling code :-/ ).






                            share|improve this answer













                            If there is no longer any process running that would handle a login attempt (i.e. getty on the console or serial port, or sshd or similar for network connections), then there is very little you can do.



                            If there is a chance that the init would still be providing a getty process for the console, but the current holder of the console has hung for some reason, you might try Alt-SysRq-k to kill the hung process and hope that init will start a new one for you. But if you've ended up in that state at the tail end of a shutdown, it might not help, as init has already stopped the gettys and not starting any new ones.



                            The talk of rebooting being a "death sin" is a bit of hyperbole aimed to head off bad habits that some new Linux users may have inherited from their previous operating systems. There is a time and place for everything, including a hard reboot. If you're reasonably sure that there are no other options, then so be it: a large uptime is usually not a goal per se, but a side effect of tight SLAs. And if you have a tight SLA, you want to quickly investigate what has gone wrong, and then do whatever it takes to get the system back up and running ASAP. Once that's done, you can dig into logs and crash dumps to try and find out the root cause and if possible, prevent it from happening again.



                            I'we worked as enterprise Linux/Unix sysadmin for almost 20 years now. During that time, I've seen quite a few systems so hopelessly wedged that the only solution was to reboot them. Sometimes the reason was broken hardware; other times, an application with a memory leak, or an application acting like a fork bomb when a database connection was not available (a tiny bug in error handling code :-/ ).







                            share|improve this answer













                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer











                            answered Apr 29 at 20:43









                            telcoM

                            10.2k11032




                            10.2k11032












                                Popular posts from this blog

                                Peggy Mitchell

                                Palaiologos

                                The Forum (Inglewood, California)