Adding thousand separator to various number types
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
$begingroup$
Am making a pure .net library with helper functions (GitHub).
However I wanted to have a thousand separator for all number types and here is what I am currently doing
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
public static class Extension_Number
#region ThousandSeparator
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
#endregion
As you can see above ,
l have to repeat the same for
int , decimal , long
l can achieve the results l want but is it best
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
class Program
static void Main(string args)
decimal tes = 294944.8484827M;
int iint = 34;
Console.WriteLine(tes.ToThousandSeparator(3));
Console.WriteLine(iint.ToThousandSeparator(2));
Console.ReadKey();
but is there an eloquent way of doing it , but allowing number types only.
c# formatting integer floating-point fixed-point
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Am making a pure .net library with helper functions (GitHub).
However I wanted to have a thousand separator for all number types and here is what I am currently doing
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
public static class Extension_Number
#region ThousandSeparator
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
#endregion
As you can see above ,
l have to repeat the same for
int , decimal , long
l can achieve the results l want but is it best
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
class Program
static void Main(string args)
decimal tes = 294944.8484827M;
int iint = 34;
Console.WriteLine(tes.ToThousandSeparator(3));
Console.WriteLine(iint.ToThousandSeparator(2));
Console.ReadKey();
but is there an eloquent way of doing it , but allowing number types only.
c# formatting integer floating-point fixed-point
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Am making a pure .net library with helper functions (GitHub).
However I wanted to have a thousand separator for all number types and here is what I am currently doing
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
public static class Extension_Number
#region ThousandSeparator
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
#endregion
As you can see above ,
l have to repeat the same for
int , decimal , long
l can achieve the results l want but is it best
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
class Program
static void Main(string args)
decimal tes = 294944.8484827M;
int iint = 34;
Console.WriteLine(tes.ToThousandSeparator(3));
Console.WriteLine(iint.ToThousandSeparator(2));
Console.ReadKey();
but is there an eloquent way of doing it , but allowing number types only.
c# formatting integer floating-point fixed-point
$endgroup$
Am making a pure .net library with helper functions (GitHub).
However I wanted to have a thousand separator for all number types and here is what I am currently doing
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
public static class Extension_Number
#region ThousandSeparator
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
if (numberOfDecimalPlaces < 0) numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0;
return string.Format("0:N" + numberOfDecimalPlaces + "", value).ToString();
#endregion
As you can see above ,
l have to repeat the same for
int , decimal , long
l can achieve the results l want but is it best
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace Avo
class Program
static void Main(string args)
decimal tes = 294944.8484827M;
int iint = 34;
Console.WriteLine(tes.ToThousandSeparator(3));
Console.WriteLine(iint.ToThousandSeparator(2));
Console.ReadKey();
but is there an eloquent way of doing it , but allowing number types only.
c# formatting integer floating-point fixed-point
c# formatting integer floating-point fixed-point
edited Mar 7 at 15:52
200_success
131k17157422
131k17157422
asked Mar 7 at 9:19
Billy WatsyBilly Watsy
183
183
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is no common base type for numeric types, unfortunately.
You could still reduce the repetitiveness of your code though, by encapsulating the common structure in a single function:
private static string AddThousandsSeparator(Object numeric, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
// note this would crash when passed a non-numeric object.
// that's why it's private, and it's the class's responsibility
// to limit the entry points to this function to numeric types only
return String.Format("0:N" + Math.Max(0, numberOfDecimalPlaces) + "", numeric);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
A few side remarks:
There is no point in calling
ToString()
on the result ofString.Format
.String.Format
already returns astring
.Math.Max
is a more concise alternative for the conditional reassignment. (For what it's worth, Kotlin provides readable extension functions as syntax sugar for this sort of thing, eg.someNumber.coerceAtLeast(0)
- trivially easy to reimplement them in C# for readability).I also corrected the naming slightly. It's "thousands" separator (plural), plus I think
With...
makes it clearer what the function does. TheToSomething
phrase conventionally means a value is getting converted to Something, as if you were converting the number to the thousands separator itself - obviously nonsensical - rather than just adding it to the formatting.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
making AddThousandsSeparator private is nice and the other types public , thus make change to a single function applies to all , thanks for that
$endgroup$
– Billy Watsy
Mar 7 at 11:31
$begingroup$
Sure thing, happy to be of help
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 11:36
2
$begingroup$
You can slightly optimize it by making theObject
parameter anIFormattable
.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
Mar 7 at 11:46
$begingroup$
That's a valid remark (well, it's been a while since I coded in C# day to day), although instinctively I feel that the more specific the parameter type, the more of a false sense of type security it projects. It's a tradeoff of sorts.
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 12:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would definitely go with t3chb0t and replace Object
with IFormattable
in Konrads answer. Further you could provide default values to numberOfDecimalPlaces
of your own choice and maybe the possibility to provide a FormatProvider
which defaults to CultureInfo.CurrentCulture
:
public static class Extension_Number
private static string Format(this IFormattable value, int decimalPlaces, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null) => value.ToString($"NMath.Max(0, decimalPlaces)", formatProvider ?? CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 2, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 6, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "196"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f214900%2fadding-thousand-separator-to-various-number-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
There is no common base type for numeric types, unfortunately.
You could still reduce the repetitiveness of your code though, by encapsulating the common structure in a single function:
private static string AddThousandsSeparator(Object numeric, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
// note this would crash when passed a non-numeric object.
// that's why it's private, and it's the class's responsibility
// to limit the entry points to this function to numeric types only
return String.Format("0:N" + Math.Max(0, numberOfDecimalPlaces) + "", numeric);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
A few side remarks:
There is no point in calling
ToString()
on the result ofString.Format
.String.Format
already returns astring
.Math.Max
is a more concise alternative for the conditional reassignment. (For what it's worth, Kotlin provides readable extension functions as syntax sugar for this sort of thing, eg.someNumber.coerceAtLeast(0)
- trivially easy to reimplement them in C# for readability).I also corrected the naming slightly. It's "thousands" separator (plural), plus I think
With...
makes it clearer what the function does. TheToSomething
phrase conventionally means a value is getting converted to Something, as if you were converting the number to the thousands separator itself - obviously nonsensical - rather than just adding it to the formatting.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
making AddThousandsSeparator private is nice and the other types public , thus make change to a single function applies to all , thanks for that
$endgroup$
– Billy Watsy
Mar 7 at 11:31
$begingroup$
Sure thing, happy to be of help
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 11:36
2
$begingroup$
You can slightly optimize it by making theObject
parameter anIFormattable
.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
Mar 7 at 11:46
$begingroup$
That's a valid remark (well, it's been a while since I coded in C# day to day), although instinctively I feel that the more specific the parameter type, the more of a false sense of type security it projects. It's a tradeoff of sorts.
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 12:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no common base type for numeric types, unfortunately.
You could still reduce the repetitiveness of your code though, by encapsulating the common structure in a single function:
private static string AddThousandsSeparator(Object numeric, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
// note this would crash when passed a non-numeric object.
// that's why it's private, and it's the class's responsibility
// to limit the entry points to this function to numeric types only
return String.Format("0:N" + Math.Max(0, numberOfDecimalPlaces) + "", numeric);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
A few side remarks:
There is no point in calling
ToString()
on the result ofString.Format
.String.Format
already returns astring
.Math.Max
is a more concise alternative for the conditional reassignment. (For what it's worth, Kotlin provides readable extension functions as syntax sugar for this sort of thing, eg.someNumber.coerceAtLeast(0)
- trivially easy to reimplement them in C# for readability).I also corrected the naming slightly. It's "thousands" separator (plural), plus I think
With...
makes it clearer what the function does. TheToSomething
phrase conventionally means a value is getting converted to Something, as if you were converting the number to the thousands separator itself - obviously nonsensical - rather than just adding it to the formatting.
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
making AddThousandsSeparator private is nice and the other types public , thus make change to a single function applies to all , thanks for that
$endgroup$
– Billy Watsy
Mar 7 at 11:31
$begingroup$
Sure thing, happy to be of help
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 11:36
2
$begingroup$
You can slightly optimize it by making theObject
parameter anIFormattable
.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
Mar 7 at 11:46
$begingroup$
That's a valid remark (well, it's been a while since I coded in C# day to day), although instinctively I feel that the more specific the parameter type, the more of a false sense of type security it projects. It's a tradeoff of sorts.
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 12:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is no common base type for numeric types, unfortunately.
You could still reduce the repetitiveness of your code though, by encapsulating the common structure in a single function:
private static string AddThousandsSeparator(Object numeric, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
// note this would crash when passed a non-numeric object.
// that's why it's private, and it's the class's responsibility
// to limit the entry points to this function to numeric types only
return String.Format("0:N" + Math.Max(0, numberOfDecimalPlaces) + "", numeric);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
A few side remarks:
There is no point in calling
ToString()
on the result ofString.Format
.String.Format
already returns astring
.Math.Max
is a more concise alternative for the conditional reassignment. (For what it's worth, Kotlin provides readable extension functions as syntax sugar for this sort of thing, eg.someNumber.coerceAtLeast(0)
- trivially easy to reimplement them in C# for readability).I also corrected the naming slightly. It's "thousands" separator (plural), plus I think
With...
makes it clearer what the function does. TheToSomething
phrase conventionally means a value is getting converted to Something, as if you were converting the number to the thousands separator itself - obviously nonsensical - rather than just adding it to the formatting.
$endgroup$
There is no common base type for numeric types, unfortunately.
You could still reduce the repetitiveness of your code though, by encapsulating the common structure in a single function:
private static string AddThousandsSeparator(Object numeric, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
// note this would crash when passed a non-numeric object.
// that's why it's private, and it's the class's responsibility
// to limit the entry points to this function to numeric types only
return String.Format("0:N" + Math.Max(0, numberOfDecimalPlaces) + "", numeric);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
public static string WithThousandsSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces)
return AddThousandsSeparator(value, numberOfDecimalPlaces);
A few side remarks:
There is no point in calling
ToString()
on the result ofString.Format
.String.Format
already returns astring
.Math.Max
is a more concise alternative for the conditional reassignment. (For what it's worth, Kotlin provides readable extension functions as syntax sugar for this sort of thing, eg.someNumber.coerceAtLeast(0)
- trivially easy to reimplement them in C# for readability).I also corrected the naming slightly. It's "thousands" separator (plural), plus I think
With...
makes it clearer what the function does. TheToSomething
phrase conventionally means a value is getting converted to Something, as if you were converting the number to the thousands separator itself - obviously nonsensical - rather than just adding it to the formatting.
edited Mar 7 at 11:02
answered Mar 7 at 10:56
Konrad MorawskiKonrad Morawski
1,902711
1,902711
1
$begingroup$
making AddThousandsSeparator private is nice and the other types public , thus make change to a single function applies to all , thanks for that
$endgroup$
– Billy Watsy
Mar 7 at 11:31
$begingroup$
Sure thing, happy to be of help
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 11:36
2
$begingroup$
You can slightly optimize it by making theObject
parameter anIFormattable
.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
Mar 7 at 11:46
$begingroup$
That's a valid remark (well, it's been a while since I coded in C# day to day), although instinctively I feel that the more specific the parameter type, the more of a false sense of type security it projects. It's a tradeoff of sorts.
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 12:35
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
making AddThousandsSeparator private is nice and the other types public , thus make change to a single function applies to all , thanks for that
$endgroup$
– Billy Watsy
Mar 7 at 11:31
$begingroup$
Sure thing, happy to be of help
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 11:36
2
$begingroup$
You can slightly optimize it by making theObject
parameter anIFormattable
.
$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
Mar 7 at 11:46
$begingroup$
That's a valid remark (well, it's been a while since I coded in C# day to day), although instinctively I feel that the more specific the parameter type, the more of a false sense of type security it projects. It's a tradeoff of sorts.
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 12:35
1
1
$begingroup$
making AddThousandsSeparator private is nice and the other types public , thus make change to a single function applies to all , thanks for that
$endgroup$
– Billy Watsy
Mar 7 at 11:31
$begingroup$
making AddThousandsSeparator private is nice and the other types public , thus make change to a single function applies to all , thanks for that
$endgroup$
– Billy Watsy
Mar 7 at 11:31
$begingroup$
Sure thing, happy to be of help
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 11:36
$begingroup$
Sure thing, happy to be of help
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 11:36
2
2
$begingroup$
You can slightly optimize it by making the
Object
parameter an IFormattable
.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
Mar 7 at 11:46
$begingroup$
You can slightly optimize it by making the
Object
parameter an IFormattable
.$endgroup$
– t3chb0t
Mar 7 at 11:46
$begingroup$
That's a valid remark (well, it's been a while since I coded in C# day to day), although instinctively I feel that the more specific the parameter type, the more of a false sense of type security it projects. It's a tradeoff of sorts.
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 12:35
$begingroup$
That's a valid remark (well, it's been a while since I coded in C# day to day), although instinctively I feel that the more specific the parameter type, the more of a false sense of type security it projects. It's a tradeoff of sorts.
$endgroup$
– Konrad Morawski
Mar 7 at 12:35
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would definitely go with t3chb0t and replace Object
with IFormattable
in Konrads answer. Further you could provide default values to numberOfDecimalPlaces
of your own choice and maybe the possibility to provide a FormatProvider
which defaults to CultureInfo.CurrentCulture
:
public static class Extension_Number
private static string Format(this IFormattable value, int decimalPlaces, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null) => value.ToString($"NMath.Max(0, decimalPlaces)", formatProvider ?? CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 2, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 6, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would definitely go with t3chb0t and replace Object
with IFormattable
in Konrads answer. Further you could provide default values to numberOfDecimalPlaces
of your own choice and maybe the possibility to provide a FormatProvider
which defaults to CultureInfo.CurrentCulture
:
public static class Extension_Number
private static string Format(this IFormattable value, int decimalPlaces, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null) => value.ToString($"NMath.Max(0, decimalPlaces)", formatProvider ?? CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 2, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 6, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I would definitely go with t3chb0t and replace Object
with IFormattable
in Konrads answer. Further you could provide default values to numberOfDecimalPlaces
of your own choice and maybe the possibility to provide a FormatProvider
which defaults to CultureInfo.CurrentCulture
:
public static class Extension_Number
private static string Format(this IFormattable value, int decimalPlaces, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null) => value.ToString($"NMath.Max(0, decimalPlaces)", formatProvider ?? CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 2, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 6, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
$endgroup$
I would definitely go with t3chb0t and replace Object
with IFormattable
in Konrads answer. Further you could provide default values to numberOfDecimalPlaces
of your own choice and maybe the possibility to provide a FormatProvider
which defaults to CultureInfo.CurrentCulture
:
public static class Extension_Number
private static string Format(this IFormattable value, int decimalPlaces, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null) => value.ToString($"NMath.Max(0, decimalPlaces)", formatProvider ?? CultureInfo.CurrentCulture);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this decimal value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 2, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this int value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this double value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 6, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
public static string ToThousandSeparator(this long value, int numberOfDecimalPlaces = 0, IFormatProvider formatProvider = null)
return value.Format(numberOfDecimalPlaces, formatProvider);
answered Mar 7 at 13:46
Henrik HansenHenrik Hansen
8,29011231
8,29011231
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Code Review Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcodereview.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f214900%2fadding-thousand-separator-to-various-number-types%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown