For Loop and Sum

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












3












$begingroup$


I am requested to do a sum of the first fifty positive even numbers by using For loop.
The For loop that I created is 



For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]


The output of this is a list of numbers from 2 to 50 and they are increasing by 2. Now I need these numbers to be sum so I created 



Sum[For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]]


However, it is not a correct input. I am not sure if I should write the Sum inside the For loop.






homework







share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If this is a class assignment, I'd suggest withdrawing from the class. For loops are almost never a good way to do anything in Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Mar 3 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    If you want the first 50 positive even numbers, I believe that is 2, 4, ..., 100. The sum is (2+100) + (4+98) + ... + (50 + 52) = 102 * 25 = 2550.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 3 at 22:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Total@Range[2, 2*50, 2] would be pretty direct. Note also that Print prints its arguments, but does not return them (in fact, it returns Null).
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:57







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since the days of Carl Friedrich Gauß we know that using a For loop to compute 50 * 51 is a pretty bad idea....
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the first fifty that you want, or is it 2, 4, ..., 50? The original question had both.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:56















3












$begingroup$


I am requested to do a sum of the first fifty positive even numbers by using For loop.
The For loop that I created is 



For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]


The output of this is a list of numbers from 2 to 50 and they are increasing by 2. Now I need these numbers to be sum so I created 



Sum[For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]]


However, it is not a correct input. I am not sure if I should write the Sum inside the For loop.






homework







share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If this is a class assignment, I'd suggest withdrawing from the class. For loops are almost never a good way to do anything in Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Mar 3 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    If you want the first 50 positive even numbers, I believe that is 2, 4, ..., 100. The sum is (2+100) + (4+98) + ... + (50 + 52) = 102 * 25 = 2550.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 3 at 22:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Total@Range[2, 2*50, 2] would be pretty direct. Note also that Print prints its arguments, but does not return them (in fact, it returns Null).
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:57







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since the days of Carl Friedrich Gauß we know that using a For loop to compute 50 * 51 is a pretty bad idea....
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the first fifty that you want, or is it 2, 4, ..., 50? The original question had both.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:56













3












3








3





$begingroup$


I am requested to do a sum of the first fifty positive even numbers by using For loop.
The For loop that I created is 



For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]


The output of this is a list of numbers from 2 to 50 and they are increasing by 2. Now I need these numbers to be sum so I created 



Sum[For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]]


However, it is not a correct input. I am not sure if I should write the Sum inside the For loop.






homework







share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I am requested to do a sum of the first fifty positive even numbers by using For loop.
The For loop that I created is 



For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]


The output of this is a list of numbers from 2 to 50 and they are increasing by 2. Now I need these numbers to be sum so I created 



Sum[For[natNum = 2, natNum <= 50, natNum = natNum + 2, Print[natNum]]]


However, it is not a correct input. I am not sure if I should write the Sum inside the For loop.






homework




homework






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Mar 3 at 22:51









MarcoB

38.2k556114




38.2k556114










asked Mar 3 at 20:11









Laura FigueroaLaura Figueroa

161




161







  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If this is a class assignment, I'd suggest withdrawing from the class. For loops are almost never a good way to do anything in Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Mar 3 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    If you want the first 50 positive even numbers, I believe that is 2, 4, ..., 100. The sum is (2+100) + (4+98) + ... + (50 + 52) = 102 * 25 = 2550.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 3 at 22:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Total@Range[2, 2*50, 2] would be pretty direct. Note also that Print prints its arguments, but does not return them (in fact, it returns Null).
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:57







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since the days of Carl Friedrich Gauß we know that using a For loop to compute 50 * 51 is a pretty bad idea....
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the first fifty that you want, or is it 2, 4, ..., 50? The original question had both.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:56












  • 5




    $begingroup$
    If this is a class assignment, I'd suggest withdrawing from the class. For loops are almost never a good way to do anything in Mathematica.
    $endgroup$
    – John Doty
    Mar 3 at 20:32










  • $begingroup$
    If you want the first 50 positive even numbers, I believe that is 2, 4, ..., 100. The sum is (2+100) + (4+98) + ... + (50 + 52) = 102 * 25 = 2550.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 3 at 22:06







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Total@Range[2, 2*50, 2] would be pretty direct. Note also that Print prints its arguments, but does not return them (in fact, it returns Null).
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:57







  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Since the days of Carl Friedrich Gauß we know that using a For loop to compute 50 * 51 is a pretty bad idea....
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:51










  • $begingroup$
    Is it the first fifty that you want, or is it 2, 4, ..., 50? The original question had both.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:56







5




5




$begingroup$
If this is a class assignment, I'd suggest withdrawing from the class. For loops are almost never a good way to do anything in Mathematica.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
Mar 3 at 20:32




$begingroup$
If this is a class assignment, I'd suggest withdrawing from the class. For loops are almost never a good way to do anything in Mathematica.
$endgroup$
– John Doty
Mar 3 at 20:32












$begingroup$
If you want the first 50 positive even numbers, I believe that is 2, 4, ..., 100. The sum is (2+100) + (4+98) + ... + (50 + 52) = 102 * 25 = 2550.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 3 at 22:06





$begingroup$
If you want the first 50 positive even numbers, I believe that is 2, 4, ..., 100. The sum is (2+100) + (4+98) + ... + (50 + 52) = 102 * 25 = 2550.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 3 at 22:06





1




1




$begingroup$
Total@Range[2, 2*50, 2] would be pretty direct. Note also that Print prints its arguments, but does not return them (in fact, it returns Null).
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 3 at 22:57





$begingroup$
Total@Range[2, 2*50, 2] would be pretty direct. Note also that Print prints its arguments, but does not return them (in fact, it returns Null).
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 3 at 22:57





7




7




$begingroup$
Since the days of Carl Friedrich Gauß we know that using a For loop to compute 50 * 51 is a pretty bad idea....
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 3 at 23:51




$begingroup$
Since the days of Carl Friedrich Gauß we know that using a For loop to compute 50 * 51 is a pretty bad idea....
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 3 at 23:51












$begingroup$
Is it the first fifty that you want, or is it 2, 4, ..., 50? The original question had both.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 4 at 2:56




$begingroup$
Is it the first fifty that you want, or is it 2, 4, ..., 50? The original question had both.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 4 at 2:56










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

Anyone asking you to write For loops in Mathematica for such a problem is a dolt. Nevertheless, here's how you might do that:



rslt = 0;
For[i = 0, i <= 50, i += 2, rslt += i];
rslt


And here's how someone with some familiarity with Mathematica might write it



Plus @@ Range[25]*2


Now, spend the time you were going to waste writing a For loop by reading the answers to this question Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the first sentence.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:49


















3












$begingroup$

The first fifty positive integers can be computed with Table:



Q = 0; (* Initialization *)
T = Table[Q + k, k, 2 Range[50]]


output of the above code



We can sum up the values of T with Sum:



Sum[T[[k]], k, Range[50]]


2550






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps better / more idiomatic than your Sum approach would be using Total[T] or Plus@@T.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was looking for something like Total and I saw the Plus posting above, but haven't yet learned about @@ and such. I would have thought Map might work here (it does not). Anyway, yes Total[T] and Plus@@T are simpler and more elegant!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 0:23










  • $begingroup$
    I was a latecomer to @@ as well. When I was learning about it, it helped me to think about it as a way of "swapping heads" of expressions. So for instance, if you have 1, 2, 3, its FullForm would be List[1, 2, 3]. If you then Apply Plus to it, i.e. Plus@@, you swap the Listhead for a Plus head, to give Plus[1, 2, 3]. Although it may seem like a niche application at first, once you get used to it, it is tremendously useful!
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 4 at 1:34











  • $begingroup$
    This is great, thank you! Just as I learned not to use For loops (especially on this Forum), and to Do use Do, I'll look for opportunities to Apply @@.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:23











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192541%2ffor-loop-and-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









10












$begingroup$

Anyone asking you to write For loops in Mathematica for such a problem is a dolt. Nevertheless, here's how you might do that:



rslt = 0;
For[i = 0, i <= 50, i += 2, rslt += i];
rslt


And here's how someone with some familiarity with Mathematica might write it



Plus @@ Range[25]*2


Now, spend the time you were going to waste writing a For loop by reading the answers to this question Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the first sentence.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:49















10












$begingroup$

Anyone asking you to write For loops in Mathematica for such a problem is a dolt. Nevertheless, here's how you might do that:



rslt = 0;
For[i = 0, i <= 50, i += 2, rslt += i];
rslt


And here's how someone with some familiarity with Mathematica might write it



Plus @@ Range[25]*2


Now, spend the time you were going to waste writing a For loop by reading the answers to this question Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 3




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the first sentence.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:49













10












10








10





$begingroup$

Anyone asking you to write For loops in Mathematica for such a problem is a dolt. Nevertheless, here's how you might do that:



rslt = 0;
For[i = 0, i <= 50, i += 2, rslt += i];
rslt


And here's how someone with some familiarity with Mathematica might write it



Plus @@ Range[25]*2


Now, spend the time you were going to waste writing a For loop by reading the answers to this question Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Anyone asking you to write For loops in Mathematica for such a problem is a dolt. Nevertheless, here's how you might do that:



rslt = 0;
For[i = 0, i <= 50, i += 2, rslt += i];
rslt


And here's how someone with some familiarity with Mathematica might write it



Plus @@ Range[25]*2


Now, spend the time you were going to waste writing a For loop by reading the answers to this question Why should I avoid the For loop in Mathematica?







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 3 at 20:36









High Performance MarkHigh Performance Mark

636512




636512







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the first sentence.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:49












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    +1 for the first sentence.
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Mar 3 at 23:49







3




3




$begingroup$
+1 for the first sentence.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 3 at 23:49




$begingroup$
+1 for the first sentence.
$endgroup$
– Henrik Schumacher
Mar 3 at 23:49











3












$begingroup$

The first fifty positive integers can be computed with Table:



Q = 0; (* Initialization *)
T = Table[Q + k, k, 2 Range[50]]


output of the above code



We can sum up the values of T with Sum:



Sum[T[[k]], k, Range[50]]


2550






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps better / more idiomatic than your Sum approach would be using Total[T] or Plus@@T.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was looking for something like Total and I saw the Plus posting above, but haven't yet learned about @@ and such. I would have thought Map might work here (it does not). Anyway, yes Total[T] and Plus@@T are simpler and more elegant!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 0:23










  • $begingroup$
    I was a latecomer to @@ as well. When I was learning about it, it helped me to think about it as a way of "swapping heads" of expressions. So for instance, if you have 1, 2, 3, its FullForm would be List[1, 2, 3]. If you then Apply Plus to it, i.e. Plus@@, you swap the Listhead for a Plus head, to give Plus[1, 2, 3]. Although it may seem like a niche application at first, once you get used to it, it is tremendously useful!
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 4 at 1:34











  • $begingroup$
    This is great, thank you! Just as I learned not to use For loops (especially on this Forum), and to Do use Do, I'll look for opportunities to Apply @@.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:23















3












$begingroup$

The first fifty positive integers can be computed with Table:



Q = 0; (* Initialization *)
T = Table[Q + k, k, 2 Range[50]]


output of the above code



We can sum up the values of T with Sum:



Sum[T[[k]], k, Range[50]]


2550






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps better / more idiomatic than your Sum approach would be using Total[T] or Plus@@T.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was looking for something like Total and I saw the Plus posting above, but haven't yet learned about @@ and such. I would have thought Map might work here (it does not). Anyway, yes Total[T] and Plus@@T are simpler and more elegant!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 0:23










  • $begingroup$
    I was a latecomer to @@ as well. When I was learning about it, it helped me to think about it as a way of "swapping heads" of expressions. So for instance, if you have 1, 2, 3, its FullForm would be List[1, 2, 3]. If you then Apply Plus to it, i.e. Plus@@, you swap the Listhead for a Plus head, to give Plus[1, 2, 3]. Although it may seem like a niche application at first, once you get used to it, it is tremendously useful!
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 4 at 1:34











  • $begingroup$
    This is great, thank you! Just as I learned not to use For loops (especially on this Forum), and to Do use Do, I'll look for opportunities to Apply @@.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:23













3












3








3





$begingroup$

The first fifty positive integers can be computed with Table:



Q = 0; (* Initialization *)
T = Table[Q + k, k, 2 Range[50]]


output of the above code



We can sum up the values of T with Sum:



Sum[T[[k]], k, Range[50]]


2550






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The first fifty positive integers can be computed with Table:



Q = 0; (* Initialization *)
T = Table[Q + k, k, 2 Range[50]]


output of the above code



We can sum up the values of T with Sum:



Sum[T[[k]], k, Range[50]]


2550







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Mar 4 at 2:52









Conor O'Brien

1034




1034










answered Mar 3 at 22:02









mjwmjw

1,20810




1,20810







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps better / more idiomatic than your Sum approach would be using Total[T] or Plus@@T.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was looking for something like Total and I saw the Plus posting above, but haven't yet learned about @@ and such. I would have thought Map might work here (it does not). Anyway, yes Total[T] and Plus@@T are simpler and more elegant!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 0:23










  • $begingroup$
    I was a latecomer to @@ as well. When I was learning about it, it helped me to think about it as a way of "swapping heads" of expressions. So for instance, if you have 1, 2, 3, its FullForm would be List[1, 2, 3]. If you then Apply Plus to it, i.e. Plus@@, you swap the Listhead for a Plus head, to give Plus[1, 2, 3]. Although it may seem like a niche application at first, once you get used to it, it is tremendously useful!
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 4 at 1:34











  • $begingroup$
    This is great, thank you! Just as I learned not to use For loops (especially on this Forum), and to Do use Do, I'll look for opportunities to Apply @@.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:23












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Perhaps better / more idiomatic than your Sum approach would be using Total[T] or Plus@@T.
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 3 at 22:56










  • $begingroup$
    Thank you! I was looking for something like Total and I saw the Plus posting above, but haven't yet learned about @@ and such. I would have thought Map might work here (it does not). Anyway, yes Total[T] and Plus@@T are simpler and more elegant!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 0:23










  • $begingroup$
    I was a latecomer to @@ as well. When I was learning about it, it helped me to think about it as a way of "swapping heads" of expressions. So for instance, if you have 1, 2, 3, its FullForm would be List[1, 2, 3]. If you then Apply Plus to it, i.e. Plus@@, you swap the Listhead for a Plus head, to give Plus[1, 2, 3]. Although it may seem like a niche application at first, once you get used to it, it is tremendously useful!
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    Mar 4 at 1:34











  • $begingroup$
    This is great, thank you! Just as I learned not to use For loops (especially on this Forum), and to Do use Do, I'll look for opportunities to Apply @@.
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    Mar 4 at 2:23







1




1




$begingroup$
Perhaps better / more idiomatic than your Sum approach would be using Total[T] or Plus@@T.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 3 at 22:56




$begingroup$
Perhaps better / more idiomatic than your Sum approach would be using Total[T] or Plus@@T.
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 3 at 22:56












$begingroup$
Thank you! I was looking for something like Total and I saw the Plus posting above, but haven't yet learned about @@ and such. I would have thought Map might work here (it does not). Anyway, yes Total[T] and Plus@@T are simpler and more elegant!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 4 at 0:23




$begingroup$
Thank you! I was looking for something like Total and I saw the Plus posting above, but haven't yet learned about @@ and such. I would have thought Map might work here (it does not). Anyway, yes Total[T] and Plus@@T are simpler and more elegant!
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 4 at 0:23












$begingroup$
I was a latecomer to @@ as well. When I was learning about it, it helped me to think about it as a way of "swapping heads" of expressions. So for instance, if you have 1, 2, 3, its FullForm would be List[1, 2, 3]. If you then Apply Plus to it, i.e. Plus@@, you swap the Listhead for a Plus head, to give Plus[1, 2, 3]. Although it may seem like a niche application at first, once you get used to it, it is tremendously useful!
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 4 at 1:34





$begingroup$
I was a latecomer to @@ as well. When I was learning about it, it helped me to think about it as a way of "swapping heads" of expressions. So for instance, if you have 1, 2, 3, its FullForm would be List[1, 2, 3]. If you then Apply Plus to it, i.e. Plus@@, you swap the Listhead for a Plus head, to give Plus[1, 2, 3]. Although it may seem like a niche application at first, once you get used to it, it is tremendously useful!
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
Mar 4 at 1:34













$begingroup$
This is great, thank you! Just as I learned not to use For loops (especially on this Forum), and to Do use Do, I'll look for opportunities to Apply @@.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 4 at 2:23




$begingroup$
This is great, thank you! Just as I learned not to use For loops (especially on this Forum), and to Do use Do, I'll look for opportunities to Apply @@.
$endgroup$
– mjw
Mar 4 at 2:23

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192541%2ffor-loop-and-sum%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






-

Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
Read more

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
Read more

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

Image
Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
Read more