Is upcasting the Chromatic Orb spell (for fire damage) at 2nd level ever better than casting Scorching Ray?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












10












$begingroup$


Is upcasting the chromatic orb spell (PHB, p. 221) for fire damage at 2nd level ever better than casting scorching ray (PHB, p. 273)?



I am mainly asking this since both are attack roll based fire spells



Is there a point where 4d8 (average of 20) damage would be better than 3 attacks of 2d6 (average 8) damage each?



Ways I would like to test it:



  • attacks made with +5 to hit and another set with +7 to hit.


  • attacks made at disadvantage


  • attacks made at advantage


  • attack made at advantage with Elven Accuracy feat.


  • against 3 enemies: one AC 12 , one AC 16, one AC 20.


My reason for this is that I am making a spread sheet comparing spells that have similar functions, and the comparison my players want to see first is these two.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related questions that might help you answer it yourself: How do I calculate the chance to hit a given AC? and How do you calculate average damage for DPR comparisons?. It is not nearly as complex as some other statistical models, and I'm sure with some practice you could get the hang of it. If you can't figure it out from just these Q&As, the fellows in RPG.SE General Chat are very technically literate and could likely help you out.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Feb 1 at 23:08











  • $begingroup$
    Ask for @Xirema.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Feb 1 at 23:33










  • $begingroup$
    Not to sound obvious, but Chromatic Orb isn't a fire spell - it's a fire/cold/lightning/thunder/acid spell.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    Feb 1 at 23:44










  • $begingroup$
    Average value of 4d8 is 18, and average value of 2d6 is 7.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim
    Feb 2 at 9:53















10












$begingroup$


Is upcasting the chromatic orb spell (PHB, p. 221) for fire damage at 2nd level ever better than casting scorching ray (PHB, p. 273)?



I am mainly asking this since both are attack roll based fire spells



Is there a point where 4d8 (average of 20) damage would be better than 3 attacks of 2d6 (average 8) damage each?



Ways I would like to test it:



  • attacks made with +5 to hit and another set with +7 to hit.


  • attacks made at disadvantage


  • attacks made at advantage


  • attack made at advantage with Elven Accuracy feat.


  • against 3 enemies: one AC 12 , one AC 16, one AC 20.


My reason for this is that I am making a spread sheet comparing spells that have similar functions, and the comparison my players want to see first is these two.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related questions that might help you answer it yourself: How do I calculate the chance to hit a given AC? and How do you calculate average damage for DPR comparisons?. It is not nearly as complex as some other statistical models, and I'm sure with some practice you could get the hang of it. If you can't figure it out from just these Q&As, the fellows in RPG.SE General Chat are very technically literate and could likely help you out.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Feb 1 at 23:08











  • $begingroup$
    Ask for @Xirema.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Feb 1 at 23:33










  • $begingroup$
    Not to sound obvious, but Chromatic Orb isn't a fire spell - it's a fire/cold/lightning/thunder/acid spell.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    Feb 1 at 23:44










  • $begingroup$
    Average value of 4d8 is 18, and average value of 2d6 is 7.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim
    Feb 2 at 9:53













10












10








10





$begingroup$


Is upcasting the chromatic orb spell (PHB, p. 221) for fire damage at 2nd level ever better than casting scorching ray (PHB, p. 273)?



I am mainly asking this since both are attack roll based fire spells



Is there a point where 4d8 (average of 20) damage would be better than 3 attacks of 2d6 (average 8) damage each?



Ways I would like to test it:



  • attacks made with +5 to hit and another set with +7 to hit.


  • attacks made at disadvantage


  • attacks made at advantage


  • attack made at advantage with Elven Accuracy feat.


  • against 3 enemies: one AC 12 , one AC 16, one AC 20.


My reason for this is that I am making a spread sheet comparing spells that have similar functions, and the comparison my players want to see first is these two.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




Is upcasting the chromatic orb spell (PHB, p. 221) for fire damage at 2nd level ever better than casting scorching ray (PHB, p. 273)?



I am mainly asking this since both are attack roll based fire spells



Is there a point where 4d8 (average of 20) damage would be better than 3 attacks of 2d6 (average 8) damage each?



Ways I would like to test it:



  • attacks made with +5 to hit and another set with +7 to hit.


  • attacks made at disadvantage


  • attacks made at advantage


  • attack made at advantage with Elven Accuracy feat.


  • against 3 enemies: one AC 12 , one AC 16, one AC 20.


My reason for this is that I am making a spread sheet comparing spells that have similar functions, and the comparison my players want to see first is these two.







dnd-5e spells damage ranged-attack statistics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 2 at 1:37









V2Blast

23.2k374146




23.2k374146










asked Feb 1 at 22:44









DecepteciumDeceptecium

1,051319




1,051319







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related questions that might help you answer it yourself: How do I calculate the chance to hit a given AC? and How do you calculate average damage for DPR comparisons?. It is not nearly as complex as some other statistical models, and I'm sure with some practice you could get the hang of it. If you can't figure it out from just these Q&As, the fellows in RPG.SE General Chat are very technically literate and could likely help you out.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Feb 1 at 23:08











  • $begingroup$
    Ask for @Xirema.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Feb 1 at 23:33










  • $begingroup$
    Not to sound obvious, but Chromatic Orb isn't a fire spell - it's a fire/cold/lightning/thunder/acid spell.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    Feb 1 at 23:44










  • $begingroup$
    Average value of 4d8 is 18, and average value of 2d6 is 7.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim
    Feb 2 at 9:53












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Related questions that might help you answer it yourself: How do I calculate the chance to hit a given AC? and How do you calculate average damage for DPR comparisons?. It is not nearly as complex as some other statistical models, and I'm sure with some practice you could get the hang of it. If you can't figure it out from just these Q&As, the fellows in RPG.SE General Chat are very technically literate and could likely help you out.
    $endgroup$
    – David Coffron
    Feb 1 at 23:08











  • $begingroup$
    Ask for @Xirema.
    $endgroup$
    – GreySage
    Feb 1 at 23:33










  • $begingroup$
    Not to sound obvious, but Chromatic Orb isn't a fire spell - it's a fire/cold/lightning/thunder/acid spell.
    $endgroup$
    – Miniman
    Feb 1 at 23:44










  • $begingroup$
    Average value of 4d8 is 18, and average value of 2d6 is 7.
    $endgroup$
    – Tim
    Feb 2 at 9:53







1




1




$begingroup$
Related questions that might help you answer it yourself: How do I calculate the chance to hit a given AC? and How do you calculate average damage for DPR comparisons?. It is not nearly as complex as some other statistical models, and I'm sure with some practice you could get the hang of it. If you can't figure it out from just these Q&As, the fellows in RPG.SE General Chat are very technically literate and could likely help you out.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Feb 1 at 23:08





$begingroup$
Related questions that might help you answer it yourself: How do I calculate the chance to hit a given AC? and How do you calculate average damage for DPR comparisons?. It is not nearly as complex as some other statistical models, and I'm sure with some practice you could get the hang of it. If you can't figure it out from just these Q&As, the fellows in RPG.SE General Chat are very technically literate and could likely help you out.
$endgroup$
– David Coffron
Feb 1 at 23:08













$begingroup$
Ask for @Xirema.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Feb 1 at 23:33




$begingroup$
Ask for @Xirema.
$endgroup$
– GreySage
Feb 1 at 23:33












$begingroup$
Not to sound obvious, but Chromatic Orb isn't a fire spell - it's a fire/cold/lightning/thunder/acid spell.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
Feb 1 at 23:44




$begingroup$
Not to sound obvious, but Chromatic Orb isn't a fire spell - it's a fire/cold/lightning/thunder/acid spell.
$endgroup$
– Miniman
Feb 1 at 23:44












$begingroup$
Average value of 4d8 is 18, and average value of 2d6 is 7.
$endgroup$
– Tim
Feb 2 at 9:53




$begingroup$
Average value of 4d8 is 18, and average value of 2d6 is 7.
$endgroup$
– Tim
Feb 2 at 9:53










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















19












$begingroup$


Scorching ray is always more damaging if you have the same chance to hit



I could tell you even before running the numbers that this would be the case. As long as both spells are on equal playing ground (both have adv/dis, etc.), the higher average damage will always win out. This is because even though scorching ray is split among 3 attacks, the average damage will stay the same. The difference between scorching ray and chromatic orb's damage is only going to be the deviation (the likelihood that the result is close to the average) in the damages:



enter image description here



Notice that the scorching ray damage is slightly more likely to hit near the average (since there are more dice involved). As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up (to show the different deviations) meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit. Since each ray has an independent chance of hitting, the damage output approximates to the same.



The numbers



Linked here, you can find a spreadsheet with all of the calculations you requested (feel free to download a copy if you want to check out the formulas I used). Essentially it only involves figuring out the chance that the character hits and multiplying the average damage by that chance. Since the scorching rays are independent, you can simply multiply this adjusted damage by 3.



In summary, scorching ray will always be more damaging if the chance to hit is the same throughout.



The case for chromatic orb



There is one instance where chromatic orb deal more average damage, and that is when only the first attack will have advantage (such as if you used true strike). The modified damage in this instance is in the spreadsheet linked in the previous section to show how this changes the numbers. In this case, the greater damage that is applicable to an advantage attack does more than the extra average damage of scorching ray. However, as your normal chance to hit increases, this advantage to chromatic orb decreases and scorching ray catches up.



Versatility of chromatic orb



Chromatic orb still has a comparative advantage over scorching ray and that is its versatility. Fire is one of the most resisted damage types in the game, so if you are dealing with a monster with such a resistance, scorching ray falls off hard, but chromatic orb can select a different option. This lets you go around resistances and target vulnerabilities, greatly increasing utility (perhaps at the cost of raw damage).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks it's a big help!! Its interesting to see that a 2nd level chromatic orb can be better in certain scenarios ^.^ this will make for some fun team work between the level 3 sorc and either the cleric or the mastermind rogue I DM for since guiding bolt and help action are first attack. ^.^
    $endgroup$
    – Deceptecium
    Feb 2 at 0:21






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit." Answer would be improved by elaborating why you did this. What's important about making them "line up" and what does that mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Feb 2 at 2:11






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest first having an image where the distributions are not artificially lined up. I was confused for a while, as it seems that the average damages are the same, looking at the picture, which contradicts basic arithmetic. Or at least add a big fat warning above the graph that the averages there do not reflect reality.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:35










  • $begingroup$
    If you take critical hits into account, it might be that it is more likely to get an isntance of high damage with chromatic orb (where only crit is necessary) when compared to scorching ray, where really outstanding damage would require several hits. Maybe worth an examination.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:40


















4












$begingroup$

The instances where chromatic orb is better are few and far between.



To start, if there are no misses, scorching ray deals an average of 21 (6 * 3.5) points fire damage, and chromatic orb deals 18 (3 * 4.5) points of fire damage.



When there is a 50% chance of hitting (assuming the same modifier to hit), you divide both damage totals by 2, so chromatic orb would deal an average of 9 damage, and scorching ray would be 10.5. If there is a 1 in 20 chance you hit, you will hit 3 times more often (actually slightly more, as you can hit multiple hits, but it is very unlikely), but deal a third of the damage, so it cancels out.



There is a point, however, when chromatic orb is more useful. Scorching ray tends to be much more consistent, as you take multiple attacks, and chromatic orb tends to be either nothing or a lot of damage. So, when you need to deal a lot of damage, chromatic orb is better due to its "high risk, high reward" policy.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe more specific / clear to say "when less than big damage is truly useless", i.e. when the only useful thing is to do more than X damage on your turn. As other comments mentioned, both can crit, but a chromatic orb crit doubles all the damage for the whole spell, not just one ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Feb 2 at 8:15










Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140361%2fis-upcasting-the-chromatic-orb-spell-for-fire-damage-at-2nd-level-ever-better%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









19












$begingroup$


Scorching ray is always more damaging if you have the same chance to hit



I could tell you even before running the numbers that this would be the case. As long as both spells are on equal playing ground (both have adv/dis, etc.), the higher average damage will always win out. This is because even though scorching ray is split among 3 attacks, the average damage will stay the same. The difference between scorching ray and chromatic orb's damage is only going to be the deviation (the likelihood that the result is close to the average) in the damages:



enter image description here



Notice that the scorching ray damage is slightly more likely to hit near the average (since there are more dice involved). As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up (to show the different deviations) meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit. Since each ray has an independent chance of hitting, the damage output approximates to the same.



The numbers



Linked here, you can find a spreadsheet with all of the calculations you requested (feel free to download a copy if you want to check out the formulas I used). Essentially it only involves figuring out the chance that the character hits and multiplying the average damage by that chance. Since the scorching rays are independent, you can simply multiply this adjusted damage by 3.



In summary, scorching ray will always be more damaging if the chance to hit is the same throughout.



The case for chromatic orb



There is one instance where chromatic orb deal more average damage, and that is when only the first attack will have advantage (such as if you used true strike). The modified damage in this instance is in the spreadsheet linked in the previous section to show how this changes the numbers. In this case, the greater damage that is applicable to an advantage attack does more than the extra average damage of scorching ray. However, as your normal chance to hit increases, this advantage to chromatic orb decreases and scorching ray catches up.



Versatility of chromatic orb



Chromatic orb still has a comparative advantage over scorching ray and that is its versatility. Fire is one of the most resisted damage types in the game, so if you are dealing with a monster with such a resistance, scorching ray falls off hard, but chromatic orb can select a different option. This lets you go around resistances and target vulnerabilities, greatly increasing utility (perhaps at the cost of raw damage).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks it's a big help!! Its interesting to see that a 2nd level chromatic orb can be better in certain scenarios ^.^ this will make for some fun team work between the level 3 sorc and either the cleric or the mastermind rogue I DM for since guiding bolt and help action are first attack. ^.^
    $endgroup$
    – Deceptecium
    Feb 2 at 0:21






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit." Answer would be improved by elaborating why you did this. What's important about making them "line up" and what does that mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Feb 2 at 2:11






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest first having an image where the distributions are not artificially lined up. I was confused for a while, as it seems that the average damages are the same, looking at the picture, which contradicts basic arithmetic. Or at least add a big fat warning above the graph that the averages there do not reflect reality.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:35










  • $begingroup$
    If you take critical hits into account, it might be that it is more likely to get an isntance of high damage with chromatic orb (where only crit is necessary) when compared to scorching ray, where really outstanding damage would require several hits. Maybe worth an examination.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:40















19












$begingroup$


Scorching ray is always more damaging if you have the same chance to hit



I could tell you even before running the numbers that this would be the case. As long as both spells are on equal playing ground (both have adv/dis, etc.), the higher average damage will always win out. This is because even though scorching ray is split among 3 attacks, the average damage will stay the same. The difference between scorching ray and chromatic orb's damage is only going to be the deviation (the likelihood that the result is close to the average) in the damages:



enter image description here



Notice that the scorching ray damage is slightly more likely to hit near the average (since there are more dice involved). As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up (to show the different deviations) meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit. Since each ray has an independent chance of hitting, the damage output approximates to the same.



The numbers



Linked here, you can find a spreadsheet with all of the calculations you requested (feel free to download a copy if you want to check out the formulas I used). Essentially it only involves figuring out the chance that the character hits and multiplying the average damage by that chance. Since the scorching rays are independent, you can simply multiply this adjusted damage by 3.



In summary, scorching ray will always be more damaging if the chance to hit is the same throughout.



The case for chromatic orb



There is one instance where chromatic orb deal more average damage, and that is when only the first attack will have advantage (such as if you used true strike). The modified damage in this instance is in the spreadsheet linked in the previous section to show how this changes the numbers. In this case, the greater damage that is applicable to an advantage attack does more than the extra average damage of scorching ray. However, as your normal chance to hit increases, this advantage to chromatic orb decreases and scorching ray catches up.



Versatility of chromatic orb



Chromatic orb still has a comparative advantage over scorching ray and that is its versatility. Fire is one of the most resisted damage types in the game, so if you are dealing with a monster with such a resistance, scorching ray falls off hard, but chromatic orb can select a different option. This lets you go around resistances and target vulnerabilities, greatly increasing utility (perhaps at the cost of raw damage).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks it's a big help!! Its interesting to see that a 2nd level chromatic orb can be better in certain scenarios ^.^ this will make for some fun team work between the level 3 sorc and either the cleric or the mastermind rogue I DM for since guiding bolt and help action are first attack. ^.^
    $endgroup$
    – Deceptecium
    Feb 2 at 0:21






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit." Answer would be improved by elaborating why you did this. What's important about making them "line up" and what does that mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Feb 2 at 2:11






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest first having an image where the distributions are not artificially lined up. I was confused for a while, as it seems that the average damages are the same, looking at the picture, which contradicts basic arithmetic. Or at least add a big fat warning above the graph that the averages there do not reflect reality.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:35










  • $begingroup$
    If you take critical hits into account, it might be that it is more likely to get an isntance of high damage with chromatic orb (where only crit is necessary) when compared to scorching ray, where really outstanding damage would require several hits. Maybe worth an examination.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:40













19












19








19





$begingroup$


Scorching ray is always more damaging if you have the same chance to hit



I could tell you even before running the numbers that this would be the case. As long as both spells are on equal playing ground (both have adv/dis, etc.), the higher average damage will always win out. This is because even though scorching ray is split among 3 attacks, the average damage will stay the same. The difference between scorching ray and chromatic orb's damage is only going to be the deviation (the likelihood that the result is close to the average) in the damages:



enter image description here



Notice that the scorching ray damage is slightly more likely to hit near the average (since there are more dice involved). As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up (to show the different deviations) meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit. Since each ray has an independent chance of hitting, the damage output approximates to the same.



The numbers



Linked here, you can find a spreadsheet with all of the calculations you requested (feel free to download a copy if you want to check out the formulas I used). Essentially it only involves figuring out the chance that the character hits and multiplying the average damage by that chance. Since the scorching rays are independent, you can simply multiply this adjusted damage by 3.



In summary, scorching ray will always be more damaging if the chance to hit is the same throughout.



The case for chromatic orb



There is one instance where chromatic orb deal more average damage, and that is when only the first attack will have advantage (such as if you used true strike). The modified damage in this instance is in the spreadsheet linked in the previous section to show how this changes the numbers. In this case, the greater damage that is applicable to an advantage attack does more than the extra average damage of scorching ray. However, as your normal chance to hit increases, this advantage to chromatic orb decreases and scorching ray catches up.



Versatility of chromatic orb



Chromatic orb still has a comparative advantage over scorching ray and that is its versatility. Fire is one of the most resisted damage types in the game, so if you are dealing with a monster with such a resistance, scorching ray falls off hard, but chromatic orb can select a different option. This lets you go around resistances and target vulnerabilities, greatly increasing utility (perhaps at the cost of raw damage).






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




Scorching ray is always more damaging if you have the same chance to hit



I could tell you even before running the numbers that this would be the case. As long as both spells are on equal playing ground (both have adv/dis, etc.), the higher average damage will always win out. This is because even though scorching ray is split among 3 attacks, the average damage will stay the same. The difference between scorching ray and chromatic orb's damage is only going to be the deviation (the likelihood that the result is close to the average) in the damages:



enter image description here



Notice that the scorching ray damage is slightly more likely to hit near the average (since there are more dice involved). As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up (to show the different deviations) meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit. Since each ray has an independent chance of hitting, the damage output approximates to the same.



The numbers



Linked here, you can find a spreadsheet with all of the calculations you requested (feel free to download a copy if you want to check out the formulas I used). Essentially it only involves figuring out the chance that the character hits and multiplying the average damage by that chance. Since the scorching rays are independent, you can simply multiply this adjusted damage by 3.



In summary, scorching ray will always be more damaging if the chance to hit is the same throughout.



The case for chromatic orb



There is one instance where chromatic orb deal more average damage, and that is when only the first attack will have advantage (such as if you used true strike). The modified damage in this instance is in the spreadsheet linked in the previous section to show how this changes the numbers. In this case, the greater damage that is applicable to an advantage attack does more than the extra average damage of scorching ray. However, as your normal chance to hit increases, this advantage to chromatic orb decreases and scorching ray catches up.



Versatility of chromatic orb



Chromatic orb still has a comparative advantage over scorching ray and that is its versatility. Fire is one of the most resisted damage types in the game, so if you are dealing with a monster with such a resistance, scorching ray falls off hard, but chromatic orb can select a different option. This lets you go around resistances and target vulnerabilities, greatly increasing utility (perhaps at the cost of raw damage).







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 2 at 10:55

























answered Feb 1 at 23:47









David CoffronDavid Coffron

36k3123249




36k3123249











  • $begingroup$
    Thanks it's a big help!! Its interesting to see that a 2nd level chromatic orb can be better in certain scenarios ^.^ this will make for some fun team work between the level 3 sorc and either the cleric or the mastermind rogue I DM for since guiding bolt and help action are first attack. ^.^
    $endgroup$
    – Deceptecium
    Feb 2 at 0:21






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit." Answer would be improved by elaborating why you did this. What's important about making them "line up" and what does that mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Feb 2 at 2:11






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest first having an image where the distributions are not artificially lined up. I was confused for a while, as it seems that the average damages are the same, looking at the picture, which contradicts basic arithmetic. Or at least add a big fat warning above the graph that the averages there do not reflect reality.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:35










  • $begingroup$
    If you take critical hits into account, it might be that it is more likely to get an isntance of high damage with chromatic orb (where only crit is necessary) when compared to scorching ray, where really outstanding damage would require several hits. Maybe worth an examination.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:40
















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks it's a big help!! Its interesting to see that a 2nd level chromatic orb can be better in certain scenarios ^.^ this will make for some fun team work between the level 3 sorc and either the cleric or the mastermind rogue I DM for since guiding bolt and help action are first attack. ^.^
    $endgroup$
    – Deceptecium
    Feb 2 at 0:21






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    "As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit." Answer would be improved by elaborating why you did this. What's important about making them "line up" and what does that mean?
    $endgroup$
    – Bloodcinder
    Feb 2 at 2:11






  • 3




    $begingroup$
    I would suggest first having an image where the distributions are not artificially lined up. I was confused for a while, as it seems that the average damages are the same, looking at the picture, which contradicts basic arithmetic. Or at least add a big fat warning above the graph that the averages there do not reflect reality.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:35










  • $begingroup$
    If you take critical hits into account, it might be that it is more likely to get an isntance of high damage with chromatic orb (where only crit is necessary) when compared to scorching ray, where really outstanding damage would require several hits. Maybe worth an examination.
    $endgroup$
    – Thanuir
    Feb 2 at 7:40















$begingroup$
Thanks it's a big help!! Its interesting to see that a 2nd level chromatic orb can be better in certain scenarios ^.^ this will make for some fun team work between the level 3 sorc and either the cleric or the mastermind rogue I DM for since guiding bolt and help action are first attack. ^.^
$endgroup$
– Deceptecium
Feb 2 at 0:21




$begingroup$
Thanks it's a big help!! Its interesting to see that a 2nd level chromatic orb can be better in certain scenarios ^.^ this will make for some fun team work between the level 3 sorc and either the cleric or the mastermind rogue I DM for since guiding bolt and help action are first attack. ^.^
$endgroup$
– Deceptecium
Feb 2 at 0:21




4




4




$begingroup$
"As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit." Answer would be improved by elaborating why you did this. What's important about making them "line up" and what does that mean?
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
Feb 2 at 2:11




$begingroup$
"As you can see, I had to correct the scorching ray by 3 points for them to line up meaning scorching ray will deal 3 more damage than chromatic orb if they all hit." Answer would be improved by elaborating why you did this. What's important about making them "line up" and what does that mean?
$endgroup$
– Bloodcinder
Feb 2 at 2:11




3




3




$begingroup$
I would suggest first having an image where the distributions are not artificially lined up. I was confused for a while, as it seems that the average damages are the same, looking at the picture, which contradicts basic arithmetic. Or at least add a big fat warning above the graph that the averages there do not reflect reality.
$endgroup$
– Thanuir
Feb 2 at 7:35




$begingroup$
I would suggest first having an image where the distributions are not artificially lined up. I was confused for a while, as it seems that the average damages are the same, looking at the picture, which contradicts basic arithmetic. Or at least add a big fat warning above the graph that the averages there do not reflect reality.
$endgroup$
– Thanuir
Feb 2 at 7:35












$begingroup$
If you take critical hits into account, it might be that it is more likely to get an isntance of high damage with chromatic orb (where only crit is necessary) when compared to scorching ray, where really outstanding damage would require several hits. Maybe worth an examination.
$endgroup$
– Thanuir
Feb 2 at 7:40




$begingroup$
If you take critical hits into account, it might be that it is more likely to get an isntance of high damage with chromatic orb (where only crit is necessary) when compared to scorching ray, where really outstanding damage would require several hits. Maybe worth an examination.
$endgroup$
– Thanuir
Feb 2 at 7:40













4












$begingroup$

The instances where chromatic orb is better are few and far between.



To start, if there are no misses, scorching ray deals an average of 21 (6 * 3.5) points fire damage, and chromatic orb deals 18 (3 * 4.5) points of fire damage.



When there is a 50% chance of hitting (assuming the same modifier to hit), you divide both damage totals by 2, so chromatic orb would deal an average of 9 damage, and scorching ray would be 10.5. If there is a 1 in 20 chance you hit, you will hit 3 times more often (actually slightly more, as you can hit multiple hits, but it is very unlikely), but deal a third of the damage, so it cancels out.



There is a point, however, when chromatic orb is more useful. Scorching ray tends to be much more consistent, as you take multiple attacks, and chromatic orb tends to be either nothing or a lot of damage. So, when you need to deal a lot of damage, chromatic orb is better due to its "high risk, high reward" policy.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe more specific / clear to say "when less than big damage is truly useless", i.e. when the only useful thing is to do more than X damage on your turn. As other comments mentioned, both can crit, but a chromatic orb crit doubles all the damage for the whole spell, not just one ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Feb 2 at 8:15















4












$begingroup$

The instances where chromatic orb is better are few and far between.



To start, if there are no misses, scorching ray deals an average of 21 (6 * 3.5) points fire damage, and chromatic orb deals 18 (3 * 4.5) points of fire damage.



When there is a 50% chance of hitting (assuming the same modifier to hit), you divide both damage totals by 2, so chromatic orb would deal an average of 9 damage, and scorching ray would be 10.5. If there is a 1 in 20 chance you hit, you will hit 3 times more often (actually slightly more, as you can hit multiple hits, but it is very unlikely), but deal a third of the damage, so it cancels out.



There is a point, however, when chromatic orb is more useful. Scorching ray tends to be much more consistent, as you take multiple attacks, and chromatic orb tends to be either nothing or a lot of damage. So, when you need to deal a lot of damage, chromatic orb is better due to its "high risk, high reward" policy.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Maybe more specific / clear to say "when less than big damage is truly useless", i.e. when the only useful thing is to do more than X damage on your turn. As other comments mentioned, both can crit, but a chromatic orb crit doubles all the damage for the whole spell, not just one ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Feb 2 at 8:15













4












4








4





$begingroup$

The instances where chromatic orb is better are few and far between.



To start, if there are no misses, scorching ray deals an average of 21 (6 * 3.5) points fire damage, and chromatic orb deals 18 (3 * 4.5) points of fire damage.



When there is a 50% chance of hitting (assuming the same modifier to hit), you divide both damage totals by 2, so chromatic orb would deal an average of 9 damage, and scorching ray would be 10.5. If there is a 1 in 20 chance you hit, you will hit 3 times more often (actually slightly more, as you can hit multiple hits, but it is very unlikely), but deal a third of the damage, so it cancels out.



There is a point, however, when chromatic orb is more useful. Scorching ray tends to be much more consistent, as you take multiple attacks, and chromatic orb tends to be either nothing or a lot of damage. So, when you need to deal a lot of damage, chromatic orb is better due to its "high risk, high reward" policy.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The instances where chromatic orb is better are few and far between.



To start, if there are no misses, scorching ray deals an average of 21 (6 * 3.5) points fire damage, and chromatic orb deals 18 (3 * 4.5) points of fire damage.



When there is a 50% chance of hitting (assuming the same modifier to hit), you divide both damage totals by 2, so chromatic orb would deal an average of 9 damage, and scorching ray would be 10.5. If there is a 1 in 20 chance you hit, you will hit 3 times more often (actually slightly more, as you can hit multiple hits, but it is very unlikely), but deal a third of the damage, so it cancels out.



There is a point, however, when chromatic orb is more useful. Scorching ray tends to be much more consistent, as you take multiple attacks, and chromatic orb tends to be either nothing or a lot of damage. So, when you need to deal a lot of damage, chromatic orb is better due to its "high risk, high reward" policy.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Feb 2 at 2:21

























answered Feb 2 at 0:24









JustinJustin

1,6511724




1,6511724











  • $begingroup$
    Maybe more specific / clear to say "when less than big damage is truly useless", i.e. when the only useful thing is to do more than X damage on your turn. As other comments mentioned, both can crit, but a chromatic orb crit doubles all the damage for the whole spell, not just one ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Feb 2 at 8:15
















  • $begingroup$
    Maybe more specific / clear to say "when less than big damage is truly useless", i.e. when the only useful thing is to do more than X damage on your turn. As other comments mentioned, both can crit, but a chromatic orb crit doubles all the damage for the whole spell, not just one ray.
    $endgroup$
    – Peter Cordes
    Feb 2 at 8:15















$begingroup$
Maybe more specific / clear to say "when less than big damage is truly useless", i.e. when the only useful thing is to do more than X damage on your turn. As other comments mentioned, both can crit, but a chromatic orb crit doubles all the damage for the whole spell, not just one ray.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Feb 2 at 8:15




$begingroup$
Maybe more specific / clear to say "when less than big damage is truly useless", i.e. when the only useful thing is to do more than X damage on your turn. As other comments mentioned, both can crit, but a chromatic orb crit doubles all the damage for the whole spell, not just one ray.
$endgroup$
– Peter Cordes
Feb 2 at 8:15

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f140361%2fis-upcasting-the-chromatic-orb-spell-for-fire-damage-at-2nd-level-ever-better%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown






Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?