Does my Wireless USB Adapter support monitor mode? [duplicate]

Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
This question already has an answer here:
Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?
5 answers
I have a TL-WN721N Wireless USB Adapter and it has Atheros AR9271 2.0.0.32 driver version. Is it possible to send packets and set the mode to monitor with this adapter chipset? I read on a post and it said this:
Atheros AR9271: The Alfa AWUS036NHA is my favorite long-range network
adapter and the standard by which I judge other long-range adapters.
It's stable, fast, and a well-supported b/g/n wireless network
adapter. There's also the TP-Link TL-WN722N, a favorite for newbies
and experienced hackers alike. It's a compact b/g/n adapter that has
one of the cheapest prices but boasts surprisingly impressive
performance. That being said, only v1 will work with Kali Linux since
v2 uses a different chipset.
I don't know if he referred to the driver version or chipset version. I can't find the information about the version of my chipset but the driver Atheros AR9271 has the version 2.0.0.32.
Also when I run iwconfig wifi0 mode monitor it shows this error message:
Error for wireless request "Set Mode" (8B06) :
SET failed on device wifi0 ; Invalid argument.
And when I run sudo airmon-ng start wifi0 it just gives me this and doesn't list any networks:
PHY Interface Driver Chipset
I am using a Kali Linux subsystem on my Windows 10 OS. Maybe that can be a problem?
wifi kali-linux usb
marked as duplicate by Fabby, dirkt, Rui F Ribeiro, elbarna, Christopher Jan 24 at 16:41
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?
5 answers
I have a TL-WN721N Wireless USB Adapter and it has Atheros AR9271 2.0.0.32 driver version. Is it possible to send packets and set the mode to monitor with this adapter chipset? I read on a post and it said this:
Atheros AR9271: The Alfa AWUS036NHA is my favorite long-range network
adapter and the standard by which I judge other long-range adapters.
It's stable, fast, and a well-supported b/g/n wireless network
adapter. There's also the TP-Link TL-WN722N, a favorite for newbies
and experienced hackers alike. It's a compact b/g/n adapter that has
one of the cheapest prices but boasts surprisingly impressive
performance. That being said, only v1 will work with Kali Linux since
v2 uses a different chipset.
I don't know if he referred to the driver version or chipset version. I can't find the information about the version of my chipset but the driver Atheros AR9271 has the version 2.0.0.32.
Also when I run iwconfig wifi0 mode monitor it shows this error message:
Error for wireless request "Set Mode" (8B06) :
SET failed on device wifi0 ; Invalid argument.
And when I run sudo airmon-ng start wifi0 it just gives me this and doesn't list any networks:
PHY Interface Driver Chipset
I am using a Kali Linux subsystem on my Windows 10 OS. Maybe that can be a problem?
wifi kali-linux usb
marked as duplicate by Fabby, dirkt, Rui F Ribeiro, elbarna, Christopher Jan 24 at 16:41
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
This question already has an answer here:
Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?
5 answers
I have a TL-WN721N Wireless USB Adapter and it has Atheros AR9271 2.0.0.32 driver version. Is it possible to send packets and set the mode to monitor with this adapter chipset? I read on a post and it said this:
Atheros AR9271: The Alfa AWUS036NHA is my favorite long-range network
adapter and the standard by which I judge other long-range adapters.
It's stable, fast, and a well-supported b/g/n wireless network
adapter. There's also the TP-Link TL-WN722N, a favorite for newbies
and experienced hackers alike. It's a compact b/g/n adapter that has
one of the cheapest prices but boasts surprisingly impressive
performance. That being said, only v1 will work with Kali Linux since
v2 uses a different chipset.
I don't know if he referred to the driver version or chipset version. I can't find the information about the version of my chipset but the driver Atheros AR9271 has the version 2.0.0.32.
Also when I run iwconfig wifi0 mode monitor it shows this error message:
Error for wireless request "Set Mode" (8B06) :
SET failed on device wifi0 ; Invalid argument.
And when I run sudo airmon-ng start wifi0 it just gives me this and doesn't list any networks:
PHY Interface Driver Chipset
I am using a Kali Linux subsystem on my Windows 10 OS. Maybe that can be a problem?
wifi kali-linux usb
This question already has an answer here:
Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?
5 answers
I have a TL-WN721N Wireless USB Adapter and it has Atheros AR9271 2.0.0.32 driver version. Is it possible to send packets and set the mode to monitor with this adapter chipset? I read on a post and it said this:
Atheros AR9271: The Alfa AWUS036NHA is my favorite long-range network
adapter and the standard by which I judge other long-range adapters.
It's stable, fast, and a well-supported b/g/n wireless network
adapter. There's also the TP-Link TL-WN722N, a favorite for newbies
and experienced hackers alike. It's a compact b/g/n adapter that has
one of the cheapest prices but boasts surprisingly impressive
performance. That being said, only v1 will work with Kali Linux since
v2 uses a different chipset.
I don't know if he referred to the driver version or chipset version. I can't find the information about the version of my chipset but the driver Atheros AR9271 has the version 2.0.0.32.
Also when I run iwconfig wifi0 mode monitor it shows this error message:
Error for wireless request "Set Mode" (8B06) :
SET failed on device wifi0 ; Invalid argument.
And when I run sudo airmon-ng start wifi0 it just gives me this and doesn't list any networks:
PHY Interface Driver Chipset
I am using a Kali Linux subsystem on my Windows 10 OS. Maybe that can be a problem?
This question already has an answer here:
Why is Kali Linux so hard to set up? Why won't people help me?
5 answers
wifi kali-linux usb
wifi kali-linux usb
edited Jan 24 at 16:41
Christopher
10.4k33148
10.4k33148
asked Jan 23 at 11:20
Amir ŠaranAmir Šaran
213
213
marked as duplicate by Fabby, dirkt, Rui F Ribeiro, elbarna, Christopher Jan 24 at 16:41
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
marked as duplicate by Fabby, dirkt, Rui F Ribeiro, elbarna, Christopher Jan 24 at 16:41
This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You've hit the nail on the head: Windows Subsystem for Linux: It's good to muck around in
bashand use most of the GNU tools, but when you need deeper access into the system, it will not provide that functionality as per the Micro$oft WSL about section
The Windows Subsystem for Linux lets developers run GNU/Linux environment -- including most command-line tools, utilities, and applications -- directly on Windows, unmodified, without the overhead of a virtual machine.
(Emphasis mine)
because the WSL doesn't even contain a Linux kernel!
As per the Kali Linux Docs section:
- Getting Started(4)
- Kali Linux Live(3)
- Installing Kali Linux(9)
Kali is meant to be run live (Chapter 2) before you even try the next chapter on installing it on bare metal or (heaven forbid) dual booting it with Windows.
Note: No, a Kali VM is not a good substitute for booting it live from a USB Stick: You'll be running into the same kind of issues as running under WSL.
1
As per Fabby's answer: WSL is not Linux - do not even think of doing low-level operations there. Nevertheless, I advise seeing what hw supports monitor mode before buying it. There are also databases out there for that, no need for asking here for each specific chipset.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 at 12:06
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You've hit the nail on the head: Windows Subsystem for Linux: It's good to muck around in
bashand use most of the GNU tools, but when you need deeper access into the system, it will not provide that functionality as per the Micro$oft WSL about section
The Windows Subsystem for Linux lets developers run GNU/Linux environment -- including most command-line tools, utilities, and applications -- directly on Windows, unmodified, without the overhead of a virtual machine.
(Emphasis mine)
because the WSL doesn't even contain a Linux kernel!
As per the Kali Linux Docs section:
- Getting Started(4)
- Kali Linux Live(3)
- Installing Kali Linux(9)
Kali is meant to be run live (Chapter 2) before you even try the next chapter on installing it on bare metal or (heaven forbid) dual booting it with Windows.
Note: No, a Kali VM is not a good substitute for booting it live from a USB Stick: You'll be running into the same kind of issues as running under WSL.
1
As per Fabby's answer: WSL is not Linux - do not even think of doing low-level operations there. Nevertheless, I advise seeing what hw supports monitor mode before buying it. There are also databases out there for that, no need for asking here for each specific chipset.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 at 12:06
add a comment |
You've hit the nail on the head: Windows Subsystem for Linux: It's good to muck around in
bashand use most of the GNU tools, but when you need deeper access into the system, it will not provide that functionality as per the Micro$oft WSL about section
The Windows Subsystem for Linux lets developers run GNU/Linux environment -- including most command-line tools, utilities, and applications -- directly on Windows, unmodified, without the overhead of a virtual machine.
(Emphasis mine)
because the WSL doesn't even contain a Linux kernel!
As per the Kali Linux Docs section:
- Getting Started(4)
- Kali Linux Live(3)
- Installing Kali Linux(9)
Kali is meant to be run live (Chapter 2) before you even try the next chapter on installing it on bare metal or (heaven forbid) dual booting it with Windows.
Note: No, a Kali VM is not a good substitute for booting it live from a USB Stick: You'll be running into the same kind of issues as running under WSL.
1
As per Fabby's answer: WSL is not Linux - do not even think of doing low-level operations there. Nevertheless, I advise seeing what hw supports monitor mode before buying it. There are also databases out there for that, no need for asking here for each specific chipset.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 at 12:06
add a comment |
You've hit the nail on the head: Windows Subsystem for Linux: It's good to muck around in
bashand use most of the GNU tools, but when you need deeper access into the system, it will not provide that functionality as per the Micro$oft WSL about section
The Windows Subsystem for Linux lets developers run GNU/Linux environment -- including most command-line tools, utilities, and applications -- directly on Windows, unmodified, without the overhead of a virtual machine.
(Emphasis mine)
because the WSL doesn't even contain a Linux kernel!
As per the Kali Linux Docs section:
- Getting Started(4)
- Kali Linux Live(3)
- Installing Kali Linux(9)
Kali is meant to be run live (Chapter 2) before you even try the next chapter on installing it on bare metal or (heaven forbid) dual booting it with Windows.
Note: No, a Kali VM is not a good substitute for booting it live from a USB Stick: You'll be running into the same kind of issues as running under WSL.
You've hit the nail on the head: Windows Subsystem for Linux: It's good to muck around in
bashand use most of the GNU tools, but when you need deeper access into the system, it will not provide that functionality as per the Micro$oft WSL about section
The Windows Subsystem for Linux lets developers run GNU/Linux environment -- including most command-line tools, utilities, and applications -- directly on Windows, unmodified, without the overhead of a virtual machine.
(Emphasis mine)
because the WSL doesn't even contain a Linux kernel!
As per the Kali Linux Docs section:
- Getting Started(4)
- Kali Linux Live(3)
- Installing Kali Linux(9)
Kali is meant to be run live (Chapter 2) before you even try the next chapter on installing it on bare metal or (heaven forbid) dual booting it with Windows.
Note: No, a Kali VM is not a good substitute for booting it live from a USB Stick: You'll be running into the same kind of issues as running under WSL.
edited Jan 23 at 11:43
answered Jan 23 at 11:38
FabbyFabby
3,89711329
3,89711329
1
As per Fabby's answer: WSL is not Linux - do not even think of doing low-level operations there. Nevertheless, I advise seeing what hw supports monitor mode before buying it. There are also databases out there for that, no need for asking here for each specific chipset.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 at 12:06
add a comment |
1
As per Fabby's answer: WSL is not Linux - do not even think of doing low-level operations there. Nevertheless, I advise seeing what hw supports monitor mode before buying it. There are also databases out there for that, no need for asking here for each specific chipset.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 at 12:06
1
1
As per Fabby's answer: WSL is not Linux - do not even think of doing low-level operations there. Nevertheless, I advise seeing what hw supports monitor mode before buying it. There are also databases out there for that, no need for asking here for each specific chipset.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 at 12:06
As per Fabby's answer: WSL is not Linux - do not even think of doing low-level operations there. Nevertheless, I advise seeing what hw supports monitor mode before buying it. There are also databases out there for that, no need for asking here for each specific chipset.
– Rui F Ribeiro
Jan 23 at 12:06
add a comment |