ddrescue: reread only good sectors?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












4















Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive, I decided to dry-run ddrescue (throwing rescued output to /dev/null) just to see how much data is unreadable:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 -r 3 -f /dev/sda1 /dev/null sda1.log


In the end it took 3 days to finish. Now I'm ready to make a real image, but I don't want to wait another 3 days until it finishes. But, luckily because I have a logfile, is it possible to force ddrescue to rescue only the good sectors and do not touch bad ones?



Having read some documentation, I've came up with the following idea:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 --fill=+ /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img sda1.log


Will this work? Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?










share|improve this question
























  • I thought it didn't even try to reread at all by default... In fact, you told it to retry 3 times, -r 3. -n may also save time, although I guess it won't try to get as much data as possible.

    – njsg
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:09











  • So that's why I came up with the idea of using --fill=+ option ("fill mode")

    – evaldaz
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:17















4















Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive, I decided to dry-run ddrescue (throwing rescued output to /dev/null) just to see how much data is unreadable:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 -r 3 -f /dev/sda1 /dev/null sda1.log


In the end it took 3 days to finish. Now I'm ready to make a real image, but I don't want to wait another 3 days until it finishes. But, luckily because I have a logfile, is it possible to force ddrescue to rescue only the good sectors and do not touch bad ones?



Having read some documentation, I've came up with the following idea:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 --fill=+ /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img sda1.log


Will this work? Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?










share|improve this question
























  • I thought it didn't even try to reread at all by default... In fact, you told it to retry 3 times, -r 3. -n may also save time, although I guess it won't try to get as much data as possible.

    – njsg
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:09











  • So that's why I came up with the idea of using --fill=+ option ("fill mode")

    – evaldaz
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:17













4












4








4


2






Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive, I decided to dry-run ddrescue (throwing rescued output to /dev/null) just to see how much data is unreadable:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 -r 3 -f /dev/sda1 /dev/null sda1.log


In the end it took 3 days to finish. Now I'm ready to make a real image, but I don't want to wait another 3 days until it finishes. But, luckily because I have a logfile, is it possible to force ddrescue to rescue only the good sectors and do not touch bad ones?



Having read some documentation, I've came up with the following idea:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 --fill=+ /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img sda1.log


Will this work? Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?










share|improve this question
















Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive, I decided to dry-run ddrescue (throwing rescued output to /dev/null) just to see how much data is unreadable:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 -r 3 -f /dev/sda1 /dev/null sda1.log


In the end it took 3 days to finish. Now I'm ready to make a real image, but I don't want to wait another 3 days until it finishes. But, luckily because I have a logfile, is it possible to force ddrescue to rescue only the good sectors and do not touch bad ones?



Having read some documentation, I've came up with the following idea:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 --fill=+ /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img sda1.log


Will this work? Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?







data-recovery ddrescue






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 11 '13 at 13:05







evaldaz

















asked Jan 10 '13 at 11:55









evaldazevaldaz

4617




4617












  • I thought it didn't even try to reread at all by default... In fact, you told it to retry 3 times, -r 3. -n may also save time, although I guess it won't try to get as much data as possible.

    – njsg
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:09











  • So that's why I came up with the idea of using --fill=+ option ("fill mode")

    – evaldaz
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:17

















  • I thought it didn't even try to reread at all by default... In fact, you told it to retry 3 times, -r 3. -n may also save time, although I guess it won't try to get as much data as possible.

    – njsg
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:09











  • So that's why I came up with the idea of using --fill=+ option ("fill mode")

    – evaldaz
    Jan 10 '13 at 12:17
















I thought it didn't even try to reread at all by default... In fact, you told it to retry 3 times, -r 3. -n may also save time, although I guess it won't try to get as much data as possible.

– njsg
Jan 10 '13 at 12:09





I thought it didn't even try to reread at all by default... In fact, you told it to retry 3 times, -r 3. -n may also save time, although I guess it won't try to get as much data as possible.

– njsg
Jan 10 '13 at 12:09













So that's why I came up with the idea of using --fill=+ option ("fill mode")

– evaldaz
Jan 10 '13 at 12:17





So that's why I came up with the idea of using --fill=+ option ("fill mode")

– evaldaz
Jan 10 '13 at 12:17










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















3














Thoroughly reread ddrescue manual and found out the following option:




-m file
--domain-logfile=file



Restrict the rescue domain to the blocks marked as finished in the logfile file. This is useful if the destination drive fails during the rescue.




So the invocation of ddrescue would look something like this:



# ddrescue -d -b 4096 -m sda1.log /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img logfile2.log





share|improve this answer
































    2














    Quick edit 2018:



    I use ddrescue sometimes, from some years ago, for rescuing hard-drive.



    Something quicker than dd on hdd with really broken surfaces.



    But dd is really safe and my first post stay true.



    Original post



    This is a very bad idea!



    I'm talking about Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive...



    As when a disk drive come to be corrupted, corruption are generally growing each time you try to access your drive.



    So the good way to rescue a broken drive is to make an image by copying whole disk from begin to end in one uninterrupted operation!. After that: unplug the disk drive and store them quietly. As: less you touch the broken drive, more chance you have to restore something.



    As each time mechanical access to broken material could make some more damages, the log you're become from your last operation is not a reference for knowing wich block are damaged now.



    I personally, don't use ddrescue. I use dd from a while and this tool make all I need:



    dd bs=512 if=/dev/sdX of=/backuprepo/sdXBroken.img conv=noerror,sync


    And, I let it work patiently.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Using dd without a block size (bs) set makes FSM sad.

      – laebshade
      Jan 11 '13 at 22:55











    • "corrupted filesystem" - if he is lucky, he only has a software issue, not a hardware issue :)

      – PythoNic
      Nov 17 '16 at 16:53











    • stick to ddrescue - dd noerror sync corrupts data superuser.com/a/1075837/195171

      – frostschutz
      Jan 23 at 13:49











    • @frostschutz, The link you point to is a very special case, using virtual block devices and non-standard device block size. In all normal cases, trying to backup physical drive, using conv=noerror,sync is correct. For special case, you may have to explicitely specify ibs and obs. But that's no matter with the main subject of my answer: When things goes wrong don't try else than backup immediately

      – F. Hauri
      Jan 23 at 16:00


















    1














    Knowing what ddrecue does, you should not use it to write to /dev/null while recovering data from broken disk, but to get "at least something" using writes into real image file.



    Writing to /dev/null has sence e.g. if you want to know for brand-new disk if to return it to the store.



    In this case, i would not use log file from "/dev/null attempt", but empty/new one, and then trying eventually more times couple of passes, depending how it does...






    share|improve this answer























    • pretty sure this doesn't address the question of "Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?"

      – Jeff Schaller
      May 20 '16 at 16:15











    • @JeffSchaller: which means this should be a comment to the question -> not possible with the low points

      – PythoNic
      Nov 17 '16 at 16:54











    • To which the easy answer is: get more points! (By providing answers that people find useful and up-vote)

      – Jeff Schaller
      Nov 17 '16 at 16:55










    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60876%2fddrescue-reread-only-good-sectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Thoroughly reread ddrescue manual and found out the following option:




    -m file
    --domain-logfile=file



    Restrict the rescue domain to the blocks marked as finished in the logfile file. This is useful if the destination drive fails during the rescue.




    So the invocation of ddrescue would look something like this:



    # ddrescue -d -b 4096 -m sda1.log /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img logfile2.log





    share|improve this answer





























      3














      Thoroughly reread ddrescue manual and found out the following option:




      -m file
      --domain-logfile=file



      Restrict the rescue domain to the blocks marked as finished in the logfile file. This is useful if the destination drive fails during the rescue.




      So the invocation of ddrescue would look something like this:



      # ddrescue -d -b 4096 -m sda1.log /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img logfile2.log





      share|improve this answer



























        3












        3








        3







        Thoroughly reread ddrescue manual and found out the following option:




        -m file
        --domain-logfile=file



        Restrict the rescue domain to the blocks marked as finished in the logfile file. This is useful if the destination drive fails during the rescue.




        So the invocation of ddrescue would look something like this:



        # ddrescue -d -b 4096 -m sda1.log /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img logfile2.log





        share|improve this answer















        Thoroughly reread ddrescue manual and found out the following option:




        -m file
        --domain-logfile=file



        Restrict the rescue domain to the blocks marked as finished in the logfile file. This is useful if the destination drive fails during the rescue.




        So the invocation of ddrescue would look something like this:



        # ddrescue -d -b 4096 -m sda1.log /dev/sda1 /mnt/sda1.img logfile2.log






        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jan 11 '13 at 22:24


























        community wiki





        3 revs
        evaldaz
























            2














            Quick edit 2018:



            I use ddrescue sometimes, from some years ago, for rescuing hard-drive.



            Something quicker than dd on hdd with really broken surfaces.



            But dd is really safe and my first post stay true.



            Original post



            This is a very bad idea!



            I'm talking about Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive...



            As when a disk drive come to be corrupted, corruption are generally growing each time you try to access your drive.



            So the good way to rescue a broken drive is to make an image by copying whole disk from begin to end in one uninterrupted operation!. After that: unplug the disk drive and store them quietly. As: less you touch the broken drive, more chance you have to restore something.



            As each time mechanical access to broken material could make some more damages, the log you're become from your last operation is not a reference for knowing wich block are damaged now.



            I personally, don't use ddrescue. I use dd from a while and this tool make all I need:



            dd bs=512 if=/dev/sdX of=/backuprepo/sdXBroken.img conv=noerror,sync


            And, I let it work patiently.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Using dd without a block size (bs) set makes FSM sad.

              – laebshade
              Jan 11 '13 at 22:55











            • "corrupted filesystem" - if he is lucky, he only has a software issue, not a hardware issue :)

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:53











            • stick to ddrescue - dd noerror sync corrupts data superuser.com/a/1075837/195171

              – frostschutz
              Jan 23 at 13:49











            • @frostschutz, The link you point to is a very special case, using virtual block devices and non-standard device block size. In all normal cases, trying to backup physical drive, using conv=noerror,sync is correct. For special case, you may have to explicitely specify ibs and obs. But that's no matter with the main subject of my answer: When things goes wrong don't try else than backup immediately

              – F. Hauri
              Jan 23 at 16:00















            2














            Quick edit 2018:



            I use ddrescue sometimes, from some years ago, for rescuing hard-drive.



            Something quicker than dd on hdd with really broken surfaces.



            But dd is really safe and my first post stay true.



            Original post



            This is a very bad idea!



            I'm talking about Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive...



            As when a disk drive come to be corrupted, corruption are generally growing each time you try to access your drive.



            So the good way to rescue a broken drive is to make an image by copying whole disk from begin to end in one uninterrupted operation!. After that: unplug the disk drive and store them quietly. As: less you touch the broken drive, more chance you have to restore something.



            As each time mechanical access to broken material could make some more damages, the log you're become from your last operation is not a reference for knowing wich block are damaged now.



            I personally, don't use ddrescue. I use dd from a while and this tool make all I need:



            dd bs=512 if=/dev/sdX of=/backuprepo/sdXBroken.img conv=noerror,sync


            And, I let it work patiently.






            share|improve this answer

























            • Using dd without a block size (bs) set makes FSM sad.

              – laebshade
              Jan 11 '13 at 22:55











            • "corrupted filesystem" - if he is lucky, he only has a software issue, not a hardware issue :)

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:53











            • stick to ddrescue - dd noerror sync corrupts data superuser.com/a/1075837/195171

              – frostschutz
              Jan 23 at 13:49











            • @frostschutz, The link you point to is a very special case, using virtual block devices and non-standard device block size. In all normal cases, trying to backup physical drive, using conv=noerror,sync is correct. For special case, you may have to explicitely specify ibs and obs. But that's no matter with the main subject of my answer: When things goes wrong don't try else than backup immediately

              – F. Hauri
              Jan 23 at 16:00













            2












            2








            2







            Quick edit 2018:



            I use ddrescue sometimes, from some years ago, for rescuing hard-drive.



            Something quicker than dd on hdd with really broken surfaces.



            But dd is really safe and my first post stay true.



            Original post



            This is a very bad idea!



            I'm talking about Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive...



            As when a disk drive come to be corrupted, corruption are generally growing each time you try to access your drive.



            So the good way to rescue a broken drive is to make an image by copying whole disk from begin to end in one uninterrupted operation!. After that: unplug the disk drive and store them quietly. As: less you touch the broken drive, more chance you have to restore something.



            As each time mechanical access to broken material could make some more damages, the log you're become from your last operation is not a reference for knowing wich block are damaged now.



            I personally, don't use ddrescue. I use dd from a while and this tool make all I need:



            dd bs=512 if=/dev/sdX of=/backuprepo/sdXBroken.img conv=noerror,sync


            And, I let it work patiently.






            share|improve this answer















            Quick edit 2018:



            I use ddrescue sometimes, from some years ago, for rescuing hard-drive.



            Something quicker than dd on hdd with really broken surfaces.



            But dd is really safe and my first post stay true.



            Original post



            This is a very bad idea!



            I'm talking about Before imaging the corrupted filesystem to a file on another hard drive...



            As when a disk drive come to be corrupted, corruption are generally growing each time you try to access your drive.



            So the good way to rescue a broken drive is to make an image by copying whole disk from begin to end in one uninterrupted operation!. After that: unplug the disk drive and store them quietly. As: less you touch the broken drive, more chance you have to restore something.



            As each time mechanical access to broken material could make some more damages, the log you're become from your last operation is not a reference for knowing wich block are damaged now.



            I personally, don't use ddrescue. I use dd from a while and this tool make all I need:



            dd bs=512 if=/dev/sdX of=/backuprepo/sdXBroken.img conv=noerror,sync


            And, I let it work patiently.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Jan 23 at 15:59

























            answered Jan 11 '13 at 13:54









            F. HauriF. Hauri

            2,6871327




            2,6871327












            • Using dd without a block size (bs) set makes FSM sad.

              – laebshade
              Jan 11 '13 at 22:55











            • "corrupted filesystem" - if he is lucky, he only has a software issue, not a hardware issue :)

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:53











            • stick to ddrescue - dd noerror sync corrupts data superuser.com/a/1075837/195171

              – frostschutz
              Jan 23 at 13:49











            • @frostschutz, The link you point to is a very special case, using virtual block devices and non-standard device block size. In all normal cases, trying to backup physical drive, using conv=noerror,sync is correct. For special case, you may have to explicitely specify ibs and obs. But that's no matter with the main subject of my answer: When things goes wrong don't try else than backup immediately

              – F. Hauri
              Jan 23 at 16:00

















            • Using dd without a block size (bs) set makes FSM sad.

              – laebshade
              Jan 11 '13 at 22:55











            • "corrupted filesystem" - if he is lucky, he only has a software issue, not a hardware issue :)

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:53











            • stick to ddrescue - dd noerror sync corrupts data superuser.com/a/1075837/195171

              – frostschutz
              Jan 23 at 13:49











            • @frostschutz, The link you point to is a very special case, using virtual block devices and non-standard device block size. In all normal cases, trying to backup physical drive, using conv=noerror,sync is correct. For special case, you may have to explicitely specify ibs and obs. But that's no matter with the main subject of my answer: When things goes wrong don't try else than backup immediately

              – F. Hauri
              Jan 23 at 16:00
















            Using dd without a block size (bs) set makes FSM sad.

            – laebshade
            Jan 11 '13 at 22:55





            Using dd without a block size (bs) set makes FSM sad.

            – laebshade
            Jan 11 '13 at 22:55













            "corrupted filesystem" - if he is lucky, he only has a software issue, not a hardware issue :)

            – PythoNic
            Nov 17 '16 at 16:53





            "corrupted filesystem" - if he is lucky, he only has a software issue, not a hardware issue :)

            – PythoNic
            Nov 17 '16 at 16:53













            stick to ddrescue - dd noerror sync corrupts data superuser.com/a/1075837/195171

            – frostschutz
            Jan 23 at 13:49





            stick to ddrescue - dd noerror sync corrupts data superuser.com/a/1075837/195171

            – frostschutz
            Jan 23 at 13:49













            @frostschutz, The link you point to is a very special case, using virtual block devices and non-standard device block size. In all normal cases, trying to backup physical drive, using conv=noerror,sync is correct. For special case, you may have to explicitely specify ibs and obs. But that's no matter with the main subject of my answer: When things goes wrong don't try else than backup immediately

            – F. Hauri
            Jan 23 at 16:00





            @frostschutz, The link you point to is a very special case, using virtual block devices and non-standard device block size. In all normal cases, trying to backup physical drive, using conv=noerror,sync is correct. For special case, you may have to explicitely specify ibs and obs. But that's no matter with the main subject of my answer: When things goes wrong don't try else than backup immediately

            – F. Hauri
            Jan 23 at 16:00











            1














            Knowing what ddrecue does, you should not use it to write to /dev/null while recovering data from broken disk, but to get "at least something" using writes into real image file.



            Writing to /dev/null has sence e.g. if you want to know for brand-new disk if to return it to the store.



            In this case, i would not use log file from "/dev/null attempt", but empty/new one, and then trying eventually more times couple of passes, depending how it does...






            share|improve this answer























            • pretty sure this doesn't address the question of "Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?"

              – Jeff Schaller
              May 20 '16 at 16:15











            • @JeffSchaller: which means this should be a comment to the question -> not possible with the low points

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:54











            • To which the easy answer is: get more points! (By providing answers that people find useful and up-vote)

              – Jeff Schaller
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:55















            1














            Knowing what ddrecue does, you should not use it to write to /dev/null while recovering data from broken disk, but to get "at least something" using writes into real image file.



            Writing to /dev/null has sence e.g. if you want to know for brand-new disk if to return it to the store.



            In this case, i would not use log file from "/dev/null attempt", but empty/new one, and then trying eventually more times couple of passes, depending how it does...






            share|improve this answer























            • pretty sure this doesn't address the question of "Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?"

              – Jeff Schaller
              May 20 '16 at 16:15











            • @JeffSchaller: which means this should be a comment to the question -> not possible with the low points

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:54











            • To which the easy answer is: get more points! (By providing answers that people find useful and up-vote)

              – Jeff Schaller
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:55













            1












            1








            1







            Knowing what ddrecue does, you should not use it to write to /dev/null while recovering data from broken disk, but to get "at least something" using writes into real image file.



            Writing to /dev/null has sence e.g. if you want to know for brand-new disk if to return it to the store.



            In this case, i would not use log file from "/dev/null attempt", but empty/new one, and then trying eventually more times couple of passes, depending how it does...






            share|improve this answer













            Knowing what ddrecue does, you should not use it to write to /dev/null while recovering data from broken disk, but to get "at least something" using writes into real image file.



            Writing to /dev/null has sence e.g. if you want to know for brand-new disk if to return it to the store.



            In this case, i would not use log file from "/dev/null attempt", but empty/new one, and then trying eventually more times couple of passes, depending how it does...







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered May 20 '16 at 15:48









            StanleyStanley

            111




            111












            • pretty sure this doesn't address the question of "Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?"

              – Jeff Schaller
              May 20 '16 at 16:15











            • @JeffSchaller: which means this should be a comment to the question -> not possible with the low points

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:54











            • To which the easy answer is: get more points! (By providing answers that people find useful and up-vote)

              – Jeff Schaller
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:55

















            • pretty sure this doesn't address the question of "Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?"

              – Jeff Schaller
              May 20 '16 at 16:15











            • @JeffSchaller: which means this should be a comment to the question -> not possible with the low points

              – PythoNic
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:54











            • To which the easy answer is: get more points! (By providing answers that people find useful and up-vote)

              – Jeff Schaller
              Nov 17 '16 at 16:55
















            pretty sure this doesn't address the question of "Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?"

            – Jeff Schaller
            May 20 '16 at 16:15





            pretty sure this doesn't address the question of "Is there another (preferred) way of rereading only good sectors?"

            – Jeff Schaller
            May 20 '16 at 16:15













            @JeffSchaller: which means this should be a comment to the question -> not possible with the low points

            – PythoNic
            Nov 17 '16 at 16:54





            @JeffSchaller: which means this should be a comment to the question -> not possible with the low points

            – PythoNic
            Nov 17 '16 at 16:54













            To which the easy answer is: get more points! (By providing answers that people find useful and up-vote)

            – Jeff Schaller
            Nov 17 '16 at 16:55





            To which the easy answer is: get more points! (By providing answers that people find useful and up-vote)

            – Jeff Schaller
            Nov 17 '16 at 16:55

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f60876%2fddrescue-reread-only-good-sectors%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown






            Popular posts from this blog

            How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

            Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

            How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?