Superscript and subscript together after the same atom
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
$begingroup$
In the chemical formula of some ion compounds, there is the necessity to write the charge in the superscript and the numbers of atoms in the subscript, but together at the right of the same symbol like in the PO43- ion:
Does IUPAC provide universal guidelines saying that I have to typewrite the two numbers in a stacked or staggered way?
ions notation
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the chemical formula of some ion compounds, there is the necessity to write the charge in the superscript and the numbers of atoms in the subscript, but together at the right of the same symbol like in the PO43- ion:
Does IUPAC provide universal guidelines saying that I have to typewrite the two numbers in a stacked or staggered way?
ions notation
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2803/…
$endgroup$
– Nilay Ghosh
Jan 8 at 16:30
add a comment |
$begingroup$
In the chemical formula of some ion compounds, there is the necessity to write the charge in the superscript and the numbers of atoms in the subscript, but together at the right of the same symbol like in the PO43- ion:
Does IUPAC provide universal guidelines saying that I have to typewrite the two numbers in a stacked or staggered way?
ions notation
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
$endgroup$
In the chemical formula of some ion compounds, there is the necessity to write the charge in the superscript and the numbers of atoms in the subscript, but together at the right of the same symbol like in the PO43- ion:
Does IUPAC provide universal guidelines saying that I have to typewrite the two numbers in a stacked or staggered way?
ions notation
ions notation
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
edited Jan 8 at 19:33
andselisk
14.9k649108
14.9k649108
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
asked Jan 8 at 14:44
andreagoo8andreagoo8
264
264
1
$begingroup$
chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2803/…
$endgroup$
– Nilay Ghosh
Jan 8 at 16:30
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2803/…
$endgroup$
– Nilay Ghosh
Jan 8 at 16:30
1
1
$begingroup$
chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2803/…
$endgroup$
– Nilay Ghosh
Jan 8 at 16:30
$begingroup$
chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2803/…
$endgroup$
– Nilay Ghosh
Jan 8 at 16:30
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From IUPAC Green Book [1, p. 51]:
In writing the formula for a complex ion, spacing for charge number can be added (staggered arrangement), as well as parentheses: $ceSO4^2-$, $ce(SO4)^2-$. The staggered arrangement is now recommended.
Also, as you are apparently a $mathrmLaTeX$-user, the same convention is used by default in chemmacros package. From the manual:
If a compound does not start with a sub- or superscript and there is both a sub- and a superscript, the superscript is shifted additionally by a length determined from the option
charge-hshift = ❬dim❭, also see page 13f.
The second point follows IUPAC’s recommendations.
References:
- IUPAC “Green Book” Quantities, Units, and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Cohen, R. E., Mills, I., Eds.; IUPAC Recommendations; RSC Pub: Cambridge, UK, 2007. ISBN 978-0-85404-433-7.
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
International and various national standards (e.g. ISO 80000, DIN 1338) do not agree with the typographic disaster of the staggered notation that was introduced in Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations 2005 (Red Book). The standardized notation still is aligned: $mathrmPO_4^3-$ or $mathrm(PO_4)^3-$.
Nevertheless, the current IUPAC recommendations as well as the ACS Style Guide stagger the subscript and superscript: $mathrmPO_4^3-$
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "431"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107660%2fsuperscript-and-subscript-together-after-the-same-atom%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
From IUPAC Green Book [1, p. 51]:
In writing the formula for a complex ion, spacing for charge number can be added (staggered arrangement), as well as parentheses: $ceSO4^2-$, $ce(SO4)^2-$. The staggered arrangement is now recommended.
Also, as you are apparently a $mathrmLaTeX$-user, the same convention is used by default in chemmacros package. From the manual:
If a compound does not start with a sub- or superscript and there is both a sub- and a superscript, the superscript is shifted additionally by a length determined from the option
charge-hshift = ❬dim❭, also see page 13f.
The second point follows IUPAC’s recommendations.
References:
- IUPAC “Green Book” Quantities, Units, and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Cohen, R. E., Mills, I., Eds.; IUPAC Recommendations; RSC Pub: Cambridge, UK, 2007. ISBN 978-0-85404-433-7.
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From IUPAC Green Book [1, p. 51]:
In writing the formula for a complex ion, spacing for charge number can be added (staggered arrangement), as well as parentheses: $ceSO4^2-$, $ce(SO4)^2-$. The staggered arrangement is now recommended.
Also, as you are apparently a $mathrmLaTeX$-user, the same convention is used by default in chemmacros package. From the manual:
If a compound does not start with a sub- or superscript and there is both a sub- and a superscript, the superscript is shifted additionally by a length determined from the option
charge-hshift = ❬dim❭, also see page 13f.
The second point follows IUPAC’s recommendations.
References:
- IUPAC “Green Book” Quantities, Units, and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Cohen, R. E., Mills, I., Eds.; IUPAC Recommendations; RSC Pub: Cambridge, UK, 2007. ISBN 978-0-85404-433-7.
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
From IUPAC Green Book [1, p. 51]:
In writing the formula for a complex ion, spacing for charge number can be added (staggered arrangement), as well as parentheses: $ceSO4^2-$, $ce(SO4)^2-$. The staggered arrangement is now recommended.
Also, as you are apparently a $mathrmLaTeX$-user, the same convention is used by default in chemmacros package. From the manual:
If a compound does not start with a sub- or superscript and there is both a sub- and a superscript, the superscript is shifted additionally by a length determined from the option
charge-hshift = ❬dim❭, also see page 13f.
The second point follows IUPAC’s recommendations.
References:
- IUPAC “Green Book” Quantities, Units, and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Cohen, R. E., Mills, I., Eds.; IUPAC Recommendations; RSC Pub: Cambridge, UK, 2007. ISBN 978-0-85404-433-7.
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
$endgroup$
From IUPAC Green Book [1, p. 51]:
In writing the formula for a complex ion, spacing for charge number can be added (staggered arrangement), as well as parentheses: $ceSO4^2-$, $ce(SO4)^2-$. The staggered arrangement is now recommended.
Also, as you are apparently a $mathrmLaTeX$-user, the same convention is used by default in chemmacros package. From the manual:
If a compound does not start with a sub- or superscript and there is both a sub- and a superscript, the superscript is shifted additionally by a length determined from the option
charge-hshift = ❬dim❭, also see page 13f.
The second point follows IUPAC’s recommendations.
References:
- IUPAC “Green Book” Quantities, Units, and Symbols in Physical Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Cohen, R. E., Mills, I., Eds.; IUPAC Recommendations; RSC Pub: Cambridge, UK, 2007. ISBN 978-0-85404-433-7.
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
edited Jan 8 at 15:02
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
answered Jan 8 at 14:54
andseliskandselisk
14.9k649108
14.9k649108
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
International and various national standards (e.g. ISO 80000, DIN 1338) do not agree with the typographic disaster of the staggered notation that was introduced in Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations 2005 (Red Book). The standardized notation still is aligned: $mathrmPO_4^3-$ or $mathrm(PO_4)^3-$.
Nevertheless, the current IUPAC recommendations as well as the ACS Style Guide stagger the subscript and superscript: $mathrmPO_4^3-$
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
International and various national standards (e.g. ISO 80000, DIN 1338) do not agree with the typographic disaster of the staggered notation that was introduced in Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations 2005 (Red Book). The standardized notation still is aligned: $mathrmPO_4^3-$ or $mathrm(PO_4)^3-$.
Nevertheless, the current IUPAC recommendations as well as the ACS Style Guide stagger the subscript and superscript: $mathrmPO_4^3-$
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
International and various national standards (e.g. ISO 80000, DIN 1338) do not agree with the typographic disaster of the staggered notation that was introduced in Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations 2005 (Red Book). The standardized notation still is aligned: $mathrmPO_4^3-$ or $mathrm(PO_4)^3-$.
Nevertheless, the current IUPAC recommendations as well as the ACS Style Guide stagger the subscript and superscript: $mathrmPO_4^3-$
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
$endgroup$
International and various national standards (e.g. ISO 80000, DIN 1338) do not agree with the typographic disaster of the staggered notation that was introduced in Nomenclature of Inorganic Chemistry – IUPAC Recommendations 2005 (Red Book). The standardized notation still is aligned: $mathrmPO_4^3-$ or $mathrm(PO_4)^3-$.
Nevertheless, the current IUPAC recommendations as well as the ACS Style Guide stagger the subscript and superscript: $mathrmPO_4^3-$
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
answered Jan 8 at 18:50
Loong♦Loong
33.1k882170
33.1k882170
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Chemistry Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fchemistry.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f107660%2fsuperscript-and-subscript-together-after-the-same-atom%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
chemistry.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2803/…
$endgroup$
– Nilay Ghosh
Jan 8 at 16:30