Science fiction story: asymptotic drive the empire lost out to low tech rebels due to focusing on new and ultimately failing techs
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.
It is at least 50 years old.
story-identification
add a comment |
In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.
It is at least 50 years old.
story-identification
1
Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
Jan 8 at 17:09
Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
Jan 8 at 17:23
Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
Jan 8 at 17:50
1
Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
Jan 8 at 22:50
add a comment |
In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.
It is at least 50 years old.
story-identification
In this story the low tech rebels on the outer worlds gradually win small peripheral battles, but at the centre the empire is initially unconcerned as it is about to roll out bigger and better weapons, but each of these has a small but fatal flaw and ultimately they are defeated by the low tech rebels.
It is at least 50 years old.
story-identification
story-identification
edited Jan 8 at 17:12
TheLethalCarrot
41.3k15221270
41.3k15221270
asked Jan 8 at 17:05
dave andrewsdave andrews
513
513
1
Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
Jan 8 at 17:09
Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
Jan 8 at 17:23
Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
Jan 8 at 17:50
1
Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
Jan 8 at 22:50
add a comment |
1
Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
Jan 8 at 17:09
Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
Jan 8 at 17:23
Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
Jan 8 at 17:50
1
Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
Jan 8 at 22:50
1
1
Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
Jan 8 at 17:09
Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
Jan 8 at 17:09
Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
Jan 8 at 17:23
Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
Jan 8 at 17:23
Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
Jan 8 at 17:50
Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
Jan 8 at 17:50
1
1
Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
Jan 8 at 22:50
Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
Jan 8 at 22:50
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":
Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.
After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":
We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.
The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":
The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.
It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.
As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.
In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.
The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.
The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?
2
If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
Jan 8 at 18:17
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203028%2fscience-fiction-story-asymptotic-drive-the-empire-lost-out-to-low-tech-rebels-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":
Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.
After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":
We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.
The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":
The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.
It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.
As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.
In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.
The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.
The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?
2
If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
Jan 8 at 18:17
add a comment |
This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":
Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.
After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":
We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.
The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":
The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.
It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.
As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.
In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.
The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.
The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?
2
If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
Jan 8 at 18:17
add a comment |
This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":
Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.
After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":
We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.
The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":
The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.
It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.
As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.
In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.
The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.
The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?
This is almost certainly Arthur C. Clarke's "Superiority" (1951). It has been asked about on this site and successfully answered several times, for example at Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
The narrator of the story is highly-placed within the military command structure of the losing side. He describes several inventions that cause the high command to halt operations while they prepare to roll out a new superweapon. The first is a "Sphere of Annhiliation":
Norden proved his case less than a month later, when he demonstrated
the Sphere of Annihilation, which produced complete disintegration of
matter over a radius of several hundred meters. We were intoxicated by
the power of the new weapon, and were quite prepared to overlook one
fundamental defect - the fact that it was a sphere and hence destroyed
its rather complicated generating equipment at the instant of
formation. This meant, of course, that it could not be used on
warships but only on guided missiles, and a great program was started
to convert all homing torpedoes to carry the new weapon. For the time
being all further offensives were suspended.
After this comes the "Battle Analyzer":
We now know that Research had been working on the Battle Analyzer for
many years, but at the time it came as a revelation to us and perhaps
we were too easily swept off our feet. Norden's argument, also, was
seductively convincing. What did it matter, he said, if the enemy had
twice as many ships as we - if the efficiency of ours could be doubled
or even trebled? For decades the limiting factor in warfare had been
not mechanical but biological - it had become more and more difficult
for any single mind, or group of minds, to cope with the rapidly
changing complexities of battle in three-dimensional space. Norden's
mathematicians had analyzed some of the classic engagements of the
past, and had shown that even when we had been victorious we had often
operated our units at much less than half of their theoretical
efficiency.
The third and final innovation is the "Exponential Field":
The final weapon was something so fantastic that even now it seems
difficult to believe that it ever existed. Its innocent, noncommittal
name - The Exponential Field - gave no hint of its real
potentialities. Some of Norden's mathematicians had discovered it
during a piece of entirely theoretical research into the properties of
space, and to everyone's great surprise their results were found to be
physically realizable.
It seems very difficult to explain the operation of the Field to the
layman. According to the technical description, it "produces an
exponential condition of space, so that a finite distance in normal,
linear space may become infinite in pseudo-space." Norden gave an
analogy which some of us found useful. It was as if one took a flat
disk of rubber - representing a region of normal space - and then
pulled its center out to infinity. The circumference of the disk would
be unaltered - but its "diameter" would be infinite. That was the sort
of thing the generator of the Field did to the space around it.
As an example, suppose that a ship carrying the generator was
surrounded by a ring of hostile machines. If it switched on the Field,
each of the enemy ships would think that it - and the ships on the far
side of the circle - had suddenly receded into nothingness. Yet the
circumference of the circle would be the same as before: only the
journey to the center would be of infinite duration, for as one
proceeded, distances would appear to become greater and greater as the
"scale" of space altered.
In each case, the rush to deploy the new technology to the battlefield results in overlooked side effects and negative consequences. This, coupled with the fact that offensive operations are halted to prepare for each deployment, results in the enemy gaining the initiative and overwhelming them with "inferior" but far more plentiful ships and weapons.
The story can be read in its entirety online at Mayo Family.
The "asymptotic drive" that you mention in the question title is another fictional invention of Clarke's, from his novel Imperial Earth. It does not appear in this story, however. Possibly you read the novel and short story around the same time and your memory is conflating the two?
edited Jan 8 at 18:01
answered Jan 8 at 17:09
OtisOtis
5,8162360
5,8162360
2
If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
Jan 8 at 18:17
add a comment |
2
If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
Jan 8 at 18:17
2
2
If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
Jan 8 at 18:17
If this is the correct answer, querent, you can accept it by clicking on the checkmark by the voting buttons.
– FuzzyBoots
Jan 8 at 18:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f203028%2fscience-fiction-story-asymptotic-drive-the-empire-lost-out-to-low-tech-rebels-d%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Sounds like "Superiority" by Arthur C. Clarke, as described in this question: scifi.stackexchange.com/questions/857/…
– David
Jan 8 at 17:09
Possible duplicate of Process management and high technology weapon. Novel name and author?
– Neo Darwin
Jan 8 at 17:23
Not a dupe unless OP confirms
– amflare
Jan 8 at 17:50
1
Sounds almost like Star Wars.
– Mad Physicist
Jan 8 at 22:50