Reason for Index Fund and Index Disconnect
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.
Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?
stocks index-fund
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
add a comment |
My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.
Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?
stocks index-fund
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
add a comment |
My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.
Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?
stocks index-fund
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
My understanding of index funds like QQQ and SPY, is that they are built to mirror the index movements from which they are created. And as is typically the case, the index funds move with the index both in direction and magnitude. But there have been a number of times that the index and a corresponding index fund have moved quite differently. The most recent large difference that I noticed was a couple of days ago on the 24th of December where QQQ was down ~2% and the Nasdaq was down 5%.
Why was there such a difference in the movement of QQQ and Nasdaq in this case, and why does this occasionally happen?
stocks index-fund
stocks index-fund
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
asked Dec 27 '18 at 17:22
The NightmanThe Nightman
1084
1084
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.
Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.
The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
4
Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:02
He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:08
3
He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:10
1
Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
add a comment |
An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.
An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.
A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.
And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
Great answer, welcome!
– quid
Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103375%2freason-for-index-fund-and-index-disconnect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.
Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.
The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
4
Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:02
He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:08
3
He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:10
1
Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
add a comment |
From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.
Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.
The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
4
Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:02
He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:08
3
He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:10
1
Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
add a comment |
From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.
Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.
The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
From what I see, the NAZ composite was down 2.21% on 12/24 and the QQQ was down 2.76%.
Note that the QQQ is an ETF and it can trade at a premium or a discount due to excessive buying or selling pressure. Given that the market lost ~3% on 12/24, it's a likely culprit.
The other factor is that the QQQ went ex-div for $0.421 on 12/24 and the share holder will receive that on the Payable Date. When you figure that into the QQQ loss, it about halves the discrepancy.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
answered Dec 27 '18 at 17:58
Bob BaerkerBob Baerker
15.1k11948
15.1k11948
4
Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:02
He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:08
3
He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:10
1
Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
add a comment |
4
Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:02
He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:08
3
He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:10
1
Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
4
4
Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:02
Probably worth highlighting that there are two major Nasdaq indexes, the Nasdaq composite, and the Nasdaq-100. QQQ is based on the Nasdaq-100 (^NDX) which fell 2.43% on 12/24. So that reduces the discrepancy even further.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:02
He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:08
He said composite. I calculated composite. Good point about the N-100. When you factor in the dividend and compare, the discrepancy is about 5 basis points which isn't far from a rounding error :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:08
3
3
He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:10
He didn't say composite, neither by the word nor by its ticker. The only appearances of "composite" are in your answer and my comment.
– Ben Voigt
Dec 27 '18 at 19:10
1
1
Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
Sorry, my bad. I'm not multi-taking well today :->)
– Bob Baerker
Dec 27 '18 at 19:35
add a comment |
An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.
An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.
A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.
And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
Great answer, welcome!
– quid
Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
add a comment |
An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.
An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.
A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.
And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
Great answer, welcome!
– quid
Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
add a comment |
An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.
An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.
A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.
And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
An ETF is only somewhat open-ended in that shares are created or dissolved only on certain conditions of large orders. And so the ETF can trade at a premium or discount based on demand of the stock market.
An open-ended mutual fund trades only at net-asset-value and there is no premium or discount because shares are created or dissolved based on every transaction but accounted at the end of the day. The open-end mutual fund is ultimately only available from the investment company that created the fund. Now a stock broker can get an open-end mutual fund as an intermediary.
A closed-end mutual fund has a set number of shares that doesn't change except in some conditions of dividend re-investment. The closed-end mutual fund trades on the stock market and at a premium or discount to net-asset-value. Since a closed-end mutual fund does not face liquidation requirements then it can easily use more leverage and hedging or hold less liquid securities.
And so only an open-end mutual fund should exactly match an index that it is based on.
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
edited Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
answered Dec 27 '18 at 18:39
S SpringS Spring
3463
3463
Great answer, welcome!
– quid
Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
add a comment |
Great answer, welcome!
– quid
Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
Great answer, welcome!
– quid
Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
Great answer, welcome!
– quid
Dec 27 '18 at 18:41
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f103375%2freason-for-index-fund-and-index-disconnect%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown