Need a programmers advice on *X display manager, window manager and composit manager combination [closed]
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
First of all: I asked this question on SuperUser, when I wasn't thinking about a StackExchange Site for Linux-related questions. So if this violates any rules please feel free to close.
I have fought with myself whether or not i should ask this question but I find myself stuck and I need another expert opinion.
I can't seem find the right combination of display and window manager (and composit manager). I have tried some different combinations but most of them don't work for me. I have been working with Linux for a few years now and currently I'm running Gentoo with GDM, Openbox(stand alone, Gnome aware) and xcompmgr.
But I have tried Metacity, Awesome and Fluxbox with and without Compiz, but always with GDM.
What I want: A lightweight, HIGHLY configurable environment that doesn't rely on mouse-input too much (except for web browsing and image processing). At 95% I work programming or so with multiple consoles and desktops on multiple screens.
What makes me ask is that most lightweight environments seem somewhat "unfinished" and show unexpected behavior quite often and that doesn't make me feel too good as I want an environment thats stable.
And of course I want an environment which is not TOO ugly to look at as I use it at an average of 10 hours a day. :) Any thoughts? What do you use in a similar situation?
Thanks for any advice!
(At SuperUser I was told to try XFCE. I am doing that right now.)
Greetings
window-manager desktop-environment
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Jeff Schaller, msp9011, Thomas, Fabby Dec 28 '18 at 21:23
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
First of all: I asked this question on SuperUser, when I wasn't thinking about a StackExchange Site for Linux-related questions. So if this violates any rules please feel free to close.
I have fought with myself whether or not i should ask this question but I find myself stuck and I need another expert opinion.
I can't seem find the right combination of display and window manager (and composit manager). I have tried some different combinations but most of them don't work for me. I have been working with Linux for a few years now and currently I'm running Gentoo with GDM, Openbox(stand alone, Gnome aware) and xcompmgr.
But I have tried Metacity, Awesome and Fluxbox with and without Compiz, but always with GDM.
What I want: A lightweight, HIGHLY configurable environment that doesn't rely on mouse-input too much (except for web browsing and image processing). At 95% I work programming or so with multiple consoles and desktops on multiple screens.
What makes me ask is that most lightweight environments seem somewhat "unfinished" and show unexpected behavior quite often and that doesn't make me feel too good as I want an environment thats stable.
And of course I want an environment which is not TOO ugly to look at as I use it at an average of 10 hours a day. :) Any thoughts? What do you use in a similar situation?
Thanks for any advice!
(At SuperUser I was told to try XFCE. I am doing that right now.)
Greetings
window-manager desktop-environment
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Jeff Schaller, msp9011, Thomas, Fabby Dec 28 '18 at 21:23
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
I'll give you the same advice here. ;-)
– Keith
Jan 4 '11 at 2:19
:-D Hey Keith. So far I like your advice..
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 2:37
I'm using openbox and xcompmgr too... and its awesome... You might try blackbox?
– Stefan
Jan 4 '11 at 8:22
The last stable Blackbox-Release was 5 years ago, that discourages me somehow... :/
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:09
add a comment |
First of all: I asked this question on SuperUser, when I wasn't thinking about a StackExchange Site for Linux-related questions. So if this violates any rules please feel free to close.
I have fought with myself whether or not i should ask this question but I find myself stuck and I need another expert opinion.
I can't seem find the right combination of display and window manager (and composit manager). I have tried some different combinations but most of them don't work for me. I have been working with Linux for a few years now and currently I'm running Gentoo with GDM, Openbox(stand alone, Gnome aware) and xcompmgr.
But I have tried Metacity, Awesome and Fluxbox with and without Compiz, but always with GDM.
What I want: A lightweight, HIGHLY configurable environment that doesn't rely on mouse-input too much (except for web browsing and image processing). At 95% I work programming or so with multiple consoles and desktops on multiple screens.
What makes me ask is that most lightweight environments seem somewhat "unfinished" and show unexpected behavior quite often and that doesn't make me feel too good as I want an environment thats stable.
And of course I want an environment which is not TOO ugly to look at as I use it at an average of 10 hours a day. :) Any thoughts? What do you use in a similar situation?
Thanks for any advice!
(At SuperUser I was told to try XFCE. I am doing that right now.)
Greetings
window-manager desktop-environment
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
First of all: I asked this question on SuperUser, when I wasn't thinking about a StackExchange Site for Linux-related questions. So if this violates any rules please feel free to close.
I have fought with myself whether or not i should ask this question but I find myself stuck and I need another expert opinion.
I can't seem find the right combination of display and window manager (and composit manager). I have tried some different combinations but most of them don't work for me. I have been working with Linux for a few years now and currently I'm running Gentoo with GDM, Openbox(stand alone, Gnome aware) and xcompmgr.
But I have tried Metacity, Awesome and Fluxbox with and without Compiz, but always with GDM.
What I want: A lightweight, HIGHLY configurable environment that doesn't rely on mouse-input too much (except for web browsing and image processing). At 95% I work programming or so with multiple consoles and desktops on multiple screens.
What makes me ask is that most lightweight environments seem somewhat "unfinished" and show unexpected behavior quite often and that doesn't make me feel too good as I want an environment thats stable.
And of course I want an environment which is not TOO ugly to look at as I use it at an average of 10 hours a day. :) Any thoughts? What do you use in a similar situation?
Thanks for any advice!
(At SuperUser I was told to try XFCE. I am doing that right now.)
Greetings
window-manager desktop-environment
window-manager desktop-environment
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
asked Jan 4 '11 at 1:26
fakemustachefakemustache
1436
1436
closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Jeff Schaller, msp9011, Thomas, Fabby Dec 28 '18 at 21:23
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as primarily opinion-based by Thomas Dickey, Jeff Schaller, msp9011, Thomas, Fabby Dec 28 '18 at 21:23
Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
I'll give you the same advice here. ;-)
– Keith
Jan 4 '11 at 2:19
:-D Hey Keith. So far I like your advice..
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 2:37
I'm using openbox and xcompmgr too... and its awesome... You might try blackbox?
– Stefan
Jan 4 '11 at 8:22
The last stable Blackbox-Release was 5 years ago, that discourages me somehow... :/
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:09
add a comment |
I'll give you the same advice here. ;-)
– Keith
Jan 4 '11 at 2:19
:-D Hey Keith. So far I like your advice..
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 2:37
I'm using openbox and xcompmgr too... and its awesome... You might try blackbox?
– Stefan
Jan 4 '11 at 8:22
The last stable Blackbox-Release was 5 years ago, that discourages me somehow... :/
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:09
I'll give you the same advice here. ;-)
– Keith
Jan 4 '11 at 2:19
I'll give you the same advice here. ;-)
– Keith
Jan 4 '11 at 2:19
:-D Hey Keith. So far I like your advice..
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 2:37
:-D Hey Keith. So far I like your advice..
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 2:37
I'm using openbox and xcompmgr too... and its awesome... You might try blackbox?
– Stefan
Jan 4 '11 at 8:22
I'm using openbox and xcompmgr too... and its awesome... You might try blackbox?
– Stefan
Jan 4 '11 at 8:22
The last stable Blackbox-Release was 5 years ago, that discourages me somehow... :/
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:09
The last stable Blackbox-Release was 5 years ago, that discourages me somehow... :/
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:09
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
If you want to go mouseless, you should try a tilling wm. Personally, my favorite is Awesome, but there are plenty in that Question.
As for a composite manager, xcompmgr has already been mentioned, but Cairo Composite Manager (CCM) seems nice too, although I find it less stable still. As always, YMMV.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
I tried Awesome and I must say I quite liked it at first, but then I had massive problems implementing some widgets (I guess the reason for that is that my Lua skills are basic at best...)
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
@fakemustache: have you tried the existing widget libraries like Vicious and Obvious? They have plenty of stuff ready to use, and reading their source is very educational. Bashets is a good one too, since it lets you use the output of shell scripts in text boxes. See the Awesome wiki for more: awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Main_Page#Statusbars_and_widgets
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 5:19
Yes I did, but it just kept crashing.. I spent hours on starring at the library code and my rc.lua, trying to figure out what went wrong. But I guess I will give it another try, and if it's just for the challenge ;)) I guess if it runs, Awesome might just be what I'm looking for in the end..
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:40
1
@fakemustache: try joining #awesome at irc.oftc.net. Plenty of helpful people, including the main developers. They also share their rc.lua for reference.
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 13:25
add a comment |
I know many people use XMonad. It is highly configurable and scriptable, it integrates with GNOME etc. The only 'disadvantage' is that it uses Haskell, a beatyful but not so popular purly functional language.
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
How awesome is this? :D I LOVE lambda calculus.. Will definitely try it out.. +1 as soon as I'm able to vote ;))
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:13
I love Haskell. I've planned part migration on some of my set up's. BTW - how can you comment (which require 50 of reputation according to FAQ) but not vote (which requires 15 according to same FAQ)?
– Maciej Piechotka
Jan 4 '11 at 13:53
1
I /think/ you can comment on your own question and its answers even without the 50 rep.
– André Paramés
Jan 4 '11 at 14:08
add a comment |
If you already are used to GNU Emacs, EXWM allows you to use Emacs as a tiling window manager by making windows into Emacs buffers. Since it is just a plugin for Emacs, it uses Emacs' existing configuration system and keyboard shortcuts. I've been using it on slim desktop manager with no compositing manager at all, and it works pretty well.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
If you want to go mouseless, you should try a tilling wm. Personally, my favorite is Awesome, but there are plenty in that Question.
As for a composite manager, xcompmgr has already been mentioned, but Cairo Composite Manager (CCM) seems nice too, although I find it less stable still. As always, YMMV.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
I tried Awesome and I must say I quite liked it at first, but then I had massive problems implementing some widgets (I guess the reason for that is that my Lua skills are basic at best...)
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
@fakemustache: have you tried the existing widget libraries like Vicious and Obvious? They have plenty of stuff ready to use, and reading their source is very educational. Bashets is a good one too, since it lets you use the output of shell scripts in text boxes. See the Awesome wiki for more: awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Main_Page#Statusbars_and_widgets
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 5:19
Yes I did, but it just kept crashing.. I spent hours on starring at the library code and my rc.lua, trying to figure out what went wrong. But I guess I will give it another try, and if it's just for the challenge ;)) I guess if it runs, Awesome might just be what I'm looking for in the end..
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:40
1
@fakemustache: try joining #awesome at irc.oftc.net. Plenty of helpful people, including the main developers. They also share their rc.lua for reference.
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 13:25
add a comment |
If you want to go mouseless, you should try a tilling wm. Personally, my favorite is Awesome, but there are plenty in that Question.
As for a composite manager, xcompmgr has already been mentioned, but Cairo Composite Manager (CCM) seems nice too, although I find it less stable still. As always, YMMV.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
I tried Awesome and I must say I quite liked it at first, but then I had massive problems implementing some widgets (I guess the reason for that is that my Lua skills are basic at best...)
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
@fakemustache: have you tried the existing widget libraries like Vicious and Obvious? They have plenty of stuff ready to use, and reading their source is very educational. Bashets is a good one too, since it lets you use the output of shell scripts in text boxes. See the Awesome wiki for more: awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Main_Page#Statusbars_and_widgets
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 5:19
Yes I did, but it just kept crashing.. I spent hours on starring at the library code and my rc.lua, trying to figure out what went wrong. But I guess I will give it another try, and if it's just for the challenge ;)) I guess if it runs, Awesome might just be what I'm looking for in the end..
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:40
1
@fakemustache: try joining #awesome at irc.oftc.net. Plenty of helpful people, including the main developers. They also share their rc.lua for reference.
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 13:25
add a comment |
If you want to go mouseless, you should try a tilling wm. Personally, my favorite is Awesome, but there are plenty in that Question.
As for a composite manager, xcompmgr has already been mentioned, but Cairo Composite Manager (CCM) seems nice too, although I find it less stable still. As always, YMMV.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
If you want to go mouseless, you should try a tilling wm. Personally, my favorite is Awesome, but there are plenty in that Question.
As for a composite manager, xcompmgr has already been mentioned, but Cairo Composite Manager (CCM) seems nice too, although I find it less stable still. As always, YMMV.
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
1
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
answered Jan 4 '11 at 14:07
André ParamésAndré Paramés
732311
732311
I tried Awesome and I must say I quite liked it at first, but then I had massive problems implementing some widgets (I guess the reason for that is that my Lua skills are basic at best...)
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
@fakemustache: have you tried the existing widget libraries like Vicious and Obvious? They have plenty of stuff ready to use, and reading their source is very educational. Bashets is a good one too, since it lets you use the output of shell scripts in text boxes. See the Awesome wiki for more: awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Main_Page#Statusbars_and_widgets
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 5:19
Yes I did, but it just kept crashing.. I spent hours on starring at the library code and my rc.lua, trying to figure out what went wrong. But I guess I will give it another try, and if it's just for the challenge ;)) I guess if it runs, Awesome might just be what I'm looking for in the end..
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:40
1
@fakemustache: try joining #awesome at irc.oftc.net. Plenty of helpful people, including the main developers. They also share their rc.lua for reference.
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 13:25
add a comment |
I tried Awesome and I must say I quite liked it at first, but then I had massive problems implementing some widgets (I guess the reason for that is that my Lua skills are basic at best...)
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
@fakemustache: have you tried the existing widget libraries like Vicious and Obvious? They have plenty of stuff ready to use, and reading their source is very educational. Bashets is a good one too, since it lets you use the output of shell scripts in text boxes. See the Awesome wiki for more: awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Main_Page#Statusbars_and_widgets
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 5:19
Yes I did, but it just kept crashing.. I spent hours on starring at the library code and my rc.lua, trying to figure out what went wrong. But I guess I will give it another try, and if it's just for the challenge ;)) I guess if it runs, Awesome might just be what I'm looking for in the end..
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:40
1
@fakemustache: try joining #awesome at irc.oftc.net. Plenty of helpful people, including the main developers. They also share their rc.lua for reference.
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 13:25
I tried Awesome and I must say I quite liked it at first, but then I had massive problems implementing some widgets (I guess the reason for that is that my Lua skills are basic at best...)
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
I tried Awesome and I must say I quite liked it at first, but then I had massive problems implementing some widgets (I guess the reason for that is that my Lua skills are basic at best...)
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:00
@fakemustache: have you tried the existing widget libraries like Vicious and Obvious? They have plenty of stuff ready to use, and reading their source is very educational. Bashets is a good one too, since it lets you use the output of shell scripts in text boxes. See the Awesome wiki for more: awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Main_Page#Statusbars_and_widgets
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 5:19
@fakemustache: have you tried the existing widget libraries like Vicious and Obvious? They have plenty of stuff ready to use, and reading their source is very educational. Bashets is a good one too, since it lets you use the output of shell scripts in text boxes. See the Awesome wiki for more: awesome.naquadah.org/wiki/Main_Page#Statusbars_and_widgets
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 5:19
Yes I did, but it just kept crashing.. I spent hours on starring at the library code and my rc.lua, trying to figure out what went wrong. But I guess I will give it another try, and if it's just for the challenge ;)) I guess if it runs, Awesome might just be what I'm looking for in the end..
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:40
Yes I did, but it just kept crashing.. I spent hours on starring at the library code and my rc.lua, trying to figure out what went wrong. But I guess I will give it another try, and if it's just for the challenge ;)) I guess if it runs, Awesome might just be what I'm looking for in the end..
– fakemustache
Jan 6 '11 at 5:40
1
1
@fakemustache: try joining #awesome at irc.oftc.net. Plenty of helpful people, including the main developers. They also share their rc.lua for reference.
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 13:25
@fakemustache: try joining #awesome at irc.oftc.net. Plenty of helpful people, including the main developers. They also share their rc.lua for reference.
– André Paramés
Jan 6 '11 at 13:25
add a comment |
I know many people use XMonad. It is highly configurable and scriptable, it integrates with GNOME etc. The only 'disadvantage' is that it uses Haskell, a beatyful but not so popular purly functional language.
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
How awesome is this? :D I LOVE lambda calculus.. Will definitely try it out.. +1 as soon as I'm able to vote ;))
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:13
I love Haskell. I've planned part migration on some of my set up's. BTW - how can you comment (which require 50 of reputation according to FAQ) but not vote (which requires 15 according to same FAQ)?
– Maciej Piechotka
Jan 4 '11 at 13:53
1
I /think/ you can comment on your own question and its answers even without the 50 rep.
– André Paramés
Jan 4 '11 at 14:08
add a comment |
I know many people use XMonad. It is highly configurable and scriptable, it integrates with GNOME etc. The only 'disadvantage' is that it uses Haskell, a beatyful but not so popular purly functional language.
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
How awesome is this? :D I LOVE lambda calculus.. Will definitely try it out.. +1 as soon as I'm able to vote ;))
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:13
I love Haskell. I've planned part migration on some of my set up's. BTW - how can you comment (which require 50 of reputation according to FAQ) but not vote (which requires 15 according to same FAQ)?
– Maciej Piechotka
Jan 4 '11 at 13:53
1
I /think/ you can comment on your own question and its answers even without the 50 rep.
– André Paramés
Jan 4 '11 at 14:08
add a comment |
I know many people use XMonad. It is highly configurable and scriptable, it integrates with GNOME etc. The only 'disadvantage' is that it uses Haskell, a beatyful but not so popular purly functional language.
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
I know many people use XMonad. It is highly configurable and scriptable, it integrates with GNOME etc. The only 'disadvantage' is that it uses Haskell, a beatyful but not so popular purly functional language.
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
answered Jan 4 '11 at 12:52
Maciej PiechotkaMaciej Piechotka
11.2k64278
11.2k64278
How awesome is this? :D I LOVE lambda calculus.. Will definitely try it out.. +1 as soon as I'm able to vote ;))
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:13
I love Haskell. I've planned part migration on some of my set up's. BTW - how can you comment (which require 50 of reputation according to FAQ) but not vote (which requires 15 according to same FAQ)?
– Maciej Piechotka
Jan 4 '11 at 13:53
1
I /think/ you can comment on your own question and its answers even without the 50 rep.
– André Paramés
Jan 4 '11 at 14:08
add a comment |
How awesome is this? :D I LOVE lambda calculus.. Will definitely try it out.. +1 as soon as I'm able to vote ;))
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:13
I love Haskell. I've planned part migration on some of my set up's. BTW - how can you comment (which require 50 of reputation according to FAQ) but not vote (which requires 15 according to same FAQ)?
– Maciej Piechotka
Jan 4 '11 at 13:53
1
I /think/ you can comment on your own question and its answers even without the 50 rep.
– André Paramés
Jan 4 '11 at 14:08
How awesome is this? :D I LOVE lambda calculus.. Will definitely try it out.. +1 as soon as I'm able to vote ;))
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:13
How awesome is this? :D I LOVE lambda calculus.. Will definitely try it out.. +1 as soon as I'm able to vote ;))
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:13
I love Haskell. I've planned part migration on some of my set up's. BTW - how can you comment (which require 50 of reputation according to FAQ) but not vote (which requires 15 according to same FAQ)?
– Maciej Piechotka
Jan 4 '11 at 13:53
I love Haskell. I've planned part migration on some of my set up's. BTW - how can you comment (which require 50 of reputation according to FAQ) but not vote (which requires 15 according to same FAQ)?
– Maciej Piechotka
Jan 4 '11 at 13:53
1
1
I /think/ you can comment on your own question and its answers even without the 50 rep.
– André Paramés
Jan 4 '11 at 14:08
I /think/ you can comment on your own question and its answers even without the 50 rep.
– André Paramés
Jan 4 '11 at 14:08
add a comment |
If you already are used to GNU Emacs, EXWM allows you to use Emacs as a tiling window manager by making windows into Emacs buffers. Since it is just a plugin for Emacs, it uses Emacs' existing configuration system and keyboard shortcuts. I've been using it on slim desktop manager with no compositing manager at all, and it works pretty well.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
add a comment |
If you already are used to GNU Emacs, EXWM allows you to use Emacs as a tiling window manager by making windows into Emacs buffers. Since it is just a plugin for Emacs, it uses Emacs' existing configuration system and keyboard shortcuts. I've been using it on slim desktop manager with no compositing manager at all, and it works pretty well.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
add a comment |
If you already are used to GNU Emacs, EXWM allows you to use Emacs as a tiling window manager by making windows into Emacs buffers. Since it is just a plugin for Emacs, it uses Emacs' existing configuration system and keyboard shortcuts. I've been using it on slim desktop manager with no compositing manager at all, and it works pretty well.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
If you already are used to GNU Emacs, EXWM allows you to use Emacs as a tiling window manager by making windows into Emacs buffers. Since it is just a plugin for Emacs, it uses Emacs' existing configuration system and keyboard shortcuts. I've been using it on slim desktop manager with no compositing manager at all, and it works pretty well.
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
answered Dec 28 '18 at 1:29
guestguest
1
1
add a comment |
add a comment |
I'll give you the same advice here. ;-)
– Keith
Jan 4 '11 at 2:19
:-D Hey Keith. So far I like your advice..
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 2:37
I'm using openbox and xcompmgr too... and its awesome... You might try blackbox?
– Stefan
Jan 4 '11 at 8:22
The last stable Blackbox-Release was 5 years ago, that discourages me somehow... :/
– fakemustache
Jan 4 '11 at 13:09