A strange computer programming language
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
Here is a list of rational numbers:
$frac2221, frac711, frac137, frac5165, frac1317, frac113, frac152, frac71$
This list is actually a computer program! It takes an integer as its input, and outputs a sequence of integers. The way it executes is as follows:
Find the first fraction on the list that, when multiplied to the input, produces an integer. That integer is output. The process is then repeated using that integer as the new input.
For example, if the program is run with input $2$, then the output will be the sequence $15, 105, 110, 70, 130, ...$.
When given $2$ as its input, what does this program do?
More specifically, when it produces an integer of the form $2^a 3^b$, what can you say about $a$ and $b$?
Source:
This puzzle is mostly an excuse to show this esoteric, Turing-complete programming language that few people have heard of. I wrote the simple program used in this puzzle myself. The programming language is called FRACTRAN, and it was invented by John Horton Conway.
mathematics computer-science
add a comment |
Here is a list of rational numbers:
$frac2221, frac711, frac137, frac5165, frac1317, frac113, frac152, frac71$
This list is actually a computer program! It takes an integer as its input, and outputs a sequence of integers. The way it executes is as follows:
Find the first fraction on the list that, when multiplied to the input, produces an integer. That integer is output. The process is then repeated using that integer as the new input.
For example, if the program is run with input $2$, then the output will be the sequence $15, 105, 110, 70, 130, ...$.
When given $2$ as its input, what does this program do?
More specifically, when it produces an integer of the form $2^a 3^b$, what can you say about $a$ and $b$?
Source:
This puzzle is mostly an excuse to show this esoteric, Turing-complete programming language that few people have heard of. I wrote the simple program used in this puzzle myself. The programming language is called FRACTRAN, and it was invented by John Horton Conway.
mathematics computer-science
add a comment |
Here is a list of rational numbers:
$frac2221, frac711, frac137, frac5165, frac1317, frac113, frac152, frac71$
This list is actually a computer program! It takes an integer as its input, and outputs a sequence of integers. The way it executes is as follows:
Find the first fraction on the list that, when multiplied to the input, produces an integer. That integer is output. The process is then repeated using that integer as the new input.
For example, if the program is run with input $2$, then the output will be the sequence $15, 105, 110, 70, 130, ...$.
When given $2$ as its input, what does this program do?
More specifically, when it produces an integer of the form $2^a 3^b$, what can you say about $a$ and $b$?
Source:
This puzzle is mostly an excuse to show this esoteric, Turing-complete programming language that few people have heard of. I wrote the simple program used in this puzzle myself. The programming language is called FRACTRAN, and it was invented by John Horton Conway.
mathematics computer-science
Here is a list of rational numbers:
$frac2221, frac711, frac137, frac5165, frac1317, frac113, frac152, frac71$
This list is actually a computer program! It takes an integer as its input, and outputs a sequence of integers. The way it executes is as follows:
Find the first fraction on the list that, when multiplied to the input, produces an integer. That integer is output. The process is then repeated using that integer as the new input.
For example, if the program is run with input $2$, then the output will be the sequence $15, 105, 110, 70, 130, ...$.
When given $2$ as its input, what does this program do?
More specifically, when it produces an integer of the form $2^a 3^b$, what can you say about $a$ and $b$?
Source:
This puzzle is mostly an excuse to show this esoteric, Turing-complete programming language that few people have heard of. I wrote the simple program used in this puzzle myself. The programming language is called FRACTRAN, and it was invented by John Horton Conway.
mathematics computer-science
mathematics computer-science
edited Dec 28 '18 at 10:27
Jaap Scherphuis
asked Dec 28 '18 at 8:14
Jaap ScherphuisJaap Scherphuis
14.8k12565
14.8k12565
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
First, let's change our interpretation of the rational numbers as
Translating some (power of) prime factors from the input to another (power of) prime factors:
$[1]~3,7 rightarrow 2,11$
$[2]~11 rightarrow 7$
$[3]~7 rightarrow 13$
$[4]~5,13 rightarrow 3,17$
$[5]~17 rightarrow 13$
$[6]~13 rightarrow .$
$[7]~2 rightarrow 3,5$
$[8]~. rightarrow 7$
As you may see, if we start with $2^a3^b$
We will always go to $[7]$, translating all $2$ to $3$ and $5$, until there is no $2$ left and we will get $3^a+b5^a$.
Next
We will go to $[8]$ to receive a "token" of $7$.
What's so special about it?
It can be used for $[1]-[3]$.
$[1]$ require the token and a prime factor $3$, generate $2$ and new token $11$.
On $[2]$ the new token will be replaced to original token $7$, so it will go back to $[1]$ until...
There is no $3$ left, and we will go to $[3]$, replace the token to another token of $13$.
Here, we will get
$2^a+b5^a13$, the $3$ were all translated to $2$.
The next part is actually
The same. $[4]-[6]$ is similar with $[1]-[3]$ except it translated $5$ to $3$, and the token will be dissapeared.
Leaving the "final" number
$2^a+b3^a$
Hence
If we let $a$ being the power of $2$ and $b$ being the power of $3$, we will transform $(a,b)$ to $(a+b,a)$. The first number will go to second one, and the sum of them will go to the first one.
This is actually a Fibonacci series with given $(F_n,F_n-1)$ which will be translated to $(F_n+1,F_n)$
add a comment |
It looks like the program calculates
the Fibonacci sequence.
Specifically, the $n$-th time the output sequence is of the form $2^a3^b$,
$a = F_n+1$, $b = F_n$
(the input, 2, counts as $n=0$)
The first few outputs are:
2, 15, 105, 110, 70, 130, 102, 78, 6, 45, 315, 330, 210, 220, 140, 260, 204, 156, 12, ..., 72 (33th output), ..., 864 (55th output), ...
How it does this is a mystery to me ...
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f77882%2fa-strange-computer-programming-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
First, let's change our interpretation of the rational numbers as
Translating some (power of) prime factors from the input to another (power of) prime factors:
$[1]~3,7 rightarrow 2,11$
$[2]~11 rightarrow 7$
$[3]~7 rightarrow 13$
$[4]~5,13 rightarrow 3,17$
$[5]~17 rightarrow 13$
$[6]~13 rightarrow .$
$[7]~2 rightarrow 3,5$
$[8]~. rightarrow 7$
As you may see, if we start with $2^a3^b$
We will always go to $[7]$, translating all $2$ to $3$ and $5$, until there is no $2$ left and we will get $3^a+b5^a$.
Next
We will go to $[8]$ to receive a "token" of $7$.
What's so special about it?
It can be used for $[1]-[3]$.
$[1]$ require the token and a prime factor $3$, generate $2$ and new token $11$.
On $[2]$ the new token will be replaced to original token $7$, so it will go back to $[1]$ until...
There is no $3$ left, and we will go to $[3]$, replace the token to another token of $13$.
Here, we will get
$2^a+b5^a13$, the $3$ were all translated to $2$.
The next part is actually
The same. $[4]-[6]$ is similar with $[1]-[3]$ except it translated $5$ to $3$, and the token will be dissapeared.
Leaving the "final" number
$2^a+b3^a$
Hence
If we let $a$ being the power of $2$ and $b$ being the power of $3$, we will transform $(a,b)$ to $(a+b,a)$. The first number will go to second one, and the sum of them will go to the first one.
This is actually a Fibonacci series with given $(F_n,F_n-1)$ which will be translated to $(F_n+1,F_n)$
add a comment |
First, let's change our interpretation of the rational numbers as
Translating some (power of) prime factors from the input to another (power of) prime factors:
$[1]~3,7 rightarrow 2,11$
$[2]~11 rightarrow 7$
$[3]~7 rightarrow 13$
$[4]~5,13 rightarrow 3,17$
$[5]~17 rightarrow 13$
$[6]~13 rightarrow .$
$[7]~2 rightarrow 3,5$
$[8]~. rightarrow 7$
As you may see, if we start with $2^a3^b$
We will always go to $[7]$, translating all $2$ to $3$ and $5$, until there is no $2$ left and we will get $3^a+b5^a$.
Next
We will go to $[8]$ to receive a "token" of $7$.
What's so special about it?
It can be used for $[1]-[3]$.
$[1]$ require the token and a prime factor $3$, generate $2$ and new token $11$.
On $[2]$ the new token will be replaced to original token $7$, so it will go back to $[1]$ until...
There is no $3$ left, and we will go to $[3]$, replace the token to another token of $13$.
Here, we will get
$2^a+b5^a13$, the $3$ were all translated to $2$.
The next part is actually
The same. $[4]-[6]$ is similar with $[1]-[3]$ except it translated $5$ to $3$, and the token will be dissapeared.
Leaving the "final" number
$2^a+b3^a$
Hence
If we let $a$ being the power of $2$ and $b$ being the power of $3$, we will transform $(a,b)$ to $(a+b,a)$. The first number will go to second one, and the sum of them will go to the first one.
This is actually a Fibonacci series with given $(F_n,F_n-1)$ which will be translated to $(F_n+1,F_n)$
add a comment |
First, let's change our interpretation of the rational numbers as
Translating some (power of) prime factors from the input to another (power of) prime factors:
$[1]~3,7 rightarrow 2,11$
$[2]~11 rightarrow 7$
$[3]~7 rightarrow 13$
$[4]~5,13 rightarrow 3,17$
$[5]~17 rightarrow 13$
$[6]~13 rightarrow .$
$[7]~2 rightarrow 3,5$
$[8]~. rightarrow 7$
As you may see, if we start with $2^a3^b$
We will always go to $[7]$, translating all $2$ to $3$ and $5$, until there is no $2$ left and we will get $3^a+b5^a$.
Next
We will go to $[8]$ to receive a "token" of $7$.
What's so special about it?
It can be used for $[1]-[3]$.
$[1]$ require the token and a prime factor $3$, generate $2$ and new token $11$.
On $[2]$ the new token will be replaced to original token $7$, so it will go back to $[1]$ until...
There is no $3$ left, and we will go to $[3]$, replace the token to another token of $13$.
Here, we will get
$2^a+b5^a13$, the $3$ were all translated to $2$.
The next part is actually
The same. $[4]-[6]$ is similar with $[1]-[3]$ except it translated $5$ to $3$, and the token will be dissapeared.
Leaving the "final" number
$2^a+b3^a$
Hence
If we let $a$ being the power of $2$ and $b$ being the power of $3$, we will transform $(a,b)$ to $(a+b,a)$. The first number will go to second one, and the sum of them will go to the first one.
This is actually a Fibonacci series with given $(F_n,F_n-1)$ which will be translated to $(F_n+1,F_n)$
First, let's change our interpretation of the rational numbers as
Translating some (power of) prime factors from the input to another (power of) prime factors:
$[1]~3,7 rightarrow 2,11$
$[2]~11 rightarrow 7$
$[3]~7 rightarrow 13$
$[4]~5,13 rightarrow 3,17$
$[5]~17 rightarrow 13$
$[6]~13 rightarrow .$
$[7]~2 rightarrow 3,5$
$[8]~. rightarrow 7$
As you may see, if we start with $2^a3^b$
We will always go to $[7]$, translating all $2$ to $3$ and $5$, until there is no $2$ left and we will get $3^a+b5^a$.
Next
We will go to $[8]$ to receive a "token" of $7$.
What's so special about it?
It can be used for $[1]-[3]$.
$[1]$ require the token and a prime factor $3$, generate $2$ and new token $11$.
On $[2]$ the new token will be replaced to original token $7$, so it will go back to $[1]$ until...
There is no $3$ left, and we will go to $[3]$, replace the token to another token of $13$.
Here, we will get
$2^a+b5^a13$, the $3$ were all translated to $2$.
The next part is actually
The same. $[4]-[6]$ is similar with $[1]-[3]$ except it translated $5$ to $3$, and the token will be dissapeared.
Leaving the "final" number
$2^a+b3^a$
Hence
If we let $a$ being the power of $2$ and $b$ being the power of $3$, we will transform $(a,b)$ to $(a+b,a)$. The first number will go to second one, and the sum of them will go to the first one.
This is actually a Fibonacci series with given $(F_n,F_n-1)$ which will be translated to $(F_n+1,F_n)$
edited Dec 28 '18 at 10:40
Jaap Scherphuis
14.8k12565
14.8k12565
answered Dec 28 '18 at 10:15
athinathin
7,28412468
7,28412468
add a comment |
add a comment |
It looks like the program calculates
the Fibonacci sequence.
Specifically, the $n$-th time the output sequence is of the form $2^a3^b$,
$a = F_n+1$, $b = F_n$
(the input, 2, counts as $n=0$)
The first few outputs are:
2, 15, 105, 110, 70, 130, 102, 78, 6, 45, 315, 330, 210, 220, 140, 260, 204, 156, 12, ..., 72 (33th output), ..., 864 (55th output), ...
How it does this is a mystery to me ...
add a comment |
It looks like the program calculates
the Fibonacci sequence.
Specifically, the $n$-th time the output sequence is of the form $2^a3^b$,
$a = F_n+1$, $b = F_n$
(the input, 2, counts as $n=0$)
The first few outputs are:
2, 15, 105, 110, 70, 130, 102, 78, 6, 45, 315, 330, 210, 220, 140, 260, 204, 156, 12, ..., 72 (33th output), ..., 864 (55th output), ...
How it does this is a mystery to me ...
add a comment |
It looks like the program calculates
the Fibonacci sequence.
Specifically, the $n$-th time the output sequence is of the form $2^a3^b$,
$a = F_n+1$, $b = F_n$
(the input, 2, counts as $n=0$)
The first few outputs are:
2, 15, 105, 110, 70, 130, 102, 78, 6, 45, 315, 330, 210, 220, 140, 260, 204, 156, 12, ..., 72 (33th output), ..., 864 (55th output), ...
How it does this is a mystery to me ...
It looks like the program calculates
the Fibonacci sequence.
Specifically, the $n$-th time the output sequence is of the form $2^a3^b$,
$a = F_n+1$, $b = F_n$
(the input, 2, counts as $n=0$)
The first few outputs are:
2, 15, 105, 110, 70, 130, 102, 78, 6, 45, 315, 330, 210, 220, 140, 260, 204, 156, 12, ..., 72 (33th output), ..., 864 (55th output), ...
How it does this is a mystery to me ...
edited Dec 28 '18 at 10:10
answered Dec 28 '18 at 9:56
GlorfindelGlorfindel
13.5k34983
13.5k34983
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f77882%2fa-strange-computer-programming-language%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown