Proving that $f(z;sigma)=sum_kinBbb Zfrac1sqrt2pi, sigmarm e^-frac(z-k)^22sigma^2$ converges to $1$ as $sigmatoinfty$

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP












7














I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_k in mathbbZ frac1sqrt2 pi , sigma textrme^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2$$



It appears that
$$lim_sigma rightarrow infty f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.



Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.



Sum of Gaussian functions










share|cite|improve this question























  • I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 13 at 6:22
















7














I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_k in mathbbZ frac1sqrt2 pi , sigma textrme^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2$$



It appears that
$$lim_sigma rightarrow infty f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.



Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.



Sum of Gaussian functions










share|cite|improve this question























  • I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 13 at 6:22














7












7








7


0





I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_k in mathbbZ frac1sqrt2 pi , sigma textrme^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2$$



It appears that
$$lim_sigma rightarrow infty f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.



Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.



Sum of Gaussian functions










share|cite|improve this question















I have an application where I get following function as a result:
$$f(z;sigma) = sum_k in mathbbZ frac1sqrt2 pi , sigma textrme^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2$$



It appears that
$$lim_sigma rightarrow infty f(z;sigma) = 1$$
but I can't currently find a way to prove this.



Is this property of the sum true, and if it is, why? Any references would be greatly appreciated.



Sum of Gaussian functions







sequences-and-series exponential-function






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Dec 13 at 10:34









Asaf Karagila

301k32422755




301k32422755










asked Dec 13 at 6:09









Arnfinn

1364




1364











  • I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 13 at 6:22

















  • I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
    – Kavi Rama Murthy
    Dec 13 at 6:22
















I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 at 6:22





I think this is an (almost) immediate consequence of Poisson Summation Formula. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_summation_formula
– Kavi Rama Murthy
Dec 13 at 6:22











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:



Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,0)dz=1$$
When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,infty)dz=int_-0.5^0.5Cdz=C=1$$






share|cite|improve this answer




























    4














    Hint. Consider the gaussian function $g(w)=frace^-fracw^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma $.
    Then
    $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma -frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)leq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
    where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbbZ$ under the graph of $g$.



    In a similar way we have that
    $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma +frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =2g(0)+sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)\geq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
    where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $g$.






    share|cite|improve this answer






























      2














      As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
      $$
      sum_kin mathbbZ f(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ hatf(j)e^2pi ijx,quad forall xin mathbbR
      $$
      for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hatf$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbbR$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac1sqrt2pisigmae^-fracx^22sigma^2= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac1alpha^frac1sg(fracxalpha)$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
      $$
      widehatf_sigma(xi) =widehatD^1_sigma f_1(xi) = D^infty_1/sigmawidehatf_1(xi)=e^-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2,quadforall xiinmathbbR.
      $$
      Hence the given sum is
      $$
      sum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ widehatf_sigma(j)e^2pi ijx=sum_jinmathbbZ e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx = 1+sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx.
      $$
      For $sigma>1$, we have
      $$
      |e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx|leq e^-2pi^2j^2 in l^1(mathbbZ).
      $$
      Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
      $$
      sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx to 0,
      $$
      and as a result
      $$
      lim_sigmatoinftysum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbbR.
      $$






      share|cite|improve this answer




















        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037664%2fproving-that-fz-sigma-sum-k-in-bbb-z-frac1-sqrt2-pi-sigma-rm-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes








        3 Answers
        3






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        4














        While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:



        Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,0)dz=1$$
        When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,infty)dz=int_-0.5^0.5Cdz=C=1$$






        share|cite|improve this answer

























          4














          While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:



          Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,0)dz=1$$
          When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,infty)dz=int_-0.5^0.5Cdz=C=1$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            4












            4








            4






            While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:



            Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,0)dz=1$$
            When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,infty)dz=int_-0.5^0.5Cdz=C=1$$






            share|cite|improve this answer












            While other people gave you mathematically rigorous solution, here is a more intuitive one:



            Let's go in the other limit, $sigmato 0$. Then what you have is a sum of delta functions at each integer. Let's calculate the area between half integers: $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,0)dz=1$$
            When you increase $sigma$, similar to melting peaks, some of the area will "flow out" from the central delta function into the adjacent intervals. But an equal area will "flow in". The area in each interval is conserved. So in the limit $sigmatoinfty$ each Gaussian becomes flat, so the sum is a constant. But in each interval $$int_-0.5^0.5f(z,infty)dz=int_-0.5^0.5Cdz=C=1$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered Dec 13 at 7:01









            Andrei

            10.9k21025




            10.9k21025





















                4














                Hint. Consider the gaussian function $g(w)=frace^-fracw^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma $.
                Then
                $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma -frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)leq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbbZ$ under the graph of $g$.



                In a similar way we have that
                $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma +frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =2g(0)+sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)\geq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $g$.






                share|cite|improve this answer



























                  4














                  Hint. Consider the gaussian function $g(w)=frace^-fracw^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma $.
                  Then
                  $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma -frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)leq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                  where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbbZ$ under the graph of $g$.



                  In a similar way we have that
                  $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma +frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =2g(0)+sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)\geq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                  where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $g$.






                  share|cite|improve this answer

























                    4












                    4








                    4






                    Hint. Consider the gaussian function $g(w)=frace^-fracw^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma $.
                    Then
                    $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma -frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)leq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                    where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbbZ$ under the graph of $g$.



                    In a similar way we have that
                    $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma +frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =2g(0)+sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)\geq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                    where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $g$.






                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    Hint. Consider the gaussian function $g(w)=frace^-fracw^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma $.
                    Then
                    $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma -frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)leq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                    where the sum on the left is the sum of the areas of rectangles with bases $[z-k-1,z-k]$ and $k in mathbbZ$ under the graph of $g$.



                    In a similar way we have that
                    $$sum_k in mathbbZ frace^-frac(z - k)^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma +frace^-fracz^22 sigma^2sqrt2 pi , sigma =2g(0)+sum_k in mathbbZsetminus 0 g(z-k)\geq int_-infty^inftyg(w),dw=1$$
                    where this time the union of the rectangles contains the area under the graph of $g$.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited Dec 13 at 7:39

























                    answered Dec 13 at 6:44









                    Robert Z

                    93.1k1060131




                    93.1k1060131





















                        2














                        As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
                        $$
                        sum_kin mathbbZ f(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ hatf(j)e^2pi ijx,quad forall xin mathbbR
                        $$
                        for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hatf$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbbR$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac1sqrt2pisigmae^-fracx^22sigma^2= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac1alpha^frac1sg(fracxalpha)$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
                        $$
                        widehatf_sigma(xi) =widehatD^1_sigma f_1(xi) = D^infty_1/sigmawidehatf_1(xi)=e^-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2,quadforall xiinmathbbR.
                        $$
                        Hence the given sum is
                        $$
                        sum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ widehatf_sigma(j)e^2pi ijx=sum_jinmathbbZ e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx = 1+sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx.
                        $$
                        For $sigma>1$, we have
                        $$
                        |e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx|leq e^-2pi^2j^2 in l^1(mathbbZ).
                        $$
                        Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
                        $$
                        sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx to 0,
                        $$
                        and as a result
                        $$
                        lim_sigmatoinftysum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbbR.
                        $$






                        share|cite|improve this answer

























                          2














                          As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
                          $$
                          sum_kin mathbbZ f(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ hatf(j)e^2pi ijx,quad forall xin mathbbR
                          $$
                          for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hatf$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbbR$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac1sqrt2pisigmae^-fracx^22sigma^2= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac1alpha^frac1sg(fracxalpha)$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
                          $$
                          widehatf_sigma(xi) =widehatD^1_sigma f_1(xi) = D^infty_1/sigmawidehatf_1(xi)=e^-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2,quadforall xiinmathbbR.
                          $$
                          Hence the given sum is
                          $$
                          sum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ widehatf_sigma(j)e^2pi ijx=sum_jinmathbbZ e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx = 1+sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx.
                          $$
                          For $sigma>1$, we have
                          $$
                          |e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx|leq e^-2pi^2j^2 in l^1(mathbbZ).
                          $$
                          Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
                          $$
                          sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx to 0,
                          $$
                          and as a result
                          $$
                          lim_sigmatoinftysum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbbR.
                          $$






                          share|cite|improve this answer























                            2












                            2








                            2






                            As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
                            $$
                            sum_kin mathbbZ f(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ hatf(j)e^2pi ijx,quad forall xin mathbbR
                            $$
                            for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hatf$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbbR$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac1sqrt2pisigmae^-fracx^22sigma^2= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac1alpha^frac1sg(fracxalpha)$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
                            $$
                            widehatf_sigma(xi) =widehatD^1_sigma f_1(xi) = D^infty_1/sigmawidehatf_1(xi)=e^-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2,quadforall xiinmathbbR.
                            $$
                            Hence the given sum is
                            $$
                            sum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ widehatf_sigma(j)e^2pi ijx=sum_jinmathbbZ e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx = 1+sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx.
                            $$
                            For $sigma>1$, we have
                            $$
                            |e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx|leq e^-2pi^2j^2 in l^1(mathbbZ).
                            $$
                            Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
                            $$
                            sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx to 0,
                            $$
                            and as a result
                            $$
                            lim_sigmatoinftysum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbbR.
                            $$






                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            As @Kavi Rama Murthy commented, this is an immediate consequence of the Poisson summation formula which is saying that
                            $$
                            sum_kin mathbbZ f(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ hatf(j)e^2pi ijx,quad forall xin mathbbR
                            $$
                            for all Schwartz function $f$. Here, $hatf$ is the Fourier transform of $f$ on $mathbbR$. In this case, let $$f_sigma(x) = frac1sqrt2pisigmae^-fracx^22sigma^2= D^1_sigma f_1(x)$$ where $D^s_alpha g(x) = frac1alpha^frac1sg(fracxalpha)$ is a dilation operator. Then, it holds that
                            $$
                            widehatf_sigma(xi) =widehatD^1_sigma f_1(xi) = D^infty_1/sigmawidehatf_1(xi)=e^-2pi^2sigma^2xi^2,quadforall xiinmathbbR.
                            $$
                            Hence the given sum is
                            $$
                            sum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = sum_jinmathbbZ widehatf_sigma(j)e^2pi ijx=sum_jinmathbbZ e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx = 1+sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx.
                            $$
                            For $sigma>1$, we have
                            $$
                            |e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx|leq e^-2pi^2j^2 in l^1(mathbbZ).
                            $$
                            Thus, by Lebesgue's dominated convergence theorem, as $sigma toinfty$, we get
                            $$
                            sum_jneq 0 e^-2pi^2sigma^2j^2e^2pi ijx to 0,
                            $$
                            and as a result
                            $$
                            lim_sigmatoinftysum_kin mathbbZ f_sigma(x+k) = 1,quad forall xin mathbbR.
                            $$







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered Dec 13 at 6:44









                            Song

                            4,115316




                            4,115316



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                                Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                                Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3037664%2fproving-that-fz-sigma-sum-k-in-bbb-z-frac1-sqrt2-pi-sigma-rm-e%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown






                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                Bahrain

                                Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay