Load_Cycle_Count has risen too much after clonezilla-backup (/etc/hdparm.conf was edited)
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I´ve created a system-backup using clonezilla.
After starting my system (Linux/Lubuntu 16.04.5 LTS, 64 bit) again I checked the Load_Cycle_Count of my drive with
sudo smartctl -A -d sat /dev/sdc
. I noticed that the Load_Cycle_Count has risen by a value of 50 from 57705 to 57755.
That was a bit unusual as the Load_Cycle_Count normally rises by a value of 3 (from one boot-up to the next).
Yet I have to say that this time clonezilla had to fix my third partition before beginning the backup-process. I let fsck do its job per default.
So could the observed phenomenon have something to do with that?
Or is there any way of preventing unusual "Load_Cycle_Count"-rises when using clonezilla for backup purposes?
clonezilla smartctl
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I´ve created a system-backup using clonezilla.
After starting my system (Linux/Lubuntu 16.04.5 LTS, 64 bit) again I checked the Load_Cycle_Count of my drive with
sudo smartctl -A -d sat /dev/sdc
. I noticed that the Load_Cycle_Count has risen by a value of 50 from 57705 to 57755.
That was a bit unusual as the Load_Cycle_Count normally rises by a value of 3 (from one boot-up to the next).
Yet I have to say that this time clonezilla had to fix my third partition before beginning the backup-process. I let fsck do its job per default.
So could the observed phenomenon have something to do with that?
Or is there any way of preventing unusual "Load_Cycle_Count"-rises when using clonezilla for backup purposes?
clonezilla smartctl
What is the drive model (cat /sys/class/block/sdc/device/model
), and do you know the brand (manufacturer) as well ? What doeshdparm -B /dev/sdc
show, both when running Lubuntu, and when you run it from a shell in the Clonezilla live system?
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:16
2
Might be worth linking to some article like superuser.com/a/847431/110495 when you want to ask about a concern with Load_Cycle_Count, because not everyone will know what it is & why you might be concerned.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:19
@ sourcejedi: Info: - WD Elements 25A2, - Model Family: Western Digital Elements / My Passport (USB, AF), - Device Model: WDC WD10JMVW-11AJGS4, - Firmware Version: 01.01A01 .hdparm -B /dev/sdc /dev/sdc
returnsAPM_level = 254
. That´s o.k. as I have taken care of that already. As far as the daily routine is concerned evereything´s fine. It´s only after a clonezilla backup when the Load_Cycle_Count rises. But when using the PC again (after the backup) the count is o.k. That means: it rises by a value of 3 per (re)boot, which is normal.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
+ thanks for the link.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
1
FYI, comments are intended to be used to gather information which can be used to edit the question to make it clear. The question would be improved by editing to include the information about having modified/etc/hdparm.conf
on your Lubuntu system. You do not need to worry about the comments looking out of date: this is the exact intended purpose of the comments on this site.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 14:17
|
show 9 more comments
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I´ve created a system-backup using clonezilla.
After starting my system (Linux/Lubuntu 16.04.5 LTS, 64 bit) again I checked the Load_Cycle_Count of my drive with
sudo smartctl -A -d sat /dev/sdc
. I noticed that the Load_Cycle_Count has risen by a value of 50 from 57705 to 57755.
That was a bit unusual as the Load_Cycle_Count normally rises by a value of 3 (from one boot-up to the next).
Yet I have to say that this time clonezilla had to fix my third partition before beginning the backup-process. I let fsck do its job per default.
So could the observed phenomenon have something to do with that?
Or is there any way of preventing unusual "Load_Cycle_Count"-rises when using clonezilla for backup purposes?
clonezilla smartctl
I´ve created a system-backup using clonezilla.
After starting my system (Linux/Lubuntu 16.04.5 LTS, 64 bit) again I checked the Load_Cycle_Count of my drive with
sudo smartctl -A -d sat /dev/sdc
. I noticed that the Load_Cycle_Count has risen by a value of 50 from 57705 to 57755.
That was a bit unusual as the Load_Cycle_Count normally rises by a value of 3 (from one boot-up to the next).
Yet I have to say that this time clonezilla had to fix my third partition before beginning the backup-process. I let fsck do its job per default.
So could the observed phenomenon have something to do with that?
Or is there any way of preventing unusual "Load_Cycle_Count"-rises when using clonezilla for backup purposes?
clonezilla smartctl
clonezilla smartctl
edited Nov 25 at 14:25
asked Nov 25 at 11:08
Rosika
164
164
What is the drive model (cat /sys/class/block/sdc/device/model
), and do you know the brand (manufacturer) as well ? What doeshdparm -B /dev/sdc
show, both when running Lubuntu, and when you run it from a shell in the Clonezilla live system?
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:16
2
Might be worth linking to some article like superuser.com/a/847431/110495 when you want to ask about a concern with Load_Cycle_Count, because not everyone will know what it is & why you might be concerned.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:19
@ sourcejedi: Info: - WD Elements 25A2, - Model Family: Western Digital Elements / My Passport (USB, AF), - Device Model: WDC WD10JMVW-11AJGS4, - Firmware Version: 01.01A01 .hdparm -B /dev/sdc /dev/sdc
returnsAPM_level = 254
. That´s o.k. as I have taken care of that already. As far as the daily routine is concerned evereything´s fine. It´s only after a clonezilla backup when the Load_Cycle_Count rises. But when using the PC again (after the backup) the count is o.k. That means: it rises by a value of 3 per (re)boot, which is normal.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
+ thanks for the link.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
1
FYI, comments are intended to be used to gather information which can be used to edit the question to make it clear. The question would be improved by editing to include the information about having modified/etc/hdparm.conf
on your Lubuntu system. You do not need to worry about the comments looking out of date: this is the exact intended purpose of the comments on this site.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 14:17
|
show 9 more comments
What is the drive model (cat /sys/class/block/sdc/device/model
), and do you know the brand (manufacturer) as well ? What doeshdparm -B /dev/sdc
show, both when running Lubuntu, and when you run it from a shell in the Clonezilla live system?
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:16
2
Might be worth linking to some article like superuser.com/a/847431/110495 when you want to ask about a concern with Load_Cycle_Count, because not everyone will know what it is & why you might be concerned.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:19
@ sourcejedi: Info: - WD Elements 25A2, - Model Family: Western Digital Elements / My Passport (USB, AF), - Device Model: WDC WD10JMVW-11AJGS4, - Firmware Version: 01.01A01 .hdparm -B /dev/sdc /dev/sdc
returnsAPM_level = 254
. That´s o.k. as I have taken care of that already. As far as the daily routine is concerned evereything´s fine. It´s only after a clonezilla backup when the Load_Cycle_Count rises. But when using the PC again (after the backup) the count is o.k. That means: it rises by a value of 3 per (re)boot, which is normal.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
+ thanks for the link.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
1
FYI, comments are intended to be used to gather information which can be used to edit the question to make it clear. The question would be improved by editing to include the information about having modified/etc/hdparm.conf
on your Lubuntu system. You do not need to worry about the comments looking out of date: this is the exact intended purpose of the comments on this site.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 14:17
What is the drive model (
cat /sys/class/block/sdc/device/model
), and do you know the brand (manufacturer) as well ? What does hdparm -B /dev/sdc
show, both when running Lubuntu, and when you run it from a shell in the Clonezilla live system?– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:16
What is the drive model (
cat /sys/class/block/sdc/device/model
), and do you know the brand (manufacturer) as well ? What does hdparm -B /dev/sdc
show, both when running Lubuntu, and when you run it from a shell in the Clonezilla live system?– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:16
2
2
Might be worth linking to some article like superuser.com/a/847431/110495 when you want to ask about a concern with Load_Cycle_Count, because not everyone will know what it is & why you might be concerned.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:19
Might be worth linking to some article like superuser.com/a/847431/110495 when you want to ask about a concern with Load_Cycle_Count, because not everyone will know what it is & why you might be concerned.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:19
@ sourcejedi: Info: - WD Elements 25A2, - Model Family: Western Digital Elements / My Passport (USB, AF), - Device Model: WDC WD10JMVW-11AJGS4, - Firmware Version: 01.01A01 .
hdparm -B /dev/sdc /dev/sdc
returns APM_level = 254
. That´s o.k. as I have taken care of that already. As far as the daily routine is concerned evereything´s fine. It´s only after a clonezilla backup when the Load_Cycle_Count rises. But when using the PC again (after the backup) the count is o.k. That means: it rises by a value of 3 per (re)boot, which is normal.– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
@ sourcejedi: Info: - WD Elements 25A2, - Model Family: Western Digital Elements / My Passport (USB, AF), - Device Model: WDC WD10JMVW-11AJGS4, - Firmware Version: 01.01A01 .
hdparm -B /dev/sdc /dev/sdc
returns APM_level = 254
. That´s o.k. as I have taken care of that already. As far as the daily routine is concerned evereything´s fine. It´s only after a clonezilla backup when the Load_Cycle_Count rises. But when using the PC again (after the backup) the count is o.k. That means: it rises by a value of 3 per (re)boot, which is normal.– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
+ thanks for the link.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
+ thanks for the link.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
1
1
FYI, comments are intended to be used to gather information which can be used to edit the question to make it clear. The question would be improved by editing to include the information about having modified
/etc/hdparm.conf
on your Lubuntu system. You do not need to worry about the comments looking out of date: this is the exact intended purpose of the comments on this site.– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 14:17
FYI, comments are intended to be used to gather information which can be used to edit the question to make it clear. The question would be improved by editing to include the information about having modified
/etc/hdparm.conf
on your Lubuntu system. You do not need to worry about the comments looking out of date: this is the exact intended purpose of the comments on this site.– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 14:17
|
show 9 more comments
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f484015%2fload-cycle-count-has-risen-too-much-after-clonezilla-backup-etc-hdparm-conf-wa%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
What is the drive model (
cat /sys/class/block/sdc/device/model
), and do you know the brand (manufacturer) as well ? What doeshdparm -B /dev/sdc
show, both when running Lubuntu, and when you run it from a shell in the Clonezilla live system?– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:16
2
Might be worth linking to some article like superuser.com/a/847431/110495 when you want to ask about a concern with Load_Cycle_Count, because not everyone will know what it is & why you might be concerned.
– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 11:19
@ sourcejedi: Info: - WD Elements 25A2, - Model Family: Western Digital Elements / My Passport (USB, AF), - Device Model: WDC WD10JMVW-11AJGS4, - Firmware Version: 01.01A01 .
hdparm -B /dev/sdc /dev/sdc
returnsAPM_level = 254
. That´s o.k. as I have taken care of that already. As far as the daily routine is concerned evereything´s fine. It´s only after a clonezilla backup when the Load_Cycle_Count rises. But when using the PC again (after the backup) the count is o.k. That means: it rises by a value of 3 per (re)boot, which is normal.– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
+ thanks for the link.
– Rosika
Nov 25 at 13:09
1
FYI, comments are intended to be used to gather information which can be used to edit the question to make it clear. The question would be improved by editing to include the information about having modified
/etc/hdparm.conf
on your Lubuntu system. You do not need to worry about the comments looking out of date: this is the exact intended purpose of the comments on this site.– sourcejedi
Nov 25 at 14:17