Wiring 2 or 3 outlets controlled by one switch
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I want 2 ( maybe 3) outlets controlled by the same switch. Easy enough. But, in addition, I want half of each outlet controlled by the switch and the other half of each outlet always hot. Is there a wiring diagram somewhere for this? I just haven't found it. A diagram would help confirm how I think it should be done. They will be in the same room and the wiring will be relatively easy to run.
switch receptacle wire
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I want 2 ( maybe 3) outlets controlled by the same switch. Easy enough. But, in addition, I want half of each outlet controlled by the switch and the other half of each outlet always hot. Is there a wiring diagram somewhere for this? I just haven't found it. A diagram would help confirm how I think it should be done. They will be in the same room and the wiring will be relatively easy to run.
switch receptacle wire
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
1
The next owner will probably not be happy about this. Assuming this is for controlling plug-in lamps, with all the 'smart' products coming out now, is it really necessary?
– Glen Yates
yesterday
1
@GlenYates then it's kinda the next owner's issue to fix, isn't it?
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
@GlenYates: Said "smart" products are junk, and probably will be for the forseeable future, because there's no incentive to make non-awful. But just a traditional plug-in xmas-tree-remote system would be a lot less awful and more obvious to the user what's going on than having half the outlet mysteriously on a switch with the logic hidden inside the walls.
– R..
yesterday
1
It's really not that hard for the next owner to revert if they don't like it. You just cap off the switched hot in each box and either pigtail both hot terminals to the remaining hot, or replace with a new outlet that still has the tab in place (outlets are dirt cheap). Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes per box.
– CactusCake
yesterday
1
It is KCB3rd's house, so he can do what he wants with it, I really just wanted to point out that there may be alternatives. One that's been around for a long time is an X10 controller, this would provide flexibility to move the controlled outlet at will.
– Glen Yates
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
I want 2 ( maybe 3) outlets controlled by the same switch. Easy enough. But, in addition, I want half of each outlet controlled by the switch and the other half of each outlet always hot. Is there a wiring diagram somewhere for this? I just haven't found it. A diagram would help confirm how I think it should be done. They will be in the same room and the wiring will be relatively easy to run.
switch receptacle wire
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
I want 2 ( maybe 3) outlets controlled by the same switch. Easy enough. But, in addition, I want half of each outlet controlled by the switch and the other half of each outlet always hot. Is there a wiring diagram somewhere for this? I just haven't found it. A diagram would help confirm how I think it should be done. They will be in the same room and the wiring will be relatively easy to run.
switch receptacle wire
switch receptacle wire
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
edited yesterday
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
asked yesterday
KCB3rd
226
226
1
The next owner will probably not be happy about this. Assuming this is for controlling plug-in lamps, with all the 'smart' products coming out now, is it really necessary?
– Glen Yates
yesterday
1
@GlenYates then it's kinda the next owner's issue to fix, isn't it?
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
@GlenYates: Said "smart" products are junk, and probably will be for the forseeable future, because there's no incentive to make non-awful. But just a traditional plug-in xmas-tree-remote system would be a lot less awful and more obvious to the user what's going on than having half the outlet mysteriously on a switch with the logic hidden inside the walls.
– R..
yesterday
1
It's really not that hard for the next owner to revert if they don't like it. You just cap off the switched hot in each box and either pigtail both hot terminals to the remaining hot, or replace with a new outlet that still has the tab in place (outlets are dirt cheap). Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes per box.
– CactusCake
yesterday
1
It is KCB3rd's house, so he can do what he wants with it, I really just wanted to point out that there may be alternatives. One that's been around for a long time is an X10 controller, this would provide flexibility to move the controlled outlet at will.
– Glen Yates
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
1
The next owner will probably not be happy about this. Assuming this is for controlling plug-in lamps, with all the 'smart' products coming out now, is it really necessary?
– Glen Yates
yesterday
1
@GlenYates then it's kinda the next owner's issue to fix, isn't it?
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
@GlenYates: Said "smart" products are junk, and probably will be for the forseeable future, because there's no incentive to make non-awful. But just a traditional plug-in xmas-tree-remote system would be a lot less awful and more obvious to the user what's going on than having half the outlet mysteriously on a switch with the logic hidden inside the walls.
– R..
yesterday
1
It's really not that hard for the next owner to revert if they don't like it. You just cap off the switched hot in each box and either pigtail both hot terminals to the remaining hot, or replace with a new outlet that still has the tab in place (outlets are dirt cheap). Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes per box.
– CactusCake
yesterday
1
It is KCB3rd's house, so he can do what he wants with it, I really just wanted to point out that there may be alternatives. One that's been around for a long time is an X10 controller, this would provide flexibility to move the controlled outlet at will.
– Glen Yates
yesterday
1
1
The next owner will probably not be happy about this. Assuming this is for controlling plug-in lamps, with all the 'smart' products coming out now, is it really necessary?
– Glen Yates
yesterday
The next owner will probably not be happy about this. Assuming this is for controlling plug-in lamps, with all the 'smart' products coming out now, is it really necessary?
– Glen Yates
yesterday
1
1
@GlenYates then it's kinda the next owner's issue to fix, isn't it?
– FreeMan
yesterday
@GlenYates then it's kinda the next owner's issue to fix, isn't it?
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
2
@GlenYates: Said "smart" products are junk, and probably will be for the forseeable future, because there's no incentive to make non-awful. But just a traditional plug-in xmas-tree-remote system would be a lot less awful and more obvious to the user what's going on than having half the outlet mysteriously on a switch with the logic hidden inside the walls.
– R..
yesterday
@GlenYates: Said "smart" products are junk, and probably will be for the forseeable future, because there's no incentive to make non-awful. But just a traditional plug-in xmas-tree-remote system would be a lot less awful and more obvious to the user what's going on than having half the outlet mysteriously on a switch with the logic hidden inside the walls.
– R..
yesterday
1
1
It's really not that hard for the next owner to revert if they don't like it. You just cap off the switched hot in each box and either pigtail both hot terminals to the remaining hot, or replace with a new outlet that still has the tab in place (outlets are dirt cheap). Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes per box.
– CactusCake
yesterday
It's really not that hard for the next owner to revert if they don't like it. You just cap off the switched hot in each box and either pigtail both hot terminals to the remaining hot, or replace with a new outlet that still has the tab in place (outlets are dirt cheap). Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes per box.
– CactusCake
yesterday
1
1
It is KCB3rd's house, so he can do what he wants with it, I really just wanted to point out that there may be alternatives. One that's been around for a long time is an X10 controller, this would provide flexibility to move the controlled outlet at will.
– Glen Yates
yesterday
It is KCB3rd's house, so he can do what he wants with it, I really just wanted to point out that there may be alternatives. One that's been around for a long time is an X10 controller, this would provide flexibility to move the controlled outlet at will.
– Glen Yates
yesterday
|
show 1 more comment
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
20
down vote
accepted
Wiring diagram, though I hope you don't really need it:
Don't forget to break the tabs off the hot side of the outlets.
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
7
+1 for hand drawn red ---circles--- wires
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
+1 for diagram.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
4
I'll use my 12-3 indoor wire. I kinda thought it would be as the diagram showed, just good to see a diagram for visual confirmation.
– KCB3rd
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The switch opens or closes contact on the hot wire leading to the outlet(s) (receptacles) that you want to control with it. It "makes or breaks" the hot connection to the load. An additional unswitched hot wire would need to run to the receptacles that will not be controlled by the switch.
So... you will need a run of wires that includes a switched hot, an unswitched hot, a neutral, and a ground wire. If you plan on using NM sheathed cable (e.g. Romex) you would need 3 conductor w/ground, e.g. 12-3 w/ground.
If you plan on using common duplex receptacles (the devices with 2 "outlets" on a single frame), you will need to break off a little jumper tab that ties the wire contact plate under the terminal screws together on the hot side, to isolate the switched receptacle from the unswitched.
No diagram is really needed because if this does not make sense to you then you ought to hire an electrician.
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
3
+1 "if this does not make sense... you ought to hire an electrician"
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
You'd only need 12/3 copper if this is a 20A circuit. Most branch circuits will be 15A, so 14/3 is most likely the correct wire.
– J...
yesterday
1
14/3 is most likely the correct minimum but 12 is allowed and arguably better in all aspects except cost and difficulty of fishing.
– Timbo
23 hours ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
20
down vote
accepted
Wiring diagram, though I hope you don't really need it:
Don't forget to break the tabs off the hot side of the outlets.
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
7
+1 for hand drawn red ---circles--- wires
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
+1 for diagram.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
4
I'll use my 12-3 indoor wire. I kinda thought it would be as the diagram showed, just good to see a diagram for visual confirmation.
– KCB3rd
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
20
down vote
accepted
Wiring diagram, though I hope you don't really need it:
Don't forget to break the tabs off the hot side of the outlets.
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
7
+1 for hand drawn red ---circles--- wires
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
+1 for diagram.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
4
I'll use my 12-3 indoor wire. I kinda thought it would be as the diagram showed, just good to see a diagram for visual confirmation.
– KCB3rd
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
20
down vote
accepted
up vote
20
down vote
accepted
Wiring diagram, though I hope you don't really need it:
Don't forget to break the tabs off the hot side of the outlets.
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
Wiring diagram, though I hope you don't really need it:
Don't forget to break the tabs off the hot side of the outlets.
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
answered yesterday
A. I. Breveleri
6,9071823
6,9071823
7
+1 for hand drawn red ---circles--- wires
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
+1 for diagram.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
4
I'll use my 12-3 indoor wire. I kinda thought it would be as the diagram showed, just good to see a diagram for visual confirmation.
– KCB3rd
yesterday
add a comment |
7
+1 for hand drawn red ---circles--- wires
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
+1 for diagram.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
4
I'll use my 12-3 indoor wire. I kinda thought it would be as the diagram showed, just good to see a diagram for visual confirmation.
– KCB3rd
yesterday
7
7
+1 for hand drawn red ---circles--- wires
– FreeMan
yesterday
+1 for hand drawn red ---circles--- wires
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
2
+1 for diagram.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
+1 for diagram.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
4
4
I'll use my 12-3 indoor wire. I kinda thought it would be as the diagram showed, just good to see a diagram for visual confirmation.
– KCB3rd
yesterday
I'll use my 12-3 indoor wire. I kinda thought it would be as the diagram showed, just good to see a diagram for visual confirmation.
– KCB3rd
yesterday
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The switch opens or closes contact on the hot wire leading to the outlet(s) (receptacles) that you want to control with it. It "makes or breaks" the hot connection to the load. An additional unswitched hot wire would need to run to the receptacles that will not be controlled by the switch.
So... you will need a run of wires that includes a switched hot, an unswitched hot, a neutral, and a ground wire. If you plan on using NM sheathed cable (e.g. Romex) you would need 3 conductor w/ground, e.g. 12-3 w/ground.
If you plan on using common duplex receptacles (the devices with 2 "outlets" on a single frame), you will need to break off a little jumper tab that ties the wire contact plate under the terminal screws together on the hot side, to isolate the switched receptacle from the unswitched.
No diagram is really needed because if this does not make sense to you then you ought to hire an electrician.
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
3
+1 "if this does not make sense... you ought to hire an electrician"
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
You'd only need 12/3 copper if this is a 20A circuit. Most branch circuits will be 15A, so 14/3 is most likely the correct wire.
– J...
yesterday
1
14/3 is most likely the correct minimum but 12 is allowed and arguably better in all aspects except cost and difficulty of fishing.
– Timbo
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
The switch opens or closes contact on the hot wire leading to the outlet(s) (receptacles) that you want to control with it. It "makes or breaks" the hot connection to the load. An additional unswitched hot wire would need to run to the receptacles that will not be controlled by the switch.
So... you will need a run of wires that includes a switched hot, an unswitched hot, a neutral, and a ground wire. If you plan on using NM sheathed cable (e.g. Romex) you would need 3 conductor w/ground, e.g. 12-3 w/ground.
If you plan on using common duplex receptacles (the devices with 2 "outlets" on a single frame), you will need to break off a little jumper tab that ties the wire contact plate under the terminal screws together on the hot side, to isolate the switched receptacle from the unswitched.
No diagram is really needed because if this does not make sense to you then you ought to hire an electrician.
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
3
+1 "if this does not make sense... you ought to hire an electrician"
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
You'd only need 12/3 copper if this is a 20A circuit. Most branch circuits will be 15A, so 14/3 is most likely the correct wire.
– J...
yesterday
1
14/3 is most likely the correct minimum but 12 is allowed and arguably better in all aspects except cost and difficulty of fishing.
– Timbo
23 hours ago
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
The switch opens or closes contact on the hot wire leading to the outlet(s) (receptacles) that you want to control with it. It "makes or breaks" the hot connection to the load. An additional unswitched hot wire would need to run to the receptacles that will not be controlled by the switch.
So... you will need a run of wires that includes a switched hot, an unswitched hot, a neutral, and a ground wire. If you plan on using NM sheathed cable (e.g. Romex) you would need 3 conductor w/ground, e.g. 12-3 w/ground.
If you plan on using common duplex receptacles (the devices with 2 "outlets" on a single frame), you will need to break off a little jumper tab that ties the wire contact plate under the terminal screws together on the hot side, to isolate the switched receptacle from the unswitched.
No diagram is really needed because if this does not make sense to you then you ought to hire an electrician.
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
The switch opens or closes contact on the hot wire leading to the outlet(s) (receptacles) that you want to control with it. It "makes or breaks" the hot connection to the load. An additional unswitched hot wire would need to run to the receptacles that will not be controlled by the switch.
So... you will need a run of wires that includes a switched hot, an unswitched hot, a neutral, and a ground wire. If you plan on using NM sheathed cable (e.g. Romex) you would need 3 conductor w/ground, e.g. 12-3 w/ground.
If you plan on using common duplex receptacles (the devices with 2 "outlets" on a single frame), you will need to break off a little jumper tab that ties the wire contact plate under the terminal screws together on the hot side, to isolate the switched receptacle from the unswitched.
No diagram is really needed because if this does not make sense to you then you ought to hire an electrician.
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
answered yesterday
Jimmy Fix-it
20.4k1029
20.4k1029
3
+1 "if this does not make sense... you ought to hire an electrician"
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
You'd only need 12/3 copper if this is a 20A circuit. Most branch circuits will be 15A, so 14/3 is most likely the correct wire.
– J...
yesterday
1
14/3 is most likely the correct minimum but 12 is allowed and arguably better in all aspects except cost and difficulty of fishing.
– Timbo
23 hours ago
add a comment |
3
+1 "if this does not make sense... you ought to hire an electrician"
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
You'd only need 12/3 copper if this is a 20A circuit. Most branch circuits will be 15A, so 14/3 is most likely the correct wire.
– J...
yesterday
1
14/3 is most likely the correct minimum but 12 is allowed and arguably better in all aspects except cost and difficulty of fishing.
– Timbo
23 hours ago
3
3
+1 "if this does not make sense... you ought to hire an electrician"
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
+1 "if this does not make sense... you ought to hire an electrician"
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
1
You'd only need 12/3 copper if this is a 20A circuit. Most branch circuits will be 15A, so 14/3 is most likely the correct wire.
– J...
yesterday
You'd only need 12/3 copper if this is a 20A circuit. Most branch circuits will be 15A, so 14/3 is most likely the correct wire.
– J...
yesterday
1
1
14/3 is most likely the correct minimum but 12 is allowed and arguably better in all aspects except cost and difficulty of fishing.
– Timbo
23 hours ago
14/3 is most likely the correct minimum but 12 is allowed and arguably better in all aspects except cost and difficulty of fishing.
– Timbo
23 hours ago
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdiy.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f150568%2fwiring-2-or-3-outlets-controlled-by-one-switch%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
The next owner will probably not be happy about this. Assuming this is for controlling plug-in lamps, with all the 'smart' products coming out now, is it really necessary?
– Glen Yates
yesterday
1
@GlenYates then it's kinda the next owner's issue to fix, isn't it?
– FreeMan
yesterday
2
@GlenYates: Said "smart" products are junk, and probably will be for the forseeable future, because there's no incentive to make non-awful. But just a traditional plug-in xmas-tree-remote system would be a lot less awful and more obvious to the user what's going on than having half the outlet mysteriously on a switch with the logic hidden inside the walls.
– R..
yesterday
1
It's really not that hard for the next owner to revert if they don't like it. You just cap off the switched hot in each box and either pigtail both hot terminals to the remaining hot, or replace with a new outlet that still has the tab in place (outlets are dirt cheap). Shouldn't take more than 5 minutes per box.
– CactusCake
yesterday
1
It is KCB3rd's house, so he can do what he wants with it, I really just wanted to point out that there may be alternatives. One that's been around for a long time is an X10 controller, this would provide flexibility to move the controlled outlet at will.
– Glen Yates
yesterday