why /proc/net/udp is showing wrong rx_queue size in CentOS server?

Multi tool use
Multi tool use

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have a java server application.



 while(true)
 
 serverSocket.receive(receivePacket);
 process(receivePacket);
 serverSocket.send(sendPacket);
 try 
 Thread.sleep(10000); // sleep for 10s
 catch (InterruptedException e) 
 e.printStackTrace();


It receives and processes 1 UDP packet / 10 sec.



If I send 10 UDP packets to the server processes 1 packet and then goes to sleep for 10s. so I get the 10th packet's response after 100s.



If I do this is server1 with CentOS release 6.4 (Final).



Server 1: cat /proc/net/udp
 sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
 110: 00000000:10AE 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635445 2 ffff880836e6d100 0 
 111: 00000000:10AF 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635446 2 ffff88083913a1c0 0 
 115: 00000000:15B3 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00004FC8 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 390649369 2 ffff880434ae7440 0 
 117: 02FE6341:0035 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 353480394 2 ffff8808367f9040 0


If I do this same thing in server 2:



Server 2: cat /proc/net/udp
 sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
 4: FCA9C11F:C36F 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494501 2 ffff880169aff4c0 0 
 5: FCA9C11F:D3F0 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494485 2 ffff8801b9bbedc0 0 
 16: 7A52BB59:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608536 2 ffff8807656764c0 0 
 16: A2EE0D55:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608045 2 ffff88077ccdd7c0 0 
 16: A58F466D:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438607809 2 ffff8801129f6240 0


They are both centos servers and as we can see that the server1's rx_queue buffer is increasing as the application is processing packets slower than data is coming to the server.



I did this exact same thing in server2 but in server2 the rx_queue is not increasing.
what am I doing/understanding wrong?






centos java udp buffer







share|improve this question

























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I have a java server application.



     while(true)
     
     serverSocket.receive(receivePacket);
     process(receivePacket);
     serverSocket.send(sendPacket);
     try 
     Thread.sleep(10000); // sleep for 10s
     catch (InterruptedException e) 
     e.printStackTrace();


    It receives and processes 1 UDP packet / 10 sec.



    If I send 10 UDP packets to the server processes 1 packet and then goes to sleep for 10s. so I get the 10th packet's response after 100s.



    If I do this is server1 with CentOS release 6.4 (Final).



    Server 1: cat /proc/net/udp
     sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
     110: 00000000:10AE 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635445 2 ffff880836e6d100 0 
     111: 00000000:10AF 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635446 2 ffff88083913a1c0 0 
     115: 00000000:15B3 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00004FC8 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 390649369 2 ffff880434ae7440 0 
     117: 02FE6341:0035 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 353480394 2 ffff8808367f9040 0


    If I do this same thing in server 2:



    Server 2: cat /proc/net/udp
     sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
     4: FCA9C11F:C36F 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494501 2 ffff880169aff4c0 0 
     5: FCA9C11F:D3F0 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494485 2 ffff8801b9bbedc0 0 
     16: 7A52BB59:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608536 2 ffff8807656764c0 0 
     16: A2EE0D55:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608045 2 ffff88077ccdd7c0 0 
     16: A58F466D:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438607809 2 ffff8801129f6240 0


    They are both centos servers and as we can see that the server1's rx_queue buffer is increasing as the application is processing packets slower than data is coming to the server.



    I did this exact same thing in server2 but in server2 the rx_queue is not increasing.
    what am I doing/understanding wrong?






    centos java udp buffer







    share|improve this question























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I have a java server application.



       while(true)
       
       serverSocket.receive(receivePacket);
       process(receivePacket);
       serverSocket.send(sendPacket);
       try 
       Thread.sleep(10000); // sleep for 10s
       catch (InterruptedException e) 
       e.printStackTrace();


      It receives and processes 1 UDP packet / 10 sec.



      If I send 10 UDP packets to the server processes 1 packet and then goes to sleep for 10s. so I get the 10th packet's response after 100s.



      If I do this is server1 with CentOS release 6.4 (Final).



      Server 1: cat /proc/net/udp
       sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
       110: 00000000:10AE 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635445 2 ffff880836e6d100 0 
       111: 00000000:10AF 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635446 2 ffff88083913a1c0 0 
       115: 00000000:15B3 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00004FC8 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 390649369 2 ffff880434ae7440 0 
       117: 02FE6341:0035 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 353480394 2 ffff8808367f9040 0


      If I do this same thing in server 2:



      Server 2: cat /proc/net/udp
       sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
       4: FCA9C11F:C36F 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494501 2 ffff880169aff4c0 0 
       5: FCA9C11F:D3F0 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494485 2 ffff8801b9bbedc0 0 
       16: 7A52BB59:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608536 2 ffff8807656764c0 0 
       16: A2EE0D55:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608045 2 ffff88077ccdd7c0 0 
       16: A58F466D:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438607809 2 ffff8801129f6240 0


      They are both centos servers and as we can see that the server1's rx_queue buffer is increasing as the application is processing packets slower than data is coming to the server.



      I did this exact same thing in server2 but in server2 the rx_queue is not increasing.
      what am I doing/understanding wrong?






      centos java udp buffer







      share|improve this question













      I have a java server application.



       while(true)
       
       serverSocket.receive(receivePacket);
       process(receivePacket);
       serverSocket.send(sendPacket);
       try 
       Thread.sleep(10000); // sleep for 10s
       catch (InterruptedException e) 
       e.printStackTrace();


      It receives and processes 1 UDP packet / 10 sec.



      If I send 10 UDP packets to the server processes 1 packet and then goes to sleep for 10s. so I get the 10th packet's response after 100s.



      If I do this is server1 with CentOS release 6.4 (Final).



      Server 1: cat /proc/net/udp
       sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
       110: 00000000:10AE 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635445 2 ffff880836e6d100 0 
       111: 00000000:10AF 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 85635446 2 ffff88083913a1c0 0 
       115: 00000000:15B3 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00004FC8 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 390649369 2 ffff880434ae7440 0 
       117: 02FE6341:0035 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 353480394 2 ffff8808367f9040 0


      If I do this same thing in server 2:



      Server 2: cat /proc/net/udp
       sl local_address rem_address st tx_queue rx_queue tr tm->when retrnsmt uid timeout inode ref pointer drops 
       4: FCA9C11F:C36F 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494501 2 ffff880169aff4c0 0 
       5: FCA9C11F:D3F0 8C719AC6:0035 01 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 0 0 2983494485 2 ffff8801b9bbedc0 0 
       16: 7A52BB59:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608536 2 ffff8807656764c0 0 
       16: A2EE0D55:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438608045 2 ffff88077ccdd7c0 0 
       16: A58F466D:007B 00000000:0000 07 00000000:00000000 00:00000000 00000000 38 0 2438607809 2 ffff8801129f6240 0


      They are both centos servers and as we can see that the server1's rx_queue buffer is increasing as the application is processing packets slower than data is coming to the server.



      I did this exact same thing in server2 but in server2 the rx_queue is not increasing.
      what am I doing/understanding wrong?






      centos java udp buffer




      centos java udp buffer






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 20 mins ago









      Al-Alamin

      1011




      1011

























          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480505%2fwhy-proc-net-udp-is-showing-wrong-rx-queue-size-in-centos-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






















          active

          oldest

          votes













          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480505%2fwhy-proc-net-udp-is-showing-wrong-rx-queue-size-in-centos-server%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest
































































          J8O3L Zmb7LozzhRTDwR,wq9okpu
          -
          JEU,G4 LLRSBNFZuC,f 7Qw77Q8i0FuDKRu moLbZ,uLSKsH2rsvbGBHCR jm5IYu

          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this question asked Sep 26 at 0:12 ToanLuong 49 9 add a comment  |  up vote 1 down vote favorite I'm using WordPress 4.9.8, CiviCRM to 5.5.1, I usually send email to contact by Search> Find contacts View contact details Action> Send email Send email ok, Contact received mail ok like picture But status only Email sent though contact read email or not. So, can CiviCRM can change status to Email read when contact read email? wordpress email share | improve this questi...
          Read more

          How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP up vote 2 down vote favorite I am currently learning reverse engineering and am studying the flags register. I had in my mind that rflags was just another name for one of the 16 general purpose registers, for example rax or rbx . But it looks like rflags is actually an additional register. So that makes 17 registers in total... how many more could there be? I have spent at least an hour on this and found numerous different answers. The best answer so far is this, which says that there are 40 registers in total. 16 General Purpose Registers 2 Status Registers 6 Code Segment Registers 16 SSE Registers 8 FPU/MMX Registers But if I add that up, I get 48. Could anybody provide an official answer on how many registers an x86_64 CPU has (e.g. an Intel i7). Additionally, I have seen references to 'hardware' and 'architectural' registers. What are those registers and how many are there? register x86-64 share | improve this...
          Read more

          Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

          Image
          Clash Royale CLAN TAG #URR8PPP 1 How can I extract a single band from multi-band raster in QGIS? I have an remote sensed image which has 6 bands (including NDVI band), I want to display each band separately, but have no idea how to do. I have seen some questions similar here but none worked for me. The original image (has 6 bands) is: I want to display the band 6 which should be like this: But I tried gdal_translate, and couldn't get the correct result. What I have got is: qgis raster multi-band share | improve this question edited Mar 5 at 0:53 Summer asked Mar 4 at 6:42 Summer Summer 23 6 Is this any help gis.stackexchange.com/questions/220658/… ? if not gis.stackexchange.com/questions/62133/… might help. – Michael Stimson Mar 4 at 6:46 Thanks for answering but when I used gdal_translate, qgis showed that 'Error 4: Kayena.tif: No such file or directory". Would you know how to fi...
          Read more