Top showing virtual memory usage of hundreds of gigabytes
Clash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
On a new virtual machine, top shows that a process of mine consumes 100 GB of virtual memory. I've read that it's possible because of overcommit, however, it's a bit too much. I've never seen anything like this, especially in a VM having just 6 GB real memory, 2 GB swap and a single 40 GB HD partition.
The funny process with 101 GB VIRT is Eclipse IDE (started a few minutes ago) and there's another one, WebKitWebProcess with 98 GB VIRT. All other processes have sane VIRT values of about 1-2 GB. All three tools seem to agree on that: top
, htop
and ps
.
- Is there any good reason for the processes to request that much virtual memory?
- Isn't such behavior detrimental to the system?
- What are the current limits on the total virtual memory?
Details: Linux 4.15.0-38-generic x86_64 GNU/Linux, Linux Mint 19 Tara
memory top htop
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
On a new virtual machine, top shows that a process of mine consumes 100 GB of virtual memory. I've read that it's possible because of overcommit, however, it's a bit too much. I've never seen anything like this, especially in a VM having just 6 GB real memory, 2 GB swap and a single 40 GB HD partition.
The funny process with 101 GB VIRT is Eclipse IDE (started a few minutes ago) and there's another one, WebKitWebProcess with 98 GB VIRT. All other processes have sane VIRT values of about 1-2 GB. All three tools seem to agree on that: top
, htop
and ps
.
- Is there any good reason for the processes to request that much virtual memory?
- Isn't such behavior detrimental to the system?
- What are the current limits on the total virtual memory?
Details: Linux 4.15.0-38-generic x86_64 GNU/Linux, Linux Mint 19 Tara
memory top htop
add a comment |Â
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
up vote
-1
down vote
favorite
On a new virtual machine, top shows that a process of mine consumes 100 GB of virtual memory. I've read that it's possible because of overcommit, however, it's a bit too much. I've never seen anything like this, especially in a VM having just 6 GB real memory, 2 GB swap and a single 40 GB HD partition.
The funny process with 101 GB VIRT is Eclipse IDE (started a few minutes ago) and there's another one, WebKitWebProcess with 98 GB VIRT. All other processes have sane VIRT values of about 1-2 GB. All three tools seem to agree on that: top
, htop
and ps
.
- Is there any good reason for the processes to request that much virtual memory?
- Isn't such behavior detrimental to the system?
- What are the current limits on the total virtual memory?
Details: Linux 4.15.0-38-generic x86_64 GNU/Linux, Linux Mint 19 Tara
memory top htop
On a new virtual machine, top shows that a process of mine consumes 100 GB of virtual memory. I've read that it's possible because of overcommit, however, it's a bit too much. I've never seen anything like this, especially in a VM having just 6 GB real memory, 2 GB swap and a single 40 GB HD partition.
The funny process with 101 GB VIRT is Eclipse IDE (started a few minutes ago) and there's another one, WebKitWebProcess with 98 GB VIRT. All other processes have sane VIRT values of about 1-2 GB. All three tools seem to agree on that: top
, htop
and ps
.
- Is there any good reason for the processes to request that much virtual memory?
- Isn't such behavior detrimental to the system?
- What are the current limits on the total virtual memory?
Details: Linux 4.15.0-38-generic x86_64 GNU/Linux, Linux Mint 19 Tara
memory top htop
memory top htop
asked 1 min ago
maaartinus
1,67352022
1,67352022
add a comment |Â
add a comment |Â
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f479675%2ftop-showing-virtual-memory-usage-of-hundreds-of-gigabytes%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password