Harmonic oscillator in spherical coordinates

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












It is probably the most well-known result in quantum mechanics that the harmonic oscillator can be solved by supersymmetry.



More precisely, the operator



$$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2$$



can be decomposed as



$$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2 = left(-fracddx-xright)left(fracddx-xright)=:a^*a.$$



When I tried to see whether the same holds true in spherical coordinates I noticed a complete suprise



$$left(-fracddr-fracn-1r-rright)left(fracddr-rright) = -fracd^2dr^2 -fracn-1r fracddr +r^2+(n-1).$$



The first three terms comprise the harmonic oscillator in spherical coordinates that is



$$-Delta_r + r^2.$$



For convenience, I discarded the angular part in this calculation.



But for some reasons I seem to get this superficial term $(n-1)$. Why is that? And can I do anything smarter to avoid this term?










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    It is probably the most well-known result in quantum mechanics that the harmonic oscillator can be solved by supersymmetry.



    More precisely, the operator



    $$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2$$



    can be decomposed as



    $$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2 = left(-fracddx-xright)left(fracddx-xright)=:a^*a.$$



    When I tried to see whether the same holds true in spherical coordinates I noticed a complete suprise



    $$left(-fracddr-fracn-1r-rright)left(fracddr-rright) = -fracd^2dr^2 -fracn-1r fracddr +r^2+(n-1).$$



    The first three terms comprise the harmonic oscillator in spherical coordinates that is



    $$-Delta_r + r^2.$$



    For convenience, I discarded the angular part in this calculation.



    But for some reasons I seem to get this superficial term $(n-1)$. Why is that? And can I do anything smarter to avoid this term?










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.





















      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      It is probably the most well-known result in quantum mechanics that the harmonic oscillator can be solved by supersymmetry.



      More precisely, the operator



      $$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2$$



      can be decomposed as



      $$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2 = left(-fracddx-xright)left(fracddx-xright)=:a^*a.$$



      When I tried to see whether the same holds true in spherical coordinates I noticed a complete suprise



      $$left(-fracddr-fracn-1r-rright)left(fracddr-rright) = -fracd^2dr^2 -fracn-1r fracddr +r^2+(n-1).$$



      The first three terms comprise the harmonic oscillator in spherical coordinates that is



      $$-Delta_r + r^2.$$



      For convenience, I discarded the angular part in this calculation.



      But for some reasons I seem to get this superficial term $(n-1)$. Why is that? And can I do anything smarter to avoid this term?










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      It is probably the most well-known result in quantum mechanics that the harmonic oscillator can be solved by supersymmetry.



      More precisely, the operator



      $$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2$$



      can be decomposed as



      $$-fracd^2dx^2+x^2 = left(-fracddx-xright)left(fracddx-xright)=:a^*a.$$



      When I tried to see whether the same holds true in spherical coordinates I noticed a complete suprise



      $$left(-fracddr-fracn-1r-rright)left(fracddr-rright) = -fracd^2dr^2 -fracn-1r fracddr +r^2+(n-1).$$



      The first three terms comprise the harmonic oscillator in spherical coordinates that is



      $$-Delta_r + r^2.$$



      For convenience, I discarded the angular part in this calculation.



      But for some reasons I seem to get this superficial term $(n-1)$. Why is that? And can I do anything smarter to avoid this term?







      fa.functional-analysis real-analysis ap.analysis-of-pdes mp.mathematical-physics quantum-mechanics






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 4 hours ago









      ErwinSchr

      232




      232




      New contributor




      ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      ErwinSchr is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Indeed, the supersymmetric operators do not factorize the Hamiltonian of the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, there is an additional term. See Creation and annihilation operators, symmetry and supersymmetry of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator, equation 16.






          share|cite|improve this answer



























            up vote
            0
            down vote













            Supplementing @CarloBeenakker's answer: a different sort of "factorization" of the Laplacian can be done in terms of the Dirac operator, which in some regards better preserves the nature of the situation, but/and has scalar coefficients in an appropriate Clifford algebra, which in general is not commutative. E.g., on $mathbb R$, it is $mathbb C$, which is convenient. But already in two dimensions the relevant Clifford algebra is the Hamiltonian quaternions...



            Depending what you want to do, this might be a useful direction to consider, in addition to the "scalarization" of immediate reduction to the spherically symmetric case.






            share|cite|improve this answer




















              Your Answer





              StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
              return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
              StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
              StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
              );
              );
              , "mathjax-editing");

              StackExchange.ready(function()
              var channelOptions =
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "504"
              ;
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
              createEditor();
              );

              else
              createEditor();

              );

              function createEditor()
              StackExchange.prepareEditor(
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              convertImagesToLinks: true,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: 10,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader:
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              ,
              noCode: true, onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              );



              );






              ErwinSchr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









               

              draft saved


              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function ()
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f314560%2fharmonic-oscillator-in-spherical-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');

              );

              Post as a guest






























              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes








              2 Answers
              2






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes








              up vote
              2
              down vote



              accepted










              Indeed, the supersymmetric operators do not factorize the Hamiltonian of the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, there is an additional term. See Creation and annihilation operators, symmetry and supersymmetry of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator, equation 16.






              share|cite|improve this answer
























                up vote
                2
                down vote



                accepted










                Indeed, the supersymmetric operators do not factorize the Hamiltonian of the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, there is an additional term. See Creation and annihilation operators, symmetry and supersymmetry of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator, equation 16.






                share|cite|improve this answer






















                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted







                  up vote
                  2
                  down vote



                  accepted






                  Indeed, the supersymmetric operators do not factorize the Hamiltonian of the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, there is an additional term. See Creation and annihilation operators, symmetry and supersymmetry of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator, equation 16.






                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  Indeed, the supersymmetric operators do not factorize the Hamiltonian of the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator, there is an additional term. See Creation and annihilation operators, symmetry and supersymmetry of the 3D isotropic harmonic oscillator, equation 16.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered 2 hours ago









                  Carlo Beenakker

                  70.8k9157263




                  70.8k9157263




















                      up vote
                      0
                      down vote













                      Supplementing @CarloBeenakker's answer: a different sort of "factorization" of the Laplacian can be done in terms of the Dirac operator, which in some regards better preserves the nature of the situation, but/and has scalar coefficients in an appropriate Clifford algebra, which in general is not commutative. E.g., on $mathbb R$, it is $mathbb C$, which is convenient. But already in two dimensions the relevant Clifford algebra is the Hamiltonian quaternions...



                      Depending what you want to do, this might be a useful direction to consider, in addition to the "scalarization" of immediate reduction to the spherically symmetric case.






                      share|cite|improve this answer
























                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        Supplementing @CarloBeenakker's answer: a different sort of "factorization" of the Laplacian can be done in terms of the Dirac operator, which in some regards better preserves the nature of the situation, but/and has scalar coefficients in an appropriate Clifford algebra, which in general is not commutative. E.g., on $mathbb R$, it is $mathbb C$, which is convenient. But already in two dimensions the relevant Clifford algebra is the Hamiltonian quaternions...



                        Depending what you want to do, this might be a useful direction to consider, in addition to the "scalarization" of immediate reduction to the spherically symmetric case.






                        share|cite|improve this answer






















                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote










                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote









                          Supplementing @CarloBeenakker's answer: a different sort of "factorization" of the Laplacian can be done in terms of the Dirac operator, which in some regards better preserves the nature of the situation, but/and has scalar coefficients in an appropriate Clifford algebra, which in general is not commutative. E.g., on $mathbb R$, it is $mathbb C$, which is convenient. But already in two dimensions the relevant Clifford algebra is the Hamiltonian quaternions...



                          Depending what you want to do, this might be a useful direction to consider, in addition to the "scalarization" of immediate reduction to the spherically symmetric case.






                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          Supplementing @CarloBeenakker's answer: a different sort of "factorization" of the Laplacian can be done in terms of the Dirac operator, which in some regards better preserves the nature of the situation, but/and has scalar coefficients in an appropriate Clifford algebra, which in general is not commutative. E.g., on $mathbb R$, it is $mathbb C$, which is convenient. But already in two dimensions the relevant Clifford algebra is the Hamiltonian quaternions...



                          Depending what you want to do, this might be a useful direction to consider, in addition to the "scalarization" of immediate reduction to the spherically symmetric case.







                          share|cite|improve this answer












                          share|cite|improve this answer



                          share|cite|improve this answer










                          answered 2 hours ago









                          paul garrett

                          17.5k25298




                          17.5k25298




















                              ErwinSchr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                               

                              draft saved


                              draft discarded


















                              ErwinSchr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              ErwinSchr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                              ErwinSchr is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                               


                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function ()
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathoverflow.net%2fquestions%2f314560%2fharmonic-oscillator-in-spherical-coordinates%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                              );

                              Post as a guest













































































                              Popular posts from this blog

                              How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                              Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                              How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?