Why are set operations always showed with a Venn Diagram where both A and B are intersecting?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
3
down vote

favorite












So there is this question involving the pictorial representations of set operations (i.e. $A - B$).



In each Venn Diagram, the A and B circles (sets) are always shown overlapping. For example, $A - B$:



<span class=$A - B$">



What if the circles $A$ and $B$ were separate? How would defining the set operation be showed? Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question























  • If the circles do not overlap, then this depicts the sets being disjoint, i.e. $Acap B=emptyset.$ The overlap represents the intersection: the elements that are in both sets. Beyond that, I'm not sure I understand your question.
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:10











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Hi, okay so if the sets are disjoint, why isn't that the case when describing i.e. $A - B$. Why is it that they are always joint when showing the different set operations?
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:17







  • 1




    They are shading the region that represents the set. The red region is $A-B$ (if $A$ is the right circle and $B$ is the left circle). If the circles didn't overlap, all of $A$ would be red. This means that if $Acap B=emptyset,$ then $A-B = A.$
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:20











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Okay, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21














up vote
3
down vote

favorite












So there is this question involving the pictorial representations of set operations (i.e. $A - B$).



In each Venn Diagram, the A and B circles (sets) are always shown overlapping. For example, $A - B$:



<span class=$A - B$">



What if the circles $A$ and $B$ were separate? How would defining the set operation be showed? Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question























  • If the circles do not overlap, then this depicts the sets being disjoint, i.e. $Acap B=emptyset.$ The overlap represents the intersection: the elements that are in both sets. Beyond that, I'm not sure I understand your question.
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:10











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Hi, okay so if the sets are disjoint, why isn't that the case when describing i.e. $A - B$. Why is it that they are always joint when showing the different set operations?
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:17







  • 1




    They are shading the region that represents the set. The red region is $A-B$ (if $A$ is the right circle and $B$ is the left circle). If the circles didn't overlap, all of $A$ would be red. This means that if $Acap B=emptyset,$ then $A-B = A.$
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:20











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Okay, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21












up vote
3
down vote

favorite









up vote
3
down vote

favorite











So there is this question involving the pictorial representations of set operations (i.e. $A - B$).



In each Venn Diagram, the A and B circles (sets) are always shown overlapping. For example, $A - B$:



<span class=$A - B$">



What if the circles $A$ and $B$ were separate? How would defining the set operation be showed? Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question















So there is this question involving the pictorial representations of set operations (i.e. $A - B$).



In each Venn Diagram, the A and B circles (sets) are always shown overlapping. For example, $A - B$:



<span class=$A - B$">



What if the circles $A$ and $B$ were separate? How would defining the set operation be showed? Thanks.







elementary-set-theory proof-verification proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Oct 4 at 2:15

























asked Oct 4 at 2:05







user595054


















  • If the circles do not overlap, then this depicts the sets being disjoint, i.e. $Acap B=emptyset.$ The overlap represents the intersection: the elements that are in both sets. Beyond that, I'm not sure I understand your question.
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:10











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Hi, okay so if the sets are disjoint, why isn't that the case when describing i.e. $A - B$. Why is it that they are always joint when showing the different set operations?
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:17







  • 1




    They are shading the region that represents the set. The red region is $A-B$ (if $A$ is the right circle and $B$ is the left circle). If the circles didn't overlap, all of $A$ would be red. This means that if $Acap B=emptyset,$ then $A-B = A.$
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:20











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Okay, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21
















  • If the circles do not overlap, then this depicts the sets being disjoint, i.e. $Acap B=emptyset.$ The overlap represents the intersection: the elements that are in both sets. Beyond that, I'm not sure I understand your question.
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:10











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Hi, okay so if the sets are disjoint, why isn't that the case when describing i.e. $A - B$. Why is it that they are always joint when showing the different set operations?
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:17







  • 1




    They are shading the region that represents the set. The red region is $A-B$ (if $A$ is the right circle and $B$ is the left circle). If the circles didn't overlap, all of $A$ would be red. This means that if $Acap B=emptyset,$ then $A-B = A.$
    – spaceisdarkgreen
    Oct 4 at 2:20











  • @spaceisdarkgreen Okay, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21















If the circles do not overlap, then this depicts the sets being disjoint, i.e. $Acap B=emptyset.$ The overlap represents the intersection: the elements that are in both sets. Beyond that, I'm not sure I understand your question.
– spaceisdarkgreen
Oct 4 at 2:10





If the circles do not overlap, then this depicts the sets being disjoint, i.e. $Acap B=emptyset.$ The overlap represents the intersection: the elements that are in both sets. Beyond that, I'm not sure I understand your question.
– spaceisdarkgreen
Oct 4 at 2:10













@spaceisdarkgreen Hi, okay so if the sets are disjoint, why isn't that the case when describing i.e. $A - B$. Why is it that they are always joint when showing the different set operations?
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:17





@spaceisdarkgreen Hi, okay so if the sets are disjoint, why isn't that the case when describing i.e. $A - B$. Why is it that they are always joint when showing the different set operations?
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:17





1




1




They are shading the region that represents the set. The red region is $A-B$ (if $A$ is the right circle and $B$ is the left circle). If the circles didn't overlap, all of $A$ would be red. This means that if $Acap B=emptyset,$ then $A-B = A.$
– spaceisdarkgreen
Oct 4 at 2:20





They are shading the region that represents the set. The red region is $A-B$ (if $A$ is the right circle and $B$ is the left circle). If the circles didn't overlap, all of $A$ would be red. This means that if $Acap B=emptyset,$ then $A-B = A.$
– spaceisdarkgreen
Oct 4 at 2:20













@spaceisdarkgreen Okay, thanks.
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:21




@spaceisdarkgreen Okay, thanks.
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:21










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote



accepted










In Venn diagrams, the circles are shown to intersect each other to provide for all possible scenarios. Now dots (representing elements) that lie in both circles in such diagrams represent elements that belong to both sets, and if these two sets are disjoint (have no elements in common), that just means that there are really no dots lying in both circles. If the circles were drawn as non-intersecting, there would be no way to represent elements that belong to both sets.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Okay, this makes senses, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21

















up vote
0
down vote













I am assuming that you are using $A-B$ to denote $Asetminus B$, and that the right-hand circle is $A$, while the other is $B$. If the circles were not overlapping, then $Acap B=emptyset$. In that case:$$A-B=Asetminus B=A$$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Okay, this is good additional information to the question. Thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:27










Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2941546%2fwhy-are-set-operations-always-showed-with-a-venn-diagram-where-both-a-and-b-are%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest





























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
2
down vote



accepted










In Venn diagrams, the circles are shown to intersect each other to provide for all possible scenarios. Now dots (representing elements) that lie in both circles in such diagrams represent elements that belong to both sets, and if these two sets are disjoint (have no elements in common), that just means that there are really no dots lying in both circles. If the circles were drawn as non-intersecting, there would be no way to represent elements that belong to both sets.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Okay, this makes senses, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21














up vote
2
down vote



accepted










In Venn diagrams, the circles are shown to intersect each other to provide for all possible scenarios. Now dots (representing elements) that lie in both circles in such diagrams represent elements that belong to both sets, and if these two sets are disjoint (have no elements in common), that just means that there are really no dots lying in both circles. If the circles were drawn as non-intersecting, there would be no way to represent elements that belong to both sets.






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Okay, this makes senses, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21












up vote
2
down vote



accepted







up vote
2
down vote



accepted






In Venn diagrams, the circles are shown to intersect each other to provide for all possible scenarios. Now dots (representing elements) that lie in both circles in such diagrams represent elements that belong to both sets, and if these two sets are disjoint (have no elements in common), that just means that there are really no dots lying in both circles. If the circles were drawn as non-intersecting, there would be no way to represent elements that belong to both sets.






share|cite|improve this answer












In Venn diagrams, the circles are shown to intersect each other to provide for all possible scenarios. Now dots (representing elements) that lie in both circles in such diagrams represent elements that belong to both sets, and if these two sets are disjoint (have no elements in common), that just means that there are really no dots lying in both circles. If the circles were drawn as non-intersecting, there would be no way to represent elements that belong to both sets.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Oct 4 at 2:17









Will Hunting

42016




42016











  • Okay, this makes senses, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21
















  • Okay, this makes senses, thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:21















Okay, this makes senses, thanks.
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:21




Okay, this makes senses, thanks.
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:21










up vote
0
down vote













I am assuming that you are using $A-B$ to denote $Asetminus B$, and that the right-hand circle is $A$, while the other is $B$. If the circles were not overlapping, then $Acap B=emptyset$. In that case:$$A-B=Asetminus B=A$$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Okay, this is good additional information to the question. Thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:27














up vote
0
down vote













I am assuming that you are using $A-B$ to denote $Asetminus B$, and that the right-hand circle is $A$, while the other is $B$. If the circles were not overlapping, then $Acap B=emptyset$. In that case:$$A-B=Asetminus B=A$$






share|cite|improve this answer




















  • Okay, this is good additional information to the question. Thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:27












up vote
0
down vote










up vote
0
down vote









I am assuming that you are using $A-B$ to denote $Asetminus B$, and that the right-hand circle is $A$, while the other is $B$. If the circles were not overlapping, then $Acap B=emptyset$. In that case:$$A-B=Asetminus B=A$$






share|cite|improve this answer












I am assuming that you are using $A-B$ to denote $Asetminus B$, and that the right-hand circle is $A$, while the other is $B$. If the circles were not overlapping, then $Acap B=emptyset$. In that case:$$A-B=Asetminus B=A$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Oct 4 at 2:24









clathratus

48512




48512











  • Okay, this is good additional information to the question. Thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:27
















  • Okay, this is good additional information to the question. Thanks.
    – user595054
    Oct 4 at 2:27















Okay, this is good additional information to the question. Thanks.
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:27




Okay, this is good additional information to the question. Thanks.
– user595054
Oct 4 at 2:27

















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2941546%2fwhy-are-set-operations-always-showed-with-a-venn-diagram-where-both-a-and-b-are%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay