How to open a specific application like macOS `open -a`?

up vote
11
down vote

favorite

On macOS in the default Terminal running bash, I can type open -a Firefox http://www.wikipedia.org to open a URL with Firefox, or another browser. It also works to launch a program, e.g. open -a maps, and to open a file in the default program, e.g. open file.pdf.

How can I do the same on Ubuntu in the default GNOME Terminal also running bash? I know that I can open a file or URL with xdg-open /path/to/file, and I can open the default browser with sensible-browser. Does Ubuntu have a general command to open files, applications, or files in specific applications?

I am running bash on both machines, 3.2.57(1)-release on macOS and 4.4.19(1)-release on Ubuntu.

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

New contributor

I've never used a Mac, so can you tell me why you'd use open -a Firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? Can't you do firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? It seems like a useless feature of open, when opening programs is the very point of bash.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:26

1

Bash on macOS works differently, e.g. your command gives the error bash: firefox: command not found. Same error with Firefox as program name.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 16:36

3

bash works exactly the same; it's Firefox that is installed differently than it is on Ubuntu. On macOS, you could, for instance, run /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin from the command line. Firefox.app is a special kind of folder that contains not just the executable, but files that in Linux might be scattered about in various /usr/bin/, /usr/lib, /etc, etc. directories. The Finder knows how to run the actual application when you, for instance, double-click on Firefox.app. open is a way to "run" the special folder from the command line.
â€“Â chepner
Oct 4 at 18:53

4

It's not that bash works differently: firefox is installed as an OS X application (Firefox.app) and is not on the regular PATH. Another reason to use open -a is that it properly backgrounds the application it launches, instead of waiting on it until it exits.
â€“Â alexis
Oct 4 at 18:54

askubuntu.com/a/15356 &
â€“Â Dev
Oct 4 at 20:00

Â |Â
show 2 more comments

up vote
11
down vote

favorite

I am running bash on both machines, 3.2.57(1)-release on macOS and 4.4.19(1)-release on Ubuntu.

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

New contributor

I've never used a Mac, so can you tell me why you'd use open -a Firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? Can't you do firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? It seems like a useless feature of open, when opening programs is the very point of bash.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:26

1

Bash on macOS works differently, e.g. your command gives the error bash: firefox: command not found. Same error with Firefox as program name.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 16:36

3

bash works exactly the same; it's Firefox that is installed differently than it is on Ubuntu. On macOS, you could, for instance, run /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin from the command line. Firefox.app is a special kind of folder that contains not just the executable, but files that in Linux might be scattered about in various /usr/bin/, /usr/lib, /etc, etc. directories. The Finder knows how to run the actual application when you, for instance, double-click on Firefox.app. open is a way to "run" the special folder from the command line.
â€“Â chepner
Oct 4 at 18:53

4

It's not that bash works differently: firefox is installed as an OS X application (Firefox.app) and is not on the regular PATH. Another reason to use open -a is that it properly backgrounds the application it launches, instead of waiting on it until it exits.
â€“Â alexis
Oct 4 at 18:54

askubuntu.com/a/15356 &
â€“Â Dev
Oct 4 at 20:00

Â |Â
show 2 more comments

up vote
11
down vote

favorite

I am running bash on both machines, 3.2.57(1)-release on macOS and 4.4.19(1)-release on Ubuntu.

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

New contributor

I am running bash on both machines, 3.2.57(1)-release on macOS and 4.4.19(1)-release on Ubuntu.

command-line

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

New contributor

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

New contributor

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

edited Oct 5 at 1:26

muru

131k19276473

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

New contributor

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

asked Oct 4 at 11:11

mmorin

1646

New contributor

mmorin is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

I've never used a Mac, so can you tell me why you'd use open -a Firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? Can't you do firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? It seems like a useless feature of open, when opening programs is the very point of bash.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:26

1

Bash on macOS works differently, e.g. your command gives the error bash: firefox: command not found. Same error with Firefox as program name.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 16:36

3

bash works exactly the same; it's Firefox that is installed differently than it is on Ubuntu. On macOS, you could, for instance, run /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin from the command line. Firefox.app is a special kind of folder that contains not just the executable, but files that in Linux might be scattered about in various /usr/bin/, /usr/lib, /etc, etc. directories. The Finder knows how to run the actual application when you, for instance, double-click on Firefox.app. open is a way to "run" the special folder from the command line.
â€“Â chepner
Oct 4 at 18:53

4

It's not that bash works differently: firefox is installed as an OS X application (Firefox.app) and is not on the regular PATH. Another reason to use open -a is that it properly backgrounds the application it launches, instead of waiting on it until it exits.
â€“Â alexis
Oct 4 at 18:54

askubuntu.com/a/15356 &
â€“Â Dev
Oct 4 at 20:00

Â |Â
show 2 more comments

I've never used a Mac, so can you tell me why you'd use open -a Firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? Can't you do firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? It seems like a useless feature of open, when opening programs is the very point of bash.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:26

1

Bash on macOS works differently, e.g. your command gives the error bash: firefox: command not found. Same error with Firefox as program name.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 16:36

3

bash works exactly the same; it's Firefox that is installed differently than it is on Ubuntu. On macOS, you could, for instance, run /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin from the command line. Firefox.app is a special kind of folder that contains not just the executable, but files that in Linux might be scattered about in various /usr/bin/, /usr/lib, /etc, etc. directories. The Finder knows how to run the actual application when you, for instance, double-click on Firefox.app. open is a way to "run" the special folder from the command line.
â€“Â chepner
Oct 4 at 18:53

4

It's not that bash works differently: firefox is installed as an OS X application (Firefox.app) and is not on the regular PATH. Another reason to use open -a is that it properly backgrounds the application it launches, instead of waiting on it until it exits.
â€“Â alexis
Oct 4 at 18:54

askubuntu.com/a/15356 &
â€“Â Dev
Oct 4 at 20:00

I've never used a Mac, so can you tell me why you'd use open -a Firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? Can't you do firefox http://www.wikipedia.org? It seems like a useless feature of open, when opening programs is the very point of bash.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:26

Bash on macOS works differently, e.g. your command gives the error bash: firefox: command not found. Same error with Firefox as program name.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 16:36

bash works exactly the same; it's Firefox that is installed differently than it is on Ubuntu. On macOS, you could, for instance, run /Applications/Firefox.app/Contents/MacOS/firefox-bin from the command line. Firefox.app is a special kind of folder that contains not just the executable, but files that in Linux might be scattered about in various /usr/bin/, /usr/lib, /etc, etc. directories. The Finder knows how to run the actual application when you, for instance, double-click on Firefox.app. open is a way to "run" the special folder from the command line.
â€“Â chepner
Oct 4 at 18:53

It's not that bash works differently: firefox is installed as an OS X application (Firefox.app) and is not on the regular PATH. Another reason to use open -a is that it properly backgrounds the application it launches, instead of waiting on it until it exits.
â€“Â alexis
Oct 4 at 18:54

askubuntu.com/a/15356 &
â€“Â Dev
Oct 4 at 20:00

Â |Â
show 2 more comments

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
10
down vote

accepted

You can specifically use your desired program's name (if it's able to be used as a command line tool).

For example, urls:

firefox duckduckgo.com
chromium-browser askubuntu.com

PDF:

evince foo.pdf
okular bar.pdf

Images:

gpicview foo.png
feh bar.jpeg

Texts:

gedit foo.txt
mousepad /etc/config
leafpad bar.xml

Video/Music:

mpv foo.mp3
vlc bar.mp4

If you want the program to be run detached from the terminal then this is the way that I prefer doing it:

nohup program args &

For example:

nohup firefox askubuntu.com &

Remember that you can always redirect the outputs as usual, e.g. :

nohup firefox duckduckgo.com &> /dev/null &

edited 2 days ago

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

2

eog picture.jpg for images too if you have gnome-desktop installed :)
â€“Â Videonauth
Oct 4 at 11:19

1

@Videonauth Yeah, or any other kind of tools ;)
â€“Â Ravexina
Oct 4 at 11:20

2

@BaptisteCandellier I don't get the point of calling open to call another program. Why not just call the other program directly? What usefulness does open add? This answer reflects the natural thing to do to open specific applications.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:35

1

@BaptisteCandellier I agree, and open on macOS works both for opening files and folders in the default application and in specific applications. It seems the original bash went on a different path with xdg-open for files and the application names for the rest.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 17:00

2

Another thing that is different about open in MacOS is that it launches the application detached from the console it's run from, i.e. if the console closes, the app will stay on. On Ubuntu one needs to use the nohup command to get the same behaviour. (since prefixing each command with nohup and redirecting output for each command you run gets tiring, it may make more sense to define a custom shortcut)
â€“Â undercat
Oct 5 at 4:20

Â |Â
show 8 more comments

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "89"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);

);

mmorin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2faskubuntu.com%2fquestions%2f1080846%2fhow-to-open-a-specific-application-like-macos-open-a%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

up vote
10
down vote

accepted

You can specifically use your desired program's name (if it's able to be used as a command line tool).

For example, urls:

firefox duckduckgo.com
chromium-browser askubuntu.com

PDF:

evince foo.pdf
okular bar.pdf

Images:

gpicview foo.png
feh bar.jpeg

Texts:

gedit foo.txt
mousepad /etc/config
leafpad bar.xml

Video/Music:

mpv foo.mp3
vlc bar.mp4

If you want the program to be run detached from the terminal then this is the way that I prefer doing it:

nohup program args &

For example:

nohup firefox askubuntu.com &

Remember that you can always redirect the outputs as usual, e.g. :

nohup firefox duckduckgo.com &> /dev/null &

edited 2 days ago

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

2

eog picture.jpg for images too if you have gnome-desktop installed :)
â€“Â Videonauth
Oct 4 at 11:19

1

@Videonauth Yeah, or any other kind of tools ;)
â€“Â Ravexina
Oct 4 at 11:20

2

@BaptisteCandellier I don't get the point of calling open to call another program. Why not just call the other program directly? What usefulness does open add? This answer reflects the natural thing to do to open specific applications.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:35

1

@BaptisteCandellier I agree, and open on macOS works both for opening files and folders in the default application and in specific applications. It seems the original bash went on a different path with xdg-open for files and the application names for the rest.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 17:00

2

Another thing that is different about open in MacOS is that it launches the application detached from the console it's run from, i.e. if the console closes, the app will stay on. On Ubuntu one needs to use the nohup command to get the same behaviour. (since prefixing each command with nohup and redirecting output for each command you run gets tiring, it may make more sense to define a custom shortcut)
â€“Â undercat
Oct 5 at 4:20

Â |Â
show 8 more comments

up vote
10
down vote

accepted

You can specifically use your desired program's name (if it's able to be used as a command line tool).

For example, urls:

firefox duckduckgo.com
chromium-browser askubuntu.com

PDF:

evince foo.pdf
okular bar.pdf

Images:

gpicview foo.png
feh bar.jpeg

Texts:

gedit foo.txt
mousepad /etc/config
leafpad bar.xml

Video/Music:

mpv foo.mp3
vlc bar.mp4

If you want the program to be run detached from the terminal then this is the way that I prefer doing it:

nohup program args &

For example:

nohup firefox askubuntu.com &

Remember that you can always redirect the outputs as usual, e.g. :

nohup firefox duckduckgo.com &> /dev/null &

edited 2 days ago

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

2

eog picture.jpg for images too if you have gnome-desktop installed :)
â€“Â Videonauth
Oct 4 at 11:19

1

@Videonauth Yeah, or any other kind of tools ;)
â€“Â Ravexina
Oct 4 at 11:20

2

@BaptisteCandellier I don't get the point of calling open to call another program. Why not just call the other program directly? What usefulness does open add? This answer reflects the natural thing to do to open specific applications.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:35

1

@BaptisteCandellier I agree, and open on macOS works both for opening files and folders in the default application and in specific applications. It seems the original bash went on a different path with xdg-open for files and the application names for the rest.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 17:00

2

Another thing that is different about open in MacOS is that it launches the application detached from the console it's run from, i.e. if the console closes, the app will stay on. On Ubuntu one needs to use the nohup command to get the same behaviour. (since prefixing each command with nohup and redirecting output for each command you run gets tiring, it may make more sense to define a custom shortcut)
â€“Â undercat
Oct 5 at 4:20

Â |Â
show 8 more comments

up vote
10
down vote

accepted

You can specifically use your desired program's name (if it's able to be used as a command line tool).

For example, urls:

firefox duckduckgo.com
chromium-browser askubuntu.com

PDF:

evince foo.pdf
okular bar.pdf

Images:

gpicview foo.png
feh bar.jpeg

Texts:

gedit foo.txt
mousepad /etc/config
leafpad bar.xml

Video/Music:

mpv foo.mp3
vlc bar.mp4

If you want the program to be run detached from the terminal then this is the way that I prefer doing it:

nohup program args &

For example:

nohup firefox askubuntu.com &

Remember that you can always redirect the outputs as usual, e.g. :

nohup firefox duckduckgo.com &> /dev/null &

edited 2 days ago

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

You can specifically use your desired program's name (if it's able to be used as a command line tool).

For example, urls:

firefox duckduckgo.com
chromium-browser askubuntu.com

PDF:

evince foo.pdf
okular bar.pdf

Images:

gpicview foo.png
feh bar.jpeg

Texts:

gedit foo.txt
mousepad /etc/config
leafpad bar.xml

Video/Music:

mpv foo.mp3
vlc bar.mp4

If you want the program to be run detached from the terminal then this is the way that I prefer doing it:

nohup program args &

For example:

nohup firefox askubuntu.com &

Remember that you can always redirect the outputs as usual, e.g. :

nohup firefox duckduckgo.com &> /dev/null &

edited 2 days ago

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

edited 2 days ago

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

answered Oct 4 at 11:16

Ravexina

29.2k147199

2

eog picture.jpg for images too if you have gnome-desktop installed :)
â€“Â Videonauth
Oct 4 at 11:19

1

@Videonauth Yeah, or any other kind of tools ;)
â€“Â Ravexina
Oct 4 at 11:20

2

@BaptisteCandellier I don't get the point of calling open to call another program. Why not just call the other program directly? What usefulness does open add? This answer reflects the natural thing to do to open specific applications.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:35

1

@BaptisteCandellier I agree, and open on macOS works both for opening files and folders in the default application and in specific applications. It seems the original bash went on a different path with xdg-open for files and the application names for the rest.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 17:00

2

Another thing that is different about open in MacOS is that it launches the application detached from the console it's run from, i.e. if the console closes, the app will stay on. On Ubuntu one needs to use the nohup command to get the same behaviour. (since prefixing each command with nohup and redirecting output for each command you run gets tiring, it may make more sense to define a custom shortcut)
â€“Â undercat
Oct 5 at 4:20

Â |Â
show 8 more comments

2

eog picture.jpg for images too if you have gnome-desktop installed :)
â€“Â Videonauth
Oct 4 at 11:19

1

@Videonauth Yeah, or any other kind of tools ;)
â€“Â Ravexina
Oct 4 at 11:20

2

@BaptisteCandellier I don't get the point of calling open to call another program. Why not just call the other program directly? What usefulness does open add? This answer reflects the natural thing to do to open specific applications.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:35

1

@BaptisteCandellier I agree, and open on macOS works both for opening files and folders in the default application and in specific applications. It seems the original bash went on a different path with xdg-open for files and the application names for the rest.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 17:00

2

Another thing that is different about open in MacOS is that it launches the application detached from the console it's run from, i.e. if the console closes, the app will stay on. On Ubuntu one needs to use the nohup command to get the same behaviour. (since prefixing each command with nohup and redirecting output for each command you run gets tiring, it may make more sense to define a custom shortcut)
â€“Â undercat
Oct 5 at 4:20

eog picture.jpg for images too if you have gnome-desktop installed :)
â€“Â Videonauth
Oct 4 at 11:19

@Videonauth Yeah, or any other kind of tools ;)
â€“Â Ravexina
Oct 4 at 11:20

@BaptisteCandellier I don't get the point of calling open to call another program. Why not just call the other program directly? What usefulness does open add? This answer reflects the natural thing to do to open specific applications.
â€“Â JoL
Oct 4 at 15:35

@BaptisteCandellier I agree, and open on macOS works both for opening files and folders in the default application and in specific applications. It seems the original bash went on a different path with xdg-open for files and the application names for the rest.
â€“Â mmorin
Oct 4 at 17:00

Another thing that is different about open in MacOS is that it launches the application detached from the console it's run from, i.e. if the console closes, the app will stay on. On Ubuntu one needs to use the nohup command to get the same behaviour. (since prefixing each command with nohup and redirecting output for each command you run gets tiring, it may make more sense to define a custom shortcut)
â€“Â undercat
Oct 5 at 4:20

Â |Â
show 8 more comments

mmorin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

mmorin is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Post as a guest

Name

搜尋此網誌

mjhjmtu