How to prevent large group of animals to destroy my land?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP











up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












This is probably a miss question and it could belong to some other site but this is the first and the best place I can think to ask it.



I've created a world that is filled with beings and creatures that are very specified and can be easily separated and recognized. In this world there are 7 basic types of life forms (not counting bacteria, viruses and micro organisms). Basic difference is their food source.



Types:




  • Rocky family - mainly eat plants and feed on magic-like energy that is all around them in nature.


  • Humans - eat normal human food ( meat, plants, etc. ... )


  • Basic animals - ( animals that are food source for humans ), grass and low bushes


  • Nature protector animals - ( These animals are not a food source for humans and have been given some magical powers and serve to protect the nature ) Eat small "Basic animal" and live on the energy provided by the magic in the air


  • Phantoms eat anything except plants, and can not live on the magical energy


  • Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them

The final category is a creature that is made from a colony of small magical creatures. They eat any kind of plants or animals, like a parasite or locust swarm.



I need to somehow limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.



My current idea is that they should only be active at specific time of a year.



Is this a viable solution to reasonably prevent this type of creature from destroying my world?










share|improve this question









New contributor




TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Hello. First, I believe this is on topic. Given how readily I vote off-topic, it has to count for something ;) But then - it looks broad/opinion based. Format of this site assumes one clear question and answers that may be good or bad. You seem to ask for ideas, with no hint which ones would be good or bad, how to judge better from worse.
    – Mołot
    3 hours ago










  • Welcome to WorldBuilding.SE! Hope you don't mind me editing your question just to make it a bit more readable. Feel free to take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site.
    – F1Krazy
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    I'm going to have to vote this as too opinion-based. There's not really a right answer, and from the information you're giving us, I instinctively want to suggest a reorganization of your system, which is simultaneously an answer, but I guarantee is not the kind of answer you want, thus making it too broad of a question. Perhaps maybe try to narrow down the details so that we can see better what you're working with?
    – Sora Tamashii
    3 hours ago










  • Yes i did think it more like an idea. But perhaps I should have asked to help me decide if it would be more likeable for them to act as a group only while there need to make next generation of there species. That is the only thing that comes to my mind. Could that be more like the question i should ask?
    – TheStwor
    3 hours ago











  • Again, too opinion-based. What may be likable to me may not to you or to F1Krazy or to Molot.
    – Sora Tamashii
    2 hours ago














up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1












This is probably a miss question and it could belong to some other site but this is the first and the best place I can think to ask it.



I've created a world that is filled with beings and creatures that are very specified and can be easily separated and recognized. In this world there are 7 basic types of life forms (not counting bacteria, viruses and micro organisms). Basic difference is their food source.



Types:




  • Rocky family - mainly eat plants and feed on magic-like energy that is all around them in nature.


  • Humans - eat normal human food ( meat, plants, etc. ... )


  • Basic animals - ( animals that are food source for humans ), grass and low bushes


  • Nature protector animals - ( These animals are not a food source for humans and have been given some magical powers and serve to protect the nature ) Eat small "Basic animal" and live on the energy provided by the magic in the air


  • Phantoms eat anything except plants, and can not live on the magical energy


  • Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them

The final category is a creature that is made from a colony of small magical creatures. They eat any kind of plants or animals, like a parasite or locust swarm.



I need to somehow limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.



My current idea is that they should only be active at specific time of a year.



Is this a viable solution to reasonably prevent this type of creature from destroying my world?










share|improve this question









New contributor




TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.



















  • Hello. First, I believe this is on topic. Given how readily I vote off-topic, it has to count for something ;) But then - it looks broad/opinion based. Format of this site assumes one clear question and answers that may be good or bad. You seem to ask for ideas, with no hint which ones would be good or bad, how to judge better from worse.
    – Mołot
    3 hours ago










  • Welcome to WorldBuilding.SE! Hope you don't mind me editing your question just to make it a bit more readable. Feel free to take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site.
    – F1Krazy
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    I'm going to have to vote this as too opinion-based. There's not really a right answer, and from the information you're giving us, I instinctively want to suggest a reorganization of your system, which is simultaneously an answer, but I guarantee is not the kind of answer you want, thus making it too broad of a question. Perhaps maybe try to narrow down the details so that we can see better what you're working with?
    – Sora Tamashii
    3 hours ago










  • Yes i did think it more like an idea. But perhaps I should have asked to help me decide if it would be more likeable for them to act as a group only while there need to make next generation of there species. That is the only thing that comes to my mind. Could that be more like the question i should ask?
    – TheStwor
    3 hours ago











  • Again, too opinion-based. What may be likable to me may not to you or to F1Krazy or to Molot.
    – Sora Tamashii
    2 hours ago












up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
4
down vote

favorite
1






1





This is probably a miss question and it could belong to some other site but this is the first and the best place I can think to ask it.



I've created a world that is filled with beings and creatures that are very specified and can be easily separated and recognized. In this world there are 7 basic types of life forms (not counting bacteria, viruses and micro organisms). Basic difference is their food source.



Types:




  • Rocky family - mainly eat plants and feed on magic-like energy that is all around them in nature.


  • Humans - eat normal human food ( meat, plants, etc. ... )


  • Basic animals - ( animals that are food source for humans ), grass and low bushes


  • Nature protector animals - ( These animals are not a food source for humans and have been given some magical powers and serve to protect the nature ) Eat small "Basic animal" and live on the energy provided by the magic in the air


  • Phantoms eat anything except plants, and can not live on the magical energy


  • Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them

The final category is a creature that is made from a colony of small magical creatures. They eat any kind of plants or animals, like a parasite or locust swarm.



I need to somehow limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.



My current idea is that they should only be active at specific time of a year.



Is this a viable solution to reasonably prevent this type of creature from destroying my world?










share|improve this question









New contributor




TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











This is probably a miss question and it could belong to some other site but this is the first and the best place I can think to ask it.



I've created a world that is filled with beings and creatures that are very specified and can be easily separated and recognized. In this world there are 7 basic types of life forms (not counting bacteria, viruses and micro organisms). Basic difference is their food source.



Types:




  • Rocky family - mainly eat plants and feed on magic-like energy that is all around them in nature.


  • Humans - eat normal human food ( meat, plants, etc. ... )


  • Basic animals - ( animals that are food source for humans ), grass and low bushes


  • Nature protector animals - ( These animals are not a food source for humans and have been given some magical powers and serve to protect the nature ) Eat small "Basic animal" and live on the energy provided by the magic in the air


  • Phantoms eat anything except plants, and can not live on the magical energy


  • Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them

The final category is a creature that is made from a colony of small magical creatures. They eat any kind of plants or animals, like a parasite or locust swarm.



I need to somehow limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.



My current idea is that they should only be active at specific time of a year.



Is this a viable solution to reasonably prevent this type of creature from destroying my world?







biology magic environment






share|improve this question









New contributor




TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Stephan

1,132211




1,132211






New contributor




TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 3 hours ago









TheStwor

212




212




New contributor




TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






TheStwor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • Hello. First, I believe this is on topic. Given how readily I vote off-topic, it has to count for something ;) But then - it looks broad/opinion based. Format of this site assumes one clear question and answers that may be good or bad. You seem to ask for ideas, with no hint which ones would be good or bad, how to judge better from worse.
    – Mołot
    3 hours ago










  • Welcome to WorldBuilding.SE! Hope you don't mind me editing your question just to make it a bit more readable. Feel free to take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site.
    – F1Krazy
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    I'm going to have to vote this as too opinion-based. There's not really a right answer, and from the information you're giving us, I instinctively want to suggest a reorganization of your system, which is simultaneously an answer, but I guarantee is not the kind of answer you want, thus making it too broad of a question. Perhaps maybe try to narrow down the details so that we can see better what you're working with?
    – Sora Tamashii
    3 hours ago










  • Yes i did think it more like an idea. But perhaps I should have asked to help me decide if it would be more likeable for them to act as a group only while there need to make next generation of there species. That is the only thing that comes to my mind. Could that be more like the question i should ask?
    – TheStwor
    3 hours ago











  • Again, too opinion-based. What may be likable to me may not to you or to F1Krazy or to Molot.
    – Sora Tamashii
    2 hours ago
















  • Hello. First, I believe this is on topic. Given how readily I vote off-topic, it has to count for something ;) But then - it looks broad/opinion based. Format of this site assumes one clear question and answers that may be good or bad. You seem to ask for ideas, with no hint which ones would be good or bad, how to judge better from worse.
    – Mołot
    3 hours ago










  • Welcome to WorldBuilding.SE! Hope you don't mind me editing your question just to make it a bit more readable. Feel free to take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site.
    – F1Krazy
    3 hours ago






  • 1




    I'm going to have to vote this as too opinion-based. There's not really a right answer, and from the information you're giving us, I instinctively want to suggest a reorganization of your system, which is simultaneously an answer, but I guarantee is not the kind of answer you want, thus making it too broad of a question. Perhaps maybe try to narrow down the details so that we can see better what you're working with?
    – Sora Tamashii
    3 hours ago










  • Yes i did think it more like an idea. But perhaps I should have asked to help me decide if it would be more likeable for them to act as a group only while there need to make next generation of there species. That is the only thing that comes to my mind. Could that be more like the question i should ask?
    – TheStwor
    3 hours ago











  • Again, too opinion-based. What may be likable to me may not to you or to F1Krazy or to Molot.
    – Sora Tamashii
    2 hours ago















Hello. First, I believe this is on topic. Given how readily I vote off-topic, it has to count for something ;) But then - it looks broad/opinion based. Format of this site assumes one clear question and answers that may be good or bad. You seem to ask for ideas, with no hint which ones would be good or bad, how to judge better from worse.
– Mołot
3 hours ago




Hello. First, I believe this is on topic. Given how readily I vote off-topic, it has to count for something ;) But then - it looks broad/opinion based. Format of this site assumes one clear question and answers that may be good or bad. You seem to ask for ideas, with no hint which ones would be good or bad, how to judge better from worse.
– Mołot
3 hours ago












Welcome to WorldBuilding.SE! Hope you don't mind me editing your question just to make it a bit more readable. Feel free to take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site.
– F1Krazy
3 hours ago




Welcome to WorldBuilding.SE! Hope you don't mind me editing your question just to make it a bit more readable. Feel free to take the tour and visit the help center to learn more about the site.
– F1Krazy
3 hours ago




1




1




I'm going to have to vote this as too opinion-based. There's not really a right answer, and from the information you're giving us, I instinctively want to suggest a reorganization of your system, which is simultaneously an answer, but I guarantee is not the kind of answer you want, thus making it too broad of a question. Perhaps maybe try to narrow down the details so that we can see better what you're working with?
– Sora Tamashii
3 hours ago




I'm going to have to vote this as too opinion-based. There's not really a right answer, and from the information you're giving us, I instinctively want to suggest a reorganization of your system, which is simultaneously an answer, but I guarantee is not the kind of answer you want, thus making it too broad of a question. Perhaps maybe try to narrow down the details so that we can see better what you're working with?
– Sora Tamashii
3 hours ago












Yes i did think it more like an idea. But perhaps I should have asked to help me decide if it would be more likeable for them to act as a group only while there need to make next generation of there species. That is the only thing that comes to my mind. Could that be more like the question i should ask?
– TheStwor
3 hours ago





Yes i did think it more like an idea. But perhaps I should have asked to help me decide if it would be more likeable for them to act as a group only while there need to make next generation of there species. That is the only thing that comes to my mind. Could that be more like the question i should ask?
– TheStwor
3 hours ago













Again, too opinion-based. What may be likable to me may not to you or to F1Krazy or to Molot.
– Sora Tamashii
2 hours ago




Again, too opinion-based. What may be likable to me may not to you or to F1Krazy or to Molot.
– Sora Tamashii
2 hours ago










6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
2
down vote














Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them (...) I need to some how limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.




"Live plant" is a misnomer. Being lifeforms, plants are by definition living beings just like animals[citation needed].



Other than that, carnivorous plants are a thing in our world. In some forrests and jungles you can find many venus flytraps and other species. The bigger ones will feed on rodents and frogs, even. The very largest one may as well be Puya chilensis, which attracts sheep that then get stuck in its spikes and die, fertilizing the soil with their corpses. These buggers have so far failed horribly in "destroying a large amount of land at once".



If your carnivorous plants can move around, then they are no different from regular predators. If they hunt by making traps as you suggest, then they are like antlions and spiders, although their prey may be quite larger.






share|improve this answer




















  • Thanks, that could just do the work! :D
    – TheStwor
    2 hours ago

















up vote
1
down vote













Are you asking who would eat the "small" animals?



If they are like IRL rats or mice, they should be eaten by same predators that eat larger animals. IRL, wolves and foxes and various wild cats eat both large animals like deer, and small animals like rats or mice.



In your world, it sounds like "nature protectors" serve the same role, since they already eat mid-sized herbivores.






share|improve this answer




















  • Hi @Bald Bear, If you are unsure of what the question is specifically asking, you should attempt to get clarification from the asker in their question's comments. As is, it seems like your answer is trying more to make sense of the question than it is answer it, which is still not a bad thing, but may ultimately end up being wrong for what the asker's needs are. Just thought I'd point that out.
    – Sora Tamashii
    3 hours ago










  • Thanks, that did help a bit. But I was asking for a time period in which they cold be peace full and not active as a group or perhaps the opposite. I need to specify period of a time in which they are not threat to the land. But your answer could have just solved my problem, because now I can imagine a scenario in which there is a hunting season and their number get reduced.
    – TheStwor
    2 hours ago

















up vote
0
down vote













So you have a group of probably aggressive plants that like to eat meat. Look at the carnivorous plants that exist in the real world.



The sort of it, as far as I understand, is that real carnivorous plants live primarily in nutrient poor soil. What they eat is still the energy from sunlight to make sugars, but they need more than that. Meat provides that supplemental nutrition. So that's why they eat animals. Nature provides us another example in common weeds. One aggressive weed will choke out competing plants in the same patch of soil.



That'll give you some Why's for why your Live Plants doing what they do. It can also give you some directions in limitations.



Soils throughout the world vary a lot, depending on a variety of conditions. That alone gives you a very solid reason for limiting the range of your very hungry plants. Perhaps they initially grew in areas that are swampy. That means they aren't going to spread readily toward more well drained soil. The water requirement may be too high. Maybe they evolved in an area that had highly acidic soil, like azaleas or roses. Those won't thrive unless you give them some specific types of fertilizers to alter the pH of the soil they are in. That give you another reason to limit range.



The types of local animals are equally influenced by the local plant life which is in turn influenced by soil. So you get low grasslands. In turn you will probably get relatively small animals like mice and voles and bunnies. If those are the predominant animal, the Live Plants will evolve to eat the most common animals, which aren't that big to begin with.



Hopefully that'll get you where you need to be.






share|improve this answer




















  • Yes, like i said, those are just some of the most basic types that I can put them in. Thanks, I think that it should be manageable from here.
    – TheStwor
    2 hours ago


















up vote
0
down vote













Your creatures sound like magic Locust.



The Locust swarms on earth ebb and swarm based on the availability of food, seasons, and their reproductive cycle.



Have a look at the Desert Locust (wiki) for ideas.



They reproduce 2 to 5 times in a year, so the swarm or "upsurge" is really the children or great-great-grandchildren of the initial hatching.



This could be a viable mechanism for your creature, especially if you intend to have an ominous stage in your world where the first sightings of the creature cause people to start trying to exterminate as many as possible before its too late to prevent an upsurge.






share|improve this answer



























    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Food availability, seasons and predation.



    Since food availability cant drop too much or it'll mark the land as destroyed you limit them through their magic. Their brand of magic (or all magic if you like) ebbs and flows. This can ebb and flow over time and even vary from location to location. This means they are limited in time and what area they can feed on. Better yet, they might only follow magic around and while they might eat a lot as they pass they dont stay long enough to deal damage.



    Seasons. Like any small creature, seasons can heavily influence their number. First food becomes scarcer and then the cold (or heat, depending on the area) kills off a lot leaving few to build up their numbers again.



    Predation. As with most creatures that generate lots and lots of offspring, the local wildlife learns how delicious they are quickly. Ducks for example get dozens of ducklings per cycle but only a few make it to adulthood. And whenever a small critter or insect manages a baby-boom, it's predators will shortly after have a baby-boom of their own as food and energy is easily accessible and more predators reach maturity.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      You want to protect your world? Isn't that what "Nature Protector Animals" are supposed to do?



      whale eats fish
      https://www.nwf.org/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2015/AugSept/PhotoZone/Brydes-Whales



      You have already in your list a class of creatures which "protect the nature" and eat magic and small animals. You are worried that your magic bug swarm will destroy the nature. I observe that the swarm is both magic and small animals - delicious! I propose that when the bugs start doing their thing, large Nature Protector Animals of various sorts will arrive in short order and devour them.





      share




















        Your Answer




        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "579"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: false,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        TheStwor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









         

        draft saved


        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128523%2fhow-to-prevent-large-group-of-animals-to-destroy-my-land%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest






























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes








        up vote
        2
        down vote














        Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them (...) I need to some how limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.




        "Live plant" is a misnomer. Being lifeforms, plants are by definition living beings just like animals[citation needed].



        Other than that, carnivorous plants are a thing in our world. In some forrests and jungles you can find many venus flytraps and other species. The bigger ones will feed on rodents and frogs, even. The very largest one may as well be Puya chilensis, which attracts sheep that then get stuck in its spikes and die, fertilizing the soil with their corpses. These buggers have so far failed horribly in "destroying a large amount of land at once".



        If your carnivorous plants can move around, then they are no different from regular predators. If they hunt by making traps as you suggest, then they are like antlions and spiders, although their prey may be quite larger.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Thanks, that could just do the work! :D
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago














        up vote
        2
        down vote














        Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them (...) I need to some how limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.




        "Live plant" is a misnomer. Being lifeforms, plants are by definition living beings just like animals[citation needed].



        Other than that, carnivorous plants are a thing in our world. In some forrests and jungles you can find many venus flytraps and other species. The bigger ones will feed on rodents and frogs, even. The very largest one may as well be Puya chilensis, which attracts sheep that then get stuck in its spikes and die, fertilizing the soil with their corpses. These buggers have so far failed horribly in "destroying a large amount of land at once".



        If your carnivorous plants can move around, then they are no different from regular predators. If they hunt by making traps as you suggest, then they are like antlions and spiders, although their prey may be quite larger.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Thanks, that could just do the work! :D
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago












        up vote
        2
        down vote










        up vote
        2
        down vote










        Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them (...) I need to some how limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.




        "Live plant" is a misnomer. Being lifeforms, plants are by definition living beings just like animals[citation needed].



        Other than that, carnivorous plants are a thing in our world. In some forrests and jungles you can find many venus flytraps and other species. The bigger ones will feed on rodents and frogs, even. The very largest one may as well be Puya chilensis, which attracts sheep that then get stuck in its spikes and die, fertilizing the soil with their corpses. These buggers have so far failed horribly in "destroying a large amount of land at once".



        If your carnivorous plants can move around, then they are no different from regular predators. If they hunt by making traps as you suggest, then they are like antlions and spiders, although their prey may be quite larger.






        share|improve this answer













        Live plants mostly act like "sand traps" eating any flesh given to them (...) I need to some how limit them from destroying a large amount of land at once.




        "Live plant" is a misnomer. Being lifeforms, plants are by definition living beings just like animals[citation needed].



        Other than that, carnivorous plants are a thing in our world. In some forrests and jungles you can find many venus flytraps and other species. The bigger ones will feed on rodents and frogs, even. The very largest one may as well be Puya chilensis, which attracts sheep that then get stuck in its spikes and die, fertilizing the soil with their corpses. These buggers have so far failed horribly in "destroying a large amount of land at once".



        If your carnivorous plants can move around, then they are no different from regular predators. If they hunt by making traps as you suggest, then they are like antlions and spiders, although their prey may be quite larger.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Renan

        37.3k1185188




        37.3k1185188











        • Thanks, that could just do the work! :D
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago
















        • Thanks, that could just do the work! :D
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago















        Thanks, that could just do the work! :D
        – TheStwor
        2 hours ago




        Thanks, that could just do the work! :D
        – TheStwor
        2 hours ago










        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Are you asking who would eat the "small" animals?



        If they are like IRL rats or mice, they should be eaten by same predators that eat larger animals. IRL, wolves and foxes and various wild cats eat both large animals like deer, and small animals like rats or mice.



        In your world, it sounds like "nature protectors" serve the same role, since they already eat mid-sized herbivores.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Hi @Bald Bear, If you are unsure of what the question is specifically asking, you should attempt to get clarification from the asker in their question's comments. As is, it seems like your answer is trying more to make sense of the question than it is answer it, which is still not a bad thing, but may ultimately end up being wrong for what the asker's needs are. Just thought I'd point that out.
          – Sora Tamashii
          3 hours ago










        • Thanks, that did help a bit. But I was asking for a time period in which they cold be peace full and not active as a group or perhaps the opposite. I need to specify period of a time in which they are not threat to the land. But your answer could have just solved my problem, because now I can imagine a scenario in which there is a hunting season and their number get reduced.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago














        up vote
        1
        down vote













        Are you asking who would eat the "small" animals?



        If they are like IRL rats or mice, they should be eaten by same predators that eat larger animals. IRL, wolves and foxes and various wild cats eat both large animals like deer, and small animals like rats or mice.



        In your world, it sounds like "nature protectors" serve the same role, since they already eat mid-sized herbivores.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Hi @Bald Bear, If you are unsure of what the question is specifically asking, you should attempt to get clarification from the asker in their question's comments. As is, it seems like your answer is trying more to make sense of the question than it is answer it, which is still not a bad thing, but may ultimately end up being wrong for what the asker's needs are. Just thought I'd point that out.
          – Sora Tamashii
          3 hours ago










        • Thanks, that did help a bit. But I was asking for a time period in which they cold be peace full and not active as a group or perhaps the opposite. I need to specify period of a time in which they are not threat to the land. But your answer could have just solved my problem, because now I can imagine a scenario in which there is a hunting season and their number get reduced.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago












        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Are you asking who would eat the "small" animals?



        If they are like IRL rats or mice, they should be eaten by same predators that eat larger animals. IRL, wolves and foxes and various wild cats eat both large animals like deer, and small animals like rats or mice.



        In your world, it sounds like "nature protectors" serve the same role, since they already eat mid-sized herbivores.






        share|improve this answer












        Are you asking who would eat the "small" animals?



        If they are like IRL rats or mice, they should be eaten by same predators that eat larger animals. IRL, wolves and foxes and various wild cats eat both large animals like deer, and small animals like rats or mice.



        In your world, it sounds like "nature protectors" serve the same role, since they already eat mid-sized herbivores.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 3 hours ago









        Bald Bear

        4,872519




        4,872519











        • Hi @Bald Bear, If you are unsure of what the question is specifically asking, you should attempt to get clarification from the asker in their question's comments. As is, it seems like your answer is trying more to make sense of the question than it is answer it, which is still not a bad thing, but may ultimately end up being wrong for what the asker's needs are. Just thought I'd point that out.
          – Sora Tamashii
          3 hours ago










        • Thanks, that did help a bit. But I was asking for a time period in which they cold be peace full and not active as a group or perhaps the opposite. I need to specify period of a time in which they are not threat to the land. But your answer could have just solved my problem, because now I can imagine a scenario in which there is a hunting season and their number get reduced.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago
















        • Hi @Bald Bear, If you are unsure of what the question is specifically asking, you should attempt to get clarification from the asker in their question's comments. As is, it seems like your answer is trying more to make sense of the question than it is answer it, which is still not a bad thing, but may ultimately end up being wrong for what the asker's needs are. Just thought I'd point that out.
          – Sora Tamashii
          3 hours ago










        • Thanks, that did help a bit. But I was asking for a time period in which they cold be peace full and not active as a group or perhaps the opposite. I need to specify period of a time in which they are not threat to the land. But your answer could have just solved my problem, because now I can imagine a scenario in which there is a hunting season and their number get reduced.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago















        Hi @Bald Bear, If you are unsure of what the question is specifically asking, you should attempt to get clarification from the asker in their question's comments. As is, it seems like your answer is trying more to make sense of the question than it is answer it, which is still not a bad thing, but may ultimately end up being wrong for what the asker's needs are. Just thought I'd point that out.
        – Sora Tamashii
        3 hours ago




        Hi @Bald Bear, If you are unsure of what the question is specifically asking, you should attempt to get clarification from the asker in their question's comments. As is, it seems like your answer is trying more to make sense of the question than it is answer it, which is still not a bad thing, but may ultimately end up being wrong for what the asker's needs are. Just thought I'd point that out.
        – Sora Tamashii
        3 hours ago












        Thanks, that did help a bit. But I was asking for a time period in which they cold be peace full and not active as a group or perhaps the opposite. I need to specify period of a time in which they are not threat to the land. But your answer could have just solved my problem, because now I can imagine a scenario in which there is a hunting season and their number get reduced.
        – TheStwor
        2 hours ago




        Thanks, that did help a bit. But I was asking for a time period in which they cold be peace full and not active as a group or perhaps the opposite. I need to specify period of a time in which they are not threat to the land. But your answer could have just solved my problem, because now I can imagine a scenario in which there is a hunting season and their number get reduced.
        – TheStwor
        2 hours ago










        up vote
        0
        down vote













        So you have a group of probably aggressive plants that like to eat meat. Look at the carnivorous plants that exist in the real world.



        The sort of it, as far as I understand, is that real carnivorous plants live primarily in nutrient poor soil. What they eat is still the energy from sunlight to make sugars, but they need more than that. Meat provides that supplemental nutrition. So that's why they eat animals. Nature provides us another example in common weeds. One aggressive weed will choke out competing plants in the same patch of soil.



        That'll give you some Why's for why your Live Plants doing what they do. It can also give you some directions in limitations.



        Soils throughout the world vary a lot, depending on a variety of conditions. That alone gives you a very solid reason for limiting the range of your very hungry plants. Perhaps they initially grew in areas that are swampy. That means they aren't going to spread readily toward more well drained soil. The water requirement may be too high. Maybe they evolved in an area that had highly acidic soil, like azaleas or roses. Those won't thrive unless you give them some specific types of fertilizers to alter the pH of the soil they are in. That give you another reason to limit range.



        The types of local animals are equally influenced by the local plant life which is in turn influenced by soil. So you get low grasslands. In turn you will probably get relatively small animals like mice and voles and bunnies. If those are the predominant animal, the Live Plants will evolve to eat the most common animals, which aren't that big to begin with.



        Hopefully that'll get you where you need to be.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Yes, like i said, those are just some of the most basic types that I can put them in. Thanks, I think that it should be manageable from here.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago















        up vote
        0
        down vote













        So you have a group of probably aggressive plants that like to eat meat. Look at the carnivorous plants that exist in the real world.



        The sort of it, as far as I understand, is that real carnivorous plants live primarily in nutrient poor soil. What they eat is still the energy from sunlight to make sugars, but they need more than that. Meat provides that supplemental nutrition. So that's why they eat animals. Nature provides us another example in common weeds. One aggressive weed will choke out competing plants in the same patch of soil.



        That'll give you some Why's for why your Live Plants doing what they do. It can also give you some directions in limitations.



        Soils throughout the world vary a lot, depending on a variety of conditions. That alone gives you a very solid reason for limiting the range of your very hungry plants. Perhaps they initially grew in areas that are swampy. That means they aren't going to spread readily toward more well drained soil. The water requirement may be too high. Maybe they evolved in an area that had highly acidic soil, like azaleas or roses. Those won't thrive unless you give them some specific types of fertilizers to alter the pH of the soil they are in. That give you another reason to limit range.



        The types of local animals are equally influenced by the local plant life which is in turn influenced by soil. So you get low grasslands. In turn you will probably get relatively small animals like mice and voles and bunnies. If those are the predominant animal, the Live Plants will evolve to eat the most common animals, which aren't that big to begin with.



        Hopefully that'll get you where you need to be.






        share|improve this answer




















        • Yes, like i said, those are just some of the most basic types that I can put them in. Thanks, I think that it should be manageable from here.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago













        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        So you have a group of probably aggressive plants that like to eat meat. Look at the carnivorous plants that exist in the real world.



        The sort of it, as far as I understand, is that real carnivorous plants live primarily in nutrient poor soil. What they eat is still the energy from sunlight to make sugars, but they need more than that. Meat provides that supplemental nutrition. So that's why they eat animals. Nature provides us another example in common weeds. One aggressive weed will choke out competing plants in the same patch of soil.



        That'll give you some Why's for why your Live Plants doing what they do. It can also give you some directions in limitations.



        Soils throughout the world vary a lot, depending on a variety of conditions. That alone gives you a very solid reason for limiting the range of your very hungry plants. Perhaps they initially grew in areas that are swampy. That means they aren't going to spread readily toward more well drained soil. The water requirement may be too high. Maybe they evolved in an area that had highly acidic soil, like azaleas or roses. Those won't thrive unless you give them some specific types of fertilizers to alter the pH of the soil they are in. That give you another reason to limit range.



        The types of local animals are equally influenced by the local plant life which is in turn influenced by soil. So you get low grasslands. In turn you will probably get relatively small animals like mice and voles and bunnies. If those are the predominant animal, the Live Plants will evolve to eat the most common animals, which aren't that big to begin with.



        Hopefully that'll get you where you need to be.






        share|improve this answer












        So you have a group of probably aggressive plants that like to eat meat. Look at the carnivorous plants that exist in the real world.



        The sort of it, as far as I understand, is that real carnivorous plants live primarily in nutrient poor soil. What they eat is still the energy from sunlight to make sugars, but they need more than that. Meat provides that supplemental nutrition. So that's why they eat animals. Nature provides us another example in common weeds. One aggressive weed will choke out competing plants in the same patch of soil.



        That'll give you some Why's for why your Live Plants doing what they do. It can also give you some directions in limitations.



        Soils throughout the world vary a lot, depending on a variety of conditions. That alone gives you a very solid reason for limiting the range of your very hungry plants. Perhaps they initially grew in areas that are swampy. That means they aren't going to spread readily toward more well drained soil. The water requirement may be too high. Maybe they evolved in an area that had highly acidic soil, like azaleas or roses. Those won't thrive unless you give them some specific types of fertilizers to alter the pH of the soil they are in. That give you another reason to limit range.



        The types of local animals are equally influenced by the local plant life which is in turn influenced by soil. So you get low grasslands. In turn you will probably get relatively small animals like mice and voles and bunnies. If those are the predominant animal, the Live Plants will evolve to eat the most common animals, which aren't that big to begin with.



        Hopefully that'll get you where you need to be.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 hours ago









        Paul TIKI

        12.9k1759




        12.9k1759











        • Yes, like i said, those are just some of the most basic types that I can put them in. Thanks, I think that it should be manageable from here.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago

















        • Yes, like i said, those are just some of the most basic types that I can put them in. Thanks, I think that it should be manageable from here.
          – TheStwor
          2 hours ago
















        Yes, like i said, those are just some of the most basic types that I can put them in. Thanks, I think that it should be manageable from here.
        – TheStwor
        2 hours ago





        Yes, like i said, those are just some of the most basic types that I can put them in. Thanks, I think that it should be manageable from here.
        – TheStwor
        2 hours ago











        up vote
        0
        down vote













        Your creatures sound like magic Locust.



        The Locust swarms on earth ebb and swarm based on the availability of food, seasons, and their reproductive cycle.



        Have a look at the Desert Locust (wiki) for ideas.



        They reproduce 2 to 5 times in a year, so the swarm or "upsurge" is really the children or great-great-grandchildren of the initial hatching.



        This could be a viable mechanism for your creature, especially if you intend to have an ominous stage in your world where the first sightings of the creature cause people to start trying to exterminate as many as possible before its too late to prevent an upsurge.






        share|improve this answer
























          up vote
          0
          down vote













          Your creatures sound like magic Locust.



          The Locust swarms on earth ebb and swarm based on the availability of food, seasons, and their reproductive cycle.



          Have a look at the Desert Locust (wiki) for ideas.



          They reproduce 2 to 5 times in a year, so the swarm or "upsurge" is really the children or great-great-grandchildren of the initial hatching.



          This could be a viable mechanism for your creature, especially if you intend to have an ominous stage in your world where the first sightings of the creature cause people to start trying to exterminate as many as possible before its too late to prevent an upsurge.






          share|improve this answer






















            up vote
            0
            down vote










            up vote
            0
            down vote









            Your creatures sound like magic Locust.



            The Locust swarms on earth ebb and swarm based on the availability of food, seasons, and their reproductive cycle.



            Have a look at the Desert Locust (wiki) for ideas.



            They reproduce 2 to 5 times in a year, so the swarm or "upsurge" is really the children or great-great-grandchildren of the initial hatching.



            This could be a viable mechanism for your creature, especially if you intend to have an ominous stage in your world where the first sightings of the creature cause people to start trying to exterminate as many as possible before its too late to prevent an upsurge.






            share|improve this answer












            Your creatures sound like magic Locust.



            The Locust swarms on earth ebb and swarm based on the availability of food, seasons, and their reproductive cycle.



            Have a look at the Desert Locust (wiki) for ideas.



            They reproduce 2 to 5 times in a year, so the swarm or "upsurge" is really the children or great-great-grandchildren of the initial hatching.



            This could be a viable mechanism for your creature, especially if you intend to have an ominous stage in your world where the first sightings of the creature cause people to start trying to exterminate as many as possible before its too late to prevent an upsurge.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 1 hour ago









            Stephan

            1,132211




            1,132211




















                up vote
                0
                down vote













                Food availability, seasons and predation.



                Since food availability cant drop too much or it'll mark the land as destroyed you limit them through their magic. Their brand of magic (or all magic if you like) ebbs and flows. This can ebb and flow over time and even vary from location to location. This means they are limited in time and what area they can feed on. Better yet, they might only follow magic around and while they might eat a lot as they pass they dont stay long enough to deal damage.



                Seasons. Like any small creature, seasons can heavily influence their number. First food becomes scarcer and then the cold (or heat, depending on the area) kills off a lot leaving few to build up their numbers again.



                Predation. As with most creatures that generate lots and lots of offspring, the local wildlife learns how delicious they are quickly. Ducks for example get dozens of ducklings per cycle but only a few make it to adulthood. And whenever a small critter or insect manages a baby-boom, it's predators will shortly after have a baby-boom of their own as food and energy is easily accessible and more predators reach maturity.






                share|improve this answer
























                  up vote
                  0
                  down vote













                  Food availability, seasons and predation.



                  Since food availability cant drop too much or it'll mark the land as destroyed you limit them through their magic. Their brand of magic (or all magic if you like) ebbs and flows. This can ebb and flow over time and even vary from location to location. This means they are limited in time and what area they can feed on. Better yet, they might only follow magic around and while they might eat a lot as they pass they dont stay long enough to deal damage.



                  Seasons. Like any small creature, seasons can heavily influence their number. First food becomes scarcer and then the cold (or heat, depending on the area) kills off a lot leaving few to build up their numbers again.



                  Predation. As with most creatures that generate lots and lots of offspring, the local wildlife learns how delicious they are quickly. Ducks for example get dozens of ducklings per cycle but only a few make it to adulthood. And whenever a small critter or insect manages a baby-boom, it's predators will shortly after have a baby-boom of their own as food and energy is easily accessible and more predators reach maturity.






                  share|improve this answer






















                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote










                    up vote
                    0
                    down vote









                    Food availability, seasons and predation.



                    Since food availability cant drop too much or it'll mark the land as destroyed you limit them through their magic. Their brand of magic (or all magic if you like) ebbs and flows. This can ebb and flow over time and even vary from location to location. This means they are limited in time and what area they can feed on. Better yet, they might only follow magic around and while they might eat a lot as they pass they dont stay long enough to deal damage.



                    Seasons. Like any small creature, seasons can heavily influence their number. First food becomes scarcer and then the cold (or heat, depending on the area) kills off a lot leaving few to build up their numbers again.



                    Predation. As with most creatures that generate lots and lots of offspring, the local wildlife learns how delicious they are quickly. Ducks for example get dozens of ducklings per cycle but only a few make it to adulthood. And whenever a small critter or insect manages a baby-boom, it's predators will shortly after have a baby-boom of their own as food and energy is easily accessible and more predators reach maturity.






                    share|improve this answer












                    Food availability, seasons and predation.



                    Since food availability cant drop too much or it'll mark the land as destroyed you limit them through their magic. Their brand of magic (or all magic if you like) ebbs and flows. This can ebb and flow over time and even vary from location to location. This means they are limited in time and what area they can feed on. Better yet, they might only follow magic around and while they might eat a lot as they pass they dont stay long enough to deal damage.



                    Seasons. Like any small creature, seasons can heavily influence their number. First food becomes scarcer and then the cold (or heat, depending on the area) kills off a lot leaving few to build up their numbers again.



                    Predation. As with most creatures that generate lots and lots of offspring, the local wildlife learns how delicious they are quickly. Ducks for example get dozens of ducklings per cycle but only a few make it to adulthood. And whenever a small critter or insect manages a baby-boom, it's predators will shortly after have a baby-boom of their own as food and energy is easily accessible and more predators reach maturity.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 1 hour ago









                    Demigan

                    5,3891328




                    5,3891328




















                        up vote
                        0
                        down vote













                        You want to protect your world? Isn't that what "Nature Protector Animals" are supposed to do?



                        whale eats fish
                        https://www.nwf.org/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2015/AugSept/PhotoZone/Brydes-Whales



                        You have already in your list a class of creatures which "protect the nature" and eat magic and small animals. You are worried that your magic bug swarm will destroy the nature. I observe that the swarm is both magic and small animals - delicious! I propose that when the bugs start doing their thing, large Nature Protector Animals of various sorts will arrive in short order and devour them.





                        share
























                          up vote
                          0
                          down vote













                          You want to protect your world? Isn't that what "Nature Protector Animals" are supposed to do?



                          whale eats fish
                          https://www.nwf.org/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2015/AugSept/PhotoZone/Brydes-Whales



                          You have already in your list a class of creatures which "protect the nature" and eat magic and small animals. You are worried that your magic bug swarm will destroy the nature. I observe that the swarm is both magic and small animals - delicious! I propose that when the bugs start doing their thing, large Nature Protector Animals of various sorts will arrive in short order and devour them.





                          share






















                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote










                            up vote
                            0
                            down vote









                            You want to protect your world? Isn't that what "Nature Protector Animals" are supposed to do?



                            whale eats fish
                            https://www.nwf.org/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2015/AugSept/PhotoZone/Brydes-Whales



                            You have already in your list a class of creatures which "protect the nature" and eat magic and small animals. You are worried that your magic bug swarm will destroy the nature. I observe that the swarm is both magic and small animals - delicious! I propose that when the bugs start doing their thing, large Nature Protector Animals of various sorts will arrive in short order and devour them.





                            share












                            You want to protect your world? Isn't that what "Nature Protector Animals" are supposed to do?



                            whale eats fish
                            https://www.nwf.org/Magazines/National-Wildlife/2015/AugSept/PhotoZone/Brydes-Whales



                            You have already in your list a class of creatures which "protect the nature" and eat magic and small animals. You are worried that your magic bug swarm will destroy the nature. I observe that the swarm is both magic and small animals - delicious! I propose that when the bugs start doing their thing, large Nature Protector Animals of various sorts will arrive in short order and devour them.






                            share











                            share


                            share










                            answered 9 mins ago









                            Willk

                            92.6k22179394




                            92.6k22179394




















                                TheStwor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                 

                                draft saved


                                draft discarded


















                                TheStwor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                TheStwor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                TheStwor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                                 


                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fworldbuilding.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f128523%2fhow-to-prevent-large-group-of-animals-to-destroy-my-land%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest













































































                                Popular posts from this blog

                                How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

                                Displaying single band from multi-band raster using QGIS

                                How many registers does an x86_64 CPU actually have?