Can a Wizard cast a spell as a ritual without physically accessing a spellbook?

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
14
down vote

favorite












Part of the answer to this question what can a wizard do without a spellbook got me wondering. It states that you, as a wizard, can't cast a ritual spell without your spellbook.



And I can't help question if that is true?



Because the rules doesn't actually seem to state that explicitly.



Let's look at the rules for rituals in the PHB.




PHB pg.202



The caster must also have the spell prepared or on his or hers list of spells known, unless the character's ritual feature specifies otherwise, as the wizard does.




So while those rules doesn't require a spellbook, they do single out the wizard's ritual feature.



So what does the wizard ritual feature say?




PHB pg. 114



You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared




Now while the rules mentions a spellbook, they don't actually state that you need to use it during the ritual casting. Just that the spell already needs to be inscribed in the spellbook. Like how the general rules for rituals states that a spell needs to be in the casters known list of spells.



And if you look at the wording it it is very similar to other wizard features that require you to have the spell in your spellbook but doesn't require you to access your spellbook while casting.



For example the Spell Mastery feature:




PHB. pg. 115.



Choose a 1st-level wizard spell and a 2nd-level wizard spell that are in your spellbook. You can cast those spells at their lowest level without expending a spell slot when you have them prepared.




or the Signature spell feature:




PHB: pg. 115.



Choose two 3rd-level spells in your spellbook as your signature spells.




In both examples the rules seem to treat the spellbook as a refernce to the spells known by the wizard, identically to the known spell list other caster classes use. And not as a physical thing the wizard are actually accessing at that moment to use those features.



Then compare it to the Arcane Recovery feature that explicitly states that you need to be using the spellbook for that feature to work.




PHB. pg. 115



You have learned to regain some of your magical energy by studying your spellbook.




There the rules explicitly states that the wizard must be using the actual physical spellbook for the feature to work.



So by comparing the RAW for rituals in general and the different wizard features there doesn't seem to be anything that says that a wizard needs to be using the actual physical spellbook while casting a ritual spell as a ritual.
And while it from a certain logical and thematically viewpoint it make sense for a wizard to read for the spellbook while performing a ritual, nothing in the RAW seem to support it.



So can a Wizard cast a spell as a ritual without physically accessing a spellbook?
And is there an official ruling, either way?










share|improve this question





















  • "can't cast a ritual spell" — you mean "can't cast spell as a ritual", right?
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 14:20










  • Yes that's right.
    – Chryckan
    Sep 19 at 21:26










  • But a Wizard has this spell prepared, hasn't she? You can edit your answer to clarify these things.
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 22:27
















up vote
14
down vote

favorite












Part of the answer to this question what can a wizard do without a spellbook got me wondering. It states that you, as a wizard, can't cast a ritual spell without your spellbook.



And I can't help question if that is true?



Because the rules doesn't actually seem to state that explicitly.



Let's look at the rules for rituals in the PHB.




PHB pg.202



The caster must also have the spell prepared or on his or hers list of spells known, unless the character's ritual feature specifies otherwise, as the wizard does.




So while those rules doesn't require a spellbook, they do single out the wizard's ritual feature.



So what does the wizard ritual feature say?




PHB pg. 114



You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared




Now while the rules mentions a spellbook, they don't actually state that you need to use it during the ritual casting. Just that the spell already needs to be inscribed in the spellbook. Like how the general rules for rituals states that a spell needs to be in the casters known list of spells.



And if you look at the wording it it is very similar to other wizard features that require you to have the spell in your spellbook but doesn't require you to access your spellbook while casting.



For example the Spell Mastery feature:




PHB. pg. 115.



Choose a 1st-level wizard spell and a 2nd-level wizard spell that are in your spellbook. You can cast those spells at their lowest level without expending a spell slot when you have them prepared.




or the Signature spell feature:




PHB: pg. 115.



Choose two 3rd-level spells in your spellbook as your signature spells.




In both examples the rules seem to treat the spellbook as a refernce to the spells known by the wizard, identically to the known spell list other caster classes use. And not as a physical thing the wizard are actually accessing at that moment to use those features.



Then compare it to the Arcane Recovery feature that explicitly states that you need to be using the spellbook for that feature to work.




PHB. pg. 115



You have learned to regain some of your magical energy by studying your spellbook.




There the rules explicitly states that the wizard must be using the actual physical spellbook for the feature to work.



So by comparing the RAW for rituals in general and the different wizard features there doesn't seem to be anything that says that a wizard needs to be using the actual physical spellbook while casting a ritual spell as a ritual.
And while it from a certain logical and thematically viewpoint it make sense for a wizard to read for the spellbook while performing a ritual, nothing in the RAW seem to support it.



So can a Wizard cast a spell as a ritual without physically accessing a spellbook?
And is there an official ruling, either way?










share|improve this question





















  • "can't cast a ritual spell" — you mean "can't cast spell as a ritual", right?
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 14:20










  • Yes that's right.
    – Chryckan
    Sep 19 at 21:26










  • But a Wizard has this spell prepared, hasn't she? You can edit your answer to clarify these things.
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 22:27












up vote
14
down vote

favorite









up vote
14
down vote

favorite











Part of the answer to this question what can a wizard do without a spellbook got me wondering. It states that you, as a wizard, can't cast a ritual spell without your spellbook.



And I can't help question if that is true?



Because the rules doesn't actually seem to state that explicitly.



Let's look at the rules for rituals in the PHB.




PHB pg.202



The caster must also have the spell prepared or on his or hers list of spells known, unless the character's ritual feature specifies otherwise, as the wizard does.




So while those rules doesn't require a spellbook, they do single out the wizard's ritual feature.



So what does the wizard ritual feature say?




PHB pg. 114



You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared




Now while the rules mentions a spellbook, they don't actually state that you need to use it during the ritual casting. Just that the spell already needs to be inscribed in the spellbook. Like how the general rules for rituals states that a spell needs to be in the casters known list of spells.



And if you look at the wording it it is very similar to other wizard features that require you to have the spell in your spellbook but doesn't require you to access your spellbook while casting.



For example the Spell Mastery feature:




PHB. pg. 115.



Choose a 1st-level wizard spell and a 2nd-level wizard spell that are in your spellbook. You can cast those spells at their lowest level without expending a spell slot when you have them prepared.




or the Signature spell feature:




PHB: pg. 115.



Choose two 3rd-level spells in your spellbook as your signature spells.




In both examples the rules seem to treat the spellbook as a refernce to the spells known by the wizard, identically to the known spell list other caster classes use. And not as a physical thing the wizard are actually accessing at that moment to use those features.



Then compare it to the Arcane Recovery feature that explicitly states that you need to be using the spellbook for that feature to work.




PHB. pg. 115



You have learned to regain some of your magical energy by studying your spellbook.




There the rules explicitly states that the wizard must be using the actual physical spellbook for the feature to work.



So by comparing the RAW for rituals in general and the different wizard features there doesn't seem to be anything that says that a wizard needs to be using the actual physical spellbook while casting a ritual spell as a ritual.
And while it from a certain logical and thematically viewpoint it make sense for a wizard to read for the spellbook while performing a ritual, nothing in the RAW seem to support it.



So can a Wizard cast a spell as a ritual without physically accessing a spellbook?
And is there an official ruling, either way?










share|improve this question













Part of the answer to this question what can a wizard do without a spellbook got me wondering. It states that you, as a wizard, can't cast a ritual spell without your spellbook.



And I can't help question if that is true?



Because the rules doesn't actually seem to state that explicitly.



Let's look at the rules for rituals in the PHB.




PHB pg.202



The caster must also have the spell prepared or on his or hers list of spells known, unless the character's ritual feature specifies otherwise, as the wizard does.




So while those rules doesn't require a spellbook, they do single out the wizard's ritual feature.



So what does the wizard ritual feature say?




PHB pg. 114



You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared




Now while the rules mentions a spellbook, they don't actually state that you need to use it during the ritual casting. Just that the spell already needs to be inscribed in the spellbook. Like how the general rules for rituals states that a spell needs to be in the casters known list of spells.



And if you look at the wording it it is very similar to other wizard features that require you to have the spell in your spellbook but doesn't require you to access your spellbook while casting.



For example the Spell Mastery feature:




PHB. pg. 115.



Choose a 1st-level wizard spell and a 2nd-level wizard spell that are in your spellbook. You can cast those spells at their lowest level without expending a spell slot when you have them prepared.




or the Signature spell feature:




PHB: pg. 115.



Choose two 3rd-level spells in your spellbook as your signature spells.




In both examples the rules seem to treat the spellbook as a refernce to the spells known by the wizard, identically to the known spell list other caster classes use. And not as a physical thing the wizard are actually accessing at that moment to use those features.



Then compare it to the Arcane Recovery feature that explicitly states that you need to be using the spellbook for that feature to work.




PHB. pg. 115



You have learned to regain some of your magical energy by studying your spellbook.




There the rules explicitly states that the wizard must be using the actual physical spellbook for the feature to work.



So by comparing the RAW for rituals in general and the different wizard features there doesn't seem to be anything that says that a wizard needs to be using the actual physical spellbook while casting a ritual spell as a ritual.
And while it from a certain logical and thematically viewpoint it make sense for a wizard to read for the spellbook while performing a ritual, nothing in the RAW seem to support it.



So can a Wizard cast a spell as a ritual without physically accessing a spellbook?
And is there an official ruling, either way?







dnd-5e wizard equipment rituals






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Sep 19 at 10:52









Chryckan

2,09741631




2,09741631











  • "can't cast a ritual spell" — you mean "can't cast spell as a ritual", right?
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 14:20










  • Yes that's right.
    – Chryckan
    Sep 19 at 21:26










  • But a Wizard has this spell prepared, hasn't she? You can edit your answer to clarify these things.
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 22:27
















  • "can't cast a ritual spell" — you mean "can't cast spell as a ritual", right?
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 14:20










  • Yes that's right.
    – Chryckan
    Sep 19 at 21:26










  • But a Wizard has this spell prepared, hasn't she? You can edit your answer to clarify these things.
    – enkryptor
    Sep 19 at 22:27















"can't cast a ritual spell" — you mean "can't cast spell as a ritual", right?
– enkryptor
Sep 19 at 14:20




"can't cast a ritual spell" — you mean "can't cast spell as a ritual", right?
– enkryptor
Sep 19 at 14:20












Yes that's right.
– Chryckan
Sep 19 at 21:26




Yes that's right.
– Chryckan
Sep 19 at 21:26












But a Wizard has this spell prepared, hasn't she? You can edit your answer to clarify these things.
– enkryptor
Sep 19 at 22:27




But a Wizard has this spell prepared, hasn't she? You can edit your answer to clarify these things.
– enkryptor
Sep 19 at 22:27










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
14
down vote













Technically, they do not



As per D&D 5e's paradigm of rules interpretation, the rules say what they say and no more.



While the warlock with Book of Ancient Secrets specifically requires their Book of Shadows in hand to cast rituals, and the Ritual Caster feat requires the user to have their ritual book in hand, no actual rule in the Player's Handbook defines that the wizard must have their book in hand.



Certainly, most DMs would expect the wizard to have their spellbook to cast rituals, as it makes little sense to be able to cast an unprepared spell based only on the fact that you scribed it in a book once years ago, but this is not clearly defined in the rules.



The wizard's Ritual Casting feature (p.114) defines only as follows:




You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared.




You might broadly interpret this to mean that you must "have" the spell to hand (in your spellbook), but whether this meaning is intended this is unclear.



At time of writing, nobody's specifically asked Jeremy Crawford if a wizard needs their spellbook in hand to use rituals. His answers on the topic only state that you can cast wizard rituals that are in your spellbook and that you don't need a spell prepared to cast it from your spellbook. Some have interpreted the second quote to mean that you need your spellbook to cast "from" it, but this is not clearly stated.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I'm curious; given this answer, how would you define "your spellbook"?
    – Miniman
    Sep 19 at 12:32






  • 4




    I agree it is not explicitly indicated but I think the flavor of the Wizard heavily implies that you would need the book (simply because you need to have the book to prepare spells but you indicate that you don't need them to cast rituals and can do so from memory?). JC has a habit of glancing at questions and not necessarily asking clarifying questions and Twitter is notorious for misunderstandings.
    – Slagmoth
    Sep 19 at 12:36







  • 1




    It is funny how things can become even more complicated. As per the rules, you can have more than one spellbook (you can have "safe copies"). All of them are your spellbook. How much of the answer would change if you have the spell in your spellbook, but not the one that you are carrying? I know that any sensible DM would say "NO" because you need the spell for reference.
    – Chepelink
    Sep 19 at 15:00











  • Sure, I'd rule that a wizard needs their spellbook on hand to cast rituals from it. There just isn't a clear rule for it in the books, though there probably should be.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    Sep 19 at 15:18










  • Contrast this with the warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets invocation: "With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals." Depending on whether they work similarly, the same could reasonably be applied to the wizard, but it's not stated.
    – V2Blast
    Sep 19 at 17:12











Your Answer




StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: false,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













 

draft saved


draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132014%2fcan-a-wizard-cast-a-spell-as-a-ritual-without-physically-accessing-a-spellbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest






























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
14
down vote













Technically, they do not



As per D&D 5e's paradigm of rules interpretation, the rules say what they say and no more.



While the warlock with Book of Ancient Secrets specifically requires their Book of Shadows in hand to cast rituals, and the Ritual Caster feat requires the user to have their ritual book in hand, no actual rule in the Player's Handbook defines that the wizard must have their book in hand.



Certainly, most DMs would expect the wizard to have their spellbook to cast rituals, as it makes little sense to be able to cast an unprepared spell based only on the fact that you scribed it in a book once years ago, but this is not clearly defined in the rules.



The wizard's Ritual Casting feature (p.114) defines only as follows:




You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared.




You might broadly interpret this to mean that you must "have" the spell to hand (in your spellbook), but whether this meaning is intended this is unclear.



At time of writing, nobody's specifically asked Jeremy Crawford if a wizard needs their spellbook in hand to use rituals. His answers on the topic only state that you can cast wizard rituals that are in your spellbook and that you don't need a spell prepared to cast it from your spellbook. Some have interpreted the second quote to mean that you need your spellbook to cast "from" it, but this is not clearly stated.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I'm curious; given this answer, how would you define "your spellbook"?
    – Miniman
    Sep 19 at 12:32






  • 4




    I agree it is not explicitly indicated but I think the flavor of the Wizard heavily implies that you would need the book (simply because you need to have the book to prepare spells but you indicate that you don't need them to cast rituals and can do so from memory?). JC has a habit of glancing at questions and not necessarily asking clarifying questions and Twitter is notorious for misunderstandings.
    – Slagmoth
    Sep 19 at 12:36







  • 1




    It is funny how things can become even more complicated. As per the rules, you can have more than one spellbook (you can have "safe copies"). All of them are your spellbook. How much of the answer would change if you have the spell in your spellbook, but not the one that you are carrying? I know that any sensible DM would say "NO" because you need the spell for reference.
    – Chepelink
    Sep 19 at 15:00











  • Sure, I'd rule that a wizard needs their spellbook on hand to cast rituals from it. There just isn't a clear rule for it in the books, though there probably should be.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    Sep 19 at 15:18










  • Contrast this with the warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets invocation: "With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals." Depending on whether they work similarly, the same could reasonably be applied to the wizard, but it's not stated.
    – V2Blast
    Sep 19 at 17:12















up vote
14
down vote













Technically, they do not



As per D&D 5e's paradigm of rules interpretation, the rules say what they say and no more.



While the warlock with Book of Ancient Secrets specifically requires their Book of Shadows in hand to cast rituals, and the Ritual Caster feat requires the user to have their ritual book in hand, no actual rule in the Player's Handbook defines that the wizard must have their book in hand.



Certainly, most DMs would expect the wizard to have their spellbook to cast rituals, as it makes little sense to be able to cast an unprepared spell based only on the fact that you scribed it in a book once years ago, but this is not clearly defined in the rules.



The wizard's Ritual Casting feature (p.114) defines only as follows:




You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared.




You might broadly interpret this to mean that you must "have" the spell to hand (in your spellbook), but whether this meaning is intended this is unclear.



At time of writing, nobody's specifically asked Jeremy Crawford if a wizard needs their spellbook in hand to use rituals. His answers on the topic only state that you can cast wizard rituals that are in your spellbook and that you don't need a spell prepared to cast it from your spellbook. Some have interpreted the second quote to mean that you need your spellbook to cast "from" it, but this is not clearly stated.






share|improve this answer


















  • 1




    I'm curious; given this answer, how would you define "your spellbook"?
    – Miniman
    Sep 19 at 12:32






  • 4




    I agree it is not explicitly indicated but I think the flavor of the Wizard heavily implies that you would need the book (simply because you need to have the book to prepare spells but you indicate that you don't need them to cast rituals and can do so from memory?). JC has a habit of glancing at questions and not necessarily asking clarifying questions and Twitter is notorious for misunderstandings.
    – Slagmoth
    Sep 19 at 12:36







  • 1




    It is funny how things can become even more complicated. As per the rules, you can have more than one spellbook (you can have "safe copies"). All of them are your spellbook. How much of the answer would change if you have the spell in your spellbook, but not the one that you are carrying? I know that any sensible DM would say "NO" because you need the spell for reference.
    – Chepelink
    Sep 19 at 15:00











  • Sure, I'd rule that a wizard needs their spellbook on hand to cast rituals from it. There just isn't a clear rule for it in the books, though there probably should be.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    Sep 19 at 15:18










  • Contrast this with the warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets invocation: "With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals." Depending on whether they work similarly, the same could reasonably be applied to the wizard, but it's not stated.
    – V2Blast
    Sep 19 at 17:12













up vote
14
down vote










up vote
14
down vote









Technically, they do not



As per D&D 5e's paradigm of rules interpretation, the rules say what they say and no more.



While the warlock with Book of Ancient Secrets specifically requires their Book of Shadows in hand to cast rituals, and the Ritual Caster feat requires the user to have their ritual book in hand, no actual rule in the Player's Handbook defines that the wizard must have their book in hand.



Certainly, most DMs would expect the wizard to have their spellbook to cast rituals, as it makes little sense to be able to cast an unprepared spell based only on the fact that you scribed it in a book once years ago, but this is not clearly defined in the rules.



The wizard's Ritual Casting feature (p.114) defines only as follows:




You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared.




You might broadly interpret this to mean that you must "have" the spell to hand (in your spellbook), but whether this meaning is intended this is unclear.



At time of writing, nobody's specifically asked Jeremy Crawford if a wizard needs their spellbook in hand to use rituals. His answers on the topic only state that you can cast wizard rituals that are in your spellbook and that you don't need a spell prepared to cast it from your spellbook. Some have interpreted the second quote to mean that you need your spellbook to cast "from" it, but this is not clearly stated.






share|improve this answer














Technically, they do not



As per D&D 5e's paradigm of rules interpretation, the rules say what they say and no more.



While the warlock with Book of Ancient Secrets specifically requires their Book of Shadows in hand to cast rituals, and the Ritual Caster feat requires the user to have their ritual book in hand, no actual rule in the Player's Handbook defines that the wizard must have their book in hand.



Certainly, most DMs would expect the wizard to have their spellbook to cast rituals, as it makes little sense to be able to cast an unprepared spell based only on the fact that you scribed it in a book once years ago, but this is not clearly defined in the rules.



The wizard's Ritual Casting feature (p.114) defines only as follows:




You can cast a wizard spell as a ritual if that spell has the ritual tag and you have the spell in your spellbook. You don't need to have the spell prepared.




You might broadly interpret this to mean that you must "have" the spell to hand (in your spellbook), but whether this meaning is intended this is unclear.



At time of writing, nobody's specifically asked Jeremy Crawford if a wizard needs their spellbook in hand to use rituals. His answers on the topic only state that you can cast wizard rituals that are in your spellbook and that you don't need a spell prepared to cast it from your spellbook. Some have interpreted the second quote to mean that you need your spellbook to cast "from" it, but this is not clearly stated.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Sep 19 at 15:20

























answered Sep 19 at 12:16









Quadratic Wizard

20.9k370116




20.9k370116







  • 1




    I'm curious; given this answer, how would you define "your spellbook"?
    – Miniman
    Sep 19 at 12:32






  • 4




    I agree it is not explicitly indicated but I think the flavor of the Wizard heavily implies that you would need the book (simply because you need to have the book to prepare spells but you indicate that you don't need them to cast rituals and can do so from memory?). JC has a habit of glancing at questions and not necessarily asking clarifying questions and Twitter is notorious for misunderstandings.
    – Slagmoth
    Sep 19 at 12:36







  • 1




    It is funny how things can become even more complicated. As per the rules, you can have more than one spellbook (you can have "safe copies"). All of them are your spellbook. How much of the answer would change if you have the spell in your spellbook, but not the one that you are carrying? I know that any sensible DM would say "NO" because you need the spell for reference.
    – Chepelink
    Sep 19 at 15:00











  • Sure, I'd rule that a wizard needs their spellbook on hand to cast rituals from it. There just isn't a clear rule for it in the books, though there probably should be.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    Sep 19 at 15:18










  • Contrast this with the warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets invocation: "With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals." Depending on whether they work similarly, the same could reasonably be applied to the wizard, but it's not stated.
    – V2Blast
    Sep 19 at 17:12













  • 1




    I'm curious; given this answer, how would you define "your spellbook"?
    – Miniman
    Sep 19 at 12:32






  • 4




    I agree it is not explicitly indicated but I think the flavor of the Wizard heavily implies that you would need the book (simply because you need to have the book to prepare spells but you indicate that you don't need them to cast rituals and can do so from memory?). JC has a habit of glancing at questions and not necessarily asking clarifying questions and Twitter is notorious for misunderstandings.
    – Slagmoth
    Sep 19 at 12:36







  • 1




    It is funny how things can become even more complicated. As per the rules, you can have more than one spellbook (you can have "safe copies"). All of them are your spellbook. How much of the answer would change if you have the spell in your spellbook, but not the one that you are carrying? I know that any sensible DM would say "NO" because you need the spell for reference.
    – Chepelink
    Sep 19 at 15:00











  • Sure, I'd rule that a wizard needs their spellbook on hand to cast rituals from it. There just isn't a clear rule for it in the books, though there probably should be.
    – Quadratic Wizard
    Sep 19 at 15:18










  • Contrast this with the warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets invocation: "With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals." Depending on whether they work similarly, the same could reasonably be applied to the wizard, but it's not stated.
    – V2Blast
    Sep 19 at 17:12








1




1




I'm curious; given this answer, how would you define "your spellbook"?
– Miniman
Sep 19 at 12:32




I'm curious; given this answer, how would you define "your spellbook"?
– Miniman
Sep 19 at 12:32




4




4




I agree it is not explicitly indicated but I think the flavor of the Wizard heavily implies that you would need the book (simply because you need to have the book to prepare spells but you indicate that you don't need them to cast rituals and can do so from memory?). JC has a habit of glancing at questions and not necessarily asking clarifying questions and Twitter is notorious for misunderstandings.
– Slagmoth
Sep 19 at 12:36





I agree it is not explicitly indicated but I think the flavor of the Wizard heavily implies that you would need the book (simply because you need to have the book to prepare spells but you indicate that you don't need them to cast rituals and can do so from memory?). JC has a habit of glancing at questions and not necessarily asking clarifying questions and Twitter is notorious for misunderstandings.
– Slagmoth
Sep 19 at 12:36





1




1




It is funny how things can become even more complicated. As per the rules, you can have more than one spellbook (you can have "safe copies"). All of them are your spellbook. How much of the answer would change if you have the spell in your spellbook, but not the one that you are carrying? I know that any sensible DM would say "NO" because you need the spell for reference.
– Chepelink
Sep 19 at 15:00





It is funny how things can become even more complicated. As per the rules, you can have more than one spellbook (you can have "safe copies"). All of them are your spellbook. How much of the answer would change if you have the spell in your spellbook, but not the one that you are carrying? I know that any sensible DM would say "NO" because you need the spell for reference.
– Chepelink
Sep 19 at 15:00













Sure, I'd rule that a wizard needs their spellbook on hand to cast rituals from it. There just isn't a clear rule for it in the books, though there probably should be.
– Quadratic Wizard
Sep 19 at 15:18




Sure, I'd rule that a wizard needs their spellbook on hand to cast rituals from it. There just isn't a clear rule for it in the books, though there probably should be.
– Quadratic Wizard
Sep 19 at 15:18












Contrast this with the warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets invocation: "With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals." Depending on whether they work similarly, the same could reasonably be applied to the wizard, but it's not stated.
– V2Blast
Sep 19 at 17:12





Contrast this with the warlock's Book of Ancient Secrets invocation: "With your Book of Shadows in hand, you can cast the chosen spells as rituals." Depending on whether they work similarly, the same could reasonably be applied to the wizard, but it's not stated.
– V2Blast
Sep 19 at 17:12


















 

draft saved


draft discarded















































 


draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f132014%2fcan-a-wizard-cast-a-spell-as-a-ritual-without-physically-accessing-a-spellbook%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest













































































Popular posts from this blog

How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

Bahrain

Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay