Stumped by a verbal analogy: “pencil is to sharpen as…”

The name of the pictureThe name of the pictureThe name of the pictureClash Royale CLAN TAG#URR8PPP





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;







up vote
0
down vote

favorite













  1. Pencil is to sharpen as

A. knife is to cut

B. carpenter is to build
C. wood is to saw

D. well is to fill

E. saw is to ax




The answer to this verbal analogy (from here) does not seem the best to me. I'd have chosen D. My reasoning is: When a pencil gets worn down (blunt), it's "out of lead," it won't write anymore, so it can't serve its purpose anymore, till it gets sharpened. Similarly, when a well runs out of water, it no longer serves its purpose, so it has to be filled.



The correct answer (C) doesn't fulfill that type of qualification. The only analogy with D. that it has, is that a pencil's made of wood, and both a saw and sharpening involve a form of cutting.



Can anyone explain why C. is the solution?










share|improve this question





























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite













    1. Pencil is to sharpen as

    A. knife is to cut

    B. carpenter is to build
    C. wood is to saw

    D. well is to fill

    E. saw is to ax




    The answer to this verbal analogy (from here) does not seem the best to me. I'd have chosen D. My reasoning is: When a pencil gets worn down (blunt), it's "out of lead," it won't write anymore, so it can't serve its purpose anymore, till it gets sharpened. Similarly, when a well runs out of water, it no longer serves its purpose, so it has to be filled.



    The correct answer (C) doesn't fulfill that type of qualification. The only analogy with D. that it has, is that a pencil's made of wood, and both a saw and sharpening involve a form of cutting.



    Can anyone explain why C. is the solution?










    share|improve this question

























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite












      1. Pencil is to sharpen as

      A. knife is to cut

      B. carpenter is to build
      C. wood is to saw

      D. well is to fill

      E. saw is to ax




      The answer to this verbal analogy (from here) does not seem the best to me. I'd have chosen D. My reasoning is: When a pencil gets worn down (blunt), it's "out of lead," it won't write anymore, so it can't serve its purpose anymore, till it gets sharpened. Similarly, when a well runs out of water, it no longer serves its purpose, so it has to be filled.



      The correct answer (C) doesn't fulfill that type of qualification. The only analogy with D. that it has, is that a pencil's made of wood, and both a saw and sharpening involve a form of cutting.



      Can anyone explain why C. is the solution?










      share|improve this question
















      1. Pencil is to sharpen as

      A. knife is to cut

      B. carpenter is to build
      C. wood is to saw

      D. well is to fill

      E. saw is to ax




      The answer to this verbal analogy (from here) does not seem the best to me. I'd have chosen D. My reasoning is: When a pencil gets worn down (blunt), it's "out of lead," it won't write anymore, so it can't serve its purpose anymore, till it gets sharpened. Similarly, when a well runs out of water, it no longer serves its purpose, so it has to be filled.



      The correct answer (C) doesn't fulfill that type of qualification. The only analogy with D. that it has, is that a pencil's made of wood, and both a saw and sharpening involve a form of cutting.



      Can anyone explain why C. is the solution?







      exam-questions analogy






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Aug 23 at 18:25









      ColleenV♦

      10.3k53159




      10.3k53159










      asked Aug 23 at 17:02









      Jerry A. Trik

      545




      545




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          As CrossRoads says, I presume the thinking behind the answer is that "sharpen" is something you do to a "pencil", so the correct answer would be words that share that relationship. "Knife/cut" doesn't work because you do not normally cut a knife, rather, you use a knife to cut. The "does the action" versus "receives the action" is backwards. Similarly with B. In E, if you think of "saw" as a noun, then it doesn't work because we have 2 nouns rather than a noun and a verb. If you think of "saw" as a verb, it doesn't work because the order doesn't match -- noun/verb versus verb/noun -- and because you can't saw things with an ax, that's not what an ax does. So either way, E doesn't work.



          I see your point about D, one could fill a well. But we don't normally talk about filling a well, we tend to think of natural processes filling a well, and then we use the well to fill a bucket or we pump the water out of the well. So again, it's backwards: we don't fill a well, the well fills our bucket. People don't normally pour water into a well and then later draw it out. If that's what you're doing, it's not a well but a cistern. If it had said "cistern is to fill", I would agree that that would be a viable choice.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            @Andrew Fair enough, I was not familiar with that definition. Still, I think insisting that a test such as this must consider every rare and obscure definition of a word is asking a bit much. If I was taking a test and said to myself, "Using the ordinary and common definitions of words, C is a correct answer. If I use this rare and obscure definition of one of the words, D is also a correct answer", surely the logical conclusion is that the expected answer is C. ...
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            ... But in fairness, what seems an obscure definition to me might be very familiar to someone else, so a test writer should certainly try to avoid such cases.
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            A "well" could be any kind of reservoir. An inkwell comes immediately to mind, and it is a well you might need to fill. A well isn't necessarily a hole in the ground.
            – slashingweapon
            Aug 23 at 22:50






          • 1




            @Andrew It's been a long time since I took an SAT so I don't remember just what sort of analogies they had. I can think of many types of analogies that I would consider "fair", from something very specific like your pencil/sharpen vs knife/hone example, to something more general, like asking the student to recognize that the pattern is noun/verb. Of course such analogies can get cryptic, and can come down to trying to guess which of many possible relationships the test-writer had in mind. "automobile is to apple as Brazil is to _______".
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 17:56






          • 1




            There was a post on one of these stackexchange forums where someone said he took an intelligence test that asked "which of these cities is not like the others". Apparently the intended answer was to pick the one that was not a national capital. But as I and many others pointed out, you could make a case for any of the cities on the list: The only one in the Western Hemisphere, the only one not on a major river, etc.
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 18:00

















          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Sharpen is something you do to a pencil.



          Saw is something you do to wood.



          ....



          Cut is not something you do to a knife.



          Build is not something you do to a carpenter.



          Fill is not something you do to a well.



          Ax is not something you do to a saw.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 2




            You can most certainly fill a well (from some underwater source) If forced, I might have had to pick that because of the additional implication in order to make it useful. But either way this is a poor example of an analogy question. If they wanted to do it right, the first choice would have been knife is to hone, because then you have a perfect parallel.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 17:58











          • One would not fill a well - it would itself from an underground source, as you noted. You would fill something else from a well normally.
            – CrossRoads
            Aug 23 at 18:05










          • I guess we'll agree to disagree. It's a moot point either way -- the point is that you can make an argument for two of the answers, which invalidates the question.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 18:27










          • Perhaps it is related to the kinds of action being taken in addition to how the action interacts with the subject. You've nailed the "Action Happens to the Subject" relationship, but maybe it's related to the fact that both sharpening and cutting involve reducing the subject whereas "fill" adds to the subject.
            – Nathalinil
            Aug 23 at 19:52










          Your Answer







          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "481"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: false,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













           

          draft saved


          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177155%2fstumped-by-a-verbal-analogy-pencil-is-to-sharpen-as%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest






























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          As CrossRoads says, I presume the thinking behind the answer is that "sharpen" is something you do to a "pencil", so the correct answer would be words that share that relationship. "Knife/cut" doesn't work because you do not normally cut a knife, rather, you use a knife to cut. The "does the action" versus "receives the action" is backwards. Similarly with B. In E, if you think of "saw" as a noun, then it doesn't work because we have 2 nouns rather than a noun and a verb. If you think of "saw" as a verb, it doesn't work because the order doesn't match -- noun/verb versus verb/noun -- and because you can't saw things with an ax, that's not what an ax does. So either way, E doesn't work.



          I see your point about D, one could fill a well. But we don't normally talk about filling a well, we tend to think of natural processes filling a well, and then we use the well to fill a bucket or we pump the water out of the well. So again, it's backwards: we don't fill a well, the well fills our bucket. People don't normally pour water into a well and then later draw it out. If that's what you're doing, it's not a well but a cistern. If it had said "cistern is to fill", I would agree that that would be a viable choice.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            @Andrew Fair enough, I was not familiar with that definition. Still, I think insisting that a test such as this must consider every rare and obscure definition of a word is asking a bit much. If I was taking a test and said to myself, "Using the ordinary and common definitions of words, C is a correct answer. If I use this rare and obscure definition of one of the words, D is also a correct answer", surely the logical conclusion is that the expected answer is C. ...
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            ... But in fairness, what seems an obscure definition to me might be very familiar to someone else, so a test writer should certainly try to avoid such cases.
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            A "well" could be any kind of reservoir. An inkwell comes immediately to mind, and it is a well you might need to fill. A well isn't necessarily a hole in the ground.
            – slashingweapon
            Aug 23 at 22:50






          • 1




            @Andrew It's been a long time since I took an SAT so I don't remember just what sort of analogies they had. I can think of many types of analogies that I would consider "fair", from something very specific like your pencil/sharpen vs knife/hone example, to something more general, like asking the student to recognize that the pattern is noun/verb. Of course such analogies can get cryptic, and can come down to trying to guess which of many possible relationships the test-writer had in mind. "automobile is to apple as Brazil is to _______".
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 17:56






          • 1




            There was a post on one of these stackexchange forums where someone said he took an intelligence test that asked "which of these cities is not like the others". Apparently the intended answer was to pick the one that was not a national capital. But as I and many others pointed out, you could make a case for any of the cities on the list: The only one in the Western Hemisphere, the only one not on a major river, etc.
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 18:00














          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted










          As CrossRoads says, I presume the thinking behind the answer is that "sharpen" is something you do to a "pencil", so the correct answer would be words that share that relationship. "Knife/cut" doesn't work because you do not normally cut a knife, rather, you use a knife to cut. The "does the action" versus "receives the action" is backwards. Similarly with B. In E, if you think of "saw" as a noun, then it doesn't work because we have 2 nouns rather than a noun and a verb. If you think of "saw" as a verb, it doesn't work because the order doesn't match -- noun/verb versus verb/noun -- and because you can't saw things with an ax, that's not what an ax does. So either way, E doesn't work.



          I see your point about D, one could fill a well. But we don't normally talk about filling a well, we tend to think of natural processes filling a well, and then we use the well to fill a bucket or we pump the water out of the well. So again, it's backwards: we don't fill a well, the well fills our bucket. People don't normally pour water into a well and then later draw it out. If that's what you're doing, it's not a well but a cistern. If it had said "cistern is to fill", I would agree that that would be a viable choice.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 1




            @Andrew Fair enough, I was not familiar with that definition. Still, I think insisting that a test such as this must consider every rare and obscure definition of a word is asking a bit much. If I was taking a test and said to myself, "Using the ordinary and common definitions of words, C is a correct answer. If I use this rare and obscure definition of one of the words, D is also a correct answer", surely the logical conclusion is that the expected answer is C. ...
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            ... But in fairness, what seems an obscure definition to me might be very familiar to someone else, so a test writer should certainly try to avoid such cases.
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            A "well" could be any kind of reservoir. An inkwell comes immediately to mind, and it is a well you might need to fill. A well isn't necessarily a hole in the ground.
            – slashingweapon
            Aug 23 at 22:50






          • 1




            @Andrew It's been a long time since I took an SAT so I don't remember just what sort of analogies they had. I can think of many types of analogies that I would consider "fair", from something very specific like your pencil/sharpen vs knife/hone example, to something more general, like asking the student to recognize that the pattern is noun/verb. Of course such analogies can get cryptic, and can come down to trying to guess which of many possible relationships the test-writer had in mind. "automobile is to apple as Brazil is to _______".
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 17:56






          • 1




            There was a post on one of these stackexchange forums where someone said he took an intelligence test that asked "which of these cities is not like the others". Apparently the intended answer was to pick the one that was not a national capital. But as I and many others pointed out, you could make a case for any of the cities on the list: The only one in the Western Hemisphere, the only one not on a major river, etc.
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 18:00












          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          5
          down vote



          accepted






          As CrossRoads says, I presume the thinking behind the answer is that "sharpen" is something you do to a "pencil", so the correct answer would be words that share that relationship. "Knife/cut" doesn't work because you do not normally cut a knife, rather, you use a knife to cut. The "does the action" versus "receives the action" is backwards. Similarly with B. In E, if you think of "saw" as a noun, then it doesn't work because we have 2 nouns rather than a noun and a verb. If you think of "saw" as a verb, it doesn't work because the order doesn't match -- noun/verb versus verb/noun -- and because you can't saw things with an ax, that's not what an ax does. So either way, E doesn't work.



          I see your point about D, one could fill a well. But we don't normally talk about filling a well, we tend to think of natural processes filling a well, and then we use the well to fill a bucket or we pump the water out of the well. So again, it's backwards: we don't fill a well, the well fills our bucket. People don't normally pour water into a well and then later draw it out. If that's what you're doing, it's not a well but a cistern. If it had said "cistern is to fill", I would agree that that would be a viable choice.






          share|improve this answer












          As CrossRoads says, I presume the thinking behind the answer is that "sharpen" is something you do to a "pencil", so the correct answer would be words that share that relationship. "Knife/cut" doesn't work because you do not normally cut a knife, rather, you use a knife to cut. The "does the action" versus "receives the action" is backwards. Similarly with B. In E, if you think of "saw" as a noun, then it doesn't work because we have 2 nouns rather than a noun and a verb. If you think of "saw" as a verb, it doesn't work because the order doesn't match -- noun/verb versus verb/noun -- and because you can't saw things with an ax, that's not what an ax does. So either way, E doesn't work.



          I see your point about D, one could fill a well. But we don't normally talk about filling a well, we tend to think of natural processes filling a well, and then we use the well to fill a bucket or we pump the water out of the well. So again, it's backwards: we don't fill a well, the well fills our bucket. People don't normally pour water into a well and then later draw it out. If that's what you're doing, it's not a well but a cistern. If it had said "cistern is to fill", I would agree that that would be a viable choice.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 23 at 18:10









          Jay

          45.2k13989




          45.2k13989







          • 1




            @Andrew Fair enough, I was not familiar with that definition. Still, I think insisting that a test such as this must consider every rare and obscure definition of a word is asking a bit much. If I was taking a test and said to myself, "Using the ordinary and common definitions of words, C is a correct answer. If I use this rare and obscure definition of one of the words, D is also a correct answer", surely the logical conclusion is that the expected answer is C. ...
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            ... But in fairness, what seems an obscure definition to me might be very familiar to someone else, so a test writer should certainly try to avoid such cases.
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            A "well" could be any kind of reservoir. An inkwell comes immediately to mind, and it is a well you might need to fill. A well isn't necessarily a hole in the ground.
            – slashingweapon
            Aug 23 at 22:50






          • 1




            @Andrew It's been a long time since I took an SAT so I don't remember just what sort of analogies they had. I can think of many types of analogies that I would consider "fair", from something very specific like your pencil/sharpen vs knife/hone example, to something more general, like asking the student to recognize that the pattern is noun/verb. Of course such analogies can get cryptic, and can come down to trying to guess which of many possible relationships the test-writer had in mind. "automobile is to apple as Brazil is to _______".
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 17:56






          • 1




            There was a post on one of these stackexchange forums where someone said he took an intelligence test that asked "which of these cities is not like the others". Apparently the intended answer was to pick the one that was not a national capital. But as I and many others pointed out, you could make a case for any of the cities on the list: The only one in the Western Hemisphere, the only one not on a major river, etc.
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 18:00












          • 1




            @Andrew Fair enough, I was not familiar with that definition. Still, I think insisting that a test such as this must consider every rare and obscure definition of a word is asking a bit much. If I was taking a test and said to myself, "Using the ordinary and common definitions of words, C is a correct answer. If I use this rare and obscure definition of one of the words, D is also a correct answer", surely the logical conclusion is that the expected answer is C. ...
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            ... But in fairness, what seems an obscure definition to me might be very familiar to someone else, so a test writer should certainly try to avoid such cases.
            – Jay
            Aug 23 at 21:37






          • 1




            A "well" could be any kind of reservoir. An inkwell comes immediately to mind, and it is a well you might need to fill. A well isn't necessarily a hole in the ground.
            – slashingweapon
            Aug 23 at 22:50






          • 1




            @Andrew It's been a long time since I took an SAT so I don't remember just what sort of analogies they had. I can think of many types of analogies that I would consider "fair", from something very specific like your pencil/sharpen vs knife/hone example, to something more general, like asking the student to recognize that the pattern is noun/verb. Of course such analogies can get cryptic, and can come down to trying to guess which of many possible relationships the test-writer had in mind. "automobile is to apple as Brazil is to _______".
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 17:56






          • 1




            There was a post on one of these stackexchange forums where someone said he took an intelligence test that asked "which of these cities is not like the others". Apparently the intended answer was to pick the one that was not a national capital. But as I and many others pointed out, you could make a case for any of the cities on the list: The only one in the Western Hemisphere, the only one not on a major river, etc.
            – Jay
            Aug 24 at 18:00







          1




          1




          @Andrew Fair enough, I was not familiar with that definition. Still, I think insisting that a test such as this must consider every rare and obscure definition of a word is asking a bit much. If I was taking a test and said to myself, "Using the ordinary and common definitions of words, C is a correct answer. If I use this rare and obscure definition of one of the words, D is also a correct answer", surely the logical conclusion is that the expected answer is C. ...
          – Jay
          Aug 23 at 21:37




          @Andrew Fair enough, I was not familiar with that definition. Still, I think insisting that a test such as this must consider every rare and obscure definition of a word is asking a bit much. If I was taking a test and said to myself, "Using the ordinary and common definitions of words, C is a correct answer. If I use this rare and obscure definition of one of the words, D is also a correct answer", surely the logical conclusion is that the expected answer is C. ...
          – Jay
          Aug 23 at 21:37




          1




          1




          ... But in fairness, what seems an obscure definition to me might be very familiar to someone else, so a test writer should certainly try to avoid such cases.
          – Jay
          Aug 23 at 21:37




          ... But in fairness, what seems an obscure definition to me might be very familiar to someone else, so a test writer should certainly try to avoid such cases.
          – Jay
          Aug 23 at 21:37




          1




          1




          A "well" could be any kind of reservoir. An inkwell comes immediately to mind, and it is a well you might need to fill. A well isn't necessarily a hole in the ground.
          – slashingweapon
          Aug 23 at 22:50




          A "well" could be any kind of reservoir. An inkwell comes immediately to mind, and it is a well you might need to fill. A well isn't necessarily a hole in the ground.
          – slashingweapon
          Aug 23 at 22:50




          1




          1




          @Andrew It's been a long time since I took an SAT so I don't remember just what sort of analogies they had. I can think of many types of analogies that I would consider "fair", from something very specific like your pencil/sharpen vs knife/hone example, to something more general, like asking the student to recognize that the pattern is noun/verb. Of course such analogies can get cryptic, and can come down to trying to guess which of many possible relationships the test-writer had in mind. "automobile is to apple as Brazil is to _______".
          – Jay
          Aug 24 at 17:56




          @Andrew It's been a long time since I took an SAT so I don't remember just what sort of analogies they had. I can think of many types of analogies that I would consider "fair", from something very specific like your pencil/sharpen vs knife/hone example, to something more general, like asking the student to recognize that the pattern is noun/verb. Of course such analogies can get cryptic, and can come down to trying to guess which of many possible relationships the test-writer had in mind. "automobile is to apple as Brazil is to _______".
          – Jay
          Aug 24 at 17:56




          1




          1




          There was a post on one of these stackexchange forums where someone said he took an intelligence test that asked "which of these cities is not like the others". Apparently the intended answer was to pick the one that was not a national capital. But as I and many others pointed out, you could make a case for any of the cities on the list: The only one in the Western Hemisphere, the only one not on a major river, etc.
          – Jay
          Aug 24 at 18:00




          There was a post on one of these stackexchange forums where someone said he took an intelligence test that asked "which of these cities is not like the others". Apparently the intended answer was to pick the one that was not a national capital. But as I and many others pointed out, you could make a case for any of the cities on the list: The only one in the Western Hemisphere, the only one not on a major river, etc.
          – Jay
          Aug 24 at 18:00












          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Sharpen is something you do to a pencil.



          Saw is something you do to wood.



          ....



          Cut is not something you do to a knife.



          Build is not something you do to a carpenter.



          Fill is not something you do to a well.



          Ax is not something you do to a saw.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 2




            You can most certainly fill a well (from some underwater source) If forced, I might have had to pick that because of the additional implication in order to make it useful. But either way this is a poor example of an analogy question. If they wanted to do it right, the first choice would have been knife is to hone, because then you have a perfect parallel.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 17:58











          • One would not fill a well - it would itself from an underground source, as you noted. You would fill something else from a well normally.
            – CrossRoads
            Aug 23 at 18:05










          • I guess we'll agree to disagree. It's a moot point either way -- the point is that you can make an argument for two of the answers, which invalidates the question.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 18:27










          • Perhaps it is related to the kinds of action being taken in addition to how the action interacts with the subject. You've nailed the "Action Happens to the Subject" relationship, but maybe it's related to the fact that both sharpening and cutting involve reducing the subject whereas "fill" adds to the subject.
            – Nathalinil
            Aug 23 at 19:52














          up vote
          4
          down vote













          Sharpen is something you do to a pencil.



          Saw is something you do to wood.



          ....



          Cut is not something you do to a knife.



          Build is not something you do to a carpenter.



          Fill is not something you do to a well.



          Ax is not something you do to a saw.






          share|improve this answer
















          • 2




            You can most certainly fill a well (from some underwater source) If forced, I might have had to pick that because of the additional implication in order to make it useful. But either way this is a poor example of an analogy question. If they wanted to do it right, the first choice would have been knife is to hone, because then you have a perfect parallel.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 17:58











          • One would not fill a well - it would itself from an underground source, as you noted. You would fill something else from a well normally.
            – CrossRoads
            Aug 23 at 18:05










          • I guess we'll agree to disagree. It's a moot point either way -- the point is that you can make an argument for two of the answers, which invalidates the question.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 18:27










          • Perhaps it is related to the kinds of action being taken in addition to how the action interacts with the subject. You've nailed the "Action Happens to the Subject" relationship, but maybe it's related to the fact that both sharpening and cutting involve reducing the subject whereas "fill" adds to the subject.
            – Nathalinil
            Aug 23 at 19:52












          up vote
          4
          down vote










          up vote
          4
          down vote









          Sharpen is something you do to a pencil.



          Saw is something you do to wood.



          ....



          Cut is not something you do to a knife.



          Build is not something you do to a carpenter.



          Fill is not something you do to a well.



          Ax is not something you do to a saw.






          share|improve this answer












          Sharpen is something you do to a pencil.



          Saw is something you do to wood.



          ....



          Cut is not something you do to a knife.



          Build is not something you do to a carpenter.



          Fill is not something you do to a well.



          Ax is not something you do to a saw.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Aug 23 at 17:12









          CrossRoads

          2062




          2062







          • 2




            You can most certainly fill a well (from some underwater source) If forced, I might have had to pick that because of the additional implication in order to make it useful. But either way this is a poor example of an analogy question. If they wanted to do it right, the first choice would have been knife is to hone, because then you have a perfect parallel.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 17:58











          • One would not fill a well - it would itself from an underground source, as you noted. You would fill something else from a well normally.
            – CrossRoads
            Aug 23 at 18:05










          • I guess we'll agree to disagree. It's a moot point either way -- the point is that you can make an argument for two of the answers, which invalidates the question.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 18:27










          • Perhaps it is related to the kinds of action being taken in addition to how the action interacts with the subject. You've nailed the "Action Happens to the Subject" relationship, but maybe it's related to the fact that both sharpening and cutting involve reducing the subject whereas "fill" adds to the subject.
            – Nathalinil
            Aug 23 at 19:52












          • 2




            You can most certainly fill a well (from some underwater source) If forced, I might have had to pick that because of the additional implication in order to make it useful. But either way this is a poor example of an analogy question. If they wanted to do it right, the first choice would have been knife is to hone, because then you have a perfect parallel.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 17:58











          • One would not fill a well - it would itself from an underground source, as you noted. You would fill something else from a well normally.
            – CrossRoads
            Aug 23 at 18:05










          • I guess we'll agree to disagree. It's a moot point either way -- the point is that you can make an argument for two of the answers, which invalidates the question.
            – Andrew
            Aug 23 at 18:27










          • Perhaps it is related to the kinds of action being taken in addition to how the action interacts with the subject. You've nailed the "Action Happens to the Subject" relationship, but maybe it's related to the fact that both sharpening and cutting involve reducing the subject whereas "fill" adds to the subject.
            – Nathalinil
            Aug 23 at 19:52







          2




          2




          You can most certainly fill a well (from some underwater source) If forced, I might have had to pick that because of the additional implication in order to make it useful. But either way this is a poor example of an analogy question. If they wanted to do it right, the first choice would have been knife is to hone, because then you have a perfect parallel.
          – Andrew
          Aug 23 at 17:58





          You can most certainly fill a well (from some underwater source) If forced, I might have had to pick that because of the additional implication in order to make it useful. But either way this is a poor example of an analogy question. If they wanted to do it right, the first choice would have been knife is to hone, because then you have a perfect parallel.
          – Andrew
          Aug 23 at 17:58













          One would not fill a well - it would itself from an underground source, as you noted. You would fill something else from a well normally.
          – CrossRoads
          Aug 23 at 18:05




          One would not fill a well - it would itself from an underground source, as you noted. You would fill something else from a well normally.
          – CrossRoads
          Aug 23 at 18:05












          I guess we'll agree to disagree. It's a moot point either way -- the point is that you can make an argument for two of the answers, which invalidates the question.
          – Andrew
          Aug 23 at 18:27




          I guess we'll agree to disagree. It's a moot point either way -- the point is that you can make an argument for two of the answers, which invalidates the question.
          – Andrew
          Aug 23 at 18:27












          Perhaps it is related to the kinds of action being taken in addition to how the action interacts with the subject. You've nailed the "Action Happens to the Subject" relationship, but maybe it's related to the fact that both sharpening and cutting involve reducing the subject whereas "fill" adds to the subject.
          – Nathalinil
          Aug 23 at 19:52




          Perhaps it is related to the kinds of action being taken in addition to how the action interacts with the subject. You've nailed the "Action Happens to the Subject" relationship, but maybe it's related to the fact that both sharpening and cutting involve reducing the subject whereas "fill" adds to the subject.
          – Nathalinil
          Aug 23 at 19:52

















           

          draft saved


          draft discarded















































           


          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f177155%2fstumped-by-a-verbal-analogy-pencil-is-to-sharpen-as%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest













































































          Popular posts from this blog

          How to check contact read email or not when send email to Individual?

          Bahrain

          Postfix configuration issue with fips on centos 7; mailgun relay